These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Plurimus Libertas

Author
Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#161 - 2013-01-24 06:22:23 UTC
I know you exist Blake because I have one of your former bodies.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Streya Jormagdnir
Alexylva Paradox
#162 - 2013-01-24 07:38:43 UTC
Mitara Newelle wrote:
The Republic and Electus Matari appear that they wish to escalate the war by conducting this invasion. I can't help but wonder if Her Majesty might rethink our laws regarding taking new slaves from outside of the Empire after this?


They're not laws your Empire came up with, but rather international laws that the Amarr Empire was forced to agree with upon becoming a CONCORD signatory nation. As a member state of CONCORD, the Amarr Empire is prohibited from taking new slaves from other nations. The exemption to this is in cases dealing with POWs and criminals.

I am also a human, straggling between the present world... and our future. I am a regulator, a coordinator, one who is meant to guide the way.

Destination Unreachable: the worst Wspace blog ever

Streya Jormagdnir
Alexylva Paradox
#163 - 2013-01-24 08:05:58 UTC
Also, reading through this thread, the propaganda on both sides is deplorable. I am obviously no fan of the Amarr Empire and wish for the liberation of all Matari people. On the other hand, I am not a fan of how the Republic government has floundered things under Shakor's leadership. Let's be real here: the truth lies somewhere in between the two extreme viewpoints presented by both sides. Yes, upon going to the Republic there are some Matari who hold to the Amarr faith and are victims of hate crimes thusly. No, there aren't massive re-eduction centres to indoctrinate recently freed individuals (how in the hell does one indoctrinate another when there are so many varying clans, sub-tribes, and beliefs?). The problem isn't the Evil Minmatars who Shoot All Whom Pray, as Katran Luftschreck suggests. Nor is it the Soulless Slaver (Twirly Mustache Edition) who seeks only to exploit slaves for economic gain. Both such caricatures of the absolute worst conditions the Republic and Empire have to offer are the minority of cases. At the end of the day, the most horrifying fanatics get the most press coverage, and that is the side of the world everyone sees.

A lot of Minmatar won't admit that somewhere deep down, the average Amarrian Holder genuinely believes he or she is doing a good thing for the people they keep as slaves. On the other side, very very few Amarrians will admit that maybe people want to be free after all and the Amarrian religion and lifestyle just isn't for everyone. It is strange how being Minmatar these days is more about being not-Amarr/anti-Amarr and less about being your own person within your clan and tribe. Are we really going to let the Amarr define our identity? It is strange how a passionate zeal for doing good in the world (and indeed, bringing salvation to all of mankind) has been twisted into a force that brings nothing but tears to the recently "Reclaimed". Are you really going to let your true potential for good stay hidden, Amarr?

There are graceful ways to solving these things that do not involve murdering people who kneel before an altar or slapping cold shackles around an unbeliever's future. Maybe people like Midular knew better. Maybe I just need to hope this whole cloning thing remains a viable industry so I can watch the next thousand years unfold with interest. Maybe you just wasted your time reading this entire post. Maybe.

I am also a human, straggling between the present world... and our future. I am a regulator, a coordinator, one who is meant to guide the way.

Destination Unreachable: the worst Wspace blog ever

von Khan
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#164 - 2013-01-24 17:35:19 UTC
Miss Jormagdnir,;

Your words show wisdom and prudence. I admire your courage in breaking away from the tribal tradition of hate and encourage the pursuit of identity and virtue among your kin. Indeed some assert that religion is necessarily a cause of division in our world; and so they argue that the less attention given to religion in the public sphere the better. However, is it not also the case that often it is the ideological manipulation of truth, sometimes for political ends, that is the real catalyst for tension and division, and at times even violence in society? In the face of this situation, where the opponents of truth seek not simply to silence its voice but to replace it with their own, the need for believers to be true to their principles and beliefs is felt all the more keenly. Amarr and Minmitar, precisely because of the burden of our common history so often marked by misunderstanding, must today strive to be known and recognized as worshipers of true freedom, eager to uphold and live by virtue consistent in bearing witness to all that is true and good, and ever mindful of the common origin and dignity of all human persons, who remain at the apex of God’s creative design for the world and for history.

von Khan

Astera Zandraki
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#165 - 2013-01-24 17:44:04 UTC
Good job, EM.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#166 - 2013-01-24 20:58:16 UTC
Were the Freedom Extension freighters pilots capsuleers, and so, under CONCORD regulations ?

If that is so, and considering that nobody seems to have a clue where these slaves come from, that looks like a storm in a kettle to me.
Streya Jormagdnir
Alexylva Paradox
#167 - 2013-01-25 05:07:24 UTC
von Khan wrote:
Miss Jormagdnir,;

However, is it not also the case that often it is the ideological manipulation of truth, sometimes for political ends, that is the real catalyst for tension and division, and at times even violence in society? In the face of this situation, where the opponents of truth seek not simply to silence its voice but to replace it with their own, the need for believers to be true to their principles and beliefs is felt all the more keenly.


Of course. The truth of our universe may be as objective and set as a rock; natural laws bend to no one's will, and the universe does not play favorites. However, a civilization's understanding of the universe may be as fluid as water an ever-changing. Indeed, reaching a conclusive and complete understanding of the universe is the goal of science. But we do not yet hold that solid, ineffable stone in our hands. And so peoples clash over ideology and differing perspectives on what that complete and whole picture may look like. The Amarr call it "God" and imbue such an absolute understanding with certain properties. Generally speaking, the Minmatar may reference to "spirits", an "afterlife" and the like (though do keep in mind Minmatar spiritual beliefs are as varied and numerous as the grains of sand on a beach). I prefer the term "enlightenment", and I believe that in all the forms it takes all peoples seek enlightenment. I disagree vehemently with the practice of taking slaves in order to enlighten them, but I can understand the rationale employed when such a worldview is held. I also strongly disagree with uplifting of people held in bondage and then indiscriminately shipping them off to a culture that may be at odds with their own views and lifestyles. I am all for the offering of opportunity for freedom, but to "force" freedom on anyone is nonsensical and paradoxical. While time-consuming, an interview with each and every individual that is in bondage and then offered the chance to leave is basically required if one seeks to do the right thing. On the other hand, discretion is needed not only in the liberation of slaves, but also when taking people under your religious teachings. Who is judged more harshly within Amarrian society, the forced convert who pays only lip service or the willing convert filled with faith? This is not a rhetorical question; I have little knowledge of the specifics of Amarrian religious teachings, but it would be interesting if a solution to the issue of slavery within Amarrian borders is lying right in the scriptures. Clearly the masses weren't satisfied with slavery as a way to follow your religion; happy people don't rebel after all. Do your own scriptures provide another way, then?



von Khan wrote:
Amarr and Minmitar [...] must today strive to be known and recognized as worshipers of true freedom, eager to uphold and live by virtue consistent in bearing witness to all that is true and good, and ever mindful of the common origin and dignity of all human persons, who remain at the apex of God’s creative design for the world and for history.


Your words are inspiring and humble, which is a refreshing change from the stereotypes. I suppose where to begin is to define "freedom". I have often asked myself if I am free, and as a rational person I honestly cannot come up with the answer. Am I free? Certainly, I am not in forced servitude that involves literal whips and chains. I'm not even drugged or blackmailed. I am more or less free to do as I please. And yet even I cannot answer the question "Am I free?", because "freedom" is a rather vague and abstract concept that I have yet to see defined by any objective measures. So when working towards this True Freedom, if you will, I believe it will be important for all parties involved to come to a common understanding of what it means to be free. If we cannot speak to each other on level ground as equals we are doomed to repeat the mistakes of history.

I am also a human, straggling between the present world... and our future. I am a regulator, a coordinator, one who is meant to guide the way.

Destination Unreachable: the worst Wspace blog ever

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#168 - 2013-01-25 12:46:42 UTC
Anabella Rella wrote:
I know you exist Blake because I have one of your former bodies.


There is a school of thought that says that nothing exists except one's own consciousness and everything else is an illusion.

When you heathens say that God is a figment of my imagination, someone could use exactly the same arguments to claim that I am a figment of your imagination.

And yet you believe in me but not God.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#169 - 2013-01-25 12:53:56 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Anabella Rella wrote:
I know you exist Blake because I have one of your former bodies.


There is a school of thought that says that nothing exists except one's own consciousness and everything else is an illusion.

When you heathens say that God is a figment of my imagination, someone could use exactly the same arguments to claim that I am a figment of your imagination.

And yet you believe in me but not God.


No, see we don't "believe" in you. We know you exist because you annoy, preach and leave bodies all over the place. If your God were to do the same I don't think anyone here would even bat an eyelash at someone saying he existed. There being not a single hint of his existence anywhere in the known universe makes the difference between you and that figment of imagination rather significant. Tangible evidence, independently verifiable at that, is going to tilt the balance and I'm sure you'll agree.

Your existence is even predictable in our verified model of the universe. We have verified humans all over the cluster. We have various nations, one of them the Amarr Empire. Said Empire is known for their rather silly superstitions and it would be rather strange not to find someone exactly like you around. You conform perfectly with reality, leave tangible evidence of your existence (bodies, amongst other things), communicate with independent entities across the entire cluster and can even be tracked down at will.

No. I don't believe in you. I know for a fact you exist. God on the other hand quite evidently does not.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

von Khan
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#170 - 2013-01-25 15:07:45 UTC
We bump up against a simplicity so profound that we must assign complexities to it to comprehend it at all. It is mindful of how we paste decals to a sliding glass door to keep from bumping our nose against it.

von Khan

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#171 - 2013-01-27 11:27:28 UTC
Jinari Otsito wrote:
Rodj Blake wrote:
Anabella Rella wrote:
I know you exist Blake because I have one of your former bodies.


There is a school of thought that says that nothing exists except one's own consciousness and everything else is an illusion.

When you heathens say that God is a figment of my imagination, someone could use exactly the same arguments to claim that I am a figment of your imagination.

And yet you believe in me but not God.


No, see we don't "believe" in you. We know you exist because you annoy, preach and leave bodies all over the place. If your God were to do the same I don't think anyone here would even bat an eyelash at someone saying he existed. There being not a single hint of his existence anywhere in the known universe makes the difference between you and that figment of imagination rather significant. Tangible evidence, independently verifiable at that, is going to tilt the balance and I'm sure you'll agree.

Your existence is even predictable in our verified model of the universe. We have verified humans all over the cluster. We have various nations, one of them the Amarr Empire. Said Empire is known for their rather silly superstitions and it would be rather strange not to find someone exactly like you around. You conform perfectly with reality, leave tangible evidence of your existence (bodies, amongst other things), communicate with independent entities across the entire cluster and can even be tracked down at will.

No. I don't believe in you. I know for a fact you exist. God on the other hand quite evidently does not.


No, you think I exist. You cannot prove my objective reality.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#172 - 2013-01-27 15:49:16 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Jinari Otsito wrote:
Many words..


No, you think I exist. You cannot prove my objective reality.


Just like I can't prove yesterday happened. I think we can all agree that it did, though. Theists taking philosophy to ******** extremes notwithstanding, reasonable people will dismiss the outlandish and ridiculous when it's completely unsupported. That you don't exist is a stupid proposition, with the data we have so far. Every point of data points to the existence of the universe, the cluster, the nations, the Empire and your annoying ass. Nothing in it points to you being a figment of everyone else's imagination. All the data > No data, we're going to go with what's likely. We know you exist for these very reasons, until data casting doubt upon it is unearthed somewhere.

Sure, in a philosophical light you can say we know absolutely nothing. Everything we ever see, hear, sense, think, whatever, may be fake, imagined or whatever. This is, however, an extremely stupid world-view to adopt, when most of the cluster (even the insane people) can look at New Eden and see the exact same things, within some personal lenses of course. And flying pink slaver hounds.

We know you exist. We have extensive libraries and databases of most things that exist in New Eden. A lot of what's outside it too. You can use fuzzy logic, eyerolling philosophy and linguistic acrobatics to try and muddy the issue if you want, but don't expect to be taken seriously with it. Science fortunately stands quite unfazed by such things.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#173 - 2013-01-27 15:58:31 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
No, you think I exist. You cannot prove my objective reality.


Solipsism is beneath you, sir, as it ought be for every member of the noble Praetoria
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#174 - 2013-01-27 16:15:04 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
Rodj Blake wrote:
No, you think I exist. You cannot prove my objective reality.


Solipsism is beneath you, sir, as it ought be for every member of the noble Praetoria



My point is not that solipsism has any validity, but rather that it has as much validity as atheism.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#175 - 2013-01-27 16:39:00 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Scherezad wrote:
Rodj Blake wrote:
No, you think I exist. You cannot prove my objective reality.


Solipsism is beneath you, sir, as it ought be for every member of the noble Praetoria



My point is not that solipsism has any validity, but rather that it has as much validity as atheism.


My apologies! I misunderstood your point.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#176 - 2013-01-27 16:46:52 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
No, you think I exist. You cannot prove my objective reality.


But if we discard the absurdly reductionist philosophy you're using as a smokescreen and begin again from basic first principles - and thus accepting that things external to myself probably exist - your existence as an entity external to my imagination can be demonstrated! We've interacted on multiple occasions.

The existence of God as an entity external to my imagination can be proved as - again, accepting that other people actually exist - other people can imagine it, but the existence of God as an entity external to everyone's imaginations cannot.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#177 - 2013-01-28 22:26:58 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Rodj Blake wrote:
No, you think I exist. You cannot prove my objective reality.


But if we discard the absurdly reductionist philosophy you're using as a smokescreen and begin again from basic first principles - and thus accepting that things external to myself probably exist - your existence as an entity external to my imagination can be demonstrated! We've interacted on multiple occasions.

The existence of God as an entity external to my imagination can be proved as - again, accepting that other people actually exist - other people can imagine it, but the existence of God as an entity external to everyone's imaginations cannot.


It's all about which axiom you base your view of reality on.

And it must really suck for you that you chose the wrong one.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori