These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Suggesting James 315 as the Highsec representative for CSM 8

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Alonzo Harris
Feminist Vegan Riot Squad
#181 - 2013-03-01 15:13:38 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
*non-related gibberish*


shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you"

Power to the People! http://freehighsec.wordpress.com/
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#182 - 2013-03-01 15:42:31 UTC
Alonzo Harris wrote:
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
*non-related gibberish*


shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you"

Ouch, that hurt.

Since you altered the quote, it's hard to tell what post you're actually referring to, especially as my last post was pretty closely related to the question that I was answering.
Vin King
State War Academy
Caldari State
#183 - 2013-03-01 16:15:13 UTC
Alonzo Harris wrote:

shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you"


Calm down, James. There's no reason to be so angry at your own alts.

Proud member of the New Order of HighSec
John E Normus
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#184 - 2013-03-01 17:26:50 UTC
Alonzo Harris wrote:
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
*non-related gibberish*


shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you"


His posts are best seen here.

Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors?

Between Ignorance and Wisdom
Wodensun
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#185 - 2013-03-14 16:07:45 UTC
Lady Spank wrote:
Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests.


/Thread

Do not give me likes them 101 likes arent a accident...
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#186 - 2013-03-14 19:15:10 UTC
Wodensun wrote:
Lady Spank wrote:
Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests.


/Thread

Hardly. Or are the scammers and gankers and bumpers who live and play in highsec not legitimate voters?
Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
#187 - 2013-03-15 16:33:54 UTC
You're at work in real life. There are maybe twenty other people working with you. One of these people is a boring jerk who incessantly takes the **** out of the weakest/strangest person in the room. He often pushes the boat out too far. This jerk could be James 315. Blink

I have no problem with bumping and suicide ganking. If you use your head these activities can be avoided. It's not hard to do.

I have read James 315's blog a few times and it honestly a load of b******* and boring as well. He makes some of what The Mittani writes interesting. Not that suggest you vote for The Mittani either.

In short James 315 is a joke and obviously not viable as a candidate for the CSM.
Asuri Kinnes
Perkone
Caldari State
#188 - 2013-03-15 21:12:09 UTC
John E Normus wrote:
Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors?

To get nominated?

Linky please to the official candidacy thread, I seem to have missed it.

Bob is the god of Wormholes.

That's all you need to know.
Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#189 - 2013-03-15 21:43:27 UTC
Bethan Le Troix wrote:
You're at work in real life. There are maybe twenty other people working with you. One of these people is a boring jerk who incessantly takes the **** out of the weakest/strangest person in the room. He often pushes the boat out too far. This jerk could be James 315. Blink


So wait, highsec is the 1-in-20 minority now? I always thought they were the massive majority and thus needed dedicated catering?

"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["
Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#190 - 2013-03-15 22:16:25 UTC
Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work.
I just want to vote against James 315.
What's the best way to do that?
John E Normus
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#191 - 2013-03-15 22:31:54 UTC
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
John E Normus wrote:
Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors?

To get nominated?

Linky please to the official candidacy thread, I seem to have missed it.


http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=74283

You're adorable.

Between Ignorance and Wisdom
Vin King
State War Academy
Caldari State
#192 - 2013-03-16 00:16:10 UTC
Khergit Deserters wrote:
Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work.
I just want to vote against James 315.
What's the best way to do that?


By voting for him.

Proud member of the New Order of HighSec
Asuri Kinnes
Perkone
Caldari State
#193 - 2013-03-16 01:16:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Asuri Kinnes
John E Normus wrote:
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
John E Normus wrote:
Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors?

To get nominated?

Linky please to the official candidacy thread, I seem to have missed it.


http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=74283

You're adorable.

Well, aren't you a special little snowflake?

Linky to *james* candidacy thread.

You know, the one where he throws his hat in the ring...

Otherwise this is just more BS as usual.
Khergit Deserters wrote:
Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work.
I just want to vote against James 315.
What's the best way to do that?

Trebor would probably be the troll candidate.

Otherwise, Malcanis for a serious candidate.

Bob is the god of Wormholes.

That's all you need to know.
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#194 - 2013-03-16 01:20:39 UTC
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
John E Normus wrote:
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
John E Normus wrote:
Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors?

To get nominated?

Linky please to the official candidacy thread, I seem to have missed it.


http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=74283

You're adorable.

Well, aren't you a special little snowflake?

Linky to *james* candidacy thread.

You know, the one where he throws his hat in the ring...

Otherwise this is just more BS as usual.


Clearly you didn't read that devblog. It's fairly short and renders all your questions moot. Try reading the part with words, this time.

Vin King
State War Academy
Caldari State
#195 - 2013-03-16 03:17:20 UTC
Vin King wrote:
Khergit Deserters wrote:
Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work.
I just want to vote against James 315.
What's the best way to do that?


By voting for him.


I've received a few questions asking me how this would work. So far, nobody I've replied to has understood the physics involved correctly, so let me try to give a brief explanation. Essentially, according to the Uncertainty Principle, when you want to interfere with the measurement of an object, all you have to do is participate with that object. To disrupt the CSM efforts of the Saviour of HighSec, you can vote for the Saviour of HighSec, and that will disrupt the measurement of his vote to the point that he cannot be elected. This is a surefire way for protesters to ensure his defeat, according to my understanding of particle physics.

If you disagree with my reading, you'd best be prepared to show your educational endorsements on this matter, and if yours cannot defeat mine, you're practically certain to be wrong.

Proud member of the New Order of HighSec
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#196 - 2013-03-16 03:38:31 UTC
Vin King wrote:
Vin King wrote:
Khergit Deserters wrote:
Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work.
I just want to vote against James 315.
What's the best way to do that?


By voting for him.


I've received a few questions asking me how this would work. So far, nobody I've replied to has understood the physics involved correctly, so let me try to give a brief explanation. Essentially, according to the Uncertainty Principle, when you want to interfere with the measurement of an object, all you have to do is participate with that object. To disrupt the CSM efforts of the Saviour of HighSec, you can vote for the Saviour of HighSec, and that will disrupt the measurement of his vote to the point that he cannot be elected. This is a surefire way for protesters to ensure his defeat, according to my understanding of particle physics.

If you disagree with my reading, you'd best be prepared to show your educational endorsements on this matter, and if yours cannot defeat mine, you're practically certain to be wrong.


This is completely wrong. The uncertainty principle doesn't just state that interaction disrupts measurement, it states that measurement CONSTITUTES disruption, and therefore the granularity of one's measurements are limited by the amount you can limit said disruption, which possesses a distinct lower-bound related to the planck constant. According to this observation, the more votes that are cast, the less uncertainty matters as a ratio, which makes your reasoning incorrect.

However, your macro-level intuition is correct, the best way to vote against James315 is to vote for him. To wit: Everyone is an alt of James315, or of the Mittani. James315 secretly is the Mittani. Therefore, a vote for anyone other than James315, is actually a vote for James315. If you omit James315 from your CSM ballot, you are voting for 14 other people. Those 14 people are all actually James315. Thus, omitting James315 from your ballot, is like voting for James315 14 times. Voting for James315 is therefore superior to not voting for James315. You might ask, what if I don't vote for anyone at all? This calls into question quantum mechanics again...yes, I know you thought we were done with QM once Vin King's use of Uncertainty was called into question, but you were wrong. If you don't vote for anyone, then your vote exists like Schrodinger's Cat, in a hidden box. Your vote in that box is voting for every possible candidate. therefore, not voting, is like voting for 28+ candidates, who are all James315. This is at least twice as bad as actually voting your block, and over 28 times as bad as just voting for James315 directly.
Lyza Kimbo
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#197 - 2013-03-16 20:00:16 UTC
James315 is a dirtbag of the first and highest level, and those New Order lackeys of his are just pirates in disguise. That protection money scam he and his minions are running in and around Kamio is like something out of 1929 Chicago.

That someone so widely loathed and detested could possibly have any chance of being elected to "represent" the very people he victimizes is a serious indictment of the whole CSM system.
Wescro2
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#198 - 2013-03-16 20:25:26 UTC
Lyza Kimbo wrote:
James315 is a dirtbag of the first and highest level, and those New Order lackeys of his are just pirates in disguise. That protection money scam he and his minions are running in and around Kamio is like something out of 1929 Chicago.

That someone so widely loathed and detested could possibly have any chance of being elected to "represent" the very people he victimizes is a serious indictment of the whole CSM system.


That fact that he can generate such a strong reaction in people, and mostly with his words and ideas, not as much his in-game actions, is a pretty solid reason to put him in that seat. The guy gets things done.

Playing a pretend-cultist political terrorist in a sandbox game is a valid play style and is just as deserving of a CSM spot as a white knight, e-bushido-honoring goodie-two-shoes.
Tiberius StarGazer
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#199 - 2013-03-17 14:59:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Tiberius StarGazer
A man who (and encourages his corp members also to) effectively grief and oppress the highsec residents as per link below is not someone I want in CSM representing my interests as a highsec industrialists and occasionas FW defender of the Caldari State.

http://soundcloud.com/drtylereve/mineteck20130301
Powers Sa
#200 - 2013-03-18 05:58:06 UTC
Yo James, how do you feel about tags for sec? http://youtu.be/g3jK-XZ2KnM?t=22m40s I suicide gank, and I would really like a streamlined method for regaining my sec status, but CCP abandoned this idea in the crimewatch patch. Would you champion getting this back into the dev cycle?

Do you like winning t2 frigs and dictors for Dirt Cheap?https://eveninggames.net/register/ref/dQddmNgyLhFBqNJk

Remeber: Gambling addiction is no laughing matter unless you've lost a vast space fortune on the internet.