These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Future of Wardecs

First post First post
Author
Adriel Malakai
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#241 - 2013-01-18 22:29:56 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Actually, now that mining is more profitable than missioning, I've not been an ISK faucet for about 6 months. Now I just mine, maintaining the current equilibrium of price stability.


In the case that you're actually a miner you are not an ISK faucet, but the rest of the statement still stands. You are harvesting materials that impact the game economy and the only really effective tool left for people to interfere with that is non-consensual decs. It doesn't matter if you stay docked for the entire war, the reality is that you're given a choice - whether or not you want to let people interfere with your gameplay. You choose to let them - that is your problem, not a problem with the mechanics.
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#242 - 2013-01-18 22:30:51 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:

The truth is, people like him need to be driven from EVE.

He needs to be wardecced and ganked util he gets it through his thick skull that he does not get to avoid PvP.
That mentality is a cancer that does not need to be propigated throughout the rest of the community.


The truth is that CCP is not going to allow people like me to be driven from EVE because we are too much of their revenue.

Perhaps rather than trying to figure out how to screw CCP out of much needed revenue by trying to drive people like me out of the game, you should go look for some people that want to PVP to have fun PVPing.



Wait, you are claiming 1bil a week and you are paying real money for all 4 accounts still?

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#243 - 2013-01-18 22:31:21 UTC
Murk Paradox wrote:

I don't think it's us needing to understand that nowhere in Eve is safe, only some places are safER.


Well, inside station, long enough to add a skill to the training queue, is pretty safe.

And, maybe you missed the point that when we are at war, we rarely log in, and never undock. That would indicate that we have a pretty good understanding that no place in EVE, outside of a station, is safe.
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#244 - 2013-01-18 22:31:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Natsett Amuinn
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:

The truth is, people like him need to be driven from EVE.

He needs to be wardecced and ganked util he gets it through his thick skull that he does not get to avoid PvP.
That mentality is a cancer that does not need to be propigated throughout the rest of the community.


The truth is that CCP is not going to allow people like me to be driven from EVE because we are too much of their revenue.

Perhaps rather than trying to figure out how to screw CCP out of much needed revenue by trying to drive people like me out of the game, you should go look for some people that want to PVP to have fun PVPing.

No you're not, you're a extremely small minority.

Because most of us understand the game we're playing, you do not.


PS: Let me say this again.
I. DO. NOT. PVP.

I'm just not a pussy.
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#245 - 2013-01-18 22:33:29 UTC
Murk Paradox wrote:


Wait, you are claiming 1bil a week and you are paying real money for all 4 accounts still?



No. I play with PLEX, which are bought from people that gave money to EVE to be able to get PLEX to sell to me. So, CCP is making the same revenue off me whether I directly give them the money, or someone else gives them to money that pays for my subscription.

If I were not playing, less PLEX demand, lower prices of PLEX, fewer people buying PLEX, less revenue for CCP.
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#246 - 2013-01-18 22:33:34 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Murk Paradox wrote:

I don't think it's us needing to understand that nowhere in Eve is safe, only some places are safER.


Well, inside station, long enough to add a skill to the training queue, is pretty safe.

And, maybe you missed the point that when we are at war, we rarely log in, and never undock. That would indicate that we have a pretty good understanding that no place in EVE, outside of a station, is safe.



Even inside a station can be unsafe, if you interact with people. Just not a matter of combat. You being docked up during a wardec and online is providing that intel alone. That might make you safe from ship harm, but can be damaging in others.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#247 - 2013-01-18 22:36:38 UTC  |  Edited by: LHA Tarawa
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
[
No you're not, you're a extremely small minority.

Because most of us understand the game we're playing, you do not.


PS: Let me say this again.
I. DO. NOT. PVP.

I'm just not a *****.



If you do not PVP, then you are the same "small" minority that I am.

According to a presentation I saw a few years ago, CCP says that 80% of toons never show up as a killer on a kill mail. 80% is small minority?
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#248 - 2013-01-18 22:38:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Natsett Amuinn
LHA Tarawa wrote:


I should be allowed to AFK mine with my 5 accounts in high sec, in my personal corporation, flooding the market with minerals, and impacting every other industrialist in EVE, and not have worry about PvP.

I think most industrialist would agree with me when I say you should biomass yourself and leave.

You make industrialists all across New Eden look bad, and we don't want you kind here; giving us a bad image.

Kindly go away please.


Or just join the NPC corp and shut up.

Oh wait...
You're in an NPC corp. Duh!

GTFO.
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#249 - 2013-01-18 22:40:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Murk Paradox
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Murk Paradox wrote:


Wait, you are claiming 1bil a week and you are paying real money for all 4 accounts still?



No. I play with PLEX, which are bought from people that gave money to EVE to be able to get PLEX to sell to me. So, CCP is making the same revenue off me whether I directly give them the money, or someone else gives them to money that pays for my subscription.

If I were not playing, less PLEX demand, lower prices of PLEX, fewer people buying PLEX, less revenue for CCP.



So if you did not sell that plex, CCP would not get any revenue from the people spending their real money on plex? I see.

You sir, are playing the game for free, which si a feature, and by all means allowed, but also does not mean it's leverage to use against anyone.

Any rate, you have just as much right to play the game as anyone else, and are equally able to be wardecced.

Sorry.

Oh wait, npc corps make you immune.

I guess you can just be ganked then.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#250 - 2013-01-18 22:41:25 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
I think most industrialist would agree with me when I say you should biomass yourself and leave.


Explain.

Other than kicking your donkey in this thread, explain.

How does it bother industrialists that I discourage war dec's on industrialists, by ensuring the war dec'er NEVER gets a kill when they dec us?
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#251 - 2013-01-18 22:42:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Natsett Amuinn
Tarawa's corp history you ask?

Why:
Pator Tech School [PTS] from 2009.10.13 13:49 to this day

And don't pull the, I'm an NPC corp alt poster crap. I'm not buying it.


You're an NPC corp main who's afraid to be in a player run corp cause they can be war decced.


Either that or,
Post with your main or STFU.
Adriel Malakai
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#252 - 2013-01-18 22:46:08 UTC
Just going to throw this little tidbit in here:

Kristoffer Touborg (CCP Soundwave) wrote:
We've been talking a lot about Eve as a hard game, and Eve might not be for everyone. But if we lose people to other games, hopefully it's because they don't like what Eve is, and not because our UI is stupid and unintuitive. I don't think there's any shame in losing players for the right reasons.

Source

You don't like that EVE is a PVP game and that people can interfere with your game. Since that is what EVE is at its core, then I would say it's safe to say that you don't like what EVE is. That, according to the quote, means that it is OK by CCP that you leave.

So make your choice. Deal with the fact that you're not immune to other players, or leave.
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#253 - 2013-01-18 22:46:24 UTC
Murk Paradox wrote:

So if you did not sell that plex, CCP would not get any revenue from the people spending their real money on plex? I see.



I'll assume you meant that if I did not buy the PLEX.

You are correct. If no one was buying PLEX so that they could play for free, then no one would be able to sell PLEX for ISK in game. Then, no one would buy PLEX with real money, to sell for ISK.



Murk Paradox wrote:

You sir, are playing the game for free, which si a feature, and by all means allowed, but also does not mean it's leverage to use against anyone.


No more than any other person that results in CCP receiving money because they play the game. The real power comes from numbers. Too many carebears drop, CCP will take notie and change the mechanic that is causing them to drop.


Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#254 - 2013-01-18 22:47:20 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
I think most industrialist would agree with me when I say you should biomass yourself and leave.


Explain.

Other than kicking your donkey in this thread, explain.

How does it bother industrialists that I discourage war dec's on industrialists, by ensuring the war dec'er NEVER gets a kill when they dec us?



They can't dec you. You're in a npc corp.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Adriel Malakai
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#255 - 2013-01-18 22:48:52 UTC
Murk Paradox wrote:
They can't dec you. You're in a npc corp.


That's an obvious alt. He's stated he does everything he can to avoid decs. Why would be so stupid as to post in a thread with that position on his main? I would have already paid to dec him, as would many others.
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#256 - 2013-01-18 22:50:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Murk Paradox
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Murk Paradox wrote:

So if you did not sell that plex, CCP would not get any revenue from the people spending their real money on plex? I see.



I'll assume you meant that if I did not buy the PLEX.

You are correct. If no one was buying PLEX so that they could play for free, then no one would be able to sell PLEX for ISK in game. Then, no one would buy PLEX with real money, to sell for ISK.



Murk Paradox wrote:

You sir, are playing the game for free, which si a feature, and by all means allowed, but also does not mean it's leverage to use against anyone.


No more than any other person that results in CCP receiving money because they play the game. The real power comes from numbers. Too many carebears drop, CCP will take notie and change the mechanic that is causing them to drop.





No, I understood what you said. You said you are helping CCP by selling isk. You aren't. You are providing content and now you are trying to imply that you need to regulate that content. I don't think that coincides with the way the game was designed.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#257 - 2013-01-18 22:50:15 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:

Either that or,
Post with your main or STFU.



No thanks. False Dichotomy.

I can post on my forum alt, and not STFU.
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#258 - 2013-01-18 22:50:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Natsett Amuinn
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
[
No you're not, you're a extremely small minority.

Because most of us understand the game we're playing, you do not.


PS: Let me say this again.
I. DO. NOT. PVP.

I'm just not a *****.



If you do not PVP, then you are the same "small" minority that I am.

According to a presentation I saw a few years ago, CCP says that 80% of toons never show up as a killer on a kill mail. 80% is small minority?

No, and you know exactly what I mean by you being an extremely small minority.

I don't think you're a stupid person.


I do think you need to post with your main or STFU Mr. NPC corp guy who's never been a member of a player run corporation, crying about wardecs and pvp.

PS: you're not a forum alt if you can't prove your not a forum alt as far as I'm concerned.

You a dude that's been in an NPC corp for the last 3 years and never joined a player run one that's had to deal with wardecs, but will come on the forums and tell CCP they shoud remove them.
Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#259 - 2013-01-18 22:53:37 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
@ LHA Tarawa

What would make you want to fight the aggressors in the war dec? Not have to, want to.


I realize that this isn't addressed to me, but I will pass along the line of thinking that was passed to me when I was a newbie:

This question is only looking at the game. Players who safe up during wardecs are looking at the metagame: The attackers want ship combat. The defenders don't. The attackers want to impose their playstyle on the defenders. They're denying the defenders the way they want to play, so the defenders deny them the way they want to play. It's a cold-shoulder tactic, or if you prefer, a blue-ball tactic. It extends to nobody saying a word in Local or private chat, or mail, or any other medium that the deccers can access.

The offense is ship PVP, because that's what the deccer prefers. The defense is social PVP, because that's what the defender prefers. The standoff is built in to the clash of playstyles, with neither side interested in giving ground, and so 90% of the time the result, as hoped for by the defenders, is a completely uneventful wardec that goes away in a week.

That's why so few mercenaries get hired, incidentally: If you're paying ISK so that the people who are denying you want you want get what they want, which probably means that the dec goes on longer than it otherwise would, what sense does that make? Why would you do that?

...

Also note that I'm not arguing that this is always exclusively true, and that willingness to PVP or fear of loss is not also a concern. In fact, socials will prefer social PVP to ship PVP precisely because they're more comfortable and familiar with it, and more confident in the outcome. They might find out that they like (or at least, don't mind) ship PVP, but it will either be by surprise or by dipping their toe in when less is at stake. That's one reason why I like the recent Crimewatch changes in low sec. You can go there and learn without taking a standing hit, and without risking more than the ship you're in.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#260 - 2013-01-18 22:57:00 UTC
Adriel Malakai wrote:
Murk Paradox wrote:
They can't dec you. You're in a npc corp.


That's an obvious alt. He's stated he does everything he can to avoid decs. Why would be so stupid as to post in a thread with that position on his main? I would have already paid to dec him, as would many others.



I'm a firm believer of seeing who I talk to, if that's his alt.. well, to me that's his only toon, and will be treated as such.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.