These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

REJOICE Citizens: War between HBC and CFC averted PAX-NULLIA!!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#81 - 2013-01-23 17:16:38 UTC
It is actually quite enlightening, now that their actions have proven how risk-adverse the null sec power blocs are.
"Oh no's, we can't touch each other's infrastructure, because that would hurt."

But given their propaganda machine, I figure they will have buried this little non-war in about a week.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#82 - 2013-01-23 17:17:57 UTC
Andski wrote:
but seriously if you want game content so much, we can bring both coalitions to Jita with 6000 Tornadoes

that way you hiseccers will also enjoy content that would otherwise be restricted to 0.0

so our saviors are failed in providing content? and then all you can is try to scare someone with "6000 tornadoes"? Shocked

well. in Dodixie we already has some people providing "content" with chatting and suspect baiting. So nope. Sit on your tech-moons in total-blue 0.0 please Cool

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2013-01-23 17:22:26 UTC
Xinivrae wrote:
Cute, but you guys in highsec are still the bottom of the barrel. Sorry.


I disagree. I'd say the ego and self-importance that comes from your fake daily risk puts most of you nullpawns at the bottom of the barrel. Fine, then come highseccers, who pray to the gods above them that reside in lowsec. The lowseccers, it must not be forgotten, give apotheosis to those who reside in wormholes. This is the great order of being.

Dodixie > Hek
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#84 - 2013-01-23 17:43:49 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
I don't know. Seems like you need to patrol your space better.


yeah patrolling space really helps when hostiles just sneak through under your noses in bombers

thanks for your insights npc alt guy o8m7

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#85 - 2013-01-23 18:02:32 UTC
Murk Paradox wrote:
Andski wrote:
i also find it hilarious that you're saying that suicide ganking, which is named as such because of a mechanic meant to discourage nonconsensual PvP in hisec, is part of what makes eve a "pvp game"



Almost seems like you'd prefer to not go to war to shoot someone else's property in order to preserve the integrity of OTEC or something.

Or wait, that's right... "mechanics" of sov make's it "boring". Much more fun NOT pvping unless it's agreed I forgot. Nevermind the fact that other ships wouldn't show up to defend or anything. We don't want to step on the toes of our superbff's or insult anyone!

Totally innocent question; have you ever participated in a sov war?
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#86 - 2013-01-23 18:02:52 UTC
oh yeah i forgot about nullfied cloaky t3s with covert cyno bonuses coming soon

along with titan ranged blackops BS

yeah patrolling will totally not be useless

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#87 - 2013-01-23 18:06:15 UTC
Im baffled with Montolio actions and attitudes. A guy like that shouldn't even be squad leader.

The Tears Must Flow
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#88 - 2013-01-23 18:09:10 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Murk Paradox wrote:
Andski wrote:
i also find it hilarious that you're saying that suicide ganking, which is named as such because of a mechanic meant to discourage nonconsensual PvP in hisec, is part of what makes eve a "pvp game"



Almost seems like you'd prefer to not go to war to shoot someone else's property in order to preserve the integrity of OTEC or something.

Or wait, that's right... "mechanics" of sov make's it "boring". Much more fun NOT pvping unless it's agreed I forgot. Nevermind the fact that other ships wouldn't show up to defend or anything. We don't want to step on the toes of our superbff's or insult anyone!

Totally innocent question; have you ever participated in a sov war?



Yes.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.
Xtover
Cold Moon Destruction.
#89 - 2013-01-23 18:16:35 UTC
Andski wrote:
oh yeah i forgot about nullfied cloaky t3s with covert cyno bonuses coming soon

along with titan ranged blackops BS


Please don't stop, I'm already getting.... excited.
Xenuria
#90 - 2013-01-23 18:19:26 UTC
Andski wrote:
but seriously if you want game content so much, we can bring both coalitions to Jita with 6000 Tornadoes

that way you hiseccers will also enjoy content that would otherwise be restricted to 0.0


Please do this!

CSM 12 Candidate
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#91 - 2013-01-23 18:31:06 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
Andski wrote:
but seriously if you want game content so much, we can bring both coalitions to Jita with 6000 Tornadoes

that way you hiseccers will also enjoy content that would otherwise be restricted to 0.0


Please do this!




I for one welcome our Nado-spamming nullsec goonstablishment overlards.


Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#92 - 2013-01-23 19:25:18 UTC
Mac Omac wrote:

Can you imagine a day where forum beefs/arguments/trolls/flames are no more, and are replaced by loving, kind words expressing our positive emotions?


This one made me laugh.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#93 - 2013-01-23 19:31:43 UTC
Murk Paradox wrote:
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Murk Paradox wrote:
Andski wrote:
i also find it hilarious that you're saying that suicide ganking, which is named as such because of a mechanic meant to discourage nonconsensual PvP in hisec, is part of what makes eve a "pvp game"



Almost seems like you'd prefer to not go to war to shoot someone else's property in order to preserve the integrity of OTEC or something.

Or wait, that's right... "mechanics" of sov make's it "boring". Much more fun NOT pvping unless it's agreed I forgot. Nevermind the fact that other ships wouldn't show up to defend or anything. We don't want to step on the toes of our superbff's or insult anyone!

Totally innocent question; have you ever participated in a sov war?



Yes.



Your lifetime record of 10 kills and 21 losses, all in T1 sub-BS ships in Empire suggests otherwise.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Mina Sebiestar
Minmatar Inner Space Conglomerate
#94 - 2013-01-23 19:33:29 UTC
http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/1977/imagep5gx.gif

You choke behind a smile a fake behind the fear

Because >>I is too hard
Merelle
Kaiser and Plume
#95 - 2013-01-23 20:01:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Merelle
Back to the original subject. While most people here seem to have accepted the GSF-spin on the matter, quite a different picture emerge if listening to neutral sources. Apparently, the Mittani has had his eyes on Test for some time now. GSF and Test have rather similar structure and culture which means that Test would be the ideal procurement as GSF could swallow them whole with very little adjustments.

What actually transpired the last few weeks was the advancement of an elaborate scheme to discredit and dispose of Montolio, the leader of Test. If this fails, rumor has it that what been named "case blue" will spring into action.

Peace in our time?

no i dont think so.
Xpaulusx
Naari LLC
#96 - 2013-01-23 20:16:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Xpaulusx
Just Rvb it for now, Goons are blue, Test is red, everybody in frigs and fight, meet in syndicate, atleast its something for now, blow off some steam, have fun in the process Blink

Edit: just think of it, the biggest frig fight in EvE history.

......................................................
Malphilos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#97 - 2013-01-23 20:23:45 UTC
Sandbox is apparently not quite sandy enough for bloated bureaucracies.

Ryuji Takemiya
Doomheim
#98 - 2013-01-23 20:33:20 UTC
Merelle wrote:
Back to the original subject. While most people here seem to have accepted the GSF-spin on the matter, quite a different picture emerge if listening to neutral sources. Apparently, the Mittani has had his eyes on Test for some time now. GSF and Test have rather similar structure and culture which means that Test would be the ideal procurement as GSF could swallow them whole with very little adjustments.

What actually transpired the last few weeks was the advancement of an elaborate scheme to discredit and dispose of Montolio, the leader of Test. If this fails, rumor has it that what been named "case blue" will spring into action.

Peace in our time?

no i dont think so.


That's a bit more tinfoil than I'm comfortable with, but I would say that TEST definately took a hit from all the sabre-rattling. Montolio blew the conch shell and his people didn't show up to back him. That's the perceived view here, making CFC not only look strong; but then throwing in some Red vs Blue action to placate the masses too.

Certainly a meta-gaming masterstroke by Mittani. Congradulations on the maneuver
Gianna Thirostin
Doomheim
#99 - 2013-01-23 20:36:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Gianna Thirostin
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
It is actually quite enlightening, now that their actions have proven how risk-adverse the null sec power blocs are.
"Oh no's, we can't touch each other's infrastructure, because that would hurt."

But given their propaganda machine, I figure they will have buried this little non-war in about a week.


Nah, they dont want it buried. They timed it so they could point at this "attempt at war" as the reason CCP should "fix sov" this summer when its their content that made null what it is today
Xpaulusx
Naari LLC
#100 - 2013-01-23 20:39:33 UTC
Malphilos wrote:
Sandbox is apparently not quite sandy enough for bloated bureaucracies.



Are you saying a couple of people are stopping thousands from having fun, nah it can't be P

......................................................