Jita Park Speakers Corner

You must be roleplaying a braindead capsuleer, that could explain why you keep answering wrong.
*sigh* I'll keep it simple for you AGAIN :
- I never said not dieing to gatecamps is hard when you commit to fly a ship to do so
- I said it's a bad design : low risk, high reward pvp which is ruining low sec.
If you don't understand that I give up on you, It' won't have impact on everything most fw fights are in plexes/hubs where they should be (feel free to camp acceleration gates).


Then stop saying stupid stuff friendo.


Again, it's low risk high reward pvp, therefore it's bad design and should be removed, especially regarding the actual state of low sec.


It's not only about gatecamps, bomb have their use in lowsec.

Gatecamps isn't "ruining lowsec", no matter how much you want to howl about it ruining lowsec.


The "actual state of low sec" has nothing to do with gatecamps.


I didn't fly a shuttle, I flew something which was designed to bust through gatecamps. You should try it.


Ah, I knew there was a trollword missing from your posts, and there it is: "bears".

That's just like your opinion I can provide facts why it's ruining lowsec :
- Average solo pvper can't fly what he wants because we are camping
- People won't fleet to fight campers because most of the time they disengage unless they are 100% sure they'll kill you (typical bears)
- Can be annoying for small gang doing fw, but it's ok I guess when you have a scout
Notice how you are in full damage control mode since it's bad design.


It's not helping, but ye low sec isn't appealing for order reasons. I should be more specific, it's ruining solo pvp in low sec.


So low sec solo pvp is limited to one type of ship, good to know homie.


Mommie always told me "you must be proud of who you are", it's ok to be a lil bear friendo. You want easy kills, you want elite pvp, you want easy afk money? It's ok you are not alone ^_^.
Have a good night/day sir bbz.


PS : I do pi/research in ls for 5 months, never died to a single gatecamp on my indy because I can scout and cloak, doesn't mean it's not a bad design who is ruining low sec solo pvp.

Because somebody posting with an hours-old NPC corp forum alt that will inevitably be biomassed by the end of the election is clearly trying to derail this thread, I'm just quoting the last useful post to ~try~ to get this thing back on track.

Did I miss something?

All this talk of lo-sec in a candidate thread who has said he is not sure what to do about lo-sec and that it is his weakest area.

that's maybe because outside of plinking at tackled supercaps that somebody else is killing in the once-per-epoch big fight that manages to take place in lowsec, casual PvP in lowsec is reduced to camping because there is literally nothing else considering that the place is a desert

as far as PvE goes, great, you have l5s which require a gang or a carrier to run, and if you have a gang you're far better off running incursions and if you have a carrier you'll make more ISK running 0.0 anomalies

incursions are awful in lowsec so let's not even go there

if people aren't doing these things then there are no "targets" which means that basically all casual PvP is reduced to camping a gate or a station, and they don't do those things because they are more rewarding elsewhere with the same amount of effort

You are 100% right.

Holy **** the tears on that thread, delicious.

Since I have clarified my position, perhaps you two could continue this in another thread.

Considering your sig, and learning it's a Goon, maybe you're posting about the wrong topic all together. Since it is the antics of Goons to troll and cause mischief, and they don't even try to hide it.

And yet you said it anyway.

See, this is the kind of meticulous attention to communication that I hope to promote in the CSM, and it's clearly already working!