EVE General Discussion

Bullshit. That's just utter trash talk, it's useless steroetyping that flies in the face of the available evidence.

And what's worse, you know it, and you've admitted to me previously that you know it.

I'm asking you nicely, V.V.; please stop this. You're capable of contriuting to this issue in a really useful and constructive way, and this pointless, meretricious Big-Lie stuff you're giving us instead is flat out disappointing.

Are you saying that because you can build a titan in null that the industry balance is fine?

How many people do you think actually do that?
How many peopel do you think it requirs to do that?
Do you think that is the only thing that gets built there?

And what about everyone that isn't doing that?

considering how is this game advertised as hardcore by players themselves and not only can you scam,lie,kill,steal or cheat its also supported there are sure too many whiners about how unfair the things are

eve is unfair - deal with it

How much more capacity would you need to exhaust the appetite of the people who are currently doing that?

Answer that question and you can actually answer the question of "how much more industrial capacity does nullsec need?"

If the answer is "all that and more", then the lack of industrial capacity in nullsec is the only thing keeping the game from thousand-titan roams.

Oh yay, the 4,986,735th "nerf high sec players who don't play the game like me" thread of the week! This must be some kind of record.

I'm sorry, my friend, but this has to be the biggest bit of nonsense I've ever heard in my life.

If there was no reward for it, no one would do it.




I repeat: If there was no reward for doing it, no one would do it. Since it's being done, that means there's a reward for it. As we've been repeatedly told, the Goonswarm knows about risk and reward, and how to factor it into what they do......and what they're doing now is building supercaps.



They must justify SOMETHING, though. What could that be?



You are calling for nerfs on hisec, and claiming that you're doing it to buff hisec corps? This is logic equivalent to claiming that if we just cut off your legs, you will be able to run faster.



No, actually, what I am is the furthest thing from an industrialist that you can find - I've done that sort of thing exactly twice. Once in the tutorials and once when I wanted some antimatter S shells and none were readily to hand. If anything, I prefer exploring and complex running. I have zero dog in this hunt, other than the general principle that the big boys can have a goodfite without turning hisec into an empty zone.

AFAIC, nullsec does need more slots and it probably can use a production boost. It doesn't need to supersede hisec in the process, and there's no good reason to attack hisec and the 71% who play there simply because CCP didn't give null the industrial production you either want or need to build all those shiny toys that you pretend not to care about but keep making.

nope blew that out of the water as it's impossible for that to be harder than importing from other regions of 0.0 absent immensely stupid game mechanics

you had no point and are merely flailing wildly: transport costs cannot be used to fix 0.0 industry (merely kill it)

right because you are risk averse and cowardly (and bad: there are ways to do it right, you keep a fueled carrier and a jumpclone in the station)

you are not the target market here you will always cower in empire

me, i manage something like 300b+ bpos in 0.0 and we still kept those even when we accidentally the whole empire one night

I was in (two) terrible alliances 3 years ago yet back at the time there was way less complaining about XSec vs YSec.

Today it looks like we got fantastic alliances (well, 99.9% posts are all from the same alliance, the sample is a bit thin) yet there's an endless bickering.

What happened?

Added some missing bits.