These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Define Carebear

First post First post
Author
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#161 - 2012-11-14 03:25:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Some Rando wrote:
Auric Veldfinger wrote:
But this ridiculous game has barriers-to-entry so high to learning PVP, and the teaching and resources that are available are so damn convoluted

This is terrible and you should be ashamed of yourself for spreading such lies.


No, this is true. I tried low-sec missioning when I was about 3-months into the game - undocked for my first mission and got ganked instantly without so much as a "lol u suck" from my assailant. Those were his exact words. If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better - nothing about that experience made me want to try low or nul again, and I'm getting my SP up before I venture back out there, it's that simple. I'm getting very close now, though - I already have access to much better ships than I did back then.

And before you ask - yes, I did attempt to fight him. I locked on and hit F1 and waited for the lock to acquire. Probably cycled my guns twice before my ship exploded.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Auric Veldfinger
Doomheim
#162 - 2012-11-14 03:31:43 UTC
Some Rando wrote:
Auric Veldfinger wrote:
But this ridiculous game has barriers-to-entry so high to learning PVP, and the teaching and resources that are available are so damn convoluted

This is terrible and you should be ashamed of yourself for spreading such lies.


How long until we hear that nostrum about "getting into pvp from day one, here's an 8 hour skill queue to get you into a pvp corp", like abstinence it works in theory but rarely happens in reality.
fukier
Gallente Federation
#163 - 2012-11-14 03:31:46 UTC
i would think carebear is a state of mind... everyone at times when they play eve are carebears...

if the definition is a risk adverse player...

a large coalition of players who dont have enough players in their fleet decide not to engage in a fight are Carebears...

a person saving up fir thier first carrier avoiding getting killed like the plague is a carebear...

pretty much on a daily basis every person who plays eve will display characteristics of being a carebear...

its human nature.
At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box.
Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#164 - 2012-11-14 04:21:55 UTC
Auric Veldfinger wrote:
How long until we hear that nostrum about "getting into pvp from day one, here's an 8 hour skill queue to get you into a pvp corp", like abstinence it works in theory but rarely happens in reality.

Jesus, you and OP have some sort of aversion to reading, Google, and practice it seems.

You have two choices:
1. Nut up and shut up.
a. Find some friends and learn with them.
b. Put some coins in, choose "hard mode", and learn solo.

2. Whine like a little ***** about how hard **** is and how mean people are.

CCP has no sense of humour.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#165 - 2012-11-14 04:33:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Some Rando wrote:
Auric Veldfinger wrote:
How long until we hear that nostrum about "getting into pvp from day one, here's an 8 hour skill queue to get you into a pvp corp", like abstinence it works in theory but rarely happens in reality.

Jesus, you and OP have some sort of aversion to reading, Google, and practice it seems.

You have two choices:
1. Nut up and shut up.
a. Find some friends and learn with them.
b. Put some coins in, choose "hard mode", and learn solo.

2. Whine like a little ***** about how hard **** is and how mean people are.


You seem to have some aversion to civilised discourse. Doesn't your mummy love you??

Google is far from the be-all and end-all of places to learn from, for another thing. You make it sound like the forums are pointless - why have them when we can just Google everything??

I didn't post here for the purposes of your own private pissing contest. If you have nothing constructive to offer other than your personal problems, then go away.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Nikodiemus
Ganja Clade
Shadow Cartel
#166 - 2012-11-14 04:36:19 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:

Carebears are awesome, and are the backbone of EVE's economy.

Without them, all us ebil people wouldn't have anyone to build ships so that we could blow eachother up.

Big smile



Another dev response that has no value at all. Connecting with the community doesn't actually require useless banter with a blue icon to send you there.
XxRTEKxX
256th Shadow Wing
#167 - 2012-11-14 04:52:50 UTC
I thought carebear was simply someone doing any form of pve. Missioning and mining mainly.

Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#168 - 2012-11-14 05:17:13 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
You seem to have some aversion to civilised discourse.

The substance of my post must have offended you, huh? Maybe try reading it again and understanding what I was talking about?

There's no point crying about mean people in EVE. You either kill them back, slink away and try not to let it happen again, or whine on the forums. The latter option should be received with nothing but contempt.

There is no barrier to entry into PvP, it's all in your head.

CCP has no sense of humour.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#169 - 2012-11-14 05:27:50 UTC
Some Rando wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
You seem to have some aversion to civilised discourse.

The substance of my post must have offended you, huh? Maybe try reading it again and understanding what I was talking about?

There's no point crying about mean people in EVE. You either kill them back, slink away and try not to let it happen again, or whine on the forums. The latter option should be received with nothing but contempt.

There is no barrier to entry into PvP, it's all in your head.


There is substance in your posts?

Could have fooled me.

FYI, why don't you read my posts and point out the ones where I was "crying" about it. I haven't cried about **** - I got blown up in lowsec and decided not to go back until my skills are better. I haven't whined - point out the post where I have, please. A link, not a quote. I know there's no "barrier" per se, but many players aren't interested in participating in something that basically means they have to "jump in the deep end of the pool" so to speak, without first learning how to swim. There are different schools of thought, such as the only way to learn is to jump in the deep end, but that doesn't make it a superior school of thought, nor does it make it the only one available.

Contempt itself is more worthy of contempt than whining, though, because whining is harmless - contempt, on the other hand, is usually just as unproductive and completely irrelevant. Instead of showing contempt to the whiners, why don't you try teaching them instead? Offer them alternatives to whining. Or, just keep showing contempt if your brain can't handle anything better, but I wonder if you realise that in that very "contempt", you are whining yourself. Whining about the whiners.

It all comes full circle, and then you become just as much a whiner as they do. Do you think that has earned you just a little contempt?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#170 - 2012-11-14 05:37:36 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I haven't whined - point out the post where I have, please. A link, not a quote.

Why not a quote?

CCP has no sense of humour.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#171 - 2012-11-14 05:39:41 UTC
Some Rando wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I haven't whined - point out the post where I have, please. A link, not a quote.

Why not a quote?


Quotes can be edited. Der.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#172 - 2012-11-14 05:40:26 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Quotes can be edited. Der.

So can posts. Der.

CCP has no sense of humour.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#173 - 2012-11-14 05:42:12 UTC
Some Rando wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Quotes can be edited. Der.

So can posts. Der.


Well, I'm having a hard time thinking of the post that I whined in, since I haven't got one. So instead of wasting your time arguing the semantics of link vs quote, why don't you make a point to me by finding the post in which I've whined. Unless you're willing to admit that you've bitten off more than you can chew in your elitist rants & ravings on my thread.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#174 - 2012-11-14 05:47:11 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Well, I'm having a hard time thinking of the post that I whined in, since I haven't got one
Remiel Pollard wrote:
undocked for my first mission and got ganked instantly without so much as a "lol u suck" from my assailant. Those were his exact words. If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better

So, uh, you gonna go edit that again?

CCP has no sense of humour.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#175 - 2012-11-14 05:53:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Some Rando wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Well, I'm having a hard time thinking of the post that I whined in, since I haven't got one
Remiel Pollard wrote:
undocked for my first mission and got ganked instantly without so much as a "lol u suck" from my assailant. Those were his exact words. If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better

So, uh, you gonna go edit that again?


That wasn't a whine. That was an explanation of what happened, explaining why I don't go back there until I've got better skills. How did you interpret that as a whine? Or do you just interpret everyone that explains their reasons for not going into nul or low as a whine?

See, what I was actually explaining was how I dealt with the situation - that is, I decided to avoid low and nul and work on my skills. But I never whine about it. That was over three months ago when that happened - if I was going to whine about it, I would have done it then.

And no where in that post do I mention any demands I made for changes to the game. I merely explained how I did with what happened with what was available to me at the time, including actually trying to fight him. The point of that post wasn't about me getting killed, it was about my personal experience of how hard it is for new players to get into PvP, and how degrading it can be when other players make it harder on them.

EDIT: what you just did is called cherry-picking. The post as a whole provides the context for the anecdote, which you seem to have ignored or missed. Instead, you picked out the part that you could make look like a whine, and tried your very best to do so, but you are only fooling yourself.

Now, please try again.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#176 - 2012-11-14 06:00:00 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better


If you were talking about this particular part, then I can understand why you might mistake this for whining. However, this is not a whine - I don't care how people want to treat other players, I handle it my own way. I was pointing out the conditions of how to achieve the result of less whiners, and more active PvPers. If you REALLY want to see less whining on the forums, then give people less stuff to whine about. Otherwise, they aren't going to care about you anyway - who are you to them? No one but an avatar on a computer monitor and a few pixels of text. You mean nothing to the whiners, you mean nothing to me, but the problem is, you seem to think you should mean something to everyone - that's your problem, and yours alone buddy.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#177 - 2012-11-14 06:03:43 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
That wasn't a whine. That was an explanation of what happened

Here's where you whined:

Remiel Pollard wrote:
If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better

You were whining about mean people.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
EDIT: what you just did is called cherry-picking. The post as a whole provides the context for the anecdote, which you seem to have ignored or missed.

Not at all, I quoted the relevant part, where you whined, with enough substance to put that into context.

CCP has no sense of humour.

Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#178 - 2012-11-14 06:04:35 UTC
Official definition from the Webster New Eden Galactic Dictionary:

Quote:
A carebear is a pilot who lives either in high security or sovereignty null security space. Risk averse and lacking the capacity to adapt by nature, these herd animals seek safety in numbers, and typically depend on CCP to change the game mechanics so their species can survive in this cold and harsh universe.

.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#179 - 2012-11-14 06:11:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Some Rando wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
That wasn't a whine. That was an explanation of what happened

Here's where you whined:

Remiel Pollard wrote:
If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better

You were whining about mean people.


Not a whine about mean people. An explanation of how the way people treat other players will set their opinion of the game and how they should play it. Do you understand the difference? If I was going to whine about it, I would have done that three months ago when it happened. This is just an example from personal experience of what kind of player behaviours exist, but I didn't whine about it.

You complain about people not reading, which is another form of whining itself, but you are completely missing everyone's point as if it is irrelevant next to your own. Perhaps if you paid attention to other people instead of expecting them to pay attention to you and only you and swallow your words as "biblical" you might be able to lose this self-absorbed attitude of yours and be able to adapt to the fact that there are other people playing this game.

EDIT: IF people are going to get treated like crap in the game, then why shouldn't they complain? Why shouldn't they speak out against jerks, elitists, self-absorbed egomaniacs like yourself, and other foul behaviour in the game? Even if it is allowed according to game mechanics and EULA, if you're treating people like crap then you should probably EXPECT them to complain. Expecting them not to is really quite daft and naive.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
#180 - 2012-11-14 06:27:59 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I see this term get thrown around a lot, more often as a pejorative for players that play the game a certain way - I'm not sure I understand what that certain way is, though, so I would appreciate it if someone explained. I know I'm going to get a few people who just say "carebears are the scum of highsec" and that's it, but that's not a definition, is it. I *don't* want to know WHY they're scum - or why they're NOT scum... in fact, I'd rather a definition, properly delivered without bias, not include the word scum at all. An explanation would be nice, not more accusations, pejoratives and condemnations. I just want to know what it means, not how you feel about it - although I'm sure some of you will tell me anyway.



IMO

1. a Carebear is someone who wants to live in high sec with absolutely no possible way for them to get ganked/bumped/can flipped/war dec'd/ninja salvaged or have any other player's actions negatively affect them. They don't PvP. They live in a magical world until they are introduced to the realities of EvE and then you find them on these forums raging.

2. Some use the term to refer to anyone who lives in hi sec (PvPing or not)

I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!  Now... where's Ken?