These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

NBSI Nullsec = Fail

First post
Author
Mayhaw Morgan
State War Academy
Caldari State
#361 - 2013-01-07 23:42:18 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
When the facilities in sov 0.0 are already so restricted . . .


Build more.

Ruby Porto wrote:
When was the last time you successfully counter-dropped a BLOPs gang ganking a ratter?


When is the last time you tried?

Ruby Porto wrote:
So now NRDS is assume all neutrals are hostile but don't do anything about them? Why should someone allow neutrals free run of their space AND insist that friendlies dock up to get out of the neutrals way?

If you're going to assume all neutrals are hostile, why not just be NBSI?


NRDS is about NOT making assumptions, like that every neutral is hostile AND that everyone who acts friendly actually is.
No one said to allow neutrals "free run" of space. Some of us are only suggesting not shooting first, asking questions second, but, rather, asking questions first, and shooting second.
No one insisted anyone dock up. I, personally, only suggested that you shouldn't fly your CNR around like an idiot when someone you don't know is in system. When neutrals are in system, you just have to do things a little differently.

Ruby Porto wrote:
You're suggesting that we stop doing that and that we stop all economic activity . . .


Show me where I suggested that. Not where YOU ASSUMED that was what I was saying. Where I actually said that. You seem to have a problem about making assumptions.

Ruby Porto wrote:
Let me tell you what that paragraph tells me.
You don't know how a worthwhile mining OP operates.
You don't know how Cloaking works, and how long it takes for a stealth bomber to point something.
You don't know what "align time" is.
You don't know what a "dictor bubble" is.
You think that a Hulk's drones are an effective defense against Titans.


Worthwhile mining op? Like the one on that battle (I use the term loosely.) report?
Why would he cloak? He was . . . part of the op?
You don't know what the term "bug out" is. They should have done that, but they just sat there in shock, instead.
Interdictor? You mean those flimsy little destroyer class ships that die to scout drones? Too bad the miners didn't have any . . . deployed.
Yeah, you can see that those Titans were doing massive DPS. If only the miners had something to counter those pesky titans, they might have had a chance.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#362 - 2013-01-07 23:45:24 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Ruby Porto wrote:
If they're in MY SPACE, yes.

What do you think they contribute when they're in MY SPACE?


Entitled, you say?


Entitled to the use of space that WE take and WE hold against all enemies? Sure. Seems about right.

What's you're point? Why do you feel entitled to the use of someone else's stuff. Stuff that they worked for and that they keep safe?

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#363 - 2013-01-07 23:55:06 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
When the facilities in sov 0.0 are already so restricted . . .


Build more.


Yeah no we can drop an upgraded Minmatar outpost in every system and you'd still have single hisec systems with more capacity than an entire region.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#364 - 2013-01-08 00:05:30 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Build more.


A single system in HS can have more industrial capacity than a Nullsec region could ever have. And it's all there for free.

Wait... you don't realize there's a hard limit of one Outpost per system, do you. How cute.

Quote:
When is the last time you tried?

I asked first. How do you propose to kill a bunch of ships that are cloaked in safe spots? Do you have any experience at all with the mechanics we're talking about?

Quote:
NRDS is about NOT making assumptions, like that every neutral is hostile AND that everyone who acts friendly actually is.
No one said to allow neutrals "free run" of space. Some of us are only suggesting not shooting first, asking questions second, but, rather, asking questions first, and shooting second.
No one insisted anyone dock up. I, personally, only suggested that you shouldn't fly your CNR around like an idiot when someone you don't know is in system. When neutrals are in system, you just have to do things a little differently.


How do you propose to keep your ratting ship safe with a neutral in system?

What questions do you think would be effective in determining the actual intent of the neutral?

Quote:
Show me where I suggested that. Not where YOU ASSUMED that was what I was saying. Where I actually said that. You seem to have a problem about making assumptions.


So what are you saying is the proper method of dealing with the flood of neutral traffic coming through your nonexistant NRDS paradise without stopping ratting or mining?


Quote:
Worthwhile mining op? Like the one on that battle (I use the term loosely.) report?
Why would he cloak? He was . . . part of the op?
You don't know what the term "bug out" is. They should have done that, but they just sat there in shock, instead.
Interdictor? You mean those flimsy little destroyer class ships that die to scout drones? Too bad the miners didn't have any . . . deployed.
Yeah, you can see that those Titans were doing massive DPS. If only the miners had something to counter those pesky titans, they might have had a chance.


You're suggesting having every miner in a different belt (which, by the way, shows a distinct lack of familiarity with the hidden belt system), which would cause significant logistical headaches.
Because a stealth bomber approaching a mining OP is suspicious. If you're continuing economic activity with neuts in system, as you suggest, the exact same thing is not only possible, but likely, as stealth bombers do not suffer from a locking delay after decloaking.
You still don't know what the term "align time" is. Hint, it's longer than the time it takes for the Sabres to jump in and bubble up.
You do know that the bubble remains up after they die, right? And no dictor pilot worth anything will die to that small number of drones.
So, in the end, you're proposing that Alliances be NRDS so that they can keep fleets of Titans on standby to counter the Titan Drops that being NRDS invites.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#365 - 2013-01-08 00:10:59 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Entitled, you say?

Hm. So I've spent the last few years taking and defending the space I claim I own.

Gee, I must be an entitled son of a *****, completely unlike those hisec guys who take everything for granted and don't spend a lick of time defending, upgrading, maintaining or anything. Well, unless you call whining to daddy ccp every time someone bumps their barge for maintaining and upgrading, I guess.

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Build more.

Tell us more about how we can actually come close to competing with hisec, using today's game mechanics.

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
NRDS is about NOT making assumptions, like that every neutral is hostile AND that everyone who acts friendly actually is.

If you setup a firewall, what do you do, set it up so it accepts and forwards everything and close off certain IPs as they prove themselves to be unfriendly, or do you set it up as strict as you can and just allow what needs to be allowed?

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Show me where I suggested that. Not where YOU ASSUMED that was what I was saying. Where I actually said that. You seem to have a problem about making assumptions.

Tell us how we can not stop all economic activity when literally any and all neuts travelling through space will be hostile.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
#366 - 2013-01-08 00:13:48 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
When the facilities in sov 0.0 are already so restricted . . .


Build more.

[snip]


Yeah, nah. There is already near saturation in nullsec, in a way that brings any sort of profit. The problem is is that outposts are 1) inferior to hisec stations and 2) you can only have one per system. POS could fill the gap but POS doesn't solve the issue of lack of market AND POS is currently poorer at everything that an outpost can do anyway (exception: Capital and Super Capital production since they can only be done at a POS).

Neuts will only come to Nullsec, in meaningful and productive ways that would make NRDS a better philosophy if it has the same profit margins as Hisec. There is no sustainable profit in allowing people into your system who are not part of your organisation. If you could tax them then they wouldn't come anyway since they can make their profits and get their thrills tax free outside of any power blocs.

Finally, you know there is a ways of avoiding NBSI? You could actually talk to the peoples whose space you are encroaching on or, in a shocking twist, actually join their coalitions?
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#367 - 2013-01-08 00:14:21 UTC
I find it funny that he's saying we should build more infrastructure and provide access to infrastructure that we've spent years building to those who have not and will not do anything to actually deserve access to trillions of ISK and countless man hours worth of infrastructure.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#368 - 2013-01-08 00:16:07 UTC
Andski wrote:
I find it funny that he's saying we should build more infrastructure and provide access to infrastructure that we've spent years building to those who have not and will not do anything to actually deserve access to trillions of ISK and countless man hours worth of infrastructure.


Well dang, we must just be some entitled summaguns to not want to share.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#369 - 2013-01-08 00:21:42 UTC
And then, when they do gain access to that infrastructure, they'd simply cherrypick ores in grav sites and, under the protection of their gracious hosts, compress the ore in Rorquals and refine it in lowsec to dodge refining taxes. Then they'd cherrypick rats in anomalies until their gracious hosts stop being so gracious when they murder their ships. After that, they'll complain on the forums about how horrible the nullseccers are.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#370 - 2013-01-08 00:36:43 UTC
cva has spent like what, over a trillion ISK on building stations alone?
sure got their money's worth I guess.
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#371 - 2013-01-08 01:04:43 UTC
Ruby Porto wrote:
When was the last time you successfully counter-dropped a BLOPs gang ganking a ratter?


Trust me, an organized group of pilots can obliterate a BLOPs drop....

I can also post success counter hotdrops too.... It requires planning and effort on your part... which I understand that most people don't want to bother with because there isn't a "guarentee" of a good outcome.

P.S. NRDS vs NBSI is irrelevant when we're Red to all of Nullsec!!!!!!


RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#372 - 2013-01-08 01:31:31 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
Ruby Porto wrote:
When was the last time you successfully counter-dropped a BLOPs gang ganking a ratter?


Trust me, an organized group of pilots can obliterate a BLOPs drop....

I can also post success counter hotdrops too.... It requires planning and effort on your part... which I understand that most people don't want to bother with because there isn't a "guarentee" of a good outcome.

P.S. NRDS vs NBSI is irrelevant when we're Red to all of Nullsec!!!!!!



I never knew Oracles, Ares', and Celestis' could get bridged through a BLOPs bridge.

Besides that, it seems that you're saying that every Ratter should have an organized counter-BLOPs fleet ready to go, the entire time they're ratting. Because I somehow doubt that Mega was just some random ratter who suddenly called for help on comms.

So, all together, that's not an example of "counter-dropping a BLOPs gang ganking a ratter" on any count. It's not a BLOPs gang, it's not a drop of any kind (let alone a BLOPs drop), and it's not a ratter that was being attacked, it was bait.

EDIT
Actually, judging from that Broadsword, it looks like it was an AWOX of a Bomber gang. So it really, really doesn't fit the bill.
/EDIT

(I never said it was impossible to counter a BLOPs gang, just that it's not in any way feasible to have the counter on hand while you're ratting)

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Mayhaw Morgan
State War Academy
Caldari State
#373 - 2013-01-08 02:32:56 UTC
Ruby Porto wrote:
Why do you feel entitled to the use of someone else's stuff. Stuff that they worked for and that they keep safe?

You bully people out of space and **** on a tree in the middle of the system. I wouldn't call that "working for and keeping safe". What are you keeping safe? The rats? The asteroids?

Andski wrote:
outpost=industry

See what you did there?

Goons gonna Goon . . .

Ruby Porto wrote:
Wait... you don't realize there's a hard limit of one Outpost per system, do you.

I didn't actually know that. It doesn't actually matter. And, even if it did, take a look at a map of null and tell me how much potential there still is for increasing industrial capacity there.

Ruby Porto wrote:
I asked first. How do you propose to kill a bunch of ships that are cloaked in safe spots? Do you have any experience at all with the mechanics we're talking about?

How do you propose to keep your ratting ship safe with a neutral in system?

What questions do you think would be effective in determining the actual intent of the neutral?

I don't propose you kill a bunch of cloaked ships in safes. It's damn near impossible. It is quite possible, howerever, to kill one or two of them at the infiltration point, prevent them from killing any or at least ALL of your ships, and to hinder their exfiltration and maybe even scan it down and kill the offending blackops. (Unlikely, I admit.)

Which mechanics do you refer to? Safe spots? Covert ops capable ships (and, no, I'm not implying black ops are in that category)? Covert jump portals? Mining security? Combat scanning? Gravimetric sites? Yes. Yes. No. Yes. Yes. Yes, I am distinctly familiar with gravimetric sites. Some are quite large and you don't all mine clustered 10km around 1 asteroid.

I don't propose to keep ratting ships safe with a neutral in system. They're ratting ships. I, personally, write most ships off before I undock them (pod, too), but that doesn't mean they can't serve their purpose before they explode.

I think wondering what someone was doing (and finding out) and understanding why they are doing it is a good start to understanding whether someone has hostile intentions and understanding how to prevent them from fulfilling those hostile intentions.

Ruby Porto wrote:
You still don't know what the term "align time" is. Hint, it's longer than the time it takes for the Sabres to jump in and bubble up.
You do know that the bubble remains up after they die, right? And no dictor pilot worth anything will die to that small number of drones.
So, in the end, you're proposing that Alliances be NRDS so that they can keep fleets of Titans on standby to counter the Titan Drops that being NRDS invites.


Are you still hung up on the concept of force dispersion? It basically means that you don't keep all your eggs in one basket. That way, when someone drops a bubble, there's only 1 or 2 of you in it instead of your whole, poorly defended fleet of expensive mining vessels. And, a couple of sets of drones (mediums might be too big) will pop an interdictor if he wants to stick around. They'll certainly give him something to think about and focus on besides blowing up your Hulk. If nothing else, they might buy you the precious extra seconds you need to clear the bubble, for the bubble to expire, for reinforcements to arrive, for . . . something to go right.

In the end, it is not the policies of the group occupying a space that determines whether things like Titan drops happen. It is whether or not such things go off successfully. Remember. You can walk into any bank and do business peacefully, not because they kill everyone coming through the door, but because of the principle the wise Thunderdick 7 so eloquently sums up in his bio. "you fuk on me i fuk on you motherfuka".

Disclaimer: I am not an associate of Thunderdick 7.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#374 - 2013-01-08 03:18:04 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:

You bully people out of space and **** on a tree in the middle of the system. I wouldn't call that "working for and keeping safe". What are you keeping safe? The rats? The asteroids?


Our friends who use the space?

Also, "bully" is such an odd word for "conquering space in areas specifically designed to be conquerable."

Quote:

I didn't actually know that. It doesn't actually matter. And, even if it did, take a look at a map of null and tell me how much potential there still is for increasing industrial capacity there.


So your answer is to spend ~100k ISK/Slot/HR on POS slots in an attempt to compete with HS's 800 ISK/hr/slot (that's Jita 4-4's cost. Elsewhere is even cheaper). Not to mention the fact that you cannot efficiently build any T2 ships at a POS (all adv ship arrays have a >1 Mat multiplier).

'kay.

Max out those regions with Outposts and you still don't get as many slots as, say, Itamo's 550 Manufacturing Slots. And that's while ignoring the fact that each Outpost costs >50b to deploy and upgrade and that putting up a manufacturing outpost means you're not going to get any significant number of corp offices, or research slots, or even proper refining.

Quote:

I don't propose you kill a bunch of cloaked ships in safes. It's damn near impossible. It is quite possible, howerever, to kill one or two of them at the infiltration point, prevent them from killing any or at least ALL of your ships, and to hinder their exfiltration and maybe even scan it down and kill the offending blackops. (Unlikely, I admit.)

So your suggestion is to use gatecamps to kill the neutral cloakie gang before they can attack your friends. Ladies and gentleman, we have a Winner!

By the way, the "infiltration" point is "the tackled ratter," and the "exfiltration" point is "a safespot where they're cloaked until the cyno's lit and the Blops is ready to jump."

Quote:
I don't propose to keep ratting ships safe with a neutral in system. They're ratting ships. I, personally, write most ships off before I undock them (pod, too), but that doesn't mean they can't serve their purpose before they explode.

I think wondering what someone was doing (and finding out) and understanding why they are doing it is a good start to understanding whether someone has hostile intentions and understanding how to prevent them from fulfilling those hostile intentions.


So your plan for dealing with neutrals in system is to feed them ratter kills in the name of being NRDS. That seems like such a pleasant place for your friends to live in.


Quote:
Are you still hung up on the concept of force dispersion? It basically means that you don't keep all your eggs in one basket. That way, when someone drops a bubble, there's only 1 or 2 of you in it instead of your whole, poorly defended fleet of expensive mining vessels. And, a couple of sets of drones (mediums might be too big) will pop an interdictor if he wants to stick around. They'll certainly give him something to think about and focus on besides blowing up your Hulk. If nothing else, they might buy you the precious extra seconds you need to clear the bubble, for the bubble to expire, for reinforcements to arrive, for . . . something to go right.

In the end, it is not the policies of the group occupying a space that determines whether things like Titan drops happen. It is whether or not such things go off successfully. Remember. You can walk into any bank and do business peacefully, not because they kill everyone coming through the door, but because of the principle the wise Thunderdick 7 so eloquently sums up in his bio. "you fuk on me i fuk on you motherfuka".

Disclaimer: I am not an associate of Thunderdick 7.


An Arazu has a longer point range than an Orca's tractor beam.
The bubble will still be up, the Sabre will be webbing and killing your drones, and those pesky DPS ships will be killing you.
The bubbles last 2 minutes, and have a 15km radius. A hulk is not going to escape before someone lands a proper tackle (probably that Arazu that came in to point your Orca sitting in the distance).
You still don't seem to understand the concepts of "align time" or "tackle."

Being NBSI means that someone has to get an alt into a blue corp/alliance to surprise you with a Hotdrop. Being NRDS means that, since (per your instructions) you are not stopping all economic activity (mining/ratting) while neuts are in system, Joe-random-chucklefuck can surprise you with a hotdrop by spending 3 days on a neutral alt (~2 weeks for a bomber).

Ever notice that virtually every bank has bulletproof glass in front of the teller and an armed guard? Also that RL banks are not the same as internet spaceships (for instance, it is very difficult to "create an alt" in RL).

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Diablo Ex
Nocturne Holdings
#375 - 2013-01-08 03:25:15 UTC
Oh just look at this threadnaught!
Doesn't this clearly illustrate all that is wrong with NBSI sov?
Why Nullsec is void of activity with the exception of bots and afk cloakers?
Why Nullsec alliances shed tears on this forum over how unfair Highsec is and why won't people go to Null?
Just look around.... the problem is the people who live there.
In order for Civilization to progress, at one point or another folks need to start acting Civil.

Diablo Ex Machina - "I'm not here to fix your problem"

Cameron Cahill
Deaths Consortium
Pandemic Horde
#376 - 2013-01-08 03:27:16 UTC
Diablo Ex wrote:

Just look around.... the problem is the people who live there.
In order for Civilization to progress, at one point or another folks need to start acting Civil.


Why don't you come make us bro?

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#377 - 2013-01-08 03:41:35 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
You bully people out of space

That's called "playing the conquerable nullsec game the way it's designed -- by conquering someone else's space". If you're such a sissy you must use loaded words like "bully", then sure.

Sissy.

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
I wouldn't call that "working for and keeping safe". What are you keeping safe? The rats? The asteroids?

Everyone we've set blue.

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
I didn't actually know that. It doesn't actually matter. And, even if it did, take a look at a map of null and tell me how much potential there still is for increasing industrial capacity there.

One system in hisec outperforms a full region.

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
I think wondering what someone was doing (and finding out) and understanding why they are doing it is a good start to understanding whether someone has hostile intentions and understanding how to prevent them from fulfilling those hostile intentions.

If they're anything other than blue, and in my space, they're hostile, 95% of the time. I'm not going to bother spending time pow-wowing with joe random chucklefuck to see if they're hostile or just some idiot taking his first trip outside of hisec "just to look", no matter how blue in the face you get over it.

You want NRDS, you can go to CVA and do a circlejerk over how PR it is. I don't, and nor does the rest of the eve universe either.

Diablo Ex wrote:
Oh just look at this threadnaught!
Doesn't this clearly illustrate all that is wrong with NBSI sov?
Why Nullsec is void of activity with the exception of bots and afk cloakers?
Why Nullsec alliances shed tears on this forum over how unfair Highsec is and why won't people go to Null?
Just look around.... the problem is the people who live there.
In order for Civilization to progress, at one point or another folks need to start acting Civil.

NBSI has nothing to do with it being void of activity, no matter how many times you or your kind repeat this fallacy. It isn't the fault of the people who live there, the complaints about nullsec being outcompeted by hisec isn't unfounded, and we are being civil -- to people who have bothered taking the first step of actually talking to us constructively enough to get blue standings prior to jumping in like a moron.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#378 - 2013-01-08 03:43:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
Diablo Ex wrote:

Why Nullsec is void of activity with the exception of bots and afk cloakers?
Why Nullsec alliances shed tears on this forum over how unfair Highsec is and why won't people go to Null?
Just look around.... the problem is the people who live there.
In order for Civilization to progress, at one point or another folks need to start acting Civil.

1) Nullsec is the source for the heavy majority of PvP and activity in the game. More then highsec and wormholes combined.
2) Only tear shedding I see here is coming from you.
3) Any argument that NRDS is valid got throughly owned by the first reply in this thread.
Skydell
Bad Girl Posse
#379 - 2013-01-08 04:03:20 UTC
The trouble with the whole NBSI vs NRDS is, you are both right and you are both wrong.

If Null was a place beyond high sec that fit in to a single defined box, you could make an argument for one or the other. It isn't like that in Null though.

Provi has some things going for it. It is close to High Sec, it has what the average HS player is looking for in Null. It has through the hard work of CVA and her various blues built a large network of outposts. It benefits from NRDS.

Deklein doesn't need that Outpost income. Deklein doesn't sit on the porch of High Sec, Deklein should never be NRDS. Deklein works as NBSI. It is a T2 powerhouse, making it a military gold mine. To be treated like an area 51 of EVE. Nobody is going to Dekelin to make a little easy ISK for som random pew pew. You can do that anywhere.

Both have their game value. With EVE it is also about supply and demand. The demand for NRDS space is there. The supply is not. I'm just not sure how someone like Goons could make for example, MO NRDS and Deklein NBSI. In ideal EVE that is how they would have it.
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#380 - 2013-01-08 04:04:43 UTC
Skydell wrote:

Provi has some things going for it. It is close to High Sec, it has what the average HS player is looking for in Null. It has through the hard work of CVA and her various blues built a large network of outposts. It benefits from NRDS.
How?