These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

NBSI Nullsec = Fail

First post
Author
Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#341 - 2013-01-07 10:03:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Vera Algaert
NRDS and NBSI are asymptotically equal.

NRDS alliances tend to create massive red lists (aiming to include every entity that is not confirmed to practice NRDS) and often have rules that allow them to engage "suspicious" neutrals (i.e. any neutral not in an industrial or mining ship) if they want to.

Meanwhile NBSI alliances continue to expand their blue lists and are usually too lazy to chase after single neutrals anyways.

The ideological difference may be huge but the practical difference is much, much smaller.

.

Danny John-Peter
The Congregation
RAPID HEAVY ROPERS
#342 - 2013-01-07 10:09:27 UTC
Vera Algaert wrote:
NRDS and NBSI are asymptotically equal.

NRDS alliances tend to create massive red lists (aiming to included every entity that is not confirmed to practice NRDS) and often have rules that allow them to engage "suspicious" neutrals (i.e. any neutral not in an industrial or mining ship) if they want to.

Meanwhile NBSI alliances continue to expand their blue lists (and are usually too lazy to chase after single neutrals anyways).

The ideological difference may be huge but the practical difference is much smaller.


Gonna chime into this thread a little late to the party.

I can confirm some truth to this, CVA had some 2500 reds and around 100 Blues (Light/Dark Combined) when I left, the most effect NRDS actually has is on NPC corp and small individual corps, they are free to rat and go about their business, for them, it makes a huge difference, for larger entities who have outgrown the need for a protectorate state such as CVA and its blues its less significant, although it does produce some excellent places to roam.

NRDS is a pain, as somebody who used to help with the governance of the system I am acutely aware of the fact, I also think its a nice ideology to live by, and it may well be worth the effort.
Mayhaw Morgan
State War Academy
Caldari State
#343 - 2013-01-07 11:06:11 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
No, the people who are excluded from nullsec due to NBSI are the exact opposite of those who "could contribute greatly". They are parasites at best (compete with defenders for resources) and menaces at worst (spies, pirates).


NBSI excludes everyone who isn't blue, so, you are saying everyone you don't have set to blue is a parasite and potential menace. Am I hearing that right?
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#344 - 2013-01-07 11:08:49 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
No, the people who are excluded from nullsec due to NBSI are the exact opposite of those who "could contribute greatly". They are parasites at best (compete with defenders for resources) and menaces at worst (spies, pirates).


NBSI excludes everyone who isn't blue, so, you are saying everyone you don't have set to blue is a parasite and potential menace. Am I hearing that right?

There does exist this concept of "talking to someone's diplos" before derping into their space like joe random.

Please do not evade the word filter. Thank you. -ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#345 - 2013-01-07 13:35:51 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Who said the neut was contributing nothing? Wasn't the point of this conversation that people who could contribute greatly to null sec are excluded from it due to NBSI?
No, the people who are excluded from nullsec due to NBSI are the exact opposite of those who "could contribute greatly". They are parasites at best (compete with defenders for resources) and menaces at worst (spies, pirates). Thus, NRDS obeying alliances will always continue to lose to alliances using NBSI engagement policy.
That was the point of this conversation.


But but, don't you know that is people wouldn't be mean to other players and not camp all the entrances to nullsec 24/7, that would fix all of null sec problems!
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#346 - 2013-01-07 14:24:13 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
Lord Zim wrote:
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
No, the people who are excluded from nullsec due to NBSI are the exact opposite of those who "could contribute greatly". They are parasites at best (compete with defenders for resources) and menaces at worst (spies, pirates).


NBSI excludes everyone who isn't blue, so, you are saying everyone you don't have set to blue is a parasite and potential menace. Am I hearing that right?

There does exist this concept of "talking to someone's diplos" before derping into their space like joe random.

Please do not evade the word filter. Thank you. -ISD Dorrim Barstorlode


See this is where the long time hi-sec player mentality comes in to play. He deserves to have free, unrestricted access to all the facilities and resources. He's entitled to consume as much of your resources as he likes and contribute as little to maintaining and increasing them as he likes. You owe him that consideration. You should be grateful that he condescends to honour your space with his presence.

And that mentality isn't even wrong, just out of place. To the long time hi-sec player, that's not being selfish or lazy or antisocial or entitled, because in hi-sec all of those things are absolutely true. You do get free access. You can mine, mission and trade as much as you like. You don't have to lift a finger to contribute. Then the hi-seccer tries to apply that NPC space mentality to space owned and developed by other players, and a mindset which works effectively and is appropriate in hi-sec, to life in 0.0 where it fails utterly and is entirely inappropriate.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#347 - 2013-01-07 14:35:31 UTC
NRDS works fine so long as the corp and alliance management properly sets statuses on a regular basis.

NRDS will leave you with a lot more reds than blues and neutrals but also gives the benefit of the doubt to the neutrals travelling through space. The moment they make an act of aggression, they are red flagged by the alliance or corp and are no longer welcome in that space. This adds a little more danger and unknown to watching neutrals in local but it allows those neutrals to travel in said space as well as transport goods and sell which improves the economy in the region.

NBSI works exactly the opposite. Since you don't really have to worry about not shooting the neutrals then you end up with less reds to manage for the alliance and corps but this also means that most people don't want to come into your space unless they are looking for a fight and nobody is going to bother trying to sell in your space so your economy in that region suffers.

It all comes down to the mindset of the people in that region. Frankly I like the way CVA manages their space...I just don't like dealing with all the RP crap they are known for.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#348 - 2013-01-07 14:37:33 UTC
The economy in our region is healthy as a horse. vOv

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#349 - 2013-01-07 14:51:47 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
NRDS works fine so long as the corp and alliance management properly sets statuses on a regular basis.

NRDS will leave you with a lot more reds than blues and neutrals but also gives the benefit of the doubt to the neutrals travelling through space. The moment they make an act of aggression, they are red flagged by the alliance or corp and are no longer welcome in that space. This adds a little more danger and unknown to watching neutrals in local but it allows those neutrals to travel in said space as well as transport goods and sell which improves the economy in the region.

NBSI works exactly the opposite. Since you don't really have to worry about not shooting the neutrals then you end up with less reds to manage for the alliance and corps but this also means that most people don't want to come into your space unless they are looking for a fight and nobody is going to bother trying to sell in your space so your economy in that region suffers.

It all comes down to the mindset of the people in that region. Frankly I like the way CVA manages their space...I just don't like dealing with all the RP crap they are known for.


When the facilities in sov 0.0 are already so restricted that most of us station our alts in hi-sec, what's the point in trying to entice strangers (and their attendant security issues) in to use the already cripplingly limited station resources?

The "local economy" consists of goods jump freightered up from hi-sec and often sold directly via alliance contract rather than indirectly via the market, plus locally produced ratting ammo & cap boosters, plus PvP loot put on the market, plus firesaled equipment from people who are leaving the area.

What we want for our "local economy" is for our outposts to have the kind of facilities that free, invulnerable NPC stations have so that we can run our local economy for our own benefit rather than importing 95% of it. We already don't need other people coming in from outside, either from a demand or a supply perspective; we just need the manufacturing lines, the minerals, the research lines and so on for our own people.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#350 - 2013-01-07 14:57:54 UTC
"You just want hisec in nullsec! Lazypants!"

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#351 - 2013-01-07 15:00:25 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
"You just want hisec in nullsec! Lazypants!"



Oops

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#352 - 2013-01-07 15:38:11 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
OMG! If only there was some way for the valiant defenders of null sec to acquire such technology, then they could bridge their own fleet in and give the invaders a stern talking to . . . oh, but, wait. There's so many invaders. The poor null seccers would need some "friends".


Let me ask you again. When was the last time you successfully counter-dropped a BLOPs gang ganking a ratter?

Quote:

If your friend died to a neut he knew was in system, he messed up. If a neut killed your friend and got away with it, you messed up. If this keeps happening, your alliance needs to put out a pamphlet or something. Your response seems to be, "Awwww, that Vagabond killed my buddy. I'd better shoot some Velators."


So now NRDS is assume all neutrals are hostile but don't do anything about them? Why should someone allow neutrals free run of their space AND insist that friendlies dock up to get out of the neutrals way?

If you're going to assume all neutrals are hostile, why not just be NBSI?

Quote:
War decs = honorable space duels? And, yeah, it's probably easy to evade a war dec if you have a bunch of alts. You consider that winning. I consider it a defeat. In any event, I wonder when the last time was that you visited high sec, since you seem to think that all high sec PVP is space duels. I'm thinking it's been a while.

As for ratting in your CNR while unfamiliar people are in local, yeah, don't do that. Security, risk mitigation, loss mitigation, these seem to be foreign concepts to you, probably because you're used to going "It's blue. It's safe." or "It's not blue. OMG, it's not blue!!!" Instead of doing that, I just use common sense.


Since they're entirely consensual, yes. Wardecs are honorablespacduels. Winning in a HS wardec is costing your enemy more ISK than they cost you. A wardec fee costs 50+m. Making a new corp costs 15m.

So do we. Common sense says that we try to exclude people we do not trust from our space. You're suggesting that we stop doing that and that we stop all economic activity while these Neuts who you want us to give free reign to buzz around.

Quote:
1. Your friends were gonna mine all that veldspar? And, who is this perpetual menace to your space? Who said the neut was contributing nothing? Wasn't the point of this conversation that people who could contribute greatly to null sec are excluded from it due to NBSI? And, how does leaving someone alone equate to your benefiting him in some way?
2. Do you realize it says the name of all the killers, their ship types, and their corporations right on the killmail? Are you familiar with the term "retribution"?
3. Maybe you should petition CCP for locks on the stargates, since you're so offended by people flying through and in "YOUR" systems.
4. Incompetent people die. Even competent people die, sometimes. Good job killing noobs and baddies. I don't know what bearing that has on this discussion.
5. Cool.
6. I have, actually.


1. You already said my friends should dock up when neuts are in system, so that venture mining Veld is competing by entirely shutting down my friends mining operation.
2. Are you familiar with the term "Alt" or the term "Nullified T3"?
3. Why should Sov holders not consider their Space Empires "theirs" and defend it from intruders?
4. NRDS is a sign of incomptetence on an organizational level, because it actively prevents your allies from securing their space.
6. Doesn't seem like it.

Quote:
Let me tell you about my experience. My experience tells me that all of those Hulks were in the same belt, when they should have been dispersed. It tells me that those Orcas were too close to the rest of the fleet. It tells me that multiboxing a bunch of expensive and defenseless ships in null sec with corpies you barely know is not a good idea. It tells me the fleet commander didn't warp the fleet as soon as the cyno was lit. It tells me that a Rifter and two bombers aren't enough to defend such a fleet. It tells me to check to see how many of the miners still had their drones their bay . . . yep, most of them. They didn't even fight back. It tells me that NBSI fails miserably, and this is a perfect example. At least if they were NRDS, they wouldn't have been under the illusion that they were safe.

Have I ever chased a black ops? No. They're rare and expensive. I don't think I've ever engaged or been engaged by one. But, how many of us have?


Let me tell you what that paragraph tells me.
You don't know how a worthwhile mining OP operates.
You don't know how Cloaking works, and how long it takes for a stealth bomber to point something.
You don't know what "align time" is.
You don't know what a "dictor bubble" is.
You think that a Hulk's drones are an effective defense against Titans.

Most people in null have been engaged by a BLOPS drop or been on a BLOPS drop. They're dead common. (Hint: The BLOPS often doesn't take part in the fight, they jump in after it's done and bridge everyone home.)

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#353 - 2013-01-07 15:40:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
No, the people who are excluded from nullsec due to NBSI are the exact opposite of those who "could contribute greatly". They are parasites at best (compete with defenders for resources) and menaces at worst (spies, pirates).


NBSI excludes everyone who isn't blue, so, you are saying everyone you don't have set to blue is a parasite and potential menace. Am I hearing that right?

Yes. Feel free to list some examples where this wouldn't be the case if you disagree.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#354 - 2013-01-07 15:43:51 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
No, the people who are excluded from nullsec due to NBSI are the exact opposite of those who "could contribute greatly". They are parasites at best (compete with defenders for resources) and menaces at worst (spies, pirates).


NBSI excludes everyone who isn't blue, so, you are saying everyone you don't have set to blue is a parasite and potential menace. Am I hearing that right?


If they're in my space, yes.

What do you think they contribute when they're in my space?
It's not taxes on Ore or Rat Bounties.
It's not numbers for fleets.

You already admitted that you think all Neutrals are potential menaces, by insisting that Ratters should be docked up when there's a neut in local even under NRDS.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#355 - 2013-01-07 16:34:00 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
No, the people who are excluded from nullsec due to NBSI are the exact opposite of those who "could contribute greatly". They are parasites at best (compete with defenders for resources) and menaces at worst (spies, pirates).


NBSI excludes everyone who isn't blue, so, you are saying everyone you don't have set to blue is a parasite and potential menace. Am I hearing that right?


If they're in my space, yes.

What do you think they contribute when they're in my space?
It's not taxes on Ore or Rat Bounties.
It's not numbers for fleets.

You already admitted that you think all Neutrals are potential menaces, by insisting that Ratters should be docked up when there's a neut in local even under NRDS.

but docking fees, market tax, reprocessing tax, ... they will create a vibrant 0.0 hub and make the alliance owning the outpost rich!

.

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#356 - 2013-01-07 18:18:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
Vera Algaert wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
No, the people who are excluded from nullsec due to NBSI are the exact opposite of those who "could contribute greatly". They are parasites at best (compete with defenders for resources) and menaces at worst (spies, pirates).


NBSI excludes everyone who isn't blue, so, you are saying everyone you don't have set to blue is a parasite and potential menace. Am I hearing that right?


If they're in my space, yes.

What do you think they contribute when they're in my space?
It's not taxes on Ore or Rat Bounties.
It's not numbers for fleets.

You already admitted that you think all Neutrals are potential menaces, by insisting that Ratters should be docked up when there's a neut in local even under NRDS.

but docking fees, market tax, reprocessing tax, ... they will create a vibrant 0.0 hub and make the alliance owning the outpost rich!

We get richer when neutrals aren't hunting us while we're trying to earn ISK.

Docking fees are peanuts compared to the stuff we actually have at stake. Oh, and did you mention market taxes and reprocessing taxes?

You don't have to dock to use the market. And nullsec corps who are NBSI already get their spoils of the minerals mined by miners kept safe by NBSI policies and enforcement.

NRDS is clearly inferior. Just ask the null-sec miners.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#357 - 2013-01-07 18:21:53 UTC
Vera Algaert wrote:
but docking fees, market tax, reprocessing tax, ... they will create a vibrant 0.0 hub and make the alliance owning the outpost rich!


Yep. Which is why the ISS (first people to build a public outpost) are all rich and running a vibrant NRDS commune in Catch today.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#358 - 2013-01-07 18:32:41 UTC
exposure to nrds advocates may result in loss of ability to sense sarcasm, please consult a posting physician before reading an EVE GD thread on 0.0
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#359 - 2013-01-07 18:56:46 UTC
While the refining tax note was obviously made in jest, it's another reason why NRDS is dumb as hell: your "guest" miners would, under your protection, haul the ore they mined in your space to empire to refine and evade your taxes.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Mayhaw Morgan
State War Academy
Caldari State
#360 - 2013-01-07 23:40:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Mayhaw Morgan
Malcanis wrote:
See this is where the long time hi-sec player mentality comes in to play . . . He's entitled . . .

Lord Zim wrote:
The economy in OUR REGION is healthy . . .

Malcanis wrote:
What WE WANT for OUR "local economy" is for our outposts . . .

Ruby Porto wrote:
Common sense says that we try to exclude people we do not trust from OUR SPACE.

Ruby Porto wrote:
If they're in MY SPACE, yes.

What do you think they contribute when they're in MY SPACE?


Entitled, you say?