These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping.

First post First post
Author
Doc Severide
Doomheim
#201 - 2012-12-28 03:05:02 UTC
Melodramatic Drivel...

Personally I think bumping miners woud be funny. My question is any of this against the EULA?

In any case I think james315 is a waste of an EVE account... Cool
Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
#202 - 2012-12-28 03:40:01 UTC
Katherine Jasmone wrote:
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
silens vesica wrote:
Sooner or later, the miners will learn new skills, or some balancing change will help them, and James 315 will be forced to come out with a new tactic.


That's simple enough. Personal wardecs, placeable on individuals instead of whole (one man) corporations, and much cheaper per week to maintain.


Utterly stupid idea now that we have a bounty system. Make the bounty high enough and said individual will be target for anyone willing to pull the trigger. Don't have the ISK for the bounty - too bad want to borrow a Retriever?


I don't think ya understand how bounties pay out. Considering what the dude said about herding the orbiting barges out of range miners have 2 options...pay for the gank ships and guys to clear your systems or get a permit.

You're better off with their permit. I would charge to rid the ebil bumpas from your systums then gank with the money ya paid me to do it.
Mira Robinson
#203 - 2012-12-28 04:00:07 UTC
I'm hoping against hope that James is just partaking in some humorous roleplay, and is just looking for some attention from his MinerBumping blog.

Because it would make me lose even more faith in people that make careers out of griefing if his attitude in-game and in his blog is a reflection of his real-life personality.

Earlier today, the Dixon Mining Guild and the Butz Manufacturing Corporation formed a coalition.

It's hard to tell if there is a light at the end of the tunnel for the Dixon-Butz Alliance.

Lady Katherine Devonshire
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#204 - 2012-12-28 04:04:49 UTC
Katherine Jasmone wrote:
Utterly stupid idea now that we have a bounty system. Make the bounty high enough and said individual will be target for anyone willing to pull the trigger. Don't have the ISK for the bounty - too bad want to borrow a Retriever?


Just curious, but how many professional bounty hunters take hisec contracts? And what is the average bounty on one of these bumping people? A cursory examination of their roster shows that there is indeed plenty of ISK to go around on putting bounties on them - an almost comically absurd amount, in fact. It is simply a question of whether or not the hunters are cashing in on them.

Now why would a hunter pursue them? Obviously for the ISK. Reasons not to? CONCORD retribution, as they are obviously a hisec only operation, so that cuts heavily into potential profits. Locating targets when they are either in one-man corporations or shielded by a massive, untouchable corporation also makes this problematic. The high probability that one may just be placing a bounty on a purely disposable alt is so obvious that it should go without saying.

I suppose that miners could simply put up their kill-rights at a price of zero to encourage more spontaneous target hunting, but that mechanic remains to be seen in action. Other than that, however, the pros of spending the ISK to bounty them, when weighed against the cons, are obviously too small - as evidenced by the fact that these bumpers even still exist to continue wasting valuable oxygen.

And no, I do not need to borrow a Retriever. We actually have a surplus of mining vessels at the moment. After all, they are so cheap (compared to their income generation) that their cost is effectively negligible.

Flurk Hellbron
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#205 - 2012-12-28 04:10:43 UTC
I like to bump bumpers in my Skiff...............Big smile
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#206 - 2012-12-28 04:43:26 UTC
Mira Robinson wrote:
I'm hoping against hope that James is just partaking in some humorous roleplay, and is just looking for some attention from his MinerBumping blog.

Because it would make me lose even more faith in people that make careers out of griefing if his attitude in-game and in his blog is a reflection of his real-life personality.

Personally I think it's like some massive troll and all the bumpers are following along because it's funny to them.

I know I do.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Mira Robinson
#207 - 2012-12-28 04:49:36 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Mira Robinson wrote:
I'm hoping against hope that James is just partaking in some humorous roleplay, and is just looking for some attention from his MinerBumping blog.

Because it would make me lose even more faith in people that make careers out of griefing if his attitude in-game and in his blog is a reflection of his real-life personality.

Personally I think it's like some massive troll and all the bumpers are following along because it's funny to them.

I know I do.

I mean yeah, if it's for reactions and roleplaying, I completely understand why he does it. I can't respect it, but I understand and acknowledge it.

But if he is honest-to-God offended at highsec miners...then he needs a life check.

Earlier today, the Dixon Mining Guild and the Butz Manufacturing Corporation formed a coalition.

It's hard to tell if there is a light at the end of the tunnel for the Dixon-Butz Alliance.

SaKoil
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#208 - 2012-12-28 07:02:41 UTC
terzho wrote:
All this fuss over highsec mining? Come on people.........

Highsec afk-mining is the most glorious profession of them all. They are the vital backbone of this game, generating content and meaning for thousands. Stories of their epic deeds spawn articles in the media almost weekly and get new players to join.

The only thing that the heroic miners would ask is to make mining a bit easier, as the current implementation is highly taxing and requires deep knowledge of the game. Mining also has some risks, such as getting bumped out of mining range, which is unacceptable.
Frying Doom
#209 - 2012-12-28 07:39:02 UTC
SaKoil wrote:
terzho wrote:
All this fuss over highsec mining? Come on people.........

Highsec afk-mining is the most glorious profession of them all. They are the vital backbone of this game, generating content and meaning for thousands. Stories of their epic deeds spawn articles in the media almost weekly and get new players to join.

The only thing that the heroic miners would ask is to make mining a bit easier, as the current implementation is highly taxing and requires deep knowledge of the game. Mining also has some risks, such as getting bumped out of mining range, which is unacceptable.

Actually I think that the miners of EvE would like a yellow paint sprayer that they can use to mark peoples pods.

Then they can mark the cowards of EvE with a big yellow strip down their backs.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#210 - 2012-12-28 08:43:46 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
SaKoil wrote:
terzho wrote:
All this fuss over highsec mining? Come on people.........

Highsec afk-mining is the most glorious profession of them all. They are the vital backbone of this game, generating content and meaning for thousands. Stories of their epic deeds spawn articles in the media almost weekly and get new players to join.

The only thing that the heroic miners would ask is to make mining a bit easier, as the current implementation is highly taxing and requires deep knowledge of the game. Mining also has some risks, such as getting bumped out of mining range, which is unacceptable.

Actually I think that the miners of EvE would like a yellow paint sprayer that they can use to mark peoples pods.

Then they can mark the cowards of EvE with a big yellow strip down their backs.


The miners would never mark themselves in such a way.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#211 - 2012-12-28 11:49:08 UTC
Can someone explain to me again why making full use of the game's mechanics to protect yourself is cowardly?

Edit: I've just had a revelation. The reason miners refuse to orbit/stay ATK/fit tanks/position themselves properly/use appropriate ships/mine somewhere else/blow us up/hire mercenaries to blow us up is because it would be cowardly!

This explains so much!
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#212 - 2012-12-28 12:00:47 UTC
Amelia Torez wrote:
Stuff


Your website says "Educate and empower miners". This is absolutely a good thing, however, you may want to address the inaccurate content on your site, and in your post, to fully realise this goal.

Bullying and griefing are both violations of the EULA, and quite rightly so. Anyone who is, or sees someone else, being griefed or bullied should file a petition with the GMs. The reason filing a petition against an Agent is a violation of the Code is because we do not violate the EULA, which means petitions against us waste GM time and keep other players with real issues waiting longer. This is Eve; what is or isn't permissible in another game is irrelevant here.

You are incorrect about our stated aims. People like to latch on to the AFK or bot parts of the Code while completely missing the other parts, failing to get the underlying point and not even being in the same ballpark as our goals. As for deliberately targeting newer players, this is nonsense. However, the quicker a new player gets ganked and podded, the quicker they learn the full extent of the danger undocking entails. Will some leave the game because of this? Sure, but if they work their way up to an officer-fit mission running ship and then it happens to them, they'll still quit, and probaby be a lot more upset.

While agents (like most people) occasionally drop a few curse words in local chat, it's actually the miners who are the by far the worst offenders. Not only does foul language seem to be the default response of a great many miners when they're confronted with rational argument, but also a number have been successfully petitioned for going as far as to threaten real-life violence to agents. Peronally, I had a guy threaten to cut off various parts of my body and re-arrange them because his internet space pixels were nudged a few virtual kilometers by my space pixels. I'm sure we can agree that this is far beyond the realm of acceptable conduct.

I'm skeptical about your resistance because you aren't the first and you'll likely not be the last. The current head of the resistance hasn't updated his blog in over a month. Fighting us will take time, isk and effort and these are things that, so far, bumphurt miners haven't been willing to do - just look at the lackluster support you've gotten in this thread; a few people saying "go get 'em", but I don't see pages of posts from people saying they'll dock up their mining ship and come join the fight in a combat ship.

With all that said, I sincerely wish you well in your endeavour, and look forward to meeting you and your followers on the field of battle, where I shall kill you. Should you mount a successful, sustained and visible operation againt us, whether you win or lose, the New Order is victorious because we will have provoked you into emergent gameplay, and that's good for the game as a whole.

admiral root
Agent of the New Order of Highsec
Desirablely belligerent

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#213 - 2012-12-28 13:01:03 UTC
Mira Robinson wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Mira Robinson wrote:
I'm hoping against hope that James is just partaking in some humorous roleplay, and is just looking for some attention from his MinerBumping blog.

Because it would make me lose even more faith in people that make careers out of griefing if his attitude in-game and in his blog is a reflection of his real-life personality.

Personally I think it's like some massive troll and all the bumpers are following along because it's funny to them.

I know I do.

I mean yeah, if it's for reactions and roleplaying, I completely understand why he does it. I can't respect it, but I understand and acknowledge it.

But if he is honest-to-God offended at highsec miners...then he needs a life check.

Sadly, I know people, IRL, who are just *exactly* like James.
Yes, delusional megalomania is real.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

destiny2
Decaying Rocky Odious Non Evil Stupid Inane Nobody
Rogue Drone Recovery Syndicate
#214 - 2012-12-28 13:05:16 UTC
Solution.
Right click your rocks your mining select keep at range :).

Solution 2.
Complaining wont make it go away.

Solution 3.
Noone ever said space was going to be nice.

Solution 4.
Blow him up.

Solution 5. All of the above.
Pewty McPew
EVE Corporation 2357451
#215 - 2012-12-28 13:09:57 UTC
destiny2 wrote:
Solution.
Right click your rocks your mining select keep at range :).

Solution 2.
Complaining wont make it go away.

Solution 3.
Noone ever said space was going to be nice.

Solution 4.
Gank him. Then have a friend gank his pod. Repeat until he goes away.

Solution 5. All of the above.


Fixed it for ya.
Karrl Tian
Doomheim
#216 - 2012-12-28 13:10:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Karrl Tian
If you had told me three years ago that bumping miners would replace suicide ganking/canflipping and that people would start 50+ page whine threads about it.....


My reaction:

LolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLol


Although it is kind of sad, too.
Frying Doom
#217 - 2012-12-28 13:14:52 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Can someone explain to me again why making full use of the game's mechanics to protect yourself is cowardly?

Edit: I've just had a revelation. The reason miners refuse to orbit/stay ATK/fit tanks/position themselves properly/use appropriate ships/mine somewhere else/blow us up/hire mercenaries to blow us up is because it would be cowardly!

This explains so much!

To use the games mechanics you can not undock so you never get blown up would you call that cowardly?
People who specifically go after those people who cannot fight back are cowards

It is kind of the definition of a coward, some on who is too scared they might get blown up by someone who can shoot back before they can get them.

Dropping a super carrier on a battle cruiser = Coward
Attacking defenseless ships = Coward

You can frame it how ever you like but going after the weak and helpless is cowardly. There really is no other way to describe it.

Call yourself a brave defender of some such crap it doesn't matter

A coward is a coward.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Pewty McPew
EVE Corporation 2357451
#218 - 2012-12-28 13:19:29 UTC
Pick a half dozen or so of the supporting corps who bump you.

War-dec

Gank

Profit???

Did I miss something?
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#219 - 2012-12-28 13:33:12 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
You can frame it how ever you like but going after the weak and helpless is cowardly. There really is no other way to describe it.

hilarious
Pewty McPew
EVE Corporation 2357451
#220 - 2012-12-28 13:37:31 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
You can frame it how ever you like but going after the weak and helpless is cowardly. There really is no other way to describe it.

hilarious


I would call it Darwinism