These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Skill reallocation Option needs to finally be added and why

Author
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#521 - 2013-01-17 17:29:08 UTC
Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:

You all against this problem are trying to argue the following concept:

* You walk down an ally and get raped and brutally beaten,a nd then on top of it robbed, you end up in the hospital for 6 months.

By your logic, this is your fault and not the Muggers, because you "chose" to walk down an ally without the knowledge that there was a guy waiting there to **** you etc.



so ur saying walking down dark and strange alleys alone when u are unable to defend urself ISNT a stupid thing to do? the mugger is doing something against the law true, but u would be at fault for being so stupid. also, CCP isnt doing anything that is against the law.

Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:


Eve is about more then pewpew, and to be honest FOTM is useless to us indy people (And Indy people make up 60% - 70% of Eve), EXCEPT for the fact that we could build them and sell to the FOTM fanatics.

BUT, as I pointed out earlier, you only get one respec a year so if your dumb enough to waste it for an FOTM ship that will probably be nerfed in the next 3 months, Hey more power to you, gimp yourself all you like for the next year.

And its a game, I know for a fact YOU probably didn't spend weeks and days researching the game before you downloaded it and tried, NO ONE does (Except a tiny Minority and it doesn't give them an advantage over anyone else other then probably discouraging them from playing). So why would you expect someone else to do it?

I mean if you actually read about Eve before you started playing it, you would never download it because although the reviews are good for the game peoples comments are HORRIBLE because Eve encourages Scum bags and psychopaths to live out their fantasies in game.


a more competent miner can still skill for and mine better than an incompetent miner, so it still applies.

i've also already said, i read up on this game 2-3 months before starting a free trial. what initially attracted me was the spaceships, what really captured me tho was the player driven community, especially the economy; the drama around the delve wars, player made videos, the freedom to be an internet space bastard, mature players, the scale of the game and the 'eliteness' over whining of players

Quote:
Eve is MASSIVE, you can play it for 10 years and still not know everything about it. You can play other games for 10 days to 15 days (Generally the amount of a trial) and know everything about it.

This in itself is why the comment that "too bad for not doing the research can never apply to Eve,because you can research all you want for years and something in Eve will still bite you in the ass and catch you with your pants down.


i know, isnt it great that it can always surprise, u have near unlimited room to grow, and its always changing. the difference between u and me is that i dnt cry like a baby when things happen out of my control and then come to the forums with a broken idea. instead i re-evaluate and move on. some might say i adapt

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Malcorian Vandsteidt
Alpha Trades
Solyaris Chtonium
#522 - 2013-01-17 17:29:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcorian Vandsteidt
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
Astroniomix wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:

This is not my fault.

False.



You all against this problem are trying to argue the following concept:

* You walk down an ally and get raped and brutally beaten,a nd then on top of it robbed, you end up in the hospital for 6 months.

By your logic, this is your fault and not the Muggers, because you "chose" to walk down an ally without the knowledge that there was a guy waiting there to **** you etc.



* You start playing a game and nothing tells you about these aspects of Eve, You train for stuff, then CCP changes everything.

By your Logic it is your fault that CCP chose to change things, and cripple your playstyle. yes you "chose" to train sklills but you did so without the knowledge that 1 you couldn't respec, and 2 that their are vastly more things you can train in simply besides what you picked on char creation.


If you can not see how unrealistic and psychotic/sociopathic this view point is, you should seek immediate psychological help, because you are a danger to society and yourself.


A victim is a victim, whether it be in a Game or in RL, The Victim is NEVER at fault.


This is such a BS analogy...

The appropriate analogy is:

You bought a Big Screen TV from the cable company and have been using it for many months... It does EVERYTHING you've want it to do, good picture, every channel, good sound, etc... Suddenly, the cable company changes their stream format (to make other TV brands usable too, to improve the general quality of offerings, etc), and your big screen TV is limited in the channels it can watch. Generally speaking, you can still watch most of the old channels, but it's quality isn't as good as it was before. You act as though the cable company is "required" to allow you to replace your old TV with a new one so you can have the highest quality, every channel, etc.... and that the cable company should be the one that eats the losses.



Actually thats a bad anology as the problem you present is with the Cable company, Not the big screen Tv. So it is neither your fault or the Big Tvs. It's the cable companies. (And in my example CCP is the cable company)

In RL however if this did happen the cable company would in fact be legally responsible for not providing a service which you are paying them for, and would be required to refund you, or face legal prosecution (in the US anyway, I am not sure what country you are from). (No one is going to sue CCP though so this is Irrelevant) However the Analogy Isn't.

It still proves that CCP is responsible, Not you. As you are not psychic,a nd can not read the future there is no way you can know what CCP is going to change and there fore can not educate or prepare yourself for it.

You just have to suck it up and suffer with it. And it is an unnecessary suffering because it is not caused by players but rather by external forces.

THIS is what I am trying to change so you no longer HAVE to suck it up and Suffer with it.
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#523 - 2013-01-17 17:33:14 UTC

Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:

1. As we have said before the Skill reallocation has been used multiple times over the years.

There is a big difference between the historic "reallocation" of SP and what you are proposing. I'd even argue that we have not in fact had "reallocation" of skillpoints, but a refunding of skillpoints. I know, from your post history there is no difference to you, as you ultimately moved SP from one group of skills to the next, but there is a big difference. In the past, you never had a CHOICE!! CCP removed learning skills, and refunded you those SP; CCP removed some of the social skills, and refunded you those SP. You didn't get to choose whether or not you prefered the skills they removed, they just simply removed them. And that is why you got to "reallocate" those SP to another group of skills.
Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:

2. As we have said before Adn as CCP stated, and by definition the sell of Plex is in fact a "Micro transaction".

Just because EvE has microtransactions does not make it F2P or P2W. Again, there is a subtlety in these definitions that you can't seem to understand or choose not to acknowledge.
Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:

3. I don't go Nu uhh, I defend my points with logic and concrete facts. I have yet to see you post anything other then an "OPINION".


You don't offer as much opinion as the rest of us.... Your entire basis for this thread is an Opinion:
Quote:
* With this feature the player will no longer need to spend months training for another ship, item or whatever, simply because the devs decided to change something critical on a ship, item, weapon, whatever, which then made it useless for your play style, or ability.


Fact CCP changed attributes on a Ship.
Opinion: "you need to train months for another ship to use instead...." While it is a fact it requires training time for another ship, your "need" is a feeling = opinion. Additionally, the notion that changes make a ship useless for your play style is generally an opinion too. Please tell me what ship was made "Useless" from the changes... and for icing on the cake, point to skillset you "needed" to remap to that takes "Months" of training.

Your so called reasons, off page 1:

  • It deals with SP that are focused in a skillset you don't use.
  • New player opportunities and the Learning Curve
  • Unused skills which are years old.
  • Streamlining the skillsystem so it is less complicated.
  • Making Eve more about the game play, then about What You have trained and what you don't. Right now because of the limited structure of the Skill System, you get in Eve and your only focus is to "Train skills".
  • With this feature the player will no longer need to spend months training for another ship, item or whatever, simply because the devs decided to change something critical on a ship, item, weapon, whatever, which then made it useless for your play style, or ability.

  • I want to shift this focus from "Train Skills" to "Play Game". Allowing people to respec their skills lets them focus more on having Fun, then worrying about how they fapped up by training Mining when they figured out they wanted to pvp instead, and now have to worry about training basic pvp skills rather then simply transferring the SP and then going off to have fun while training other skills they need for pvp.

    That long list is really two reasons, just stated many different ways:
    1.) It allows you to move SP from previously trained low-utility skills to skills you currently want to use.

    2.) It allows you to instantly adapt your SP to game/playstyle changes.

    --- Point 1.) You have already benefited from the skillpoints you have. Even if they are of low utility to you now, they still have the potential to be useful in the future. THe ONLY reason you have provided for this argument is "I want to"

    --- Point 2.) People have already explained this is NOT good for the game. This is a slow-paced game where you plan for the future, and your Skillpoint investments require Real Time. Taking that away from the game, so you can get your instant fix, is NOT good for the game...

    Reasons why you should NOT be able to respec:

    1.) It's increases the general skillpoint training rate for higher skillpoint players: They just train Titan V all year at max training, and then respec those skills to something else they desire... You can easily find 1-year worth of Per-Will skills to do this with. Even if they only take a month's worth and shift it, it still gives them a month of accelerated training.

    2.) You've already benefited from those SP, and can continue to benefit from them in the future. If tomorrow, you decide you want to swap areas of the game... you've already benefited from your current SP, even if you don't ever use them again.... why should you be able to refocus that SP to instantly be good in another area of the game? This seems detrimental to the game because it devalues the time invested in specialized training.

    3.) You don't deserve it. Never did CCP guarantee you that your current ship will remain the same, both in terms of power spectrum, utility, etc.. Never did CCP guarantee you that your play style today will be valid tomorrow. And in light of past and future changes, your suggestion really comes across as "since I'm a vet with lots of SP I should be able to remap them to try a new area of the game without going through the growing pains in becoming efficient "skillwise" at it. As a vet, I oppose this attitude (and think it comes across as obnoxiously entitled). When I branched out from PvP to Industry, I had to train up many skills to be competetive with other industrialists. When an industrialist branches into PvP, there are many skills they need to train up to be competitive with me... Neither one of us should insta-swap SP Specializations to be awesome at our new direction in EvE!!!
    Malcorian Vandsteidt
    Alpha Trades
    Solyaris Chtonium
    #524 - 2013-01-17 17:34:51 UTC
    Daichi Yamato wrote:
    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:

    You all against this problem are trying to argue the following concept:

    * You walk down an ally and get raped and brutally beaten,a nd then on top of it robbed, you end up in the hospital for 6 months.

    By your logic, this is your fault and not the Muggers, because you "chose" to walk down an ally without the knowledge that there was a guy waiting there to **** you etc.



    so ur saying walking down dark and strange alleys alone when u are unable to defend urself ISNT a stupid thing to do? the mugger is doing something against the law true, but u would be at fault for being so stupid. also, CCP isnt doing anything that is against the law.

    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:


    Eve is about more then pewpew, and to be honest FOTM is useless to us indy people (And Indy people make up 60% - 70% of Eve), EXCEPT for the fact that we could build them and sell to the FOTM fanatics.

    BUT, as I pointed out earlier, you only get one respec a year so if your dumb enough to waste it for an FOTM ship that will probably be nerfed in the next 3 months, Hey more power to you, gimp yourself all you like for the next year.

    And its a game, I know for a fact YOU probably didn't spend weeks and days researching the game before you downloaded it and tried, NO ONE does (Except a tiny Minority and it doesn't give them an advantage over anyone else other then probably discouraging them from playing). So why would you expect someone else to do it?

    I mean if you actually read about Eve before you started playing it, you would never download it because although the reviews are good for the game peoples comments are HORRIBLE because Eve encourages Scum bags and psychopaths to live out their fantasies in game.


    a more competent miner can still skill for and mine better than an incompetent miner, so it still applies.

    i've also already said, i read up on this game 2-3 months before starting a free trial. what initially attracted me was the spaceships, what really captured me tho was the player driven community, especially the economy; the drama around the delve wars, player made videos, the freedom to be an internet space bastard, mature players, the scale of the game and the 'eliteness' over whining of players

    Quote:
    Eve is MASSIVE, you can play it for 10 years and still not know everything about it. You can play other games for 10 days to 15 days (Generally the amount of a trial) and know everything about it.

    This in itself is why the comment that "too bad for not doing the research can never apply to Eve,because you can research all you want for years and something in Eve will still bite you in the ass and catch you with your pants down.


    i know, isnt it great that it can always surprise, u have near unlimited room to grow, and its always changing. the difference between u and me is that i dnt cry like a baby when things happen out of my control and then come to the forums with a broken idea. instead i re-evaluate and move on. some might say i adapt


    1. Who says the ally has to be dark and strange?, it could be bright and sunny outside and there could even be police walking around. It happens a lot in larger cities.

    2. On miners, Yes but that has nothing to do with your examples. An intelligent player will always do better then a dumb one. But if neither researched the game then both can and will make the (some) of the same mistakes, so this point is irrelevant.

    3. I don't cry like a baby either, pointing out a relevant weakness in the system and attempting to solve it is not crying like a baby, It's attempting to solve an issue for the betterment of others.
    Malcorian Vandsteidt
    Alpha Trades
    Solyaris Chtonium
    #525 - 2013-01-17 17:39:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcorian Vandsteidt
    Gizznitt Malikite wrote:

    Stuff


    If the skill remap was spammable, I would agree with you 100% on all of your points. But only being able to remap once a year makes them irrelevant for the most part, and as I said before, no system is perfect. And there are people who will always abuse anything if they can.

    It's why I suggested the Severe limitations for the system itself. Especially if you add having to spend a plex for it as someone else suggested. AND only being able to do it once a year.

    Each one of the points I point out have vastly different effects on the game, Currently which are Negative for the most part. It's the reason they are listed.
    Sean Parisi
    Blackrise Vanguard
    #526 - 2013-01-17 17:42:05 UTC
    I would like to pay plex in order to burn threads with fire. Could CCP make this an option? Even if it costs 20 PLEX - The amount of time I have spent reading this thread has nerfed my intellect. As such CCP should refund me for the changes to my mental health.
    Drake Doe
    88Th Tax Haven
    #527 - 2013-01-17 17:42:25 UTC
    So you're saying that because something was made balanced but still performs the same job as before, people should just be able to switch to the next big thing. We're better off without this.

    "The homogenization of EVE began when Gallente and Caldari started sharing a weapon system."---Vermaak Doe-- "Ohh squabbles ohh I love my dust trolls like watching an episode of Maury with less " Is he my Dad " but more of " My Neighbor took a dump on my lawn " good episode! pops more corn" ---Evernub--

    Gizznitt Malikite
    Agony Unleashed
    Agony Empire
    #528 - 2013-01-17 17:45:48 UTC
    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:

    Actually thats a bad anology as the problem you present is with the Cable company, Not the big screen Tv. So it is neither your fault or the Big Tvs. It's the cable companies. (And in my example CCP is the cable company)

    In RL however if this did happen the cable company would in fact be legally responsible for not providing a service which you are paying them for, and would be required to refund you, or face legal prosecution (in the US anyway, I am not sure what country you are from). (No one is going to sue CCP though so this is Irrelevant) However the Analogy Isn't.

    It still proves that CCP is responsible, Not you. As you are not psychic,a nd can not read the future there is no way you can know what CCP is going to change and there fore can not educate or prepare yourself for it.

    You just have to suck it up and suffer with it. And it is an unnecessary suffering because it is not caused by players but rather by external forces.

    THIS is what I am trying to change so you no longer HAVE to suck it up and Suffer with it.


    It is not a perfect analogy, but its much more relevant than your "lets invoke emotions by bringing up mugging and ****" craptastic analogy.

    Yes... CCP is the Cable company...
    Yes... Your TV is the Skillpoints you have
    Yes... The stream represents what you can do with those SP... you can fly a tengu that shoots heavy missiles to 100kms with excellent dps....

    And yes... ultimately CCP is responsible for changing the stream format... altering what you can do with the TV/SP you have...

    But... the cable company is NOT responsible for your previous purchase of that TV... even if you purchased it through them... You are responsible for buying it, and using it... Furthermore, with this analogy, the cable company does NOT make any promises that the stream will stay the same 6 months from now, or 1 year from now, just like CCP doesn't make any promises that the SP you have today will be of the same utility to you in the future.

    You are NOT entitled to a new TV just because something changes... you are NOT entitled to a skillpoint redistribution because CCP rebalances ships..

    Daichi Yamato
    Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
    #529 - 2013-01-17 17:49:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Daichi Yamato
    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
    Daichi Yamato wrote:
    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:

    You all against this problem are trying to argue the following concept:

    * You walk down an ally and get raped and brutally beaten,a nd then on top of it robbed, you end up in the hospital for 6 months.

    By your logic, this is your fault and not the Muggers, because you "chose" to walk down an ally without the knowledge that there was a guy waiting there to **** you etc.



    so ur saying walking down dark and strange alleys alone when u are unable to defend urself ISNT a stupid thing to do? the mugger is doing something against the law true, but u would be at fault for being so stupid. also, CCP isnt doing anything that is against the law.

    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:


    Eve is about more then pewpew, and to be honest FOTM is useless to us indy people (And Indy people make up 60% - 70% of Eve), EXCEPT for the fact that we could build them and sell to the FOTM fanatics.

    BUT, as I pointed out earlier, you only get one respec a year so if your dumb enough to waste it for an FOTM ship that will probably be nerfed in the next 3 months, Hey more power to you, gimp yourself all you like for the next year.

    And its a game, I know for a fact YOU probably didn't spend weeks and days researching the game before you downloaded it and tried, NO ONE does (Except a tiny Minority and it doesn't give them an advantage over anyone else other then probably discouraging them from playing). So why would you expect someone else to do it?

    I mean if you actually read about Eve before you started playing it, you would never download it because although the reviews are good for the game peoples comments are HORRIBLE because Eve encourages Scum bags and psychopaths to live out their fantasies in game.


    a more competent miner can still skill for and mine better than an incompetent miner, so it still applies.

    i've also already said, i read up on this game 2-3 months before starting a free trial. what initially attracted me was the spaceships, what really captured me tho was the player driven community, especially the economy; the drama around the delve wars, player made videos, the freedom to be an internet space bastard, mature players, the scale of the game and the 'eliteness' over whining of players

    Quote:
    Eve is MASSIVE, you can play it for 10 years and still not know everything about it. You can play other games for 10 days to 15 days (Generally the amount of a trial) and know everything about it.

    This in itself is why the comment that "too bad for not doing the research can never apply to Eve,because you can research all you want for years and something in Eve will still bite you in the ass and catch you with your pants down.


    i know, isnt it great that it can always surprise, u have near unlimited room to grow, and its always changing. the difference between u and me is that i dnt cry like a baby when things happen out of my control and then come to the forums with a broken idea. instead i re-evaluate and move on. some might say i adapt


    1. Who says the ally has to be dark and strange?, it could be bright and sunny outside and there could even be police walking around. It happens a lot in larger cities.

    2. On miners, Yes but that has nothing to do with your examples. An intelligent player will always do better then a dumb one. But if neither researched the game then both can and will make the (some) of the same mistakes, so this point is irrelevant.

    3. I don't cry like a baby either, pointing out a relevant weakness in the system and attempting to solve it is not crying like a baby, It's attempting to solve an issue for the betterment of others.


    1. then it sounds to me there is little that could have been done to prevent or mitigate the effects of the attack. Infact it sounds like there was no warning and it was impossible to predict. there was plenty that could have been done to mitigate the effects of the nerf on ur characters, even if u could not prevent the nerf itself. it was also announced ahead of time and could have been predicted even before it was announced. still ur fault and u could have began training into other ships before the nerf even happened.

    2. i put forward, with quite some confidence, that someone who reads up on mining will make significantly less mistakes than someone who just dives into it. one example may be someone who uses a retriever because they know they want to semi-afk mine over someone who wanted to semi afk mine but chose the covetor just because it had higher yield. thats just not playing smart.

    3. shall i link the post again?

    EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

    Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

    Jorma Morkkis
    State War Academy
    Caldari State
    #530 - 2013-01-17 18:18:14 UTC
    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
    2. As we have said before Adn as CCP stated, and by definition the sell of Plex is in fact a "Micro transaction".


    No, not even close.

    Only times they have given SP refunds were those that they made some skills useless (as in no in game effect).

    Useless skills doesn't mean skills you can still use or need to use ships/modules.

    By your logic it would be ok for me to go and ask Blizzard to refund all those minerals and gas I used for Stalkers/Zealots/Sentries just because they made it so that 3 Gate wasn't as effective against T as it used to be.
    Joe Risalo
    State War Academy
    Caldari State
    #531 - 2013-01-17 19:45:55 UTC
    In response to the comment on skill reallocation vs skill refunding.

    This is why my version of this idea is a refund.

    You lose the skills you choose to remove sp from, and must pay for new skill books if you don't already posses the skills you wish to wish to put that sp into.


    Now, on the analogy of CCP and the cable company.

    Worst analogy ever.
    You didn't put the player, CCP, or SP in the right places to even remotely represent the matter at hand.....
    Mag's
    Azn Empire
    #532 - 2013-01-17 19:48:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
    Mag's wrote:
    My point even though sarcastic, was that a screen shot proves nothing. People still have SP redeemed from the learning skills.

    What would be proof, is a patch note or blog. If you could provide some, showing the 20 or more times in the past 10 years, that would be great. Blink


    Honestly for something like this I don't have the time to dig through 10 years of Patch notes. Otherwise sure. But I do have a life other then Eve.
    Then I call bull on your assertion.

    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
    1. As we have said before the Skill reallocation has been used multiple times over the years. (Look it up)
    No YOU prove it. The onus is upon you to prove that assertion. Remember, you said 20 or more time in 10 years. Get to it and show us proof. But you cannot, so it's bull.

    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
    2. As we have said before Adn as CCP stated, and by definition the sell of Plex is in fact a "Micro transaction".
    Citation needed, yet again. Come on, point us to where CCP stated that Plex is MT.

    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
    3. I don't go Nu uhh, I defend my points with logic and concrete facts. I have yet to see you post anything other then an "OPINION".
    But you do go nu uhh, you also call people names and rant instead of answering points made.
    Then there's the ridiculous analogies, that prove absolutely nothing.
    Then your classic move of claiming something, not backing it up with proof and thinking you've won the argument.

    No logic involved in any of it.

    Tippia made a perfectly logical post, in reply to Crimeo Khamsi. 78 Who I may add, accepted the points and said. "Eh alright, those are good points. I am convinced against it."
    Your following post 80, was a tirade of abuse at Tippia, ranting about him not being in the CSM or a GM etc etc. Not one rebuttal of the points made in his post. NOT ONE.

    There was a full 2 post rebuttal of your post regarding WHY this is a bad idea. Posts 53 and 54. YOU AVOIDED THEM. I even made another post 377 highlighting them for you. But you avoided them, yet again.

    But that's your style isn't it? Why answer with logic, when you can simply avoid?

    Then when you have to admit a point post 410, you simply state, it's not a huge deal. Yea great logic.

    Just like the logic of stating that you're not Opposed to all caps being allowed back in high sec with the exception of Titans, then say they were removed because they were abused. Do you even read ANYTHING you post? (post 19 Another of his idea threads)

    Then there is your logic regard Pay2Win and Free2Play. You even acknowledge a Plex cannot be in the game, unless it's paid for with real cash. But you somehow forget that fact and believe people are playing for free, simply because it swapped hands at some point for ISK. HELLO, the Plex is still a Plex. It didn't magically change into armour or shield extenders. IT was paid for and the time used from it was paid for. I.E. NOT FREE.

    Then there is my request. Posted numerous times and only answer incorrectly once. So here goes again, let's have you avoid it one more time.

    Point me to ANY item in game a Plex can get you, that you cannot get by normal game play.

    You know, the definition of Pay2Win.

    Oh and NEVER stop posting.

    Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

    Mag's
    Azn Empire
    #533 - 2013-01-17 19:48:38 UTC
    Joe Risalo wrote:
    In response to the comment on skill reallocation vs skill refunding.

    This is why my version of this idea is a refund.

    You lose the skills you choose to remove sp from, and must pay for new skill books if you don't already posses the skills you wish to wish to put that sp into.


    Now, on the analogy of CCP and the cable company.

    Worst analogy ever.
    You didn't put the player, CCP, or SP in the right places to even remotely represent the matter at hand.....
    You on the other hand, should stop posting. Blink

    Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

    Gizznitt Malikite
    Agony Unleashed
    Agony Empire
    #534 - 2013-01-17 20:22:41 UTC
    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
    Gizznitt Malikite wrote:

    Stuff


    If the skill remap was spammable, I would agree with you 100% on all of your points. But only being able to remap once a year makes them irrelevant for the most part, and as I said before, no system is perfect. And there are people who will always abuse anything if they can.

    It's why I suggested the Severe limitations for the system itself. Especially if you add having to spend a plex for it as someone else suggested. AND only being able to do it once a year.

    Each one of the points I point out have vastly different effects on the game, Currently which are Negative for the most part. It's the reason they are listed.


    This is NOT a list of a bunch of "Negatives"....

    [1] It deals with SP that are focused in a skillset you don't use.

    -- If you have skillpoints in a skill you don't use... there is no negative here... you still have the option to use those skills if you change playstyles... There is no NEGATIVE impact on the game here... In contrast, if I can instantly swap my skillpoints to become a top of the line industrialists instead of a top-of-the-line PvPer, there are many negative impacts....

    [2] New player opportunities and the Learning Curve

    -- Fallacy: This doesn't help new players... it devalues the effort put into "niche" training, which is one of the primary ways new players excel over older players. It also doesn't help new players with the learning curve.

    [3] Unused skills which are years old.

    -- This is the same thing as point 1, just restated. and having unused old skills is NOT a negative...

    [4] Streamlining the skill system so it is less complicated.

    -- This is a Fallacy: Allowing remaps does not "streamline the skill system or make it less complicated."

  • Making Eve more about the game play, then about What You have trained and what you don't. Right now because of the limited structure of the Skill System, you get in Eve and your only focus is to "Train skills".

  • -- In other words, make it a game of instant gratification.. as opposed to a game of careful planning and rewarding people for their long-term investments. I don't view this as a positive change...

  • With this feature the player will no longer need to spend months training for another ship, item or whatever, simply because the devs decided to change something critical on a ship, item, weapon, whatever, which then made it useless for your play style, or ability.

  • -- Spending months to train for a new ship increases the reward for flying that ship. Additionally, while CCP's changes might have a negative impact on how you fly a specific ship, in general their changes benefit everyone... Furthermore, their changes don't take away the utility you've previously experienced with those SP, it only changes their current/future utility. As pointed out in the Cable TV analogy, you don't deserve a SP remap just because CCP mildly changed the utility of your SP.

    Finally, the rebuttals are posted are still relevant even with 1 remap a year... Your limitation doesn't sweep them under the rung or invalidate them... It lessons some of the remap's abuse, but the counter arguments are valid.


    Gizznitt Malikite
    Agony Unleashed
    Agony Empire
    #535 - 2013-01-17 20:53:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Gizznitt Malikite
    Joe Risalo wrote:
    In response to the comment on skill reallocation vs skill refunding.

    This is why my version of this idea is a refund.

    You lose the skills you choose to remove sp from, and must pay for new skill books if you don't already posses the skills you wish to wish to put that sp into.


    Now, on the analogy of CCP and the cable company.

    Worst analogy ever.
    You didn't put the player, CCP, or SP in the right places to even remotely represent the matter at hand.....



    First off... I do like the drawback of losing the Skillbook when you remove the SP... but that's, generally speaking, not a big drawback... There are lots of rank 8 skills that don't cost much isk (< 5m)... and would be popular for SP dumping in 2m Sp chunks, which is a lot of SP. Addition notions: Isk is rarely a balancing factor... so even if you give up Racial Dread (100m, Rank 12, 3m SP) or Carrier (500m sp, rank 14, 3.5m SP) these are still "inline" with the cost of a PLEX to make the transfer in the first place...

    A more relevant drawback would be... you lose 50% of the skillpoints you remap...

    Now for the Analogy:
    Please explain why the analogy is the "worst analogy ever". Because your random opinion is frankly meaningless to the discussion if you don't.

    Point in fact: I've had very similar experiences with the cable company to this when they changed their cable signals (to make it more encrypted and less hackable) in the late 90's. My old converter, which I bought from the cable company ceased to work with their new cable stream. My choices were to buy or rent a new cable converter box from them, or give up the service. They offered a discount when purchasing a new cable box to encourage us to buy new boxes, but they didn't refund my old box, and they didn't replace it for free...

    Other more recent examples would by Cable modems.. I have several "old" cable modems that I purchased several years ago, that are incompatible with the current signal from my cable internet provider. (although I suspect some of the proclaimed incompatibility is hogwash)

    I would also bring up how the FCC regulated that all Analog Public TV broadcasts required all Broadcasters to Switch to Digital Broadcasts in the U.S. in 2009, but since the FCC didn't "sell" you the TV it's not as appropriate an analogy.

    Also, what would an appropriate analogy be?
    Apostrof Ahashion
    Doomheim
    #536 - 2013-01-17 21:22:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Apostrof Ahashion
    You know what, if there were ever to be a referendum or public vote on this, im gonna +1 it.

    Ppl who propose this bullsh1t are obviously too stupid to see how this would magically create sp out of nothing, and wont even know how to exploit it. Only a matter of time they start bitch1ng again to stop remaps in posts filled with exclamation marks and capital letters.

    I could use that month or two to gain some free sp, and reading their bitch1ing on the forums about it could be a good laugh for a couple of days.
    Mag's
    Azn Empire
    #537 - 2013-01-17 21:25:07 UTC
    Apostrof Ahashion wrote:
    You know what, if there were ever to be a referendum or public vote on this, im gonna +1 it.

    Ppl who propose this bullsh1t are obviously too stupid to see how this would magically create sp out of nothing, and wont even know how to exploit it. Only a matter of time they start bitch1ng again to stop remaps in posts filled with exclamation marks and capital letters.

    I could use that month or two to gain some free sp, and reading their bitch1ing on the forums about it could be a good laugh for a couple of days.
    Didn't you hear, there is no way this will be abused. I'm serious, I've been told and everything. Straight

    Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

    Malcorian Vandsteidt
    Alpha Trades
    Solyaris Chtonium
    #538 - 2013-01-17 23:37:40 UTC
    Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:

    Actually thats a bad anology as the problem you present is with the Cable company, Not the big screen Tv. So it is neither your fault or the Big Tvs. It's the cable companies. (And in my example CCP is the cable company)

    In RL however if this did happen the cable company would in fact be legally responsible for not providing a service which you are paying them for, and would be required to refund you, or face legal prosecution (in the US anyway, I am not sure what country you are from). (No one is going to sue CCP though so this is Irrelevant) However the Analogy Isn't.

    It still proves that CCP is responsible, Not you. As you are not psychic,a nd can not read the future there is no way you can know what CCP is going to change and there fore can not educate or prepare yourself for it.

    You just have to suck it up and suffer with it. And it is an unnecessary suffering because it is not caused by players but rather by external forces.

    THIS is what I am trying to change so you no longer HAVE to suck it up and Suffer with it.


    It is not a perfect analogy, but its much more relevant than your "lets invoke emotions by bringing up mugging and ****" craptastic analogy.

    Yes... CCP is the Cable company...
    Yes... Your TV is the Skillpoints you have
    Yes... The stream represents what you can do with those SP... you can fly a tengu that shoots heavy missiles to 100kms with excellent dps....

    And yes... ultimately CCP is responsible for changing the stream format... altering what you can do with the TV/SP you have...

    But... the cable company is NOT responsible for your previous purchase of that TV... even if you purchased it through them... You are responsible for buying it, and using it... Furthermore, with this analogy, the cable company does NOT make any promises that the stream will stay the same 6 months from now, or 1 year from now, just like CCP doesn't make any promises that the SP you have today will be of the same utility to you in the future.

    You are NOT entitled to a new TV just because something changes... you are NOT entitled to a skillpoint redistribution because CCP rebalances ships..



    No the service/stream the cable company provides would be the skill points actually, The tv would be my computer monitor. neither are related to the other. Your example is invalid.
    Malcorian Vandsteidt
    Alpha Trades
    Solyaris Chtonium
    #539 - 2013-01-17 23:39:51 UTC
    Apostrof Ahashion wrote:
    You know what, if there were ever to be a referendum or public vote on this, im gonna +1 it.

    Ppl who propose this bullsh1t are obviously too stupid to see how this would magically create sp out of nothing, and wont even know how to exploit it. Only a matter of time they start bitch1ng again to stop remaps in posts filled with exclamation marks and capital letters.

    I could use that month or two to gain some free sp, and reading their bitch1ing on the forums about it could be a good laugh for a couple of days.


    It would take you 4 years to create any extra xp and it would be a negligible amount by then, Not to mention a waste of time. And as I stated before if this is actually an issue tweaks can be made to the skill system in order to prevent it.

    Not a huge deal.
    Daichi Yamato
    Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
    #540 - 2013-01-18 00:13:38 UTC
    Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
    Apostrof Ahashion wrote:
    You know what, if there were ever to be a referendum or public vote on this, im gonna +1 it.

    Ppl who propose this bullsh1t are obviously too stupid to see how this would magically create sp out of nothing, and wont even know how to exploit it. Only a matter of time they start bitch1ng again to stop remaps in posts filled with exclamation marks and capital letters.

    I could use that month or two to gain some free sp, and reading their bitch1ing on the forums about it could be a good laugh for a couple of days.


    It would take you 4 years to create any extra xp and it would be a negligible amount by then, Not to mention a waste of time. And as I stated before if this is actually an issue tweaks can be made to the skill system in order to prevent it.

    Not a huge deal.


    no, it would take you 4 years to make a negligible amount of extra SP. every year, everyone but the noobs will be re-allocating SP's trained at maximum speed with less than half the currently required implants and putting them wherever the hell they like.

    EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

    Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs