These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Your thoughts on Sword of the Stars II

First post
Author
Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#41 - 2011-11-01 10:49:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Kengutsi Akira
Quote:
And...

11. Scrap Ships doesn't work (for me, at least). A small window asks for confirmation but 'Confirm' doesn't do anything. Cancelling the Scrap order by pressing the small 'x' works instead. I also tried to press the scrap and confirm buttons again and again on the same ships and it created multiple confirmation windows but still no scrap. In the end a scrap window remains on screen (bugged) and covers most of the fleet listing. On the next turn, the game crashed.


apparently, Kerberos failed to do their homework when choosing a publishing company as these guys have a track record of this too:

Quote:
uh... well, I haven't even managed to get far enough to have a need of scrapping anything due to point 1: headaches. But never the less thanks for pointing it out.

That's true that Paradox has quite bad record in releases - HoI 3 being here my personal suffering because I really enjoyed a prequel, bought the new game with nearly all the DLCs somewhere along patch 1.2, so it was quite a while after release, and I still encountered lots of bugs. Than the Paradox comes out with expansion packs which are... essentially a paid requirement for next patches to the game.

I really hope that this time it won't end this way - I'm all fine with expansion packs, probably will buy them for SotS2 as well, but I hate, I HATE when someone is forcing me to pay for fixing the product that doesn't work in some aspects even months after release.

That's the reason why I own only 4 Paradox games (two HoI games and (now) two SotS games) - number of issues in Hearts of Iron series discouraged me to any greater involvement in Paradox products, even though I most likely would love Cold War or EU series.

But even with so poor record of the company - I'm astonished by issues with SotS2. Some of them, like these related to keyboard controls, are even well below Paradox standards.


The sheer amount of ass kissing apologists on the Paradox site that are trolling people with actual problems reminds me of here lol

Good example:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buddahcjcc View Post
The "be happy with what you got" line is getting tiresome.
The reviews ARE getting out, and its as bad as you think.
So yeah, its not just me and a select few.



No troll (just reality)but its cause of people like this that this unacceptable practice will never stop. If you buy games that a re unfinished with the promise that theyll get better, youre paying into the practice and reinforcing it as a wise strategy. Sorry, I cant look at that as a good thing.

Quote:

Id love to be directed to a grand strategy game that is bug free and works perfectly as intended on release.... They are too complex for that to happen :/


Funny thing is all the people that are buying the game DESPITE the face that its ******. Buying into the "release crap and patch it to launch readiness". This is why that practice will never go away: people will still buy the ****.

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#42 - 2011-11-01 11:27:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Kengutsi Akira
stoicfaux
#43 - 2011-11-01 12:54:04 UTC
Yup. Either get a refund or if you have (a lot) of faith in Kerberos, wait a month or six before looking at the game again. There's potentially a great game in there, however, the main concern, IMO, is that if Kerberos released early due to financial pressure, then do they have the resources to actually finish the game?

Also, never, ever, buy a pre-order again.

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Zions Child
Higashikata Industries
#44 - 2011-11-01 15:53:52 UTC
I feel bad about having bought this game now as well, but seriously, calm the **** down. They'll be happy to refund you and/or give you a free copy of SotS 1. Hold onto your nuts for a month or two on the game and it'll probably be great, SotS 1 was a fantastic game, and they continued to support it for quite a few years. Of course, it was their only real game, but still.

Simple: Don't buy the game right now, wait. If you bought the game and want to burn down Kerberos Productions, well too bad, arson is still a crime. You can get your money back, however, so you might as well do that and stop posting like five times in a row.
Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#45 - 2011-11-01 17:46:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Kengutsi Akira
Zions Child wrote:
I feel bad about having bought this game now as well, but seriously, calm the **** down. They'll be happy to refund


yeah persuing that... theyre stringing us along. After telling us we'd get it on Monday, Monday, they said to "check back next week", then today I got an email saying "We're looking into other forms of compensation".

Its a rip off plain and simple and the fact that theyre still selling it as if it were a full game is flat out fraudulent now.

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/sword-of-the-stars-ii/players.html?tag=scoresummary%3Buser-score

lol user rating 3.4 (only that high cause one guy gave it an 8. Either he was a dev or lying out his ass to get it a better rating. The rest were 1s with a single 3).

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#46 - 2011-11-01 20:43:21 UTC
An, by the way, Im perfectly calm. Im just posting the truth of the matter so this prospective purchaser will reconsider his choice.

DO NOT BUY

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Zions Child
Higashikata Industries
#47 - 2011-11-01 21:36:26 UTC
Kengutsi Akira wrote:
An, by the way, Im perfectly calm. Im just posting the truth of the matter so this prospective purchaser will reconsider his choice.

DO NOT BUY


I had not learned about the lack of a refund today.

Still, you could do this with one post, as opposed to forty.
Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#48 - 2011-11-01 23:58:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Kengutsi Akira
Zions Child wrote:
Kengutsi Akira wrote:
An, by the way, Im perfectly calm. Im just posting the truth of the matter so this prospective purchaser will reconsider his choice.

DO NOT BUY


I had not learned about the lack of a refund today.

Still, you could do this with one post, as opposed to forty.


Yes, if I had an unlimited number of characters. I do not, I had a lot of information to express
Or would you perfer I be quiet about the number of bugs in the game? I do however like the number of threads on their forums about how the reviews should "leave her alone" (the crying Britney emo kid reference). How the reviewers shouldnt review the game as is, rather they should wait until the game is ready.
lol

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Zions Child
Higashikata Industries
#49 - 2011-11-02 00:20:32 UTC
Kengutsi Akira wrote:

Yes, if I had an unlimited number of characters. I do not, I had a lot of information to express
Or would you perfer I be quiet about the number of bugs in the game? I do however like the number of threads on their forums about how the reviews should "leave her alone" (the crying Britney emo kid reference). How the reviewers shouldnt review the game as is, rather they should wait until the game is ready.
lol



They invented this newfangled concept called linking. You could have linked all of those posts. I would like to point out that Paradox has done this to all of their published games (except Sengoku) and within a month or two all of their games were absolutely fantastic.

You shouldn't say that Kerberos is trying to rip you off. Should they have released the game like this? No, but it is what it is. Don't buy it, and they will probably give you a refund in good time, you can talk to Paradox as well, by the way, regarding the refund.
Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#50 - 2011-11-02 01:11:08 UTC
Zions Child wrote:


You shouldn't say that Kerberos is trying to rip you off. Should they have released the game like this? No, but it is what it is. Don't buy it, and they will probably give you a refund in good time, you can talk to Paradox as well, by the way, regarding the refund.


Firstsly, I never said "Kerberos is ripping you off" I said:

Kengutsi Akira wrote:


Its a rip off plain and simple and the fact that theyre still selling it as if it were a full game is flat out fraudulent now.


Secondly, I DID get into the refund policy:

Kengutsi Akira wrote:


yeah persuing that... theyre stringing us along. After telling us we'd get it on Monday, Monday, they said to "check back next week", then today I got an email saying "We're looking into other forms of compensation".


Well, given that youre choosing not to read my replies, Im assuming you have me on ignore

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Zions Child
Higashikata Industries
#51 - 2011-11-02 02:42:38 UTC
Kengutsi Akira wrote:


Firstsly, I never said "Kerberos is ripping you off" I said:


Secondly, I DID get into the refund policy:



I have read your replies, and saying that its a rip off and Kerberos is ripping you off are the same thing, but whatever, argue semantics if you wish.

Also, with regards to the second bit, yes, I realize you are apparently not getting your refund for some reason. I asked if you had spoken with Paradox, as they might also be able to accommodate you, realize that there are three people involved in this, Steam, PI, and Kerberos, so talking to them all about a refund (except Steam, who will just tell you to **** yourself) would probably help. Unless you've already talked to PI, then que sera sera.
stoicfaux
#52 - 2011-11-02 14:01:21 UTC
Ladies and Gentlemen,
We've done our due diligence and warned Eve players not to purchase SotS II due to the state it's in. We've also notified current owners of the "game" that refunds are possible but that the publisher, Paradox, may be reneging on refunds.

The format of the message doesn't matter. Some folks appreciate a compilation of links so that they can read the reviews and user comments directly. Other folks appreciate having the relevant bits quoted so that they don't have to dig through the links themselves. There's no need to get into a flame war over which way is best or worst.

If you want to flame or rage or express bitter butt-hurt, then write a letter to your representative, business council, or other relevant regulatory organization about how the software industry continues to knowingly allow heavily defective and/or incomplete products to be sold to consumers. Even now, after all the drama, you can still purchase SotS II on Steam, Gamer's Gate, etc., with not even a warning about the product being essentially unplayable. Couple that with unfriendly refund policies, and we're left with a fraud being knowingly and deliberately perpetuated on the public.

So, if you're going to get angry about something, then reserve your anger for the people who truly deserve it.

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#53 - 2011-11-02 14:18:36 UTC
Also please dont flame ME for being the messenger

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#54 - 2011-11-03 04:44:12 UTC
Man, Im REALLY trying to play it
But there are just game breaking bugs. Imagine a turn based RT game where you can only have 4 fleets

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Louis deGuerre
The Dark Tribe
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#55 - 2011-11-03 09:48:35 UTC
Perhaps it is best to wait untill they fix it before upsetting yourself playing a buggy game...the irony of telling this to an EVE player suddenly hit me Lol

Also:
Free DLCs until Nov 30th
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?568294-Free-DLCs-until-Nov-30th
Emissio Lacrimare
State War Academy
Caldari State
#56 - 2011-11-03 12:47:28 UTC
People always complain about everything...

Kerberos was FORCED to release.
So paradox is to blame for this mess.

I have been playing the game after yesterdays patch.
And if you ignore the sound bug, its a really good game.
A game that will improve a lot the following months.
stoicfaux
#57 - 2011-11-03 14:33:35 UTC
Emissio Lacrimare wrote:

I have been playing the game after yesterdays patch.
And if you ignore the sound bug, its a really good game.


Ugh, no. Play some more.
- AI can't budget and continually runs a deficit and generally crashes its economy
- drones don't work
- defense satellites aren't in the game (but you can research the tech for them)
- armor tech can be researched but no one can tell if armor upgrades are actually applied to ships
- no way to scrap ships
- the meteor swarm random creates a straight line of meteors traveling in formation. Speculation is that the meteors use ship/fleet AI.
- You may or may not be able to upgrade science stations
- Budget screen - the numbers may or may not be accurate, the sliders may or may not work as intended
- NPCs sometimes bring stations with them in fleets
- Diplomacy isn't in yet
- The Defense Manager screen may or may not work. No one is quite sure how it works.
- Attacking stations is iffy because the hit box prevents you from getting close enough for your short range weapons to work,
- You cannot add/design weapons (combat) modules for your stations,
- Ship refitting isn't implemented
- etc. etc. etc.

Tactical Combat, one of the Main Features of the game, is horrid. Ship AI (ship stances, pursuit, close, etc) sometimes works, it's really easy to time out the combat timer before finding the enemy, hell, I have yet to kill a ship despite having 7 CRs shooting at one hiver CR. The tactical combat interface is very clumsy and a huge step backwards compared to SotS 1. Don't get me wrong, there's a lot of potential on SotS IIs combat, but it needs a *lot* of work.

tl;dr Most of the advertised features that make SotS II great are either not in the game, not implemented completely, or just implemented badly. The stability issues are just gravy.

Quote:
A game that will improve a lot the following months.

Yes, months. Unfortunately, lots of months.

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Sturmwolke
#58 - 2011-11-04 02:02:33 UTC
stoicfaux wrote:

Ugh, no. Play some more.


Aren't you supposed to be NOT playing it? P
Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#59 - 2011-11-04 13:35:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Kengutsi Akira
Louis deGuerre wrote:
Perhaps it is best to wait untill they fix it before upsetting yourself playing a buggy game...the irony of telling this to an EVE player suddenly hit me Lol

Also:
Free DLCs until Nov 30th
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?568294-Free-DLCs-until-Nov-30th


Seriously?
Theres a difference between buggy (I was expecting buggy, nothing doesnt follow the release **** and patch to ready later scheme) and ACTUALLY UNFINISHED

There are parts of the game missing. There are parts turned off because the game is a "mess of blown apart code"

It IS funny though, you wanna see the most hardcore of fanboying trying hard to stem the tide of anger go here:
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?488-Sword-of-the-Stars-II
or here:
http://www.kerberos-productions.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=37

Its actually getting funny as to how hard these guys'll get behind this game when its unfinished crap.
"Itll be great in six months"
lol
My main issue is theyre not selling it in six months, theyre selling it now.
and not telling anyone of course.
Thats fraud.

Also, the admirals thing is just a fully ******** "feature" to the game. They LIMIT the number of fleets you can have. OFC currently theres a bug where these dont work at all so the max youll ever have is four. Now imagine trying to defend a galactic sized civilization with four fleets.
One of the races' abilities to expand are directly linked to its ability to send ships out to construct gate networks. In tha last game, you could make as many ships as you wanted to do this. This game, four.
Thats akin to having a C&C sequel where you have to have a general with every group of tanks you wanna send out but them limiting these generals to a set number. In SOTS2 you have to have a lvl 4 Navy Yard to get a CHANCE for an additional Admiral to spawn.

stoicfaux wrote:


tl;dr Most of the advertised features that make SotS II great are either not in the game, not implemented completely, or just implemented badly. The stability issues are just gravy.


Dont forget the ones they removed completely when they realized the code broke other things

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

stoicfaux
#60 - 2011-11-04 14:55:50 UTC
Sturmwolke wrote:
stoicfaux wrote:

Ugh, no. Play some more.


Aren't you supposed to be NOT playing it? P


Ugh. I keep trying to not play, but it's like a watching a train wreck in slow motion. You just can't look away.

It's like watching a reality TV show where an 800 lb (336kg) woman was cloned from the combined DNA of Angelina Jolie and various Victoria's Secret super-models and was being worked on by a team of cosmetic surgeons/virgin internet nerds/anime fans who are pagans that worship the goddess Aphrodite. You can't help but not watch on the off chance that the results re-define what it means to be hot.

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.