These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

"The fire-eyed maid of smoky war"

Author
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#21 - 2012-12-30 02:28:32 UTC
Misha M'Liena wrote:
You compared my solution to a single planet to a conflict involving hundreds of planets? And here i thought i was the crazy. Would your solution work. If given a chance probaly not. But i't'd be fun to watch and place bets who shoots first.

Now Mr Pieter Tuulinen, back to my solution. It is a start of trying to solve the differences. It would be a competition of sorts. Ok you say that the average citizen doesn't want splendor and excellant living conditions. That they want to live in squalor and dorm housing. I think your off your meds but you might be right. *Coughs-bs-Coughs* Sorry something in my throat.

So find something that you can build to rival what the Gallente build.


Unless of course your saying that you can't.

Misha.


Ah, my mistake. I thought you were interested in actually discussing the situation, but now I see you only want me to be horrified at your terribly edgy persona. Consider me duly horrified, if it pleases you, in the meantime your people have sufficient issues of their own devising to solve that you oughtn't to waste your time in this thread.

Bioweapons. Oh my, what a dynamic free spirit you possess!

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#22 - 2012-12-30 02:38:06 UTC
Mal'achi wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:
What I, one man, but perhaps representative of some part of the Federal citizenry needs is simple trust.

We need to be able to trust you and you need to be able to trust us. Trust I think that this is where we need to start and what we need to build. Trust.

I am new and weak so I will be ignored. But you are looking for something that isn't there. A Caldari that can be trusted. The Federation gave me allot of chances. But life is too easy there. So you forget the hard lessons of life. What I learned in the Republic is that enemies have to be beaten. The Caldari started this war a long time ago with an act of sneaking duplicity. What you purpose to give them is victory. They have shown you the way. If you want something its fine to take it, if you can.


What you should have learned from the Republic is that you do what you need to do to secure the needs of your people. That a treaty signed under duress is no sort of treaty at all and that powerful masters can be defied by weaker servants if the cost of the struggle is raised beyond the Master's wish to pay that cost.

There are direct parallels between the State's situation and the Republic's, if you but had the wit to appreciate them.

Now watch and see if we can teach you the ultimate lesson - how to achieve acceptable goals, make peace with our former enemy and grant our people peace and prosperity.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Mal'achi
#23 - 2012-12-30 03:32:13 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:


There are direct parallels between the State's situation and the Republic's, if you but had the wit to appreciate them.

New, but not stupid. When the Gallente came to Caldari the first time did they come to make war or enslave your people? Did they force you to do anything? No, you wisely snapped at the promise of superior technology. Did they force you to settle colonies behind their back and against the very laws you agreed to support, for no other reason than corporate greed? When they blockaded your planet for what a week, did they force you to use terror against Nouvelle Rouvenor? How many people died that day. Sell your lies to someone else. In this war no one is clean true, but make no mistake you Caldari started it. So you want to talk about pparallels what parallels?
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#24 - 2012-12-30 03:51:55 UTC
Mal'achi wrote:
New, but not stupid.


We'll see.

Mal'achi wrote:

1. When the Gallente came to Caldari the first time did they come to make war or enslave your people? Did they force you to do anything? No, you wisely snapped at the promise of superior technology.
2. Did they force you to settle colonies behind their back and against the very laws you agreed to support, for no other reason than corporate greed?
3. When they blockaded your planet for what a week, did they force you to use terror against Nouvelle Rouvenor? How many people died that day.


1. They came to do neither, I hope - but membership within the Federation eventually came to mean a subservient position and one we were unwilling to accept.

2. Was this really such a big issue? No. Witholding the resources those colonies produced was the issue. It was about money. How many people get executed for fraud?

3. And will you sneer at the orbital bombardment that followed? Regardless, the Federation punished the population of the whole planet for the actions of a few extremist madmen. And then they killed hundreds of thousands. Because we defied them.

Mal'achi wrote:
Sell your lies to someone else. In this war no one is clean true, but make no mistake you Caldari started it. So you want to talk about pparallels what parallels?


The parallels of a stronger faction attempting to impose it's will on a weaker. The parallel of a hastily assembled ad hoc military fighting back against one of the strongest navies in New Eden using converted civilian craft. The parallel of lives sacrificed to win freedom.

Lies? Stop beleiving the propaganda you suckled at your Gallente teat along with all the economic and military aid.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#25 - 2012-12-30 04:50:59 UTC  |  Edited by: James Syagrius
Mal'achi wrote:
What you purpose to give them is victory.

Msr. Mal'achi.

I know and love our Federal Union, even the parts of it that don't love us back. ~smirks just a bit~ I know its flaws and its glories.

I understand being filled with anger. I am embarrassed by many of the things I said on this very forum when I first became a capsuleer. Just as sooner or later you will be of what you said today.

Just because I don't fly into battle or have medals on my chest doesn't mean I haven't done my part. What I would offer is peace for us all, not victory any.

What happened yesterday is beyond our control, what we do tomorrow isn't.
James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#26 - 2012-12-30 05:00:32 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Lies? Stop beleiving the propaganda you suckled at your Gallente teat along with all the economic and military aid.

Msr Tuulinen. I have left a good deal of inflammatory rhetoric unanswered.

I have tried to craft my answers without resorting to the usual litany of atrocities committed by ether side.

But this?

We have made some little progress. That should be our focus. Personal insults serve only to increase animosity.

So please show a little charity.
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#27 - 2012-12-30 05:30:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
James Syagrius wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Lies? Stop beleiving the propaganda you suckled at your Gallente teat along with all the economic and military aid.

Msr Tuulinen. I have left a good deal of inflammatory rhetoric unanswered.

I have tried to craft my answers without resorting to the usual litany of atrocities committed by ether side.

But this?

We have made some little progress. That should be our focus. Personal insults serve only to increase animosity.

So please show a little charity.


I must second this notion. Disregarding any past offenses made by him or others in other threads, this thread was started ostensibly in the hope of understanding exactly what is needed for peace. Devolving into finger pointing and arguement will not help the process. As well, there are plenty of other threads for it.

It is thus, that I respectfully implore my colleague, Pieter Tuulinen-haan, to avoid biting the flamebait posted by others who are not so interested in the purpose of this thread. Peace.

You can't stop the trolls, but you can stop feeding them.

Katrina Oniseki

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#28 - 2012-12-30 05:40:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
James Syagrius wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Lies? Stop beleiving the propaganda you suckled at your Gallente teat along with all the economic and military aid.

Msr Tuulinen. I have left a good deal of inflammatory rhetoric unanswered.

I have tried to craft my answers without resorting to the usual litany of atrocities committed by ether side.

But this?

We have made some little progress. That should be our focus. Personal insults serve only to increase animosity.

So please show a little charity.


Apologies to both Msr Sygarius and Oniseki-haani. I'll try to avoid such obvious provocation next time.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#29 - 2012-12-30 05:50:33 UTC  |  Edited by: James Syagrius
Msr. Tuulinen.

~Bows politely~ You honor me.

I thank you and I appreciate your forbearance.
Mal'achi
#30 - 2012-12-30 06:50:04 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Lies? Stop believing the propaganda you suckled at your Gallente teat along with all the economic and military aid.

LIes? Is your alliance with the slaver Amarr a lie? Is their aid to your corrupt government a lie? I don't think so.
James Syagrius wrote:
I understand being filled with anger. I am embarrassed by many of the things I said on this very forum when I first became a capsuleer. Just as sooner or later you will be of what you said today.

Ya I am angry and I have a right to be. You should be too.
James Syagrius wrote:
Just because I don't fly into battle or have medals on my chest doesn't mean I haven't done my part. What I would offer is peace for us all, not victory any.

What does that even mean? I get it your rich and get other people to do the dirty work for you. Quit talking and wasting time. Get off your a*s and do something if your so powerful.
James Syagrius wrote:
What happened yesterday is beyond our control, what we do tomorrow isn't.

Cute listen to your own advice and do something. We are you allies not them.
Misha M'Liena
Rui Freelance Mining
#31 - 2012-12-30 12:03:30 UTC
Oh your going to be one of those types. I can see this'll be fun.

Lessee you wrote this.

Ah, my mistake. I thought you were interested in actually discussing the situation, but now I see you only want me to be horrified at your terribly edgy persona. Consider me duly horrified, if it pleases you, in the meantime your people have sufficient issues of their own devising to solve that you oughtn't to waste your time in this thread.

Bioweapons. Oh my, what a dynamic free spirit you possess!

I'll answer in parts. Unlike your poor thought out insults belittling and whines.,

I am still interested in discussing the situation. But you are obviously not sir. It is what you call, **my way or my way**
Period. You are not interested in discussions. It Caldari everything, Gallente nothing. People have offered solutions deals offers to negoiate. You have offered squat.

Oh i'm a edgy terrble persona? Me? Get the hell back on your meds man. Seriously start taking them. Next you'll compare me to Ms Kim. Whom i do like.

Oh i agree that my empire and the other empires have things to work out. But unlike you sir. We use diplomacy and negotiations.
I would give you a definition of that word. But i ain't your teacher. Go learn some.

Now the next possible solution and probaly the most serious and workable one is simple.

The Caldari MUST recoginize the gallente on the planet as equal citizens, Then i suspect the gallente empire would giv up it's claim to it. Untill they do..This discussion will last a very long time.

Misha.

Ps, Oh darn fergot to comment on your last insult. Opps my bad. ...Idiot...

Not as innocent as she appears.™  

Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#32 - 2012-12-30 13:19:16 UTC
There is absolutely no wiggle room on the question of owning Home.

And do note that the Caldari have tried to use diplomacy for almost two centuries with no success. This homecoming in force was inevitable.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Misha M'Liena
Rui Freelance Mining
#33 - 2012-12-30 13:46:32 UTC
Ms Desiderya. Please don't follow in our footsteps.

You must recognize the Gallente as equals on *Home* Or otherwise you'll be treating them as second class citizens or slaves.
Do you really want to be known as slaveholders? I don't own slaves. It's repugnant to me. Theres other reasons left for other places.

I did not mean to imply that the Caldari as a whole wasn't willing to negoiate. That was meant for only one person.

Misha.

Not as innocent as she appears.™  

Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#34 - 2012-12-30 15:30:12 UTC
I must do nothing of the sort.

However, what you're describing is purely tangential at this point, since it falls under the negotiable aspects of any agreement and does not have any impact on the question of Caldari Prime being sovereign State territory.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#35 - 2012-12-30 19:46:12 UTC
Mal'achi wrote:
What does that even mean? I get it your rich and get other people to do the dirty work for you. Quit talking and wasting time. Get off your a*s and do something if your so powerful.
James Syagrius wrote:
What happened yesterday is beyond our control, what we do tomorrow isn't.

Cute listen to your own advice and do something. We are you allies not them.

Msr. Mal'achi you seem to think you know allot about me. Especially from someone I don't remember having met. Perhaps you've been listening to the wrong people?

I am a humble man of trade and that is all.

However I think I understand primary cause of your anger related to this thread. Its fear. The Federation making peace with the State will not effect out alliance with the Republic or "our" common conflict against the Empire.

I would ask you once again to please refrain from personal attacks. If victory is what you seek, then you have it. You win. So please be constructive in your answers.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#36 - 2012-12-30 23:57:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
Misha M'Liena wrote:
I am still interested in discussing the situation. But you are obviously not sir. It is what you call, **my way or my way** Period. You are not interested in discussions. It Caldari everything, Gallente nothing. People have offered solutions deals offers to negoiate. You have offered squat.


I wasn't going to answer you any further, but since you've brought some interesting points to table, I'll answer them.

I never said that the conflict beween State and Federation must be ended solely on the State's terms, but it is well known in negotiation and diplomacy that each side has a position that is their bottom line and from which they cannot back-down whilst still having the end result be mutually satisfactory. I'll refer you to the end of the Great War when the State was forced to accept a conclusion that left Home in unfriendly hands as part of a peace that was never, ever, going to hold.

I have been far more flexible and accomodating regarding secondary concerns. See Oniseki-haani's suggestions for a far more demanding opening offer. I simply said that the fate of Home was non-negotiable and that in everything else there should be wiggle room.

Misha M'Liena wrote:
Oh i'm a edgy terrble persona? Me? Get the hell back on your meds man. Seriously start taking them. Next you'll compare me to Ms Kim. Whom i do like.

Oh i agree that my empire and the other empires have things to work out. But unlike you sir. We use diplomacy and negotiations. I would give you a definition of that word. But i ain't your teacher. Go learn some.


You clapped your hands at a suggestion that the issue be settled by the death of billions. You get what you ask for. Moreover your Empire uses Diplomacy and Negotiation because your last attempt to use naked force cost you most of your fleet and a large portion of space. The Executor used a scalpel instead of a bludgeon and achieved his objectives through the use of force which is, after all, only the pursuit of diplomacy by other means.

I contend that the Federation had demonstrated that it would not listen to Diplomacy, because it thought that the State had no other recourse. Now we have shown that this is not true, I hope for a better resolution - through Diplomacy, of course. I do not think we can FORCE a resolution on the Federation, but our use of force will hopefully bring the Federation to the table to negotiate in earnest.

Misha M'Liena wrote:
Now the next possible solution and probaly the most serious and workable one is simple.

The Caldari MUST recoginize the gallente on the planet as equal citizens, Then i suspect the gallente empire would giv up it's claim to it. Untill they do..This discussion will last a very long time.


I would be open to recognising anyone whose parents were born on the Planet as a citizen of the State, provided they were willing to embrace the Caldari Way and secure a proper place for themselves within the State. Anyone who does not wish to do so or lacks the necessary qualities should be repatriated to another Gallente system - with proper compensation for any *personal* property that they are forced to leave behind - perhaps with said compensation being borne equally by the Federation and the State as a gesture of amity and good faith.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Mal'achi
#37 - 2012-12-31 02:31:14 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:
I would ask you once again to please refrain from personal attacks. If victory is what you seek, then you have it. You win. So please be constructive in your answers.

James please consider your message received. I am sorry for disrupting your discussion. I apologize to you and Pieter Tuulinen for what I said.
Emile Belfleur
Solar Zouaves
#38 - 2012-12-31 03:31:57 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Peace can be achieved at great cost to both sides, and not through war.


The proposal you have written seems like a very sensible one to me, Captain Oniseki. However, it leaves unanswered an issue which at least in my view is a very important one: The Caldari means of access to their homeworld.

To my mind, any peace agreement which forces the Federation to allow foreign traffic through its sovereign space, thereby denying us the right to close our borders if we should wish to do so, is unthinkable.

To amend this, I propose that you expand your proposal to include the construction of a new stargate in the proximity of Caldari Prime - within the borders of the Caldari zone of control you describe - linking it directly to the rest of Caldari space. This would allow the Caldari access to their homeworld while leaving the Federation's sovereignty over its own space inherently intact.

The respective Federal and Caldari sovereignties within Luminaire should also remain absolute, and the border separating them, inviolate. To ensure that our two empires remain segregated from each other, direct, in-system travel between the two homeworlds should be absolutely prohibited.
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#39 - 2012-12-31 04:13:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Emile Belfleur wrote:
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Peace can be achieved at great cost to both sides, and not through war.


The proposal you have written seems like a very sensible one to me, Captain Oniseki. However, it leaves unanswered an issue which at least in my view is a very important one: The Caldari means of access to their homeworld.

To my mind, any peace agreement which forces the Federation to allow foreign traffic through its sovereign space, thereby denying us the right to close our borders if we should wish to do so, is unthinkable.

To amend this, I propose that you expand your proposal to include the construction of a new stargate in the proximity of Caldari Prime - within the borders of the Caldari zone of control you describe - linking it directly to the rest of Caldari space. This would allow the Caldari access to their homeworld while leaving the Federation's sovereignty over its own space inherently intact.

The respective Federal and Caldari sovereignties within Luminaire should also remain absolute, and the border separating them, inviolate. To ensure that our two empires remain segregated from each other, direct, in-system travel between the two homeworlds should be absolutely prohibited.


Forgive my confusion on this matter, but, I believe I may be misunderstanding you...

You wish to allow the Caldari State to construct a stargate in Luminaire that completely bypasses your entire Tripwire defense grid, to be owned and operated by the State, to allow unfettered and largely unregulated traffic of both civilian and possibly military means to and from said system?

This is a gracious and surprisingly advantageous offer for us. What's in it for the Federation?

Why not simply allow normal peacetime traffic to pass through and be monitored by your own secure customs and defense coverage?

Katrina Oniseki

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#40 - 2012-12-31 06:43:17 UTC
Emile Belfleur wrote:
The respective Federal and Caldari sovereignties within Luminaire should also remain absolute, and the border separating them, inviolate. To ensure that our two empires remain segregated from each other, direct, in-system travel between the two homeworlds should be absolutely prohibited.

Msr. Belfeur. I sincerly appreciate your contribution and am encouraged to see that you agree a solution to this conflict is possible. However as a business man I don't see how keeping the Caldari home world (Luminaire VII) segregated from the larger system can end well. While I agree that the sovereignty issues within the system should be "absolute" regarding military or police entities, surely only through interaction can eventual understanding be possible. After perhaps a short cooling off period.
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Why not simply allow normal peacetime traffic to pass through and be monitored by your own secure customs and defense coverage?

A sensible solution Ma'dame Oniseki. I have to admit having a "direct link" between the greater State and a potential State enclave surrounding Caldari Prime would be discomforting and unacceptable to most. Perhaps after a decade or two of peace, who can say.
Previous page123Next page