These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

You CANT Nerf HighSec!

First post First post First post
Author
Frying Doom
#2181 - 2013-01-04 11:25:36 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
1) Suicide gankers would be morons to go after a "properly tanked" ship, considering the wreck revenue comes from intact armor plates and mining mods. The kill boards of course are filled by the best candidates for a gank (duh!) not by the worst.

And what would've happened if the majority of miners had been "properly tanked"?

Well what happened for those of us paranoid enough was that we occasionally got a really nice bonus to our mining.

It was like free xmas presents. That being said for the first few years I did not really understand so I just did not log in, then I learned and made a nice side line Big smile

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#2182 - 2013-01-04 11:28:12 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
It would not happen, the 80% / 20% (and sometimes the 90% / 10%) rules apply.
Any developer (and expecially game developers) know that and act accordingly.

I guess that means all aggression being banned from hisec is next, then.


I hope not! As owner of Covetor / Retriever / Tornado / Thrasher / Catalyst / Tempest / Rupture / 'Cane (and about some other hundreds BPOs, all researched to 150 to 200 ME) plus inventor of mining mods and turrets I would HATE for pew pew to drop.

It already impacted my production enough to have the barges EHP buffed, I hope they'll actually nerf them later. Or (wishful thinking!) make mining less of a sh!t mechanic, something even worth playing it at the keyboard.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#2183 - 2013-01-04 11:29:37 UTC
Judging by the latest few expansions from CCP, I wouldn't hold my breath.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#2184 - 2013-01-04 11:30:25 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
1) Suicide gankers would be morons to go after a "properly tanked" ship, considering the wreck revenue comes from intact armor plates and mining mods. The kill boards of course are filled by the best candidates for a gank (duh!) not by the worst.

And what would've happened if the majority of miners had been "properly tanked"?

Well what happened for those of us paranoid enough was that we occasionally got a really nice bonus to our mining.

It was like free xmas presents. That being said for the first few years I did not really understand so I just did not log in, then I learned and made a nice side line Big smile


Yeah same here. I both bought massive amounts of isotopes starting Dec 2011 at very very rock bottom prices and resold at 1600 (few even at 1800!) in May 2012.

At the same time I slapped together 3 Orca + mining fleets, because I have used all my ISK to buy the ices so that was the only other way to reap the gold mine in the making.

No ship loss, 2-3B a *week* at May, it was just insane P
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#2185 - 2013-01-04 11:32:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Lord Zim wrote:
Judging by the latest few expansions from CCP, I wouldn't hold my breath.


That's all on Goonwaffe's shoulders. If they played smarter they'd have no boomerang nor EHP nerf by today.

All they have to do is to keep doing, but just below the "WE WILL NERF YOU" CCP thresold.
I.e. if they gank every freighter they WILL buff freighters. If they cherry pick a bit more then the numbers won't be enough and CCP won't nerf that mechanic.

It's fairly simple, I have been seeing the same identical behavior in every other MMO. There's always the "so much push hard guild" going all out into beating the same aching teeth and then they get a nerfhammer. Whereas all the other guilds were smarter and were going "let's boil the frog slow enough so they don't nerf" way.
Debora Tsung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2186 - 2013-01-04 11:36:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Debora Tsung
Lord Zim wrote:
Debora Tsung wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
GetSirrus wrote:
CONCORD protection

Keep seeing this throughout the thread. Since when does CONCORD protect anything? Have suicide ganks ceased?!

Can I sit in hisec in a freighter with 93 ships in its hold, and not get ganked? Yes? Why golly gosh, I think concord might possibly have some protectional value after all! Who'd've thought!


Wrong, the answer is "maybe!" :)

Someone might just figure out that the cargo is worth it and get enough peeps to gank You anyways.

Someone might, yes. Go outside of hisec and do the exact same thing, and see how many weeks you can sit on a gate in that very same freighter with the exact same cargo.

Concord does protect. It isn't perfect protection, but then again hisec is called high security and not perfect security for a reason.


No, Concord does not protect. Concord merely poses the certainty of a loss for engaging in unsanctioned combat in high sec (I still like to call it surprise pvp, because it's not **** if You yell "surpise!" while doing it), while doing the same in low or null sec reduces the certainty to a mere probability or even possibility.

If You gank a freighter in high sec You have to be sure it's worth it, before You do it. This in itself poses a not insignifficant effort and requires a gang large enough to kill before concord arrives. Wether that said return in value is the mere fun of doing it or the more measurable return in ISK is irrelevant, the only thing that makes high sec safe is the effort required by players to make it unsafe again.

That said, don't complain about a too safe high sec when You're unwillig to do something about it and change it.

Changing that is possible in several ways:

- get some peeps and just do it.

- try and dump Tier 3 BC prices, those ships are mostly needed to gank the big targets, if the players benign to Your cause can acquire those ships for a reasonably low price the logical conclusion should be that more players can afford to use offensive high slot modules on other players in high sec.

- also the new bounty system provides us with many wonderfull possibilities to lessen the blow to the gankers wallet when trying to gank the people that supply us with ships on their way to jita.

EDIT: I'm sure I missed some additional ways of making highsec pvp viable in a way that does not require dev intervention, but I am sure You can figure them out all by Yourself.

EDIT 2: Come to think of it, possibility #2 is quite hilarious. Acquiring the help of a major league industrialist to make high sec ganking of industrialists a viable option of engaging in pvp.

Stupidity should be a bannable offense.

Fighting back is more fun than not.

Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#2187 - 2013-01-04 11:37:19 UTC
Uh huh. Tell me more about how an average of 6 freighters per day during the most active month I saw while glancing at eve-kill would constitute "WE WILL NERF YOU".

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#2188 - 2013-01-04 11:45:26 UTC
Debora Tsung wrote:
No, Concord does not protect.

Yes, it does. Does the police protect you against getting shot by someone? No? Funny, last I heard, people were clamoring for more police "because they protected".

Debora Tsung wrote:
That said, don't complain about a too safe high sec when You're unwillig to do something about it and change it.

According to some people, even bumping a barge is "griefing" and "CCP must protect us from it". CCP has been listening more to those people than anyone else the past few expansions, which means that any time we "do something about it" and "change it", those people ***** even harder and CCP kowtow to them and make the game even shittier.

Great plan.

Debora Tsung wrote:
- try and dump Tier 3 BC prices

Good luck with that, since they're based around the cost of minerals. I'm not going to mine minerals.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Frying Doom
#2189 - 2013-01-04 11:49:08 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Debora Tsung wrote:
No, Concord does not protect.

Yes, it does. Does the police protect you against getting shot by someone? No? Funny, last I heard, people were clamoring for more police "because they protected".

See here an isk sink waiting to happen, CONCORD can confiscate your ship for disposal (destroy it on the spot is cheaper so this makes more sense) and then fine the pilot some exorbitant amount and claim it is for public safety.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Debora Tsung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2190 - 2013-01-04 12:05:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Debora Tsung
Lord Zim wrote:
Debora Tsung wrote:
No, Concord does not protect.

Yes, it does. Does the police protect you against getting shot by someone? No? Funny, last I heard, people were clamoring for more police "because they protected".


A) People are idiots, that's not my problem.
B) The real police in the real world actually CAN protect You IF they're on the right spot at the right time. strangely enough, magical space ship police in fluffy lala space land cannot do that because they only spawn AFTER anything has happened.

Again CONORD does NOT Protect because it CAN'T protect. with the current game mechanics it simply is not possible.

Lord Zim wrote:
Debora Tsung wrote:
That said, don't complain about a too safe high sec when You're unwillig to do something about it and change it.

According to some people, even bumping a barge is "griefing" and "CCP must protect us from it". CCP has been listening more to those people than anyone else the past few expansions, which means that any time we "do something about it" and "change it", those people ***** even harder and CCP kowtow to them and make the game even shittier.

Great plan.


Really? Maybe it's just me, but I haven't seen a single "HALP! CCP must ban all hulkageddon participants NAO!" thread since the barge buff.

Lord Zim wrote:
Debora Tsung wrote: - try and dump Tier 3 BC prices

Good luck with that, since they're based around the cost of minerals. I'm not going to mine minerals.


Ofcourse You're not, nobody would expect that from You. You'd need a whole alliance to do that.

Stupidity should be a bannable offense.

Fighting back is more fun than not.

Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#2191 - 2013-01-04 12:10:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
Debora Tsung wrote:
B) The real police in the real world actually CAN protect You IF they're on the right spot at the right time. strangely enough, magical space ship police in fluffy lala space land cannot do that because they only spawn AFTER anything has happened.

Again CONORD does NOT Protect because it CAN'T protect. with the current game mechanics it simply is not possible.

CONCORD can protect you just as well as the police can.

If I walk up to someone standing right next to a police officer, pull out a gun and shoot him in the face, he's just as dead as if I'd done it within "150km" of a police officer. They'd make sure (or try to make sure, rather, since it's harder to track me down in real life than in code) that I get punished afterwards, though.

Just like CONCORD can shoot me instantly if I fire on someone while within 150km of them, that still doesn't stop me from alphaing someone.

Debora Tsung wrote:
Really? Maybe it's just me, but I haven't seen a single "HALP! CCP must ban all hulkageddon participants NAO!" thread since the barge buff.

Guess you haven't seen the numerous bitchthreads about bumping, then.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#2192 - 2013-01-04 12:27:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Lord Zim wrote:
Debora Tsung wrote:
Really? Maybe it's just me, but I haven't seen a single "HALP! CCP must ban all hulkageddon participants NAO!" thread since the barge buff.

Guess you haven't seen the numerous bitchthreads about bumping, then.

Nerf bumpers.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Frying Doom
#2193 - 2013-01-04 12:31:03 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:

Debora Tsung wrote:
Really? Maybe it's just me, but I haven't seen a single "HALP! CCP must ban all hulkageddon participants NAO!" thread since the barge buff.

Guess you haven't seen the numerous bitchthreads about bumping, then.

Bumpers should not be nerfed or banned.

They should be shunned and shot by everyone else for being cowards.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

dexington
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2194 - 2013-01-04 12:37:04 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
They should be shunned and shot by everyone else for being cowards.


They should have a medal and a small amount of isk as a reward for a job well done, miners just need to stfu and realize that crying and running home to mommy is not going to help when to big boys are picking on you.

I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#2195 - 2013-01-04 12:38:02 UTC
dexington wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
They should be shunned and shot by everyone else for being cowards.


They should have a medal and a small amount of isk as a reward for a job well done, miners just need to stfu and realize that crying and running home to mommy is not going to help when to big boys are picking on you.

Big boys in their stabbers ! Stabbing you !

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Debora Tsung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2196 - 2013-01-04 12:41:24 UTC
dexington wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
They should be shunned and shot by everyone else for being cowards.


They should have a medal and a small amount of isk as a reward for a job well done, miners just need to stfu and realize that crying and running home to mommy is not going to help when to big boys are picking on you.



That made me smile :)

I'm in favor of colission damage tho, Jita suddenly would be a lot less crowded. :P

Stupidity should be a bannable offense.

Fighting back is more fun than not.

Sticky: AFK Cloaking Thread It's not pretty, but it's there.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#2197 - 2013-01-04 13:17:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Lord Zim wrote:
Uh huh. Tell me more about how an average of 6 freighters per day during the most active month I saw while glancing at eve-kill would constitute "WE WILL NERF YOU".



Quoting the relevant words:

"I.e.if they gank every freighter they WILL buff freighters. If they cherry pick a bit more then the numbers won't be enough and CCP won't nerf that mechanic."

I.e. = in example. That is a sample scenario, not a sealed official event happened and certified.

if = .... well it means "if". "If" <> YOU ARE DOING IT NAO FOR SURE. It's an "if".


I don't know if 6 freighters a day are too little or too much. If the average before you started doing it was 4 and now it's 6, I don't think you'll see any nerf.
If the average was 1... then yes 6 times that much might raise dangerous CCP antennas.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#2198 - 2013-01-04 13:19:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
dexington wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
They should be shunned and shot by everyone else for being cowards.


They should have a medal and a small amount of isk as a reward for a job well done, miners just need to stfu and realize that crying and running home to mommy is not going to help when to big boys are picking on you.



Yeah but bumping is pointless, they should gank so that I can sell them new ships and sell the miners new macks! Twisted
CCP Falcon
#2199 - 2013-01-04 13:44:25 UTC
This thread is locked for cleaning, and for great justice.

It may be re-opened if it can be cleaned enough.

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

CCP Falcon
#2200 - 2013-01-04 13:57:00 UTC

It's quite clear that this thread has degenerated into alliance vs alliance trolling, and people taking chunks out of eachother.

It's also clear that this topic can't be discussed by people in a civil and constructive manner.

After looking over this thread, it's staying locked.

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3