These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

James315 isnt going far enough

First post First post
Author
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#141 - 2013-01-09 14:46:18 UTC
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
And why is it disgusting, mainly because those people actually fitted some plug ins, while on the other hand you are only using shell toons with no plug ins. That is mostly why. Cry

How are implants different from mods?

Besides, most Knights do have cheap damage-boosting implants.
Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#142 - 2013-01-09 15:48:57 UTC
Zol Interbottom wrote:

i started playing like 3 months ago dude, i am not responsible for the tears of carebares unable to accept what EVE is


Just because you're late to the party doesn't mean you're not at it. You think that every new whiner has a right to a new nerf to assholes just for them?
Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#143 - 2013-01-09 16:12:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Alana Charen-Teng
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
But what would the point be then of even paying that small fee if another merc group showed up backed up by the "resistance"

The problem seems to be that every opponent of the New Order, despite their sabre rattling, desperately wants someone else to do the heavy lifting in shooting us, hiring mercs against us, or generally interfering with us. Nobody seems willing to spend the time and ISK to do it themselves.

Eyana Starstruck wrote:
You blow up 200m+ worth of miners with a couple of ships that cost what, around 2-3m each? I guess that is pretty profitable especially after reading that New order killed around 70bil in miner ships and modules?

You can't blame us for trying to get the most out of our investments. Shareholders demand results - and we intend to deliver! By my count, we've reached on the order of 135 billion destroyed since this project began in early December. As for profitability - we generally don't go out of our way to loot+salvage wrecks. I haven't done the calculations on expected returns for a gank, but one should consider the probability of receiving Tech2 salvage from exhumer wrecks. Still, killing the occasional deadspace-fitted miner is always nice.

Eyana Starstruck wrote:

Maybe you should put in some time into protecting or at least educating miners or even giving them loans with no interest to equip them with, as one person suggested skiffs, which can have more than 100k ehp, which will prevent them from being ganged quite a lot from small fleets which will be destroyed well before any considerable damage is done to them, especially if they have a logistic ship, even t1 will do probably.

We are more than happy to educate miners in gank defense and bump avoidance, but so few of them seem willing to learn - even after our demonstrations. Remember, purchasing a permit entitles you to a year of mining *and* evening classes in Highsec Miner Safety!
A miner has to make his own decision on whether to trade in his Mackinaw for a Skiff.

Eyana Starstruck wrote:
Plus what I have seen and that is really despicable that you pop their capsules as well, which is really disgusting.

Again - discerning investors demand results! We are proud to deliver in two ways:
1) ISK destroyed through podkills
2) Miner outrage resulting from podkills
We make an effort to get podkills whenever we can - ultimately, the miner determines whether or not we're successful.
Karrl Tian
Doomheim
#144 - 2013-01-09 16:49:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Karrl Tian
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
But what would the point be then of even paying that small fee if another merc group showed up backed up by the "resistance"

The problem seems to be that every opponent of the New Order, despite their sabre rattling, desperately wants someone else to do the heavy lifting in shooting us, hiring mercs against us, or generally interfering with us. Nobody seems willing to spend the time and ISK to do it themselves.



So far that's proven to be the most effective way to deal with "Internet sociopaths disrupting my playstyle."

To recap, these are people who:

1)Didn't tank hulks or align out when they were gettiing ganked.
2)Didn't use GSCs or friends/alts in haulers/pvp ships when they were getting canflipped.
3)Didn't run background checks on people who joined their all-indy-no-pvp corps.
4) Couldn't be bothered to put a few SP into T1 ships so their 50-man corp could zerg a 3-man dec corp.

So what did they do? Cried foul to CCP. And what did CCP do? Reward them.

Enjoy your bumpage while it lasts.
Eyana Starstruck
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#145 - 2013-01-09 16:52:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Eyana Starstruck
Well in a way they are, they are spending their own time to earn the isk which they spend to pay for the mercenaries.

"Shareholders demand results - and we intend to deliver!" that there sounds to me that you are nothing of the divine cleansing of high sec and lead by the general idea of making high sec better, but just working for some industrialists that are cashing in with their own bot miners because of the void created by this project of "yours", so you are no better than some mercenaries hired to do the same thing to the miners you "protect".

So what you are saying is basically they can continue doing what they were doing just as long as they pay those 10mil per miner he/she is using. By doing just that you are not changing anything.

Now you are going to say they need to follow the Code, in which it states among other things they should not mine excessively, what exactly is excessive mining and who adjusts the bar, is it James or Mittani, who says has more money than people can imagine?

They can not go afk and have to remain by their keyboards all the time, how do you keep track on that, by random drop ins, pft he can say he was helping his disabled mother or father get up or making dinner for his/her kids and you would swallow it and reimburse them double, or that one time you pointed out with screenshots was a staged event which would not at all surprise me, while the reality is that he didn't change a thing and is still at afk mining and botting as he/she was before paying those miserable 10mil to get you of his/hers back.

Some education that is, you give them some pointers on how to avoid bumping and gank defense. They haven't changed a thing and deep down you know it as well, people that have been boting and afk mining for a long time wont change over night unless you force them to with tighter regulations and more check ups. The bottom line is you do not care that much about if they learn or not, now do you?

And again with the "main thing is that your shareholders are satisfied". As I said, so much for your goal of purging high sec of bots and afk miners for the sake of high sec eve growing to be a better place and I soooo wanted to believe in your cause and I still do but so far you are not making any valid arguments that what you are doing being honorable or even that you are doing it cause YOU as INDIVIDUALS think it is right thing to do.
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#146 - 2013-01-09 16:59:12 UTC
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
Well in a way they are, they are spending their own time to earn the isk which they spend to pay for the mercenaries.

"Shareholders demand results - and we intend to deliver!" that there sounds to me that you are nothing of the divine cleansing of high sec and lead by the general idea of making high sec better, but just working for some industrialists that are cashing in with their own bot miners because of the void created by this project of "yours", so you are no better than some mercenaries hired to do the same thing to the miners you "protect".

So what you are saying is basically they can continue doing what they were doing just they need to pay those 10mil per miner he/she is using. By doing just that you are not changing anything.

Now you are going to say they need to follow the Code, in which it states among other things they should not mine excessively, what exactly is excessive mining and who adjusts the bar, is it James or Mittani who says has more money than people can imagine?

They can not go afk and have to remain by their keyboards all the time, how do you keep track on that, by random drop ins, pft he can say he was helping his disabled mother or father get up or making dinner for his/her kids and you would swallow it and reimburse them double, or that one time you pointed out with screenshots was a staged event which would not at all surprise me, while the reality is that he didn't change a thing and is still at afk mining and botting as he/she was before paying those miserable 10mil to get you of his/hers back.

Some education that is, you give them some pointers on how to avoid bumping and gank defense. They haven't changed a thing and deep down you know it as well, people that have been boting and afk mining for a long time wont change over night unless you force them to with tighter regulations and more check ups. The bottom line is you do not care that much about if they learn or not, now do?

And again with the "main thing is that your shareholders are satisfied". As I said, so much for your goal of purging high sec of bots and afk miners for the sake of high sec eve growing to be a better place and I soooo wanted to believe in your cause and I still do but so far you are not making any valid arguments that what you are doing being honorable or even that you are doing it cause YOU as INDIVIDUALS think it is right thing to do.


Wow... My head is spinning.
SB Rico
Sumo Wrestlers
#147 - 2013-01-09 17:15:08 UTC
Who are these people who feel they should dictate how other people spend their money and free time.

The miners should stop whining this lot should stop boasting.

I mean the rest of us don't come round to your house and tell you sitting in the basement downloading Hannah Montana pictures is a bad thing do we?

Scammers are currently selling killrights on this toon for up to 5mil, if you have paid for this service demand your money back at once.

Killing me should be for free.

Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#148 - 2013-01-09 17:39:58 UTC
SB Rico wrote:
Who are these people who feel they should dictate how other people spend their money and free time.

The miners should stop whining this lot should stop boasting.

I mean the rest of us don't come round to your house and tell you sitting in the basement downloading Hannah Montana pictures is a bad thing do we?

That comparison hardly applies in this case.

AFK mining is far worse than paedophilia.
Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune
#149 - 2013-01-09 18:19:33 UTC
Isn't miner bumping in any form not to be discussed?

Requesting lock Smile
Capt Starfox
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#150 - 2013-01-09 18:28:05 UTC
IBTL ..again

Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#151 - 2013-01-09 19:30:25 UTC
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
But what would the point be then of even paying that small fee if another merc group showed up backed up by the "resistance", you have put it plain and simple in your threads, you blow up 200m+ worth of miners with a couple of ships that cost what, around 2-3m each? I guess that is pretty profitable especially after reading that New order killed around 70bil in miner ships and modules? That is very profitable. Another thing is that they don't even have to bump the miners that have swore allegiance, they can just come into a sector, find out who has your "bumpersticker" and attack them.

Maybe you should put in some time into protecting or at least educating miners, or even giving them loans with no interest to equip them with, as one person suggested skiffs, which can have more than 100k ehp, which will prevent them from being ganged quite a lot from small fleets which will be destroyed well before any considerable damage is done to them, especially if they have a logistic ship, even t1 will do probably.

You could teach them how to avoid bumping, maybe pay that dude that messed you up with his tactics, those are his claims or at least what he wrote, and ask him to teach you those skills, which you can later on pass to your miner followers.

If the word about you doing this spreads you can become much better known corp and your reputation would be on the good and honorable to many more people, hell you could one day even control the prices if you managed to pull in high % of high sec miners.

But this way if you are only extorting them to give you those 10mil a year and get nothing in return but "safety" from only New order agents and knights, well what a poor Order you are and there is nothing honorable or "divine" in what you are doing.



What if. I like that. Here's a what if.... What if those other merc groups showed up and blew you up anyways? You'd lose 2 ships instead of 1 + 10mil I guess.

It's your choice to pay or not. But you can't say you haven't been warned.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#152 - 2013-01-09 19:38:04 UTC
Unit CA108AF wrote:
Isn't miner bumping in any form not to be discussed?

Requesting lock Smile


Ganking, however, has not been clarified. We are talkign about ganking, and podkills.

And how disgusting it is.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Eyana Starstruck
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#153 - 2013-01-09 19:42:29 UTC
Wait a sec, wouldn't that miner be losing 2 ships and those 10 mil if another merc group besides New order came up and shot him, presuming that miner payed those 10 mil after being shot down by New order and after that paying 10mil? Big smile
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#154 - 2013-01-09 20:43:44 UTC
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
Wait a sec, wouldn't that miner be losing 2 ships and those 10 mil if another merc group besides New order came up and shot him, presuming that miner payed those 10 mil after being shot down by New order and after that paying 10mil? Big smile



The assumption would be, that prior or post bump, the miner would pay the indulgence, update bio, and not be bumped or ganked again. So we are assuming the only lost ship would be from aforementioned merc group as we assume all miners are Code compliant, or wish to be, with minimal resistance and open arms.

Some people, regrettably, need a lesson and/or reminder.

10mil doesn't guarantee you anything, since you can easily forfeit your indulgence. It's all about player responsibility you see, not acceptance and manipulation of society's value of "because I can". It does however, grant you leniency on behalf of The Code.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
#155 - 2013-01-10 00:16:51 UTC
Unit CA108AF wrote:
Isn't miner bumping in any form not to be discussed?

Requesting lock Smile



I didnt know that.

Why is it not able to be discussed?
Zol Interbottom
Blimp Requisition Services
#156 - 2013-01-10 00:30:19 UTC
Unit CA108AF wrote:
Isn't miner bumping in any form not to be discussed?

Requesting lock Smile


welcome to crime and punishment

"If you're quitting for the 3rd time you clearly ain't quitting" - Chribba

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
#157 - 2013-01-10 00:42:56 UTC
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
Yes of course it is not but then again if you destroyed 100bil worth of ships and modules lets say, now this is totally a guess based on no knowledge on how the system when you destroy ships works and how modules drop and so on, even if you get 10% of that you would still be in a big plus, meaning if you have a crew of 5 you would have 2bil each which is lets be honest quite a lot, and this is all based on assumption that you get only 10%. Am I not right?

Not to mention that James has 45bil in his wallet, shown in one of his screenshots.

James' money doesn't come from ganking, I can assure you of that much.

Here's a typical New Order Mackinaw kill. Total loss was 202 million ISK. Total module drop was three million ISK. That's about 1.5% drop, which would mean that 150 million ISK had been dropped from our 100 billion in damages, and if you spread that out among the Knights who participate, it comes to maybe 3 million each. And then you have to account for the cost of our Catalysts, which can range from 2 million to 15 million, depending on the fit.

No, ganking is no longer profitable.


Well I have randomly researched couple of your fleet members in these kills and from what I saw most of your fits are around 2.3mil and miner kills range from 1 mil to around 18mil, the lowest and highest I happen to come across with a very random and not at all thorough research of kills made by some of your fleet members. Now some of them do use more expensive fits but that usually is when you are going to fight some miners that actually did stand up and got into some ships that can strike back, and those are around 17mil only because there are t2 guns and ammo fitted but I really doubt even then you use these fits to a large degree.

So in conclusion you use 2.3mil fit in general and lets say an average of 8mil per miner killed but then again the real average could be higher, not to mention in the beginnings or when you happen to run up against a bling miner ship that has deadspace and money invested in his mining barge which could be a drop worth for 100 of your ship fits. Still you are getting 3 fitted ships for 1 miner barge giving that we take into account the 8mil drop price of modules and other things that happen to drop from the destroyed miner.

Plus what I have seen and that is really despicable that you pop their capsules as well, which is really disgusting.


Just to be clear - I do not take part in this and if I ever did I would not hide behind NPC corps like the pussies currently doing it NEED to.
You really need to question their abilities when it's miners they hide in NPC corps from.

But you also need to consider that eve is a sandbox and not all players have the skill to pvp against ships that shoot back.
So this is their only way of entertaining themselves in eve without losing ships all the time.

But that said - Whats wrong with them popping the capsule?
They explode just like ships. If it's undocked - it can and at some point will explode.

+ Pods align and warp extremely fast so unless you really are an afk miner - It shouldn't happen.
You can also have an alt in fast lock griffin in belt - it will have a good chance of saving your ships after they shoot (not if an alpha strike) and get you the kill mails against the gankers - turning them into the victim.

Then join their public channel and link the killmails to them for lolz.
You can even ecm them before they attack and keep recycling the griffin alt. That way concord will be at the belt when they arrive for the gank.
Hint - keep your ship right next to concord or over 150km away. Never inbetween the two distances.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#158 - 2013-01-10 00:47:35 UTC
IbanezLaney wrote:


Just to be clear - I do not take part in this and if I ever did I would not hide behind NPC corps like the pussies currently doing it NEED to.
You really need to question their abilities when it's miners they hide in NPC corps from.



They're not, unlike some of the miners.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Mike Adoulin
Happys Happy Hamster Hunting Club
#159 - 2013-01-10 01:14:52 UTC
*looks up*

Jesus wept.

I see the usual assortment of whining idiots are crying about The New Order again.

Attention whining idiots:

This is EVE.

If someone comes along and violences your shiny boat, you have no cause to cry, because THIS IS EVE.

Highsec does not mean Safesec.

THERE IS NO SAFE SEC.

James and his merry band pop the lazy, stupid, and AFK. This is a Good Thing, and provides much entertainmant for the rest of us.

No one cares if you are 'disabled', 'mentally challenged', had your fingers cut off in a bizarre pizza accident, or any other lame-ass excuse most morons whip out to 'explain' why they are AFK.

NO ONE CARES.

THIS IS EVE AND NO ONE CARES.

If you can't grasp that simple fact, that James and his crew can roll in, pop every shiny boat they see for the lulz, and then roll out, AND ITS PART OF THE GAME, then I suggest you leave.

Now.

Biomass your toon, sell your crap/can i haz ur stuff?, and go play Star Trek Online.

Yes, yes, EVE is dying, there's the door, bye bye.

And stay out, you freaks.

Ugh

Everything in EVE is a trap.

And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)

You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.

Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.

Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#160 - 2013-01-10 03:15:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Alana Charen-Teng
IbanezLaney wrote:

Hint - keep your [mining ship] right next to concord or over 150km away. Never inbetween the two distances.


Any distance between 0 and 150 km works equally well. Any distance greater than 150 km is beyond CONCORD's immediate protection. Tune in to New Order Radio for more free tips on protecting your mining barge!