These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

another bounty post

First post
Author
Octoven
Stellar Production
#41 - 2012-12-18 22:41:33 UTC
CCP Eterne wrote:
sitar seaton wrote:
Maybe I am not using the bounty system in the way it was designed, but I am having fun with it and the devs should be satisfied with that.


I am completely fine with placing bounties just out of random feelings of spite.


Yet...your NOT completely fine with us placing bounties on CCP's alliance and relative corps out of spitefulness correct? I mean wasn't this why it was barred in a recent patch?
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#42 - 2012-12-18 22:42:34 UTC
Hello Kitty online or Grief Online. Which one is the game leaning towards again?? Changes every day it seems...
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#43 - 2012-12-18 23:35:22 UTC
Octoven wrote:
CCP Eterne wrote:
sitar seaton wrote:
Maybe I am not using the bounty system in the way it was designed, but I am having fun with it and the devs should be satisfied with that.


I am completely fine with placing bounties just out of random feelings of spite.


Yet...your NOT completely fine with us placing bounties on CCP's alliance and relative corps out of spitefulness correct? I mean wasn't this why it was barred in a recent patch?

Because having CCP employees showing up on the list of players with the highest bounties is dumb, since you'll almost never get the opportunity to hunt them?

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Capt Starfox
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#44 - 2012-12-19 06:29:13 UTC
Kalishka Ulsguld wrote:

The x5 is mainly to prevent alts collecting bounties on themselves. If someone IS griefing another player, the victim is welcome to petition the matter. Just because one person puts a bounty on another, it does not mean they are being griefed.

The x5 also cuts down on suicide ganking. If the target is flying a 10mil, to make any profit from suicide ganking you will have to fly a ship (with all fittings) at less than 2mil cost.

If someone just wanted to gain a few more killmails through suicide ganking, I highly doubt bounties would be included in their decision making.

Why should sec status go hand in hand with the ability to place a bounty on someone? The lowsec status still prevents low sec people from entering concord controlled space safely. Your high sec status allows you to fly in safer zones if you wish and not fear the wrath of concord. Your lawful status is working as intended.

There is not really a way this can be misused to disrupt gameplay. Is it preventing you from leaving stations? From mining or running missions? No, it does not. There is nothing preventing you from returning the "favor" of someone who places a bounty on you.

Again, there has yet to be a clear definition on how this mechanic can be used for griefing. I'm pretty sure that if someone wanted to grief, they would use method with a much larger impact than throwing money into the air. They would more than likely use alts to suicide gank and save their millions if they wanted to grief.

Ok, for RP purposes I do agree that a flashy red WANTED sign isn't very nice for some people. But again, bounties are not coexistent to faction standings and security status, they are separate entities. A bounty does not mean you are criminal. It means someone is willing to pay money to have you dead. That person may have lawful intentions (such as placing a bounty on a pirate) or unlawful intentions (a pirate placing a bounty on someone who prevented them from ambushing a miner). True, some people do it for fun and place bounties on random people, but unless you make yourself a viable kill, nobody is likely to attempt to claim it.

You say you havn't transgressed anyone ingame? I find that hard to believe. Every time you compete and succeed in the market for example, you are preventing someone else (likely just as lawful as you) from gaining profit. In my book, that's transgressing someone. If you and several friends mine an asteroid field of it's rarer ore, you are transgressing someone who may have been searching for that specific ore for the minerals. It's not griefing if say a market competitor places a bounty on you, you are in direct competition with them. They want you out of their way so they can maximize profit. Perhaps they want to cripple your progress for a while, at the same time as keeping their high security status.

^This(couldn't fit the whole thing.. had to improvise). I don't understand why people are still having a hard time with this.

DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Thanks for the unspoken confirmation that CCP is steadily changing Eve Online into Grief Online. Basically the past few expansions have pretty much shown that trend. I'm slowly starting to get annoyed and disgusted with this game and the company mentality of trying to force the majority to play this game the way the vocal minority wants everyone to play.

The last expansion was a fairly substantial buff to Mining Barges. Did you forget, or since it doesn't support your argument you're just not counting it?

Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
#45 - 2012-12-19 07:00:02 UTC  |  Edited by: mechtech
Pashino wrote:
for the msot part the Bounty system is ok, but two areas still need work

1) 1st day newbies should not have to be exposed needlessly to bounties - it just cuts into initial player retention.

2) Bounties need to have expiration dates.

Both of the above issues have need of further qualifying criteria but one way or another really need to be addressed by the devs.

i detailed issue (1) above in a bit more detail here:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2336536#post2336536


Bounties shouldn't have hard expiration dates, they should have attrition.

This would make small meaningless bounties evaporate relatively quickly instead of being an annoyance, while big, meaty, bounties wouldn't simply poof instantly.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#46 - 2012-12-19 07:08:21 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Octoven wrote:
CCP Eterne wrote:
sitar seaton wrote:
Maybe I am not using the bounty system in the way it was designed, but I am having fun with it and the devs should be satisfied with that.


I am completely fine with placing bounties just out of random feelings of spite.


Yet...your NOT completely fine with us placing bounties on CCP's alliance and relative corps out of spitefulness correct? I mean wasn't this why it was barred in a recent patch?

Because having CCP employees showing up on the list of players with the highest bounties is dumb, since you'll almost never get the opportunity to hunt them?


Not entirely true. I see them around highsec all the time.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Ghazu
#47 - 2012-12-19 07:19:17 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Thanks for providing a perfect example of what's wrong with the current bounty system. I'm sorry but imo there was no reason, other than spite, for you to issue bounties on players minding their own business.

Making everyone in game have a red 'Wanted' sign is just plain stupid, not to mention it makes the characters personal security status worthless.

If so inclined, a player with very deep pockets can actually interfere with another players game time just by continuously placing a large bounty on one specific character.




DMC

How does putting a bounty on someone interfere with their game time?

lol I'd like to know

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

Rotseib Ratam
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2012-12-19 07:32:29 UTC
Ghazu wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:

How does putting a bounty on someone interfere with their game time?

lol I'd like to know


Because miners with a bounty run around their Captain's Quarters yelling HULK SMASH and breaking things when they should be out at the ice fields?
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#49 - 2012-12-19 07:38:22 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Octoven wrote:
CCP Eterne wrote:
sitar seaton wrote:
Maybe I am not using the bounty system in the way it was designed, but I am having fun with it and the devs should be satisfied with that.


I am completely fine with placing bounties just out of random feelings of spite.


Yet...your NOT completely fine with us placing bounties on CCP's alliance and relative corps out of spitefulness correct? I mean wasn't this why it was barred in a recent patch?

Because having CCP employees showing up on the list of players with the highest bounties is dumb, since you'll almost never get the opportunity to hunt them?


Not entirely true. I see them around highsec all the time.

wat

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#50 - 2012-12-19 07:43:11 UTC
CCP Eterne wrote:
sitar seaton wrote:
Maybe I am not using the bounty system in the way it was designed, but I am having fun with it and the devs should be satisfied with that.


I am completely fine with placing bounties just out of random feelings of spite.


Wow that's pretty hypocritical when they can't put the bounty on you don't cha think?
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#51 - 2012-12-19 07:46:53 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Octoven wrote:
CCP Eterne wrote:
sitar seaton wrote:
Maybe I am not using the bounty system in the way it was designed, but I am having fun with it and the devs should be satisfied with that.


I am completely fine with placing bounties just out of random feelings of spite.


Yet...your NOT completely fine with us placing bounties on CCP's alliance and relative corps out of spitefulness correct? I mean wasn't this why it was barred in a recent patch?

Because having CCP employees showing up on the list of players with the highest bounties is dumb, since you'll almost never get the opportunity to hunt them?



So... filter the list?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#52 - 2012-12-19 07:47:12 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
CCP Eterne wrote:
sitar seaton wrote:
Maybe I am not using the bounty system in the way it was designed, but I am having fun with it and the devs should be satisfied with that.


I am completely fine with placing bounties just out of random feelings of spite.


Wow that's pretty hypocritical when they can't put the bounty on you don't cha think?


It wasn't his decision

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Mag's
Azn Empire
#53 - 2012-12-19 10:45:05 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:
CCP Eterne wrote:
sitar seaton wrote:
Maybe I am not using the bounty system in the way it was designed, but I am having fun with it and the devs should be satisfied with that.


I am completely fine with placing bounties just out of random feelings of spite.


Wow that's pretty hypocritical when they can't put the bounty on you don't cha think?


It wasn't his decision
Not only that, but you wouldn't be able to kill them anyway.
Why do they moan about something, that would have been pointless?

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Maelle LuzArdiden
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2012-12-19 11:06:03 UTC
How does getting blown up interrupt someones gameplay, when it's an inherent part of this full loot, open world sandbox MMO?

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#55 - 2012-12-19 11:07:05 UTC
Maelle LuzArdiden wrote:
How does getting blown up interrupt someones gameplay, when it's an inherent part of this full loot, open world sandbox MMO?




i think you're forgetting that everyone deserves prizes just for trying

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

J3ssica Alba
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#56 - 2012-12-19 11:08:47 UTC
Oh that was you who put 100k on my Orca alt Big smile The only thing that pissed me off is the huge WANTED red thing on her pic after I spent so long to get her pose just right now 33% of it is covered >.> Seriously make that thing smaller or remove it completely unless the bounty is 500m or above ...
This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.  Without me, my signature is useless. Without my signature, I am useless
Tora Bushido
Commonwealth Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#57 - 2012-12-19 11:53:07 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Maxious wrote:
the message is clear. High sec is nerfed. wardec or not. their is no more need to suicide gank. highsec is the new low sec... but without the reward


You clearly have no idea of what you're talking about. I'm going to place a bounty on your head.


Its easier to just send his bounty to me directly......aww well......i will collect it soon enough Twisted

DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !

Meta Gaming Level VII, Psycho Warfare Level X, Smack Talk Level VII.

Mag's
Azn Empire
#58 - 2012-12-19 12:28:03 UTC
J3ssica Alba wrote:
Oh that was you who put 100k on my Orca alt Big smile The only thing that pissed me off is the huge WANTED red thing on her pic after I spent so long to get her pose just right now 33% of it is covered >.> Seriously make that thing smaller or remove it completely unless the bounty is 500m or above ...
You know what would be a solution to this, the option to choose which wanted sign is used. Not it's removal, but a choice of maybe 3 or 4 styles.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#59 - 2012-12-19 12:41:18 UTC
Mag's wrote:
J3ssica Alba wrote:
Oh that was you who put 100k on my Orca alt Big smile The only thing that pissed me off is the huge WANTED red thing on her pic after I spent so long to get her pose just right now 33% of it is covered >.> Seriously make that thing smaller or remove it completely unless the bounty is 500m or above ...
You know what would be a solution to this, the option to choose which wanted sign is used. Not it's removal, but a choice of maybe 3 or 4 styles.


That's quite a neat idea

I'd like an "Old west" style one

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Agent Akari
Absolute Order XVIII
Absolute Will
#60 - 2012-12-19 14:03:52 UTC
This new bounty system is a temporary or permanent fix to the isk sink. Most people who get the bounties will probably never undock, will fly anything expensive or have quit eventually with a bounty of billions on their heads..