These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Mass-test feedback - November 22

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
CCP Habakuk
C C P
C C P Alliance
#1 - 2012-11-22 19:00:40 UTC
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 22nd of November, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version:
  • CPU:
  • GPU:
  • RAM:
  • How many clients were you running at the same time?
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    • - Anti-Aliasing:
    - Shader Quality:
    - Texture Quality:
    - LOD Quality:


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets):
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing
Nox Lingo
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-11-22 20:14:11 UTC
A bit lag here and there, but been on many masstests that are more unstable.

Got shot at for a good while with drones. Got the information flowing down on the hitrate. It continued when I warped away and waited to dock. Not sure it's so relevant to get all the information when your first is in warp and away.
pengo1998
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2012-11-22 20:15:33 UTC
OS version: Windows Home Premium
CPU: 2.2 GHZ
GPU: not sure
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? one client
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low
- Anti-Aliasing: no
- Shader Quality: low
- Texture Quality: low
- LOD Quality: low


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 3FPS/5FPS
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 3FPS/5FPS
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes one crash
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: just being with so many ships i was getting major FPS lag
during the fights i was getting only 3 FPS
Tarn Kugisa
Kugisa Dynamics
#4 - 2012-11-22 20:16:27 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 SP1
CPU: AMD A4-3300M APU
GPU: AMD Radeon HD 6480G
RAM: 6GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low
- Anti-Aliasing: None
- Shader Quality: low
- Texture Quality: low
- LOD Quality: low


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 10/10
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 1/2
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) never been in same fleet size
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: first mass test, enjoyed it thouroughly

Be polite. Be efficient. Have a plan to troll everyone you meet - KuroVolt
Martin Breuer
Ordo Teeutonicus
#5 - 2012-11-22 20:17:00 UTC
achine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7- 64
CPU: Intel 2500k @ 3300
GPU: Radeon 6870
RAM: 4gb DDR3
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): all high
- Anti-Aliasing: high
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 60 / 60
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 20 / 30
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
After Gatejump it took up to 30 seconds to load all environment

Nice Improvements on the sounds an ship models !
Meolyne
Perkone
Caldari State
#6 - 2012-11-22 20:17:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Meolyne
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version:
    • Win7 64 Ult

  • CPU:
    • Core i7 3770K stock

  • GPU:
    • GTX 670 @3840x1200

  • RAM:
    • 8GB Predator 2.4ghz

  • How many clients were you running at the same time?
    • 2

  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    • High everywhere


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets):
    • approx 40-50 with/out brackets

  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):
    • approx 10-18 with/out brackets

  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8

  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
    • No. No lags, nothing.

  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    • Like someone said at the end, Coloring squad members could be an awesome idea.
Meolyne
Perkone
Caldari State
#7 - 2012-11-22 20:19:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Meolyne
double post sorry
Gheyna
Hoover Inc.
#8 - 2012-11-22 20:19:35 UTC
OS version: win 7 64 bit
CPU: i5 2,80
GPU: 1 gb nvida card
RAM: 4 gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low
- Anti-Aliasing: lowest
- Shader Quality: lowest
- Texture Quality: lowest
- LOD Quality: lowest


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 24
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 15
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: some fps drop when people where warping off, people that joined fleet staid on the brackets and ccp could not be killed :(
Anomander Onzo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#9 - 2012-11-22 20:20:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Anomander Onzo
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Win7
CPU: AMD X4 960T
GPU: AMD Radeon 6870
RAM:8 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: disabled
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality:high


User Experience


Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 9 - 15 FPS
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 3 - 6 FPS
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?yes, using the broadcast buttons in the fleet window crashed one of my clients.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
GvR0078
GVR's Heroes
#10 - 2012-11-22 20:22:32 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Win7 64bit
CPU: Intel i7-2600
GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti
RAM: 10GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: off
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets):
in - brack 16
out - brack 29
in + brack 11
out + brack 24

Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):
in - brack 18
out - brack 31
in + brack 15
out + brack 29

Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Nice test
MedweSajtli
The Bear's Cave
#11 - 2012-11-22 20:25:36 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU: Amd Phenom II 925
GPU: Amd 4200 (128 mb dedicate+256 share ram)
RAM: 2x2 Gb ddr 3
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low
- Anti-Aliasing: Disable
- Shader Quality: Disable
- Texture Quality: Low
- LOD Quality: Low


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 30/33
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 13-15/17
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No dc, no crash
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

After gate jump 15-20 sec load all enviorment, firstly drop fps 5-7 . 1-2 sec. after more better fps. Nice idea crime watch system.
Deadwhisper Axalus
Space Dragons Corporation
#12 - 2012-11-22 20:29:01 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: W7
CPU: Intel I-7 3610qm (2,3GHz)
GPU: Nvidia GeForce 660M GTX (2GB)
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: disabled
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: medium
- LOD Quality: high


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 20/25
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 15/18
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Never been in same fleet size
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Lodochkin
Doonheim
Parallaxis Alliance
#13 - 2012-11-22 20:29:44 UTC
OS version: Windows 7- 32
CPU: Intel T710 @ 1.80GHz
GPU: ATI mobility Radeon HD 2600
RAM: 3gb DDR2
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): all low
- Anti-Aliasing: no
- Shader Quality: low
- Texture Quality: low
- LOD Quality: low


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 4/ 6
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 8 / 13
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
After warp out from POS was freezy about 30 sec,many lags.
Safety system in Reblier works bad. I was need fast disable safety, than confirm it. It's hard to do with small FFS.
New images of Modules(shield and armor resistance) is very good
Thane Moreau
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-11-22 20:30:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Thane Moreau
OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64
CPU: Intel Core2Duo E6600
GPU: NVIDIA QUADRO FX 3800
RAM: 8GB 800Mhz
How many clients were you running at the same time? - 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
- Anti-Aliasing: no
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 10/15
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets) : 8/12
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Never been in same fleet size
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes
Levi Evans
Acefire123 Corp
#15 - 2012-11-22 20:30:33 UTC
OS version: Windows Home Premium
CPU: AMD PHENOM 9750 QUAD CORE 2.4
GPU: GTS 250
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? one client
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low
- Anti-Aliasing: no
- Shader Quality: low
- Texture Quality: low
- LOD Quality: low

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 4.5 / 10
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 4 / 10
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) I haven't been in a fleet of such size on tranq and can't give an honest respone.
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Load time as terrible but I haven't don't large fleet battles before to compare. Awesome new features, new Minnie destroyer is a awesome keep up the good work.
Kristina Puljuv
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2012-11-22 20:30:34 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Pro-64bit
CPU: Phenom II x2@3.8GHz
GPU: AMD Radeon 5770 OC
RAM: 4GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: medium
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 15/19
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 11/13
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) never been in the same size fleet
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? one long laaag in warp, but no disconnect issues
First Main
Main's Moon Mining
#17 - 2012-11-22 20:37:01 UTC
OS version: Windows 7 ultimate
CPU: 920 @ 2.67
GPU: HD5770
RAM: 12GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? one client
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): med
- Anti-Aliasing: no
- Shader Quality: med
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: med


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 8FPS/10FPS
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 3FPS/5FPS
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) never had previous experience of similar scale
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Large amount of lag during large scale combat. Ship initally didnt appear when jumping through reb into C-6 however i was able to control my ship. No major game breaking flaws stopped

While attempting to fit a dragoon the fitting window appeared but did not load relevant high low mids etc, instead it gave the appearence of being able to fit 8/8/8 plus sub systems etc

Some issues with some of the minor warning sounds, would be useful to have go to know them before hand, but was running abit late for the mass test anyway.

Personal Experience, enjoyed it, seemed well run, and gave me chance to see ships ive never seen in RL before (dreads etc)
Darth Behelzebhu
Lair of Demons
#18 - 2012-11-22 20:37:44 UTC

OS version: Vista 64
CPU: Intual Core 2Quad
GPU: Nvidia GeForce 120GT 2(2gb)
RAM: 8 gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):1
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 8-9
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 5-6 (up to 7 hiding all UI )
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: A bit of 3 seconds freeze in warps
WheatGrass
#19 - 2012-11-22 20:38:38 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: WinXP Pro x64 sp2
CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 955
GPU: AMD 6700 ( two in crossfire)
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): "Optimized for Performance"
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: Low
- Texture Quality: Medium
- LOD Quality: Low


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): only tested without brackets Unknown (maybe 20s)
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): only tested without brackets Unknown (maybe 20s)
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : unknown maybe 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No -although it seemed close at least once.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

1. When following instructions to attack the POS, I had difficulty right-clicking in space and choosing Planet/moon/...
Whenever I would mouse to the moon, the menu would disappear -causing me to have to start over again (i.e. right-click in space, navigate sub-menus, and etc.) This happened about six times. To describe this as annoying would be accurate. If there's a time-out on this type of screen navigation, it needs to be extended or eliminated.

2. I would have been more helpful in space but some lemming was not following directions and destroyed my ship -necessitating a re-fit. I lost both of my ships this time. The new Algos destroyer was fun but quite fragile. Fitment for that ship was challenging.

Thank you for the opportunity to join in on the test.
Eli Green
The Arrow Project
#20 - 2012-11-22 20:53:16 UTC
machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 64 bit
CPU: intel Core i3 2.4GHz
GPU: intel HD Graphics
RAM: 6 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): med

User Experience

Average FPS during the fights, zoomed out (no brackets): 20
Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 7
Average FPS - Zoomed out w/ brackets: 6
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Was pretty awesome as per usual. Sound cut in and out, but could still hear Eve Voice so not sure if it was a bug or my headset. Also near the end although the station environment loaded, it was not possible to spin or interact with my ship in any way.

Also Fleet X best Fleet and CCP Foxfour = best dev Pirate

wumbo
12Next page