These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Separate the four empires with low security space.

First post
Author
Rayzilla Zaraki
Yin Jian Enterprises
#421 - 2013-05-10 22:40:57 UTC
Commander Ted wrote:


Shrink the map? 500 systems isn't enough for a noob? Then on top of that how hard is it to go through lowsec by shuttle?



You may "know" there are 500 systems, but when someone, especially a noob, looks at the map, they see how small "their" space is. But, I don't see a really clean way to allow some sort of free travel between empires.

Having one or two safe routes between empires is an idea, but it would create huge choke points in those system as all players would use them, even ones more than capable of safely passing through low sec space. The solution there would be to make the safe routes a couple dozen jumps long while the dangerous ones would be but a handful.

It sure would elevate piracy as a profession, that's for sure! Not a bad thing.

Gate campers are just Carebears with anger issues.

Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#422 - 2013-05-11 05:28:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Commander Ted
Rayzilla Zaraki wrote:


Having one or two safe routes between empires is an idea, but it would create huge choke.

Thats how it already is.
Hisec doesn't do a very good job of being dangerous.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Tenris Anis
Schattenengel Clan
#423 - 2013-05-11 19:36:55 UTC
Pinky Denmark wrote:
Gate camping =! True piracy


True Scotsman fallacy.
And ironically it would be actually real piracy if people start to gate camp for trade goods instead of for the lulz.

Remove insurance.

Voith
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#424 - 2013-05-11 20:44:06 UTC
This idea is always regurgitated by bad PvPers.

Most people don't want to PvP, so some Wow Kiddie "ELITE PVPer" (who runs from any fight that they don't out number the other team 5:1) comes up with the brilliant idea to **** all over the "sandbox" aspect of Eve and force players to play his way.
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#425 - 2013-05-11 21:45:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Commander Ted
Voith wrote:
This idea is always regurgitated by bad PvPers.

Most people don't want to PvP, so some Wow Kiddie "ELITE PVPer" (who runs from any fight that they don't out number the other team 5:1) comes up with the brilliant idea to **** all over the "sandbox" aspect of Eve and force players to play his way.


Says the bad ass using a toon who never left the NPC corp to post that has 0 killboard history.

Also most people actually do want to pvp. Proof : http://youtu.be/7MZD6-vGQms?t=8m36s
Eve is a PvP oriented game, the PVE in this game is extremely bad, and you should feel bad for thinking its good.

Also isn't a world where players are prevented from affecting each other more WoW Esque than one where players can dynamically change trade through force? Im not sure you have actually played WoW, since WoW is a game where you can make yourself totally immune to PvP.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#426 - 2013-05-12 04:09:35 UTC
The Breath wrote:
JITA is not high sec, JITA = low sec in ccp mind,
In fact, ccp is doing this in other ways Sad, so.....


I have no idea what this means.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Altered Ego
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#427 - 2013-05-12 04:49:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Altered Ego
disregard
Erutpar Ambient
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#428 - 2013-05-12 16:50:49 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Erutpar Ambient wrote:
Be there no rebuttles?

Does this mean everyone is on board with a change like this?



There is plenty of rebuttal. Supporters of this idea have chosen to downplay, ignore, or outright delude themselves regarding the glaring flaws. It's been pointed out repeatedly that a change like this would not have the intended effect. It will screw up the markets for no real gain except a few pirates get some more targets. It's entirely possible to work toward the goal of making a low sec trading hub already, but the kind of people that like rolling freighters are too risk adverse to put their own ISK on the line making it happen. It's as simple as investing in a few bulky and expensive items and putting them up on a sell order for a very good price, then catching the freighters that come to get them on the way out, in turn putting whatever they have in their holds when you catch them back up for sale at bargain prices... Get together with friends, pool resources, hire traders to stock your station, supplement with the proceeds of your piracy, attract Null Sec business with shorter supply chains that can be more easily secured with jump freighters, etc... It does mean effort, financial risk, and doing something other than shooting anything that lights up your gate, but nothing in life or in EVE is free.

It's a suggestion meant to boost the temporary satisfaction of a small segment of toxic players at the expense of the majority, and will result in large alliances owning trade routes and freezing smaller operators out---probably to the ultimate conclusion of overall cancelled subscriptions and dissatisfied customers on all levels.


I have stated plainly why i think this is a good idea. Please state plainly why it's a bad idea. Your arugment that it doesn't "feel" like a good idea. Is not what we're looking for. Neither is "everyone will unsub" and things like that.

When you say it will screw up the markets you'll have to explain more plainly why. Currently lowsec pirating is the way it is because it's out of the way and if someone get's ganked nobody is bothered. But if we put low sec in the path between trade hubs there's going to be a lot of people out there who will be bothered.

This change would not force anyone to go to low sec. All that it would do is make you think twice about flying to another space.

Think of old world trade from eurpoe to china. If you could get silk and spices in europe you wouldn't need to trade. If there was no risk in the transport, they wouldn't really be worth trading anyways. Nothing is worth trading in eve right now.
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#429 - 2013-05-12 18:50:18 UTC
Hey, after nearly 10,000 views can I see a dev response?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Aria Ning
White Rabbit Industries
#430 - 2013-05-12 19:29:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Ning
Erutpar Ambient wrote:
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Erutpar Ambient wrote:
Be there no rebuttles?

Does this mean everyone is on board with a change like this?



There is plenty of rebuttal. Supporters of this idea have chosen to downplay, ignore, or outright delude themselves regarding the glaring flaws. It's been pointed out repeatedly that a change like this would not have the intended effect. It will screw up the markets for no real gain except a few pirates get some more targets. It's entirely possible to work toward the goal of making a low sec trading hub already, but the kind of people that like rolling freighters are too risk adverse to put their own ISK on the line making it happen. It's as simple as investing in a few bulky and expensive items and putting them up on a sell order for a very good price, then catching the freighters that come to get them on the way out, in turn putting whatever they have in their holds when you catch them back up for sale at bargain prices... Get together with friends, pool resources, hire traders to stock your station, supplement with the proceeds of your piracy, attract Null Sec business with shorter supply chains that can be more easily secured with jump freighters, etc... It does mean effort, financial risk, and doing something other than shooting anything that lights up your gate, but nothing in life or in EVE is free.

It's a suggestion meant to boost the temporary satisfaction of a small segment of toxic players at the expense of the majority, and will result in large alliances owning trade routes and freezing smaller operators out---probably to the ultimate conclusion of overall cancelled subscriptions and dissatisfied customers on all levels.


I have stated plainly why i think this is a good idea. Please state plainly why it's a bad idea. Your arugment that it doesn't "feel" like a good idea. Is not what we're looking for. Neither is "everyone will unsub" and things like that.

When you say it will screw up the markets you'll have to explain more plainly why. Currently lowsec pirating is the way it is because it's out of the way and if someone get's ganked nobody is bothered. But if we put low sec in the path between trade hubs there's going to be a lot of people out there who will be bothered.

This change would not force anyone to go to low sec. All that it would do is make you think twice about flying to another space.

Think of old world trade from eurpoe to china. If you could get silk and spices in europe you wouldn't need to trade. If there was no risk in the transport, they wouldn't really be worth trading anyways. Nothing is worth trading in eve right now.


The value of china silk had very little to do with the risk in the transport. It had more to do that silk was a popular item and only the Chinese knew the secret of its manufacture. However, I do agree that the value of an item due to the associated risk involved does increase the value of it, but first the item needs to have value, not the other way around. The current suggestion won't create any real value of items from trade. Items in Eve don't hold much value from trade simply because they're common in every area of space. The only thing that is not that I can think of (and that's commonly traded) is something like Racial Ice. In which case the idea would create some trade value in Racial Ice.

For this idea to work certain high sec regions of space need to have access to items while other regions don't. Otherwise, all you will see are local regions of trade and very few cross regional trade. In other words, Minmatar will stop shipping goods to Jita and only ship them to Rens/Hek and other factions will do the same in their local regional markets. In simple terms this idea will basically be just a nerf to Jita and really nothing more.
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#431 - 2013-05-12 19:40:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Commander Ted
Aria Ning wrote:
stuff

There is a huge abundance of things only found in one region.

LP Store Rewards, Ice, Exploration loot, datacores, and other things are found only in one spot.
Not to mention some minerals are more abundant in certain regions, making racial variants of ships cheaper in some regions. This price difference would create an incentive to conduct trade.

Right now you would think that Republic fleet firetails would be cheaper in rens than in Jita, but they aren't. Why is this?
Because people get the blueprints in minmatar space and move them to Jita.

If their was lowsec you would see an incentive to sell them in rens, and people would buy them there and move them to Jita for profit.

Things like battleships that have ungodly mineral costs would be cheaper to be built in there home regions. Due to the difficulty of moving battleships over low sec in bulk, people would start moving the ores that are easier to obtain in some empires to the market they want to sell them in, creating trade.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Aria Ning
White Rabbit Industries
#432 - 2013-05-12 20:02:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Ning
Commander Ted wrote:
Aria Ning wrote:
stuff

There is a huge abundance of things only found in one region.

LP Store Rewards, Ice, Exploration loot, datacores, and other things are found only in one spot.
Not to mention some minerals are more abundant in certain regions, making racial variants of ships cheaper in some regions. This price difference would create an incentive to conduct trade.

Right now you would think that Republic fleet firetails would be cheaper in rens than in Jita, but they aren't. Why is this?
Because people build them in minmatar space and move them to Jita.


All those items you mentioned are small m3 items except for ice. A blockade runner or even a frigate can haul those items without any real risk associated (unless they're mass transporting it, which I am getting into my next paragraph).

Now... Lets get to the manufacture side of this (or mass transit). Lets say I have dozens of different ships/ammo/rigs/modules etc built and I see that the market in Jita is in demand for the items I built (from doing my research of course). Currently the price it costs me to ship 800km3 worth of goods is between 11mil-14mil (using Red Frog or PushX) which is chump change because I can easily make millions of isk from the items made.

However, with your idea of low sec being the gap between empires the price of hauling the goods will skyrocket. Because now I am charged for jump freighter service which is usually around 50-60 million isk and can hold only 320k m3 goods severely crippling my profits. You think I will produce goods or transport goods to Jita? No. At least not mass transit. Instead, I am just going to produce for the local market since I get more profits that way.

Also Firetails are cheaper in Jita because Jita has the highest trade volume. Meaning there are more sellers and buyers and depending on the item(s) demand there could to be more sellers than buyers which lowers the price. For example, Jita sells about 100-300 Firetails per day, while Rens will sell only 50-150 per day. Not to mention Jita has about over 2k firetails on the market while Rens has only about 100. If you look at the ratio of Firetails sold per day to what's on the market it's only common that Jita prices of firetails will drop since it only sells about 100-300 but has over 2k on the market.
DrysonBennington
Eagle's Talon's
#433 - 2013-05-12 20:08:50 UTC
I like the idea of having a no mans land between each races territory. Make the boundary maybe three to five jumps deep. Make the Frontier Territory 0.0 security status in all territories and place Frontier outposts of neutral standing in system. Control of all of the outposts in a system would then give the owning race control of the systems where after several months of occupation the systems would slowly achieve a better security status rating eventually becoming high security status with Concord and the occupying races Navy moving in to secure the Frontier Territory.
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#434 - 2013-05-12 20:34:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Commander Ted
Aria Ning wrote:

However, with your idea of low sec being the gap between empires the price of hauling the goods will skyrocket. Because now I am charged for jump freighter service which is usually around 50-60 million isk and can hold only 320k m3 goods severely crippling my profits. You think I will produce goods or transport goods to Jita? No. At least not mass transit. Instead, I am just going to produce for the local market since I get more profits that way.


Also Firetails are cheaper in Jita because Jita has the highest trade volume. Meaning there are more sellers and buyers and depending on the item(s) demand there could to be more sellers than buyers which lowers the price. For example, Jita sells about 100-300 Firetails per day, while Rens will sell only 50-150 per day. Not to mention Jita has about over 2k firetails on the market while Rens has only about 100. If you look at the ratio of Firetails sold per day to what's on the market it's only common that Jita prices of firetails will drop since it only sells about 100-300 but has over 2k on the market.


Exactly my point, their is no point in selling things locally because no matter where it comes from, it makes the most sense to sell it in Jita. However if low sec is in the way Jita will die as a super hub. People making things for local consumption will also be a good thing for non traders, since now all four empires will have decent trade hubs.

Also those small m3 items matter to trade. Also not all LP store items are small m3, ammo can take up quite a lot of space. Not to mention ships will still be cheaper in their home empires because of how much more common the appropriate minerals are. If not the ships being moved then the minerals, which will definitely be different prices in each area, and I would argue that minerals are the most important item of all to vary in price.

Also you must consider that even for generic items like t2 modules there would be new trade opportunities. If someone in Amarr buys out every t2 large blaster there is, it will take time for the local production to make up for the loss, opening up an opportunity for people to cross low sec and make profit. Normally someone would probably have bought all the blasters from Jita and then moved them to amarr space for use, or within an hour someone would have seen the shortage on eve central and moved in one obelisk into amarr. Yet now unless someone gets a lucky empire to empire wormhole you will see multiple badger loads trying to make up for that change.

Since economies will be more isolated, they will be more vulnerable to things like a manufacturer going out of business or price manipulation, making it easier for traders to take advantage of such changes.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Aria Ning
White Rabbit Industries
#435 - 2013-05-12 20:51:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Ning
Commander Ted wrote:
Aria Ning wrote:

However, with your idea of low sec being the gap between empires the price of hauling the goods will skyrocket. Because now I am charged for jump freighter service which is usually around 50-60 million isk and can hold only 320k m3 goods severely crippling my profits. You think I will produce goods or transport goods to Jita? No. At least not mass transit. Instead, I am just going to produce for the local market since I get more profits that way.


Also Firetails are cheaper in Jita because Jita has the highest trade volume. Meaning there are more sellers and buyers and depending on the item(s) demand there could to be more sellers than buyers which lowers the price. For example, Jita sells about 100-300 Firetails per day, while Rens will sell only 50-150 per day. Not to mention Jita has about over 2k firetails on the market while Rens has only about 100. If you look at the ratio of Firetails sold per day to what's on the market it's only common that Jita prices of firetails will drop since it only sells about 100-300 but has over 2k on the market.


Exactly my point, their is no point in selling things locally because no matter where it comes from, it makes the most sense to sell it in Jita. However if low sec is in the way Jita will die as a super hub. People making things for local consumption will also be a good thing for non traders, since now all four empires will have decent trade hubs.

Also those small m3 items matter to trade. Also not all LP store items are small m3, ammo can take up quite a lot of space. Not to mention ships will still be cheaper in their home empires because of how much more common the appropriate minerals are.

Also you must consider that even for generic items like t2 modules there would be new trade opportunities. If someone in Amarr buys out every t2 warp core stab there is, it will take time for the local production to make up for the loss, opening up an opportunity for people to cross low sec and make profit. Normally someone would probably have bought all the warp core stabs from Jita and then moved them to amarr space for use, or within an hour someone would have seen the shortage on eve central and moved in one obelisk.

Since economies will be more isolated, they will be more vulnerable to things like a manufacturer going out of business or price manipulation, making it easier for traders to take advantage of such changes.


Well first off there are regional trade hubs. Are they as big as Jita? No.

Second what you're suggesting is basically a way for those who are currently rich and wealthy to take over markets. It'll be like the an EvE version of Wall Street and the Big Banks. Which means everyone will be screwed while the few will benefit. The game will turn from ships in space to the rich in space.

Pretty cool idea but I rather see something like this imposed in null sec space maybe not with trade (since there is no trade) but with resources and have the alliance fight it out. At least there are ships in space.
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#436 - 2013-05-12 20:53:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Commander Ted
Aria Ning wrote:

Well first off there are regional trade hubs. Are they as big as Jita? No.

Second what you're suggesting is basically a way for those who are currently rich and wealthy to take over markets. It'll be like the an EvE version of Wall Street and the Big Banks. Which means everyone will be screwed while the few will benefit. The game will turn from ships in space to rich in space.

Pretty cool idea but I rather see something like this imposed in null sec space maybe not with trade but with more resources.

If this change were added they would become as big as Jita. You said so yourself that if this were done you couldn't move things to Jita if this change were added, so it would be starved of supply and the demand from other empires would be cut off as well.

Also how am I suggesting anything of the sort? Explain in detail because otherwise your just wildly speculating my intentions.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Aria Ning
White Rabbit Industries
#437 - 2013-05-12 20:58:29 UTC
Commander Ted wrote:
Aria Ning wrote:

Well first off there are regional trade hubs. Are they as big as Jita? No.

Second what you're suggesting is basically a way for those who are currently rich and wealthy to take over markets. It'll be like the an EvE version of Wall Street and the Big Banks. Which means everyone will be screwed while the few will benefit. The game will turn from ships in space to rich in space.

Pretty cool idea but I rather see something like this imposed in null sec space maybe not with trade but with more resources.

If this change were added they would become as big as Jita. You said so yourself that if this were done you couldn't move things to Jita if this change were added, so it would be starved of supply and the demand from other empires would be cut off as well.

Also how am I suggesting anything of the sort? Explain in detail because otherwise your just wildly speculating my intentions.



How can they become as big as Jita? All the sellers/buyers will disperse throughout the regions. You will see an increase of market activity in the local regions but they certainly won't be nearly as big as Jita currently.
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#438 - 2013-05-12 21:00:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Commander Ted
Aria Ning wrote:



How can they become as big as Jita? All the sellers/buyers will disperse throughout the regions. You will see an increase of market activity in the local regions but they certainly won't be nearly as big as Jita currently.

They would be as big because Jita would shrink. Your not understanding what I mean. All the hubs would be equal, probably about 700 people each.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Aria Ning
White Rabbit Industries
#439 - 2013-05-12 21:03:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Ning
Commander Ted wrote:
Aria Ning wrote:



How can they become as big as Jita? All the sellers/buyers will disperse throughout the regions. You will see an increase of market activity in the local regions but they certainly won't be nearly as big as Jita currently.

They would be as big because Jita would shrink. Your not understanding what I mean. All the hubs would be equal, probably about 700 people each.


Yes while Jita is around 2k sometimes more (or would be if the servers could handle more). So as I said they will increase but no where near the level of what Jita is currently.

By the way do you know what the population levels are? If Minmatar space is more active than others or less active then you have some imbalances. Especially with factional warfare.
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#440 - 2013-05-12 21:06:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Commander Ted
Aria Ning wrote:

Yes while Jita is around 2k sometimes more (or would be if the servers could handle more). So as I said they will increase but no where near the level of what Jita is currently.

By the way do you know what the population levels are? If Minmatar space is more active than others or less active then you have some imbalances. Especially with factional warfare.


Yea i never meant that.

All the empires have populations proportional to the number of systems (excluding Jita).
Although caldari space has slightly more people than Amarr.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.