These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Malcanis for CSM 8 Vote till you drop

First post
Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#601 - 2013-03-18 09:30:05 UTC
I said I picked a side.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Anunzi
Solace Corp
#602 - 2013-03-18 11:18:46 UTC


A vote for Malcanis is a vote for Bacon then Big smile

Also, your thread seems to have derailed in to topic about booze and bacon. Not a bad thing!

"It was the way she said it, Rimmer, to rhyme with scum"

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#603 - 2013-03-18 12:01:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcanis
Well all the directly EVE related topics seem to have been covered, so now I can address issues relevant to EVE players.

I hereby declare Malc's cocktail bar and obscene limerick emporium open!

There was a young lady of Venus
Who asked to see the barman's dog, Enis
He said "Mind you don't trip"
And mixed her a Brandy Egg Flip
That inquisitive young lady of Venus!

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Temba Ronin
#604 - 2013-03-19 11:37:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Temba Ronin
Malcanis for CSM ..... Seems like an idea that will benefit players ..... I can endorse this man because he has the patience and the knowledge to make the game more playable for both new and veteran players.
VOTE MALCANIS for CSM8




Power to the Players!

The Best Ship In EVE Online Is "Friendship", Power To The Players!

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#605 - 2013-03-19 11:50:17 UTC
Thanks Temba, I remember our conversation within and around the "Hisec manifesto" thread and I'm glad you kept playing.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

GallowsCalibrator
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#606 - 2013-03-20 09:51:40 UTC
Combining whisky and bacon is also something that should be done.

(I am glad that you know what good drinks are, and I agree that tequila is only useful for clearing out plumbing.)

Naughty Ferret
Czerka.
What Could Possibly Go Wr0ng
#607 - 2013-03-20 21:23:39 UTC
I vote bacon therefore I vote Malcanis
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#608 - 2013-03-21 18:53:55 UTC
Confirming that CCP have accepted my candidacy apllication.

Much thanks to you all for your support so far.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Kytayn
Kronos TEchnologies
#609 - 2013-03-21 20:02:57 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Anunzi wrote:
Single malt, Double or Bourbon?


I've only had a few bourbons that aren't Jack Daniels. Sadly whiskey doesn't agree with me these days (I can drink one glass and get away with it, but who the hell can only drink one glass?), but back in my proper whisky drinking days, I liked a good peaty Islay like Lagavullein. And of course The Macallan, which is the whiskey a gentleman should drink. There's a lot to be said for Bushmills also.

You've redeemed yourself in my eyes. Jack is ****, though. Gentleman Jack is quite good.

Gentleman Jack isn't bad, but you can have a bottle of The Glenlivet 12yo or a bottle of Johnnie Walker Black Label for the same price. The Glenlivet blows Gentleman Jack out of the cask.

related
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=212413&find=unread

Congrats on being official Malcanis.

Be careful in Pulsar systems, you might get Pod Flu.

(Bio for YouTube reading)

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#610 - 2013-03-21 22:37:40 UTC
Kytayn wrote:
The Glenlivet blows Gentleman Jack out of the cask.

Confirming this. I was simply pointing out that Jack is **** but they can do better.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

Anunzi
Solace Corp
#611 - 2013-03-22 08:54:29 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Confirming that CCP have accepted my candidacy apllication.

Much thanks to you all for your support so far.



Congratulations Mal, best of luck!

"It was the way she said it, Rimmer, to rhyme with scum"

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#612 - 2013-03-22 09:00:31 UTC
Anunzi wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Confirming that CCP have accepted my candidacy apllication.

Much thanks to you all for your support so far.



Congratulations Mal, best of luck!


Thanks Anunzi. I'll need it, I think.

I don't know whether I'm more nervous about the possibility of losing or the possibility of winning... What?


"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Anunzi
Solace Corp
#613 - 2013-03-22 09:16:47 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Anunzi wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Confirming that CCP have accepted my candidacy apllication.

Much thanks to you all for your support so far.



Congratulations Mal, best of luck!


Thanks Anunzi. I'll need it, I think.

I don't know whether I'm more nervous about the possibility of losing or the possibility of winning... What?






I can understand that. However, I have every confidence in your ability to see it through, win or lose.

I do think that you will get elected, you just have to look at this thread and the amount of people pledging their support to you via the well known medium of EvE-O forum signatures to see that you have a lot of support within this community.

"It was the way she said it, Rimmer, to rhyme with scum"

None ofthe Above
#614 - 2013-03-24 18:40:15 UTC
Malcanis wrote:


I don't know whether I'm more nervous about the possibility of losing or the possibility of winning... What?


It is a pretty challenging position, good to see that you understand that.

Just wanted to drop by and note my support and thank you for all the contributions you've already made. Your ideas have made EVE a better game.

Like Hans, you've already had a big impact, perhaps even more so than Hans since he credits you for inspiring and informing a lot of his work. Hope to see more in the future, whatever the outcome of the election.

The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#615 - 2013-03-24 19:04:34 UTC
None ofthe Above wrote:
Malcanis wrote:


I don't know whether I'm more nervous about the possibility of losing or the possibility of winning... What?


It is a pretty challenging position, good to see that you understand that.

Just wanted to drop by and note my support and thank you for all the contributions you've already made. Your ideas have made EVE a better game.

Like Hans, you've already had a big impact, perhaps even more so than Hans since he credits you for inspiring and informing a lot of his work. Hope to see more in the future, whatever the outcome of the election.


Hans doesn't owe me anything. Ideas are cheap; hard work is what counts.

If I get elected you'll probably see very little of my ~ideas~ enacted, but I hope that I'll be able to work effectively to deliver what's good for EVE.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Xander Phoena
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#616 - 2013-03-25 00:52:56 UTC
I interviewed Malcanis as part of the Crossing Zebras CSM8 Election Interviews. You can check it out here:

http://c-z.me/csm8malcanis

www.crossingzebras.com

Dibblerette
Solitude-Industries
#617 - 2013-03-26 06:55:00 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Dibblerette wrote:
@Malcanis

Glad to see your platform is as sensible as your posting. My only question is what would you do to try and improve lowsec (specifically non-FW, CCP seems to forget about us) beyond the extensions of your Manifest? More industrialists trying to run the gates is good, but I would rather be able to describe where I live as something other than "Nullsec without bubbles, but gate guns".

Regardless, I wish you luck sir. +1


Lo-sec is a conundrum, I freely admit. When you say "improve", what exactly do you mean by "improve"? "Improve for whom"? Defining the problem is the first step in constructing the solution. I feel that I have a fairly clear idea of what sov 0.0 should look like, but I freely confess that I'm not as sure about what kind of lo-sec we should be working towards.

At the moment, lo-sec is a haven for small independent corps, and it's a ghetto. I can easily think of quite a few ideas to raise it up from ghetto status, but by the very act of making the space better, there's a danger to that "small corp haven" status. CCP did well to make Faction Warfare more attractive, and that has surely increased both the PvP activity and the economic activity in lo-sec. Would you like more of that?


More traffic is good, as FW has taught us, but you hit the nail on the head. Make lowsec too much better and why bother with null?
I guess I would like it better if we had something worth coming to (non-FW) lowsec to do or see, something beyond taking a shortcut. There was an old idea trotted out awhile back to allow pirates to corrupt a system, and anti-pirates, or even a rival pirate group, could reverse this trend and "purify" the system. Not that it would allow enough people to turn Rancer into Yulai, but perhaps with enough corruption, pirates would be able to temporarily disable or redirect gate guns. Or gain access to hidden stargates, run drugs for a new breed of NPC agents, or something like that. I've always seen lowsec as the murky underworld of EVE, and I hope some day it reflects that. Now I know you can't exactly walk up to CCP and tell them what to do, but maybe you can help plant a seed that will someday transform the bastard space of lowsec into something much more interesting and dynamic than gatecamps and ganking noobs in belts.
Bi-Mi Lansatha
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#618 - 2013-03-26 14:53:50 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Well all the directly EVE related topics seem to have been covered, so now I can address issues relevant to EVE players...


mynnna wrote:...but "tech moons are idiotic" has been the official stance of Goonswarm for a very long time...





Would you like to elaborate on how you would correct this situation?
Bi-Mi Lansatha
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#619 - 2013-03-26 14:57:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Bi-Mi Lansatha
Dibblerette wrote:
...run drugs...
Lol Before I joined this game, I truly believed that lowsec... the home of pirates and the lawless would be where all kinds of illegal activities and products would be found.

Perhaps... it just isn't PC. What a shame.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#620 - 2013-03-26 15:03:48 UTC
See back around page 9 IIRC.

Basically:

1) Return the bottleneck material status to the R64s
2) Make each racial T2 ship/weapon line associated with one of the R64s
3) Rework the distribution of the R64s so each is mostly concentrated in one quadrant of the nullsec map, with a sprinkling in the others and in lo-sec to keep things lively

The number of R64s and the map-wide distribution will make it impractical to completely monopolise bottleneck T2 material as it is now, so base prices will cap the value of the "money moons" at the 'nice to have' level, not the "if you don't have any then you're a poor and can get out" level.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016