These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Auto bidding!

Author
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#21 - 2012-11-28 11:42:46 UTC
Zack Korth wrote:
well how about CCP then, makes it into a game mechanic :)

Cause speculating on plex is total balls


What, you mean CCP actually include in their game a feature that people want so much, they write their own programs and violate terms of service to do it? Why no, that would be ridiculous. Have more eye candy instead.
Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2012-11-28 11:48:27 UTC
Ptraci wrote:
What, you mean CCP actually include in their game a feature that people want so much, they write their own programs and violate terms of service to do it? Why no, that would be ridiculous. Have more eye candy instead.


Would you extend this fine logic to ratting bots as well?

"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["

Zack Korth
Livid CO.
#23 - 2012-11-28 20:06:26 UTC
Sentient Blade wrote:
You didn't think this one through, did you OP.

All orders would, within the space of a couple of hours, drop to the lowest bid, until filled.



I did, and thats what I want.

also, thanks Gogela, appreciate that o7
Zack Korth
Livid CO.
#24 - 2012-11-28 20:11:18 UTC
All of these problems you naysayers are espousing are actually solutions, trading isn't viable against market bots, it would be if we could all do it, the markets would be far less stagnant and it would be fair game for everyone, not just me and my trade skill.. guess what, you can get those trade skills too, you could participate in a new and active facet of EVE.

and no, the market wouldn't at all need to be rebuilt, its as close as anything in a game i've seen to the RL market, and they use this in everyday life, its just as automated, but a million times more efficient.
Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#25 - 2012-11-28 20:17:13 UTC
Rengerel en Distel wrote:
You see those posts in MD because those people are actually marketeers, and don't like random yahoos costing them isk. Market pvp is just as valid though, and if you don't mind taking the loss, "gf" i guess.



Oh, i don't. 100k is small change, and the total sell price is still well over the market average. I never set myself up to take big loss, just ruin whatever second rate market manipulation they're trying to pull off. Twisted

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

Feer Truelight
#26 - 2012-11-28 20:54:54 UTC
Thats why I'm gladly paying 100 ISK more. I hate you, you penny-marketeers!

8/7/2006 3:39:36 PM UTC FreeCCP Promotional Game Time 7 Days Paid

6/1/2012 5:48:57 PM UTC PayPal 1 x 1 Month EVE Subscription + Signup €19.95 Paid

CCP took 6 years to convert me to a (still) paying subscriber :)

Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#27 - 2012-11-29 00:10:49 UTC
Snow Axe wrote:


Would you extend this fine logic to ratting bots as well?


To be honest if people are so bored ratting they have to write bots to do it for them, that should be a huge, huge hint to CCP as to which part of the game needs improvement. People want ISK, so obviously they want to play some parts of the game - the ones you can only do with ISK. However people don't want to grind because it's boring as hell.

I'm not advocating that CCP incorporate botting behavior. Rather they should look at the parts of the game that players are automating, and instead of trying to stop individuals from "botting" they have to recognize that said areas of the game need improvement.

For the market, it's fairly easy. I can, right now, place automated and rather complicated orders to buy or sell real stocks at certain prices, right here from my home. Why is it that CCP limits us to just "buy/sell" at a certain price? Botters are looking for more complex behavior - this can be designed into the game and eliminate botters from the market.

Likewise mining bots - they exists because accumulating piles of minerals confers an advantage - for example when building supercapitals that are amazingly mineral-intensive. But mining is mind-numbingly boring and simple. Thus players invent mining bots, to have their cake and eat it too. Change mining and require more involvement, more participation, more reward/unit time but also more challenge, and botting will cease.

The same with ratting. It is dull, repetitive work. So people bot. So CCP needs to fix ratting. Botters aren't the "enemy", they are just a symptom of a sick game.
Zack Korth
Livid CO.
#28 - 2012-11-29 02:09:24 UTC
Ptraci wrote:
Snow Axe wrote:


Would you extend this fine logic to ratting bots as well?


For the market, it's fairly easy. I can, right now, place automated and rather complicated orders to buy or sell real stocks at certain prices, right here from my home. Why is it that CCP limits us to just "buy/sell" at a certain price? Botters are looking for more complex behavior - this can be designed into the game and eliminate botters from the market.


exactly, and the "real" markets have existed for years this way, nothing would break if CCP implemented that plan. The real market will, but not from the types of orders that are placed lol, in fact, on the gold standard, there would be no more powerful market in the world.

so I guess what i'm trying to say is, if you ever find a time machine, go back and don't let them take us off the gold standard. i think thats right.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#29 - 2012-11-29 06:51:06 UTC
Zack Korth wrote:
Ptraci wrote:
Snow Axe wrote:


Would you extend this fine logic to ratting bots as well?


For the market, it's fairly easy. I can, right now, place automated and rather complicated orders to buy or sell real stocks at certain prices, right here from my home. Why is it that CCP limits us to just "buy/sell" at a certain price? Botters are looking for more complex behavior - this can be designed into the game and eliminate botters from the market.


exactly, and the "real" markets have existed for years this way, nothing would break if CCP implemented that plan. The real market will, but not from the types of orders that are placed lol, in fact, on the gold standard, there would be no more powerful market in the world.

so I guess what i'm trying to say is, if you ever find a time machine, go back and don't let them take us off the gold standard. i think thats right.


1) The real markets don't usually involve the participants providing the underlying (the items).
2) The real markets don't usually make you pay for moving the orders (the "0.01 ISKing").
3) The real markets charge a sensible amount at the time the order goes into execution, commodity markets in particular are going to charge up to $5-6 per contract.
4) There's no "contracts" in EvE as well.
5) I'd love to see true RL orders implemented but imagine regular gamers having to figure out what's a buy stop order, a stop loss, an iceberg order, a trailing stop, an OCO and so on.
6) Most of all, bots are allowed in RL markets because the brokers and market makers know that they will make money by beating the retail trader bots all day long. Imagine if CCP allowed market botting but implemented institutional or HFT software themselves, that would constantly kick you in the face.

Zack Korth
Livid CO.
#30 - 2012-11-29 18:46:56 UTC
No
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#31 - 2012-11-30 19:21:58 UTC
Zack Korth wrote:
No


I'll see your no, and raise you one YES.
Zack Korth
Livid CO.
#32 - 2012-12-02 05:10:39 UTC
going all in with my "no"
Ittos
Beards Confirmed
#33 - 2012-12-02 10:28:13 UTC
I think a better solution would be to add some way to customize your manufactured items. When you start the manufacturing process you can tweak the attributes of the item slightly. For example for a MWD, you can increase the speed boost at the expense of increased cap cost or slightly longer cycle time for higher powergrid. It would add more to the decision making of which 10MN MWD is the lowest cost. It wouldn't mean losing all your sales if someone was selling for lower than you. Not to mention you could customize your fits on a micro level. Just a thought that probably wouldn't happen
Previous page12