These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Black Ops - why not warp cloaked?

Author
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#21 - 2012-11-30 23:02:55 UTC
Gneeznow wrote:
Fon Revedhort wrote:
Napoleon Baleine wrote:
What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/

Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what?


Because it costs 700 million isk and since the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' ships can warp around the place cloaked then surely a specialist covert ops ship should be able to?



"the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' as you call it, can warp all around cloaked but trades something for it you seem not able to realize.


removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

Hatsumi Kobayashi
Perkone
Caldari State
#22 - 2012-12-01 00:27:50 UTC
Because there would be more people using it as the next level coward PvE ship than as a ganking platforms.

Because a jump drive is much better, despite its drawbacks (fuel usage and low range).

Because there are already plenty of ways to make them awesome on the field with a little creativity and effort.


Not to say that they're fine as they are right now, but just tacking on a covert ops cloak will hardly correct their flaws. The BlackOps BS are threading on a fine line between horrible piece of dung and overpowered and random, not thought-out fixes have the potential to be really disastrous.

No sig.

Midnight Pheonix
The Corpening
#23 - 2012-12-01 06:18:33 UTC
Moving BlackOps in a separate direction might be the way to go, keep the conventional cloak and give them the ability to use a set amount of fuel and jump to different celestials or bookmarks in a system while a MJD is equipped. It would reinforce it's role as a combat ship (or use this role on combat Black Ops). No need to warp cloaked when you can just micro jump to the battle.
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#24 - 2012-12-03 04:48:59 UTC
So many armchair generals.

You can make a Proteus which gets 700 DPS and fits a covops cloak. You can use a BLOPs to drop this monster of a thing on some poor sucker at zero. It has point range bonuses, 60K EHP, and a sig radius like a dessicated walnut.

You could also just drop your BLOPs itself; it is slower, fatter, has BS guns with useless tracking and resolution, costs more, tanks 0-20K EHP more, and gets 0-150 DPS more, unless you have figured out the ridiculous Sin fit which I've got, which actually does 1100DPS. That's a beast.

I can't see why it would be so broken to make BLOPs fly cloaked. In reality, you'd just have people doing what they do now with bomber and recon gangs, except you'd have a bit of tank to go with your gank, and could deliver it all super-secret.

You would see a few people rolling idiotic levels of BLOPs gangs around ganking people (my vote: Shadow Cartel). But they do this anyway with cloaky Proteuses which forego the 700DPS for a 120K buffer tank, and then just hop in gangs via Titan bridge (ie; Shadow Cartel) or the old fashioned way of warping. It is not like having a BLOPs flying cloaked would be the only way you would be able to get about the place ganking people.

For wormholes, yeah, covert cloaking BLOPs would be pretty revolutionary and awesome. It would give you a cloaky-flying heavy hitter which could move about the place unseen stalking, eg, ratting carriers.

The biggest impediment to BLOPs isn't whether or not they can fly cloaked. Nor is it the cost. it is the hindrances which all battleships share, namely sluggishness, giant sig radiuses, guns which don't apply DPS well.
Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC
#25 - 2012-12-03 14:37:52 UTC
Darek Castigatus wrote:
Gneeznow wrote:
Fon Revedhort wrote:
Napoleon Baleine wrote:
What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/

Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what?


Because it costs 700 million isk and since the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' ships can warp around the place cloaked then surely a specialist covert ops ship should be able to?


yes they can - provided you gimp your combat effectiveness by usng a mediocre in combat subsystem on it.

Black ops dont have to do that hence should not be allowed to warp cloaked.

And before you carry on qqing about it show me any current ship that can warp cloaked and have anything like the combat potential of a black ops.


A Proteus.

/thread
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
#26 - 2012-12-03 16:20:35 UTC
Gneeznow wrote:
Fon Revedhort wrote:
Napoleon Baleine wrote:
What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/

Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what?


Because it costs 700 million isk and since the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' ships can warp around the place cloaked then surely a specialist covert ops ship should be able to?

At the end of the day it all comes down to whether CCP thinks cloaky, hot-dropping and risk-free gameplay should be encouraged any further. I, for one, don't see how these things are good for the game health in the long run.

"Being supporters of free speech and free and open [CSM] elections... we removed Fon Revedhort from eligibility". CCP, April 2013.

Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#27 - 2012-12-03 21:37:12 UTC
Trinkets friend wrote:

You would see a few people rolling idiotic levels of BLOPs gangs around ganking people (my vote: Shadow Cartel). But they do this anyway with cloaky Proteuses which forego the 700DPS for a 120K buffer tank, and then just hop in gangs via Titan bridge (ie; Shadow Cartel) or the old fashioned way of warping. It is not like having a BLOPs flying cloaked would be the only way you would be able to get about the place ganking people.


I like this post, since one of the most frequently heard whines in our comms is that we never DO blops enough, and when we do we never have enough of the battleships and end up with ridiculous dps pilgrims and the like.

I also think the last time I personally titan bridged ontop of a target was in 2011, so I'm not sure where that idea comes from.

You have some odd preconceptions of how we work mate, I'm afraid they are rather off.
Norris Packard
Horde Vanguard.
Pandemic Horde
#28 - 2012-12-03 22:22:47 UTC
I wouldn't mind seeing a new set of BO ships that were battleships with covert ops cloaks without all the nasty jump mechanics, but to give the current versions covert ops cloaks seems like it would be too powerful. BOs have issues but I don't see the need for the current rendition of them to covert cloak.
Shaemell Buttleson
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2012-12-03 23:48:00 UTC
They are already successfully used as they are.

Because they cannot warp cloaked you need to be very careful with them and you really don't want to hang around in a drawn out fight so the high DPS are used the most like the redeemer.

The sin is hard to use safely unless you are prepared to lose drones a lot and therefore not popular for this reason. Seems daft to me it has the drone bonus where the Gallente marauder which is PVE doesn't have that bonus and uses turrets. That's the least popular Marauder also.

Anyway I digress, as I said Black-ops can be used very effectively but considering the price, their size and agility I personally don't think it would be game breaking to give them the co-ops ability.


Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#30 - 2012-12-04 06:40:14 UTC
I realize I had not weighed in on the actual topic, apologies.

What makes Blops nasty is the bridge and the jump to covert cynos, it has surprisingly little to do with cloaking in general; and I REALLY don't feel that EVE needs -yet another- covert ops get-out-of-jail-free shipclass.
Kamenev Drang
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2012-12-04 14:28:21 UTC
Because you can't actually do anything covert in them. It's useless for anything other than bridging and jumping. Giving them a Covops cloak would turn them into something far cooler - a mobile hunter-killer.
Gneeznow
Ship spinners inc
#32 - 2012-12-04 14:59:07 UTC
Fon Revedhort wrote:
At the end of the day it all comes down to whether CCP thinks cloaky, hot-dropping and risk-free gameplay should be encouraged any further. I, for one, don't see how these things are good for the game health in the long run.


It's already too late, people will always gravitate towards risk free, or AS risk free gameplay as they can get. Low sec is populated with nothing but frigates (mobility, picking their fights), Tech3 ((warp cloaked, ability to disengage / pick targets) I've seen quite a few tech 3 these days running with two warp core stabs) and HAC/BC gangs with 4 to 8 logistics running with them.

Might as well go in for a penny, in for a pound with the black ops, it's would be just another extremely expensive and risk avoidance type ship among many, and for the price of it and its role, it should have that feature.
Norris Packard
Horde Vanguard.
Pandemic Horde
#33 - 2012-12-04 22:24:55 UTC
Kamenev Drang wrote:
Because you can't actually do anything covert in them. It's useless for anything other than bridging and jumping. Giving them a Covops cloak would turn them into something far cooler - a mobile hunter-killer.


They are good at moving fleet elements past blockades and for infiltrating and setting up harassment behind enemy lines that is a very powerful tool. They don't need to be the "mobile hunter-killers" because their job is not to hunt but to come when called. They send their minions with the cyno out to do the hunting.

Again I would love to see a second set of Black Ops ship that could use a covert ops cloak but the jump ships shouldn't be able to do both, they would become way too powerful on their own.
Tarn Kugisa
Kugisa Dynamics
#34 - 2012-12-05 02:16:19 UTC
let the sin's drones cloak
or make a new set of 'covert' drones that can cloak and don't intterupt cloaking, but deal less than T2 damage for it

Be polite. Be efficient. Have a plan to troll everyone you meet - KuroVolt

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#35 - 2012-12-05 08:51:59 UTC
I heard there was a ton of arguments against allowing SBs to warp cloaked, was quite some time ago ofc.

Just patience.
Previous page12