These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

REJOICE Citizens: War between HBC and CFC averted PAX-NULLIA!!

First post
Author
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#161 - 2013-01-24 09:29:39 UTC
Artimis Scout wrote:
Ohh I understand.
What I am getting at is you guys have blued everybody in Null and can travel from one end of the galaxy to the other without seeing an enemy. You won, you made Null safe for Goons and all the other Brosefs honeybadgers BFFs you have. I was trying to imply that it more dangerous for the average player in Hi-sec than it is for the average Goonie in Null now.


http://standings.goonfleet.com/

tell me more about how we're blue to the HBC

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#162 - 2013-01-24 09:31:33 UTC
Zloco Crendraven wrote:
Andski wrote:
Zloco Crendraven wrote:
What, of you guys gone nuts. The evidences are all around forums.


wow that's airtight and you've proved your claims beyond a doubt

write up an email to security@ccpgames.com, pronto!


Raad better and focus more. I stated that the evidence of you guys going nuts are all over forums.


"Going nuts?"

I wasn't aware that "going nuts" is against the EULA, but RMT definitely is. Have you proven your RMT allegation?

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#163 - 2013-01-24 09:32:16 UTC
Yolanta Geezenstack wrote:
Yes, I am a noob. And yes, I am very seldom in Nullsec. And yes, I have never participated in a "SOV-war".

So, propably it's uninformed bias on my side. But still, after reading the following comment from Shadoo on the evenews24-site:

Shadoo wrote:
Cry all you like. It doesn't change the fact that all the whiners have no idea how to maintain tech and power. I play both sides and I win and win so get over it. While the whining faggots all cry for war its not going to happen. Mont does the wrong thing and we'll take his tech and rejoin goons. Goons do the wrong thing and we take their tech. Win ******* win so tears that way.


you think that a guy commenting as "Shadoo" on EN24 is actually Shadoo

that isn't even his writing style l m a o

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Shepard Wong Ogeko
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#164 - 2013-01-24 09:44:20 UTC
Signal11th wrote:
Yolanta Geezenstack wrote:
Yes, I am a noob. And yes, I am very seldom in Nullsec. And yes, I have never participated in a "SOV-war".

So, propably it's uninformed bias on my side. But still, after reading the following comment from Shadoo on the evenews24-site:

Shadoo wrote:
Cry all you like. It doesn't change the fact that all the whiners have no idea how to maintain tech and power. I play both sides and I win and win so get over it. While the whining faggots all cry for war its not going to happen. Mont does the wrong thing and we'll take his tech and rejoin goons. Goons do the wrong thing and we take their tech. Win ******* win so tears that way.


I got the same impression as Dinsdale Pirannha:

Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
The mentality in high sec and null sec is the same. It has always been the same when it comes to wealth generation. [...] The sov null sec bunch are just as risk adverse as any high sec group.


Winning is when you maintain tech and power sounds the same to me like winning is when you have the highest isk/hour ratio.



Humm the force is strong with this one.....

Of course the above is semi true, the majority of 0.0 dwellers like the odd scrap now and again but really they like fattening their wallets just as much, it's just human nature,


Especially true when the choices are;

(1) Fatten our wallets

(2) Doing boring as hell structure shots because some CEO was bored.


Fattening our wallets lets us lose ships doing fun things, like shoot spaceships instead of structures. And since cooler and smarter heads prevailed, we'll just reset each other and have fun shooting spaceships.
Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#165 - 2013-01-24 09:45:55 UTC
Who said that in that war there would be a need for that much sov grinding.

- TEST takes few systems to be stage systems.
- From there TEST attacks Tech moons
- TEST go for bears around Goonie space

Results:
- Low morale
- No more income
- Huge sov bills
- Goons break down eventually

And in middle lot of fun fights and no much of sov grind.

BALEX, bringing piracy on a whole new level.

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#166 - 2013-01-24 09:58:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Katran Luftschreck
Dave Stark wrote:
i wasn't denying that RMT happens.

i was mainly asking the person implying the whole "lets not shoot each other" thing was caused by RMT, of which he provided 0 proof (probably because there is none)


Ok then riddle me this - you've got the Titan fleet, you got the sov map showing that you own half of null to **** off to, you've got the toon with every skill in the game maxed. Now what? Why keep playing? Why keep grinding up billions upon billions of ISK, day after day, month after month, year after year even after you've got everything that ISK can buy?

Because there is still something your ISK hasn't bought yet: Cash. This is simple human psychology and it happens in every MMO out there. Once you've "been there, done that" to everything in the game and maxed out your toon to the limit, people get bored and either sell their portfolio off to RMTers or become RMTers themselves. Again, happens in every MMO.

Think of it like this: EvE is like a casino. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. But all the time you're collecting chips. One day you've got a this huge pile of chips and Real Life cannot be ignored any longer. So you turn those chips in for cash. That's what RMTers are doing. And once they see just how much cash their chips were worth... they turn around and head right back into the casino.

That's where RMTers are born, at least the ones that aren't Chinese gold farmers working in sweat-shops. And given these environmental variables the creation of RMTers is inevitable.

The conditions are simple:

#1) Waxing automated generation of in-game income. This can be macros, bots, or... hmm... moon goo.

#2) Waning interest in playing the actual game.

#3) An opportunity for RMT to happen.

Golly... sound like any area of space you know? You keep saying proof, I say you don't need it, not the way you keep saying it. Take a fish tank, fill it with water, set it in direct sunlight and don't clean it for a month. Algae will form. Give MMO players too much money and not enough to spend it on and RMT will form. It is not a question of "if" only "when."

Have you ever set foot on the moon? Then you've got just as much proof the moon exists as I do in saying that RMT in nullsec alliances exist. I don't have to touch it to see it. I don't even have to see it to see how it's gravity affects the tides. I don't have to set foot on it to know it's not made of gas or just a figment of my imagination. I don't have to go to Iskbank & open a fake account to try to figure out Who In The World Could Possibly Be Feeding So Many Billions of ISK Into This Thing Golly Gee.

It isn't hard to figure out: Make a list of all the groups of people in the game who have the kind of "billions a day" ISK income required to sustain a "RMT as Real Life Job" operation. It's a pretty short list, and all the names are in null.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#167 - 2013-01-24 09:59:45 UTC
Zloco Crendraven wrote:
Who said that in that war there would be a need for that much sov grinding.

- TEST takes few systems to be stage systems.
- From there TEST attacks Tech moons
- TEST go for bears around Goonie space

Results:
- Low morale
- No more income
- Huge sov bills
- Goons break down eventually

And in middle lot of fun fights and no much of sov grind.


lol you can't be serious

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#168 - 2013-01-24 10:01:18 UTC
Andski wrote:
Zloco Crendraven wrote:
Who said that in that war there would be a need for that much sov grinding.

- TEST takes few systems to be stage systems.
- From there TEST attacks Tech moons
- TEST go for bears around Goonie space

Results:
- Low morale
- No more income
- Huge sov bills
- Goons break down eventually

And in middle lot of fun fights and no much of sov grind.


lol you can't be serious


I am not . HBC would whoop your assses all around.

BALEX, bringing piracy on a whole new level.

Shepard Wong Ogeko
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#169 - 2013-01-24 10:03:45 UTC
Zloco Crendraven wrote:
Who said that in that war there would be a need for that much sov grinding.

- TEST takes few systems to be stage systems.
- From there TEST attacks Tech moons
- TEST go for bears around Goonie space

Results:
- Low morale
- No more income
- Huge sov bills
- Goons break down eventually

And in middle lot of fun fights and no much of sov grind.


Because reinforcing a moon mining POS is so much more exciting than reinforcing a sov structure.

Oh, and TEST's tech moons are near our space, so we could bash their POS too. And that is how things escalate to full on sov grinding, because if you are going to be forced into timers and structure shots, it might as be for the long term removal of who ever is annoying you.


But yah, we could just do a little sov grinding, just the occasional POS shot. Just for our loving fans here on the Eveonline dot com forums.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#170 - 2013-01-24 10:03:56 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
words


you have no idea how alliance finances work do you

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#171 - 2013-01-24 10:04:36 UTC
Replace "no sov taking" with "no eviction" (both towards people you have relations that can be called diplomatic with), and you'll have a picture of how large entities in W-space treat each other. Neither they complain about boredom, nor "bystanders" complain about them as well. Why would anyone bash people who have chosen to live in Null for wanting something similar from time to time is, I don't know.

One thing I can understand is people pointing out that if CCP wanted sov warfare to be part of the null gameplay that is fun for null players without any arrangements and the like, then they probably did something wrong.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#172 - 2013-01-24 10:04:46 UTC
Zloco Crendraven wrote:
I am not . HBC would whoop your assses all around.


yeah no

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#173 - 2013-01-24 10:09:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Zloco Crendraven
EDIT: forums gone nuts

BALEX, bringing piracy on a whole new level.

Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#174 - 2013-01-24 10:10:18 UTC
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:
Zloco Crendraven wrote:
Who said that in that war there would be a need for that much sov grinding.

- TEST takes few systems to be stage systems.
- From there TEST attacks Tech moons
- TEST go for bears around Goonie space

Results:
- Low morale
- No more income
- Huge sov bills
- Goons break down eventually

And in middle lot of fun fights and no much of sov grind.


Because reinforcing a moon mining POS is so much more exciting than reinforcing a sov structure.

Oh, and TEST's tech moons are near our space, so we could bash their POS too. And that is how things escalate to full on sov grinding, because if you are going to be forced into timers and structure shots, it might as be for the long term removal of who ever is annoying you.


But yah, we could just do a little sov grinding, just the occasional POS shot. Just for our loving fans here on the Eveonline dot com forums.


- Ofc POSs are more interesting. A sure fight to be had. And who wins gets some nice iskies.
- U could bash their POSs too ofc. Than more GFs to be had. So what wrong there.
- It TEST play smart it really doesnt have to escalate to full sov grind. Eventually the morale would break one or another Alliance.

- U could do it for yours benefits, GFs that matter actually, u know?

BALEX, bringing piracy on a whole new level.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#175 - 2013-01-24 10:17:21 UTC
in a defensive war you just move non-PvP assets to lowsec (or to hisec for liquidation) and stockpile PvP ships

goonswarm has been invaded before and at no point have we "collapsed," even when we lost delve we were still capable of functioning just fine while licking our wounds in syndicate

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Dave Stark
#176 - 2013-01-24 10:22:42 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
You keep saying proof, I say you don't need it,


lots of words that i didn't read, so i thought i'd just quote this bit and laugh at you for being a complete idiot.

yes, if you want to accuse people of things, it's generally good to have proof so you don't look like a petulant child throwing a tantrum. i find it highly amusing that ever since one terrible EN24 article about a very small group of people engaging in RMT any one posting under a null sec corp/alliance tag get repeated "you're an RMTer"-esque comments thrown at them with no substance to such a claim.

it's akin to me calling you a donkey loving transvestite, even if i have no proof of it. however, i won't call you a donkey loving transvestite because i'm not a petulant child like that. the simple fact is shouting random phrases with no proof of anything makes you look like an inarticulate moron, even more so if you could have just not posted or posted something relevant and well thought out.
Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#177 - 2013-01-24 10:28:01 UTC
Andski wrote:
in a defensive war you just move non-PvP assets to lowsec (or to hisec for liquidation) and stockpile PvP ships

goonswarm has been invaded before and at no point have we "collapsed," even when we lost delve we were still capable of functioning just fine while licking our wounds in syndicate


Yeah that s fine. And now imagine the scenario. U r in syndicate. U get camped. No more tech moons. And still u are paying your sov bills. Where TEST member would rat inbtw killing you.

BALEX, bringing piracy on a whole new level.

Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#178 - 2013-01-24 10:30:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Vera Algaert
Andski wrote:
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
words


you have no idea how alliance finances work do you

(1) kiss your corp CEO's a**, PM him pictures of your sister, make an (homo)erotic soundcloud recording
(2) get handed a personal tech moon or three
(3) if your moons get attacked invoke alliance to bail you out
(4) Profit.

that's how PL seems to run - how corporations use their tech seems to be entirely up to them and handing out tech moons to individual members is common. Even trading/selling your tech moons to some other member seems acceptable. If you fall out of favor your tech moons get reappropriated.

.

Chortle Chortle
#179 - 2013-01-24 10:33:55 UTC
Tbh I'm quite curious to see how these consensual staged wargames will play out. Who will be the referee? Which battleground will be chosen? Will it be ok to tackle capitals and supers, or is that a no no?

So much choices! So much excitements!
Shepard Wong Ogeko
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#180 - 2013-01-24 11:06:14 UTC
Vera Algaert wrote:

(1) kiss your corp CEO's a**, PM him pictures of your sister, make an (homo)erotic soundcloud recording
(2) get handed a personal tech moon or three
(3) if your moons get attacked invoke alliance to bail you out
(4) Profit.

that's how PL seems to run - how corporations use their tech seems to be entirely up to them and handing out tech moons to individual members is common. Even trading/selling your tech moons to some other member seems acceptable. If you fall out of favor your tech moons get reappropriated.

I'm a NPC corp alt, any argument I make is invalid.


The bolded is apropos.