These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
First pagePrevious page8910
 

When will the GM team be producing their response to the Miner Bumping Discussion Thread?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#181 - 2013-01-08 13:44:25 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
It'd be a complete bloody joke if CCP "banned" bumping. Miners cried and cried and cried instead of fitting a tank, so CCP caved and made some huge built in tanks... and what did the miners do? Rejoice? No, they found something else to cry about and demand "fixing".


You would bring it on yourself, belligerent undesirable. You utilized a game mechanic as an excuse to abuse individuals and target them for humiliation. If it is banned, you brought it on yourself. Deal with it. Smile

Quote:
Calling it now: If CCP ban bumping, the miners will immediately find some new thing to cry about because it slows down their potential isk making and botting


No. We will simply return to mining in peace like good, True Citizens of High Security Space and enjoy Civilization's fruits, while also being able to deal with the real world and go AFK for a bit to deal with what must be dealt with.

It will be banned and you will comply, or be removed.

If it is not banned, hundreds, if not thousands of players will vote with their wallet Smile
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#182 - 2013-01-08 14:02:30 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
If it is not banned, three or four players will vote with their wallet Smile

FTFY
psycho freak
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#183 - 2013-01-08 14:05:07 UTC
Damn didnt know there was a ccp debate on miner bumping

nothing wrong with it tbh just a extorsion tactic

damn this game is getting bad with all these whineing pansys crying nurf all the time

also this is the reson i hate the carbare they move to an area and cry and whine to change the area or situation to theyer likeing they could orbit the fcking rock and avoide bumping but no cry cry cry

I love killing the carebare watching them cry in local to save they ship i have many they teairs in all my toons bio's and they wonder why ppl detest theyer kind

my spelling sux brb find phone number for someone who gives a fu*k

nop cant find it
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#184 - 2013-01-08 14:06:03 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
I am editing quotes because I want to hide the truth and use buzz words to try to convince CCP that abusing people is ok.


FTFY. Continue on your path and hundreds, if not thousands of players will quit, because of you and your kind. Filthy undesirable.Smile
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#185 - 2013-01-08 14:08:26 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
I am editing quotes because I want to hide the truth and use buzz words to try to convince CCP that abusing people is ok.


FTFY. Continue on your path and hundreds, if not thousands of players will quit, because of you and your kind. Filthy undesirable.Smile

'three or four' is not a buzz word.
psycho freak
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#186 - 2013-01-08 14:10:05 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
I am editing quotes because I want to hide the truth and use buzz words to try to convince CCP that abusing people is ok.


FTFY. Continue on your path and hundreds, if not thousands of players will quit, because of you and your kind. Filthy undesirable.Smile



Bullsh#t tbfh forum scare tactic to try sway ccp

tell you what list the thousend that would leave or did u just pull these random numbers out your @ss

my spelling sux brb find phone number for someone who gives a fu*k

nop cant find it
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#187 - 2013-01-08 14:14:02 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
'three or four' is not a buzz word.

No, it's an understatement to try to downplay the issue. A new tactic of the undesirables!

psycho freak wrote:


Bullsh#t tbfh forum scare tactic to try sway ccp

tell you what list the thousend that would leave or did u just pull these random numbers out your @ss



When you learn to spell, I might actually grace you with an answer. Sad...see what being a belligerent undesirable gets you? Mental deficiencies. So sad...
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#188 - 2013-01-08 14:17:11 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
No, it's an understatement to try to downplay the issue. A new tactic of the undesirables!
And 'thousands' isn't a massive exaggeration?

Also, can you list the thousands of players that would leave, or did you just pull random numbers out of your arse?
psycho freak
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#189 - 2013-01-08 14:19:43 UTC
Aww your so cute

How nieve of you to asume everyone in eve if speaks perfect english in a multy national game bless your little hart

now these thousends of players you were talking about any list or is it still random numbers pulled out your #ss?

Also read sig about spelling

my spelling sux brb find phone number for someone who gives a fu*k

nop cant find it
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#190 - 2013-01-08 14:20:55 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
And 'thousands' isn't a massive exaggeration?

Hundreds, if not thousands. I did not say only thousands. Learn to read, undesirable. Smile

Quote:
Also, can you list the thousands of players that would leave, or did you just pull random numbers out of your arse?

Why would I provide you with a hit list to terrorize and turn to the undesirable bumping infection? Filth...
psycho freak
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#191 - 2013-01-08 14:29:56 UTC
Me personaly i do not bump miners im a losec scumbag that would randsom your grandmoths false teath for 100m

but i see nothing wrong with bumping and extotion as long as they make isk its valid interactive game play
you signed up to a multyplayer game yet cry when interacted with by other player playing theyer way

its the constant pansys like yourself whineing all the time thats the problem

have you tryed adapting your game play like the rest of us do?
hitlist lmfao more like made uplist all in your lttle head

Guess you pulled the numbers out your @ss

my spelling sux brb find phone number for someone who gives a fu*k

nop cant find it
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#192 - 2013-01-08 14:37:17 UTC
psycho freak wrote:
Me personaly i do not bump miners im a losec scumbag that would randsom your grandmoths false teath for 100m

How charming.

Quote:
but i see nothing wrong with bumping and extotion as long as they make isk its valid interactive game play you signed up to a multyplayer game yet cry when interacted with by other player playing theyer way

There is good interaction, and then there is belligerent, malicious, abusive interaction. PvP in itself is none of the aforementioned, but bumping and..."people" like yourself are.

Quote:
its the constant pansys like yourself whineing all the time thats the problem

It is the constant sociopaths like you that facilitate the outspokenness of the "pansies."

Quote:
have you tryed adapting your game play like the rest of us do?

Have you tried learning to spell? Even non-English speakers on these forums have better spelling and grammar than you. You're simply doing it on purpose.

As for adapting, we adapted, but you changed. You are no longer playing a game, you are harassing and abusing players because you do not like that they are having a peaceful time playing Eve as a True Citizen enjoying Civilization. While you wallow in the mud of the Badlands for your Criminal Ways.

As for "listing" things, I have nothing to prove to you, undesirable. Smile
Lin Suizei
#193 - 2013-01-08 14:40:27 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
~belligerent undesirables~


Hey Tali, have a guess how many ganks your brave, brave words have stopped so far. Let me help you - the answer is 0.

Stop posting and do something, anything. If you do not like what we do, act.

Lol I can't delete my forum sig.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#194 - 2013-01-08 14:44:01 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
'three or four' is not a buzz word.

No, it's an understatement to try to downplay the issue. A new tactic of the undesirables!

psycho freak wrote:


Bullsh#t tbfh forum scare tactic to try sway ccp

tell you what list the thousend that would leave or did u just pull these random numbers out your @ss



When you learn to spell, I might actually grace you with an answer. Sad...see what being a belligerent undesirable gets you? Mental deficiencies. So sad...


the only undesirables in this game are the ones who want it to be a hand-holding, babying game a la all the defunct wow clones. Which is exactly what you do when you demand CCP remove the ability for other players to interact or interfere with you. Being a sandbox in which people can mess with you (and you can mess with them) is one of the core goals of EVE. Crying to remove the avenues which make that possible demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of the point of the game you're playing
Ginger Barbarella
#195 - 2013-01-08 14:44:56 UTC
psycho freak wrote:
Aww your so cute

How nieve of you to asume


Stopped reading here. Elementary school grammar. Go back to it.

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
Max Doobie
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#196 - 2013-01-08 14:47:15 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
It's sad to see the non-carebears letting themselves always get dragged into discussions
with the carebears. You non-carebears act as if it was a necessity to talk to them,
ignoring that it makes you just as weak as them.

The non-carebears don't have any way to force anything onto us. They are weaklings.
The only reason they succeed is because *you let them* !

Well all know the right way to deal with bigmouths, so why do you keep talking pointless discussions
which have *no* end, because they'll never understand anyway ? They are like the kid that keeps running
a bigmouth and when you slap them, he starts to cry and runs to his mother.

This whole discussion is *pointless*. It's as pointless as any other discussion with them ever was and will be.
But every time one of these discussions start, it plays right into their hands. From one nerf to the next nerf.

You keep talking and let CCP decide things for you. That's what they want and that's what they'll achieve,
because you don't actually do anything against them ... no ... you just keep talking. From one nerf to the next nerf.


I feel sad for New Eden.


o/



Look at this dude. I mean how pathetic can you be?

"... ignoring that it makes you just as weak as them"?

I would PAY to see a picture of what you look like dude. You probably look like a cracked-out carrot top. Get over yourself dude. This game would last all of 1 week without highsec people. Go find something worthwhile to brag about and use THAT to hold yourself as possibly superior to someone, because you made yourself look like a serious toolbox with this comment, holy hell...
Mhax Arthie
Doomheim
#197 - 2013-01-08 14:48:15 UTC
Mike Adoulin wrote:
Mhax Arthie wrote:
Personally I hope that James will stop the mindless gank and get back to the afk miners bumping, I had the laugh of my life reading and seeing the afk minners floating in space for hours km away from the belts... high quality entertainment! Big smile



It's highly probable that James only began ganking because it's considered a legit tactic in highsec (see Goons On Ice), while *gasp* BUMPING *gasp* is an Ancient Evil and is Officially Under Discussion.

TLDR; ganking them for isk is Working As Intended, bumping them for isk may soon become bannable.

He's just covering his bases. From James POV, ganking miners is expensive, time consuming, and cuts into his profit-margin. But CCP just might change the EULA (and if they do I can't wait until freighter pilots start sending CCP petitions against bumpy pirates/gankers....), so he is making sure he has a gameplay mode to fall back on.


My beet is that he started ganking because of the goongams and the strong support they gave him for his actions. Actually there is a huge amount of bees that joined James gang lately and they don't give a fuk about the code and that jazz, they just gank because they can.

Again, I was a big supporter of James bumping business until it turned into this ganking bloodbath. And I'm 100% sure that CCP also had nothing against bumping as it does no harm, but generates a lot of fun and lulz. And ofc... helps to get rid of the damn afk bots that ruin every mmo these days... wish that we can bump the fok out of all those Jitta spammer bots too! Evil But ganking, awoxing on a massive scale.. it's a whole different story.
psycho freak
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#198 - 2013-01-08 14:50:23 UTC
1, thnx
2, player interaction is part of eve game play there is no good or bad this is not hello kity online even if you wish it so everyone plays there own way there is no good or bad unless use exploit or r.l harrasment its a game
3, its the sociopaths like me that keeps the markets ticking over and not stockpiling crap like the carbare does
4, thanx for the personal attack but i have no intrest in learning it

and last but not least everything in eve is pvp
fighting
playing the markets
mineing
plexing
well you get the idea its ment and designed to have player interaction

my spelling sux brb find phone number for someone who gives a fu*k

nop cant find it
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#199 - 2013-01-08 14:58:44 UTC
I was wondering when the most outspoken Zealot would show up. Smile

TheGunslinger42 wrote:
the only undesirables in this game are the ones who want it to be a hand-holding, babying game a la all the defunct wow clones.

Oh the faulty logic of an undesirable, how wonderful it must be to ignore facts and live in ignorant bliss. I do not care if you think my desire to mine in peace means I want Eve as a "WoW clone." I don't care if you PvP, or Scam, or whatever have you. Eve is a microcosm for all activity and people.

It is not meant to be a microcosm of persecution and abuse for undesirables to live out their deluded fantasies of exerting perverted rules over others. Just because you wield no power in the real world does not mean we should suffer for your inadequacies. Smile

Quote:
Which is exactly what you do when you demand CCP remove the ability for other players to interact or interfere with you.

More blissful ignorance. See above.

Quote:
Being a sandbox in which people can mess with you (and you can mess with them) is one of the core goals of EVE. Crying to remove the avenues which make that possible demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of the point of the game you're playing

I am not "crying" to have it removed. I am request that belligerent undesirables are ordered to stop their abusive practices Smile
CCP Falcon
#200 - 2013-01-08 15:03:05 UTC
This is getting locked.

Reasoning : Persistent personal attacks, breaches of the rules and bad posting.

Do not re-open this topic. When a response is ready, it will be published.


CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3
First pagePrevious page8910