These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Mass-test feedback - November 22

First post
Author
big miker
Frogleap Factories
#21 - 2012-11-22 20:54:53 UTC


Machine Info and Settings
  • OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
  • CPU: Intel I5 - 3570k Ivy Bridge processor ( turbo mode overclocked to 4.2 GHZ )
  • GPU: EVGA 670 GTX 2GB signature 2
  • RAM: 8 GB DDR 1333
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 clients
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
  • First client:
    - Anti-Aliasing: High
    - Shader Quality: High
    - Texture Quality: High
    - LOD Quality: High

    Second client ( docked in station entire test )
    -- Anti-Aliasing: Low
    - Shader Quality: Low
    - Texture Quality: Low
    - LOD Quality: Low

    I've set client core affinity different aswell. Client 2 on core 0 and client 1 on the remaining cores 1, 2 and 3.


    User Experience
    [
  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 18-20
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): jumping between 13 and 20. aravage around 16 FPS
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) About the same, 5
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No crashes or disconnects experienced.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Just want to say, great masstest! I like the new sounds alot and the UI is very responsive and good looking. Haven't experienced anything bad yet.
  • Anna Panala
    Redlight District 6
    #22 - 2012-11-22 21:00:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Anna Panala
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: windows7
    CPU: core i3
    GPU: Radeon HD5470
    RAM: 2GB
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 + logserver
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    - Anti-Aliasing: disabled
    - Shader Quality: high
    - Texture Quality: high
    - LOD Quality:high


    User Experience
    Overall: Lot of lag - FPS at pos was 11.

    Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size?
    Never been in such large fleets. I died without noticing that I was targeted due to lag.

    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
    no

    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.
    Overall.. a lot of lag. Hard to play the game like that. I was impressed by the UI changes!

    Anna
    Blade Wolling
    Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
    The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
    #23 - 2012-11-22 21:04:45 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: Windows 7 prof
    • CPU: Intel Q9550 @ 2.83 GHz
    • GPU: nVidea GTX 560 Ti
    • RAM: 8 GB
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
    - Anti-Aliasing: disabled
    - Shader Quality: High
    - Texture Quality: Hight
    - LOD Quality: High


    User Experience

    • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 30 brackets
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 15 brackets
    • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) probably the same; I haven't fought in a fleet this size on TQ
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? The screen froze once during the first warp to a gate
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Couldn't add bounties. I didn't see anything that I could select when I clicked on a player or "show info"
    -- sometimes selecting buttons was slow
    -- I was not able to fire my missles during the NPC fight
    -- Had trouble selecting targets on overview. Overview was slow to scroll.
    -- I had fun as usual, and always learn something new.
    -- Need more Mass Tests on the weekends for us U.S. TZ pilots! (I was off today for Thanksgiving holiday)
    Bade Wolling
    Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
    The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
    #24 - 2012-11-22 21:16:29 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: Win 7 Home Premium SP1 64 bit
    • CPU: Intel I7 920 @ 2.67 GHz
    • GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5670
    • RAM: 12 GB
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
    - Anti-Aliasing: disabled
    - Shader Quality: High
    - Texture Quality: High
    - LOD Quality: High


    User Experience

    • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 30 brackets
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 15 brackets
    • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Never in fleet fight this large. Other parts seemed a little slow
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    -- Was not able to add Bounty to anyone. Never could find anything to click on in character info
    -- Hard to target, slow responce
    -- overview slow
    -- Ship blew up even before I knew I was targeted. Player targeting me never showed on upper screen.
    -- But I had fun as usual
    Renan Ruivo
    Forcas armadas
    Brave Collective
    #25 - 2012-11-22 21:29:22 UTC
  • OS version: Windows 7 64 bit
  • CPU: Athlon X2 5200
  • GPU: GeForce gtx260
  • RAM: 6gb ddr2 800
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
  • - Anti-Aliasing: High
    - Shader Quality: High
    - Texture Quality: High
    - LOD Quality: High

    [/list]
    User Experience

    • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 6 / 9
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 6 / 9
    • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: None, really.
    [/quote]

    The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

    Logix42
    Taxation Damnation
    #26 - 2012-11-22 21:44:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Logix42
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: Windows 7 64 bit
    CPU: Intel i7 870
    GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5830 1GB
    RAM: 12GB @ 1333MHz
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
    - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
    - Shader Quality: High
    - Texture Quality: High
    - LOD Quality: High


    User Experience

    Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets):
    15/20
    Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):
    9/13
    Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
    1
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
    No
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    The buzzing sound, that I think was coming from my shield reps when they were mid cycle and I deactivated them, IS BLOODY ANNOYING. I really hope that doesn't go through to the final build.

    On TQ in the esc menu>>General Settings tab >> just below the notification settings is a check box for "Show Targeting Crosshairs" I think this may have been removed accidentally because I could not find it. (and wanted to turn it off)

    TiDi did not seem to kick in soon enough, experience a LOT of lag

    Also, I miss the warp tunnel sounds, the new ones are too quiet

    Go beyond the edge of space... Explore

    Lucas Raholan
    Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
    #27 - 2012-11-23 00:50:12 UTC

    OS version: Window XP SP£

    CPU: Intel Dual Core @ 2.12Ghz

    GPU: Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT

    RAM: 2.75Gb

    How many clients were you running at the same time?
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium
    - Anti-Aliasing: off
    - Shader Quality: Medium
    - Texture Quality: High
    - LOD Quality: Low


    User Experience

    Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 5 zoomed in 15-20 zoomed out

    Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 7

    Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5

    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 3 disconnects on my end due to crappy router

    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Another awesome test as usual, didn't experience any problems bar some lag. hope the guy I gave a Billion ISK bounty on appreciated it.

    Shitposts so bad CONCORD gave me a 50 billion ISK bounty

    Aikari Tsero
    Ultimate Existencial
    #28 - 2012-11-23 02:15:23 UTC
    OS: Win 7, x64
    CPU: Intel Core I5
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
    RAM: 8GB
    1 Client Running
    All graphics settings on max

    -FPS During gate fight: Zoomed in: 5, zoomed out: 35
    -FPS when not at gate fight: 50-65
    -Client performance: slightly worse than TQ
    -No disconnects or crashes

    -Comments: It seemed like it took a little longer than usual for TiDi to kick in, otherwise it was an acceptable quality fleet fight experience.
    Gaia Ma'chello
    Photosynth
    #29 - 2012-11-23 02:45:42 UTC
    OS version: OSX 10.7.5
    CPU: 2.66 Ghz Intel core i7
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M 512 MB
    RAM: 8 GB 1067 MHz DDR3
    How many clients were you running at the same time? One
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium
    - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
    - Shader Quality: Medium
    - Texture Quality: Medium
    - LOD Quality: Low


    User Experience


    Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 2.5/3.0
    Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 2.0/2.5
    Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) No comparable experience, but past mass tests have been much better.
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I experienced a tremendous amount of client lag. It first got bad when we were asked to place bounties on other pilots. I only managed to place one before the next part of the test. The FPS dropped to less than 0.1, and at one point the game was frozen for about a minute.

    Things were little better in the fights. There were long periods where I had no control, chat would not update, and the game was unplayable.
    Thycoon
    Patrician Space Incorporation
    Patrician Space Incorporation Holding Alliance
    #30 - 2012-11-23 05:57:18 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings
    OS version: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
    CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs), 1600 MHz (OC)
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, Display Memory: 4014 MB
    RAM: 65536MB RAM
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 6 (six)
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Optimized Settings for Performance

    User Experience
    Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 30 - 35
    Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 25-30
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Not participated in big fleet fights on TQ
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Everything was smooth exept with some lagging. The TD (time dilation) after gatejumps was as expected and I had no problem with the grid after the TD-effect. No crashes as mentioned. Have now participated with Command Ship, support cruisers and frigates. In former tests I participated mainly with Supercaps (Titans, Supercarriers, Carriers - where not available) which caused always trouble. This I still have to test. The EVE-Voice was also very clear to listen and not lagging at all but my microphone was not recognized.
    Max Goldwing
    The Scope
    Gallente Federation
    #31 - 2012-11-23 07:37:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Max Goldwing
    OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate
    CPU: Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz
    GPU: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
    RAM: 2GB
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    - Anti-Aliasing: off
    - Shader Quality: low
    - Texture Quality: medium
    - LOD Quality: off
    All effects checkboxes off

    User Experience
    Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out: 30 no brackets
    Average FPS - Zoomed in : 15 no brackets
    Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 3
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    Market now highlights the 1, when buying, this is what many users expect from a modern userinterface, so very nice !
    Ofcause buying 1xx takes some getting used to for older players, but thats a small price to pay :)

    The "who damages me most" coloring is very nice.
    Thr new round health bars, is not as bad as feared, they are now 3 rings inside each other, so its easy enough to figure out what is hull, armor and shields.

    When jumping to the low-sec system, my right click was in the low-sec and my visual was in null-sec, but I guess thats more todo with limited server capacity.

    After the mass test I wanted to test safe-logoff, so I had to wait out my PVP timer.
    2 times during that timer, it reset to 15minutes, without being in fleet and with noone else on grid(except a offline tower), maybe it was caused by the npc spawn spam.

    The scrolling notify text is a nice improvement, hope it also works with the "you cant cloak blabla" messenges, so you have a better chance of seeing when the cloak took effect (since the icon will lag 1-2seconds before showing it).
    Night Condor
    TRUE GONER Executors
    TERRA REGNUM
    #32 - 2012-11-23 10:23:56 UTC
    achine Info and Settings

    OS version: win 7
    CPU: core i7
    GPU: GeForce 560TI
    RAM: 8
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    - Anti-Aliasing: med
    - Shader Quality: hi
    - Texture Quality: hi
    - LOD Quality: hi


    User Experience

    Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 40
    Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 20
    Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no

    [i]"7-7 И, дитя человеческое, имея разум еще младенца, приняло её. 7-8 И, хаос и холод ворвались в галактику эту."[/i]

    Hell Freeze
    Monti Industries
    #33 - 2012-11-23 15:50:52 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: Windows Home 7 Premium
    • CPU: AMD Athlon™ II X2 250 Processor 3.00 GHz
    • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
    • RAM: 5.00 GB
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

    • - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
      - Shader Quality: High
      - Texture Quality: Medium
      - LOD Quality: Hign


    User Experience

    • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 30
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 6
    • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Everything went smoothly overall. I was amazed at how many people can’t follow simple directions.



    Previous page12