These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Faction Warfare - Fixing Amarr/Minmatar Geography

First post First post First post
Author
Meditril
Hoplite Brigade
Ushra'Khan
#61 - 2012-10-31 15:53:49 UTC
Cearain wrote:

I'm glad you can make isk from plexing. One militia can make 2xs as much from this. Which militia do you think most people will join?

I don't know what you are talking about fitting a mill isk mod to a ship. Minmatar can always bring more flat out firepower than amarr due to the numbers and economic imbalance. Susan jagerblitzen appearntly liked that so he made sure it that imbalance became permanent through a rule changes that ensure the winners stay on top.


Your really sound like a bitter-vet.

What I mean with talking about fitting a mill ISK mod to a ship is that meany people seem to think that they need the best of the best to do anything useful and have fun. They just seem to forget that this is in most cases (there are exception) economically total non-sense.

So, you can today get a good Faction/T2 frigate including fitting for 30 to 40 Mill ISK. A faction cruiser with proper fitting goes for 80 Mill ISK. Both are very well capable to solo a level 2 medium plex. A medium plex gives you 10 Mill ISK from tags and loot alone. So even if not considering any LP gains, how many plexes do you need to pay off your T2 frigate? 4 and the faction cruser? 8. Now if you now take into account that you maybe as Amarr just take a Faction Frigate (Slicer is awesome!) or the Faction Cruisers by trading LP and selling the remaining LP for ISK you will maybe just need to run 2 plexes for the frigate and 4 plexes for the cruisers even if you are just at tier 2. So where exactly is the problem?

Run four plexes and you have one ship spare for crazy PVP... this will not cost you more than 2 hours max in the worst. Saying this, can you please now tell me where exactly is the problem with earning money and spending it for PVP in faction warefare and especially being on the Amarr side?

BTW: Before you answer "Meh I still get less LP" please take a look at the price of a Firetail and compare it to the price of a Slicer... you will see that Slicer is much more expensive. So you get much more ISK for your LP.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#62 - 2012-10-31 16:11:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
Meditril wrote:
Cearain wrote:

I'm glad you can make isk from plexing. One militia can make 2xs as much from this. Which militia do you think most people will join?

I don't know what you are talking about fitting a mill isk mod to a ship. Minmatar can always bring more flat out firepower than amarr due to the numbers and economic imbalance. Susan jagerblitzen appearntly liked that so he made sure it that imbalance became permanent through a rule changes that ensure the winners stay on top.


Your really sound like a bitter-vet.

What I mean with talking about fitting a mill ISK mod to a ship is that meany people seem to think that they need the best of the best to do anything useful and have fun. They just seem to forget that this is in most cases (there are exception) economically total non-sense.

So, you can today get a good Faction/T2 frigate including fitting for 30 to 40 Mill ISK. A faction cruiser with proper fitting goes for 80 Mill ISK. Both are very well capable to solo a level 2 medium plex. A medium plex gives you 10 Mill ISK from tags and loot alone. So even if not considering any LP gains, how many plexes do you need to pay off your T2 frigate? 4 and the faction cruser? 8. Now if you now take into account that you maybe as Amarr just take a Faction Frigate (Slicer is awesome!) or the Faction Cruisers by trading LP and selling the remaining LP for ISK you will maybe just need to run 2 plexes for the frigate and 4 plexes for the cruisers even if you are just at tier 2. So where exactly is the problem?

Run four plexes and you have one ship spare for crazy PVP... this will not cost you more than 2 hours max in the worst. Saying this, can you please now tell me where exactly is the problem with earning money and spending it for PVP in faction warefare and especially being on the Amarr side?

BTW: Before you answer "Meh I still get less LP" please take a look at the price of a Firetail and compare it to the price of a Slicer... you will see that Slicer is much more expensive. So you get much more ISK for your LP.



Or I could join minmatar and only have to spend one hour grinding and have more time for fun pvp.

No matter how you try pat our heads and say "half the isk is plenty for you," rational people will always choose more money instead of less money for same task. Dress it up however you want but your failure to admit this just ruins your credibility.

BTW: Part of the reason slicers are firetails are so far apart now (althoguh they are not half price and sfi and nomens are even closer) is because minmatar were able to hit tier 5 before the change and so had a bunch to sell off. The market is still adjusting and you as minmatar realize they can sell allot of the common items at a great deal the cost of sfis and possibly even the useless firetail will increase.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
#63 - 2012-10-31 16:18:12 UTC
Cearain wrote:
[quote=Meditril][quote=Cearain]
I'm glad you can make isk from plexing. One militia can make 2xs as much from this. Which militia do you think most people will join?


The Minmatar can do 2xs LP in respect of Amarr cause they worked for this. This the consequence of Amarr being for now the loosing side. You keep talking as it's the reason, as the game was cheatted or consequence of some plot. It's an effect not a cause, everyone started witht he same playground. Point is Amarr doing nothing to change this. And guess what? They don't cause it's fine for them so.

In the darkest age of the gunless plex farming Amarr simply had no interest in changing the status quo because for them was more convenient to cash out with their alts in minmatar militia.

I remember a drama about this forum about some Amarr alliance splitting cause their directors were blamed for pretending to have their farming alts flagged as blu by the others. Of course this lead to decay, but cannot blame the game mechanics or other players if the ammarr leadership is corrupted; work to fix it.

In all this months you folks had plenty of time to revert all this. But, sure, this would require some work and effort... much easyer to just whine on the forum while cashing at T5 with your alts.

The last change fix a lot of these issues; I think your problem now is simply that is no longer so easy using your alts in minmatar to earn bilons of ISK.


Meditril
Hoplite Brigade
Ushra'Khan
#64 - 2012-10-31 16:23:48 UTC
Cearain wrote:

Or I could join minmatar and only have to spend one hour grinding and have more time for fun pvp.

No matter how you try pat our heads and say "half the isk is plenty for you," rational people will always choose more money instead of less money for same task. Dress it up however you want but your failure to admit this just ruins your credibility.


You forgot one thing. Running plexes as Minmatar in Amarr space means you are much more often disturbed since there are significantly less systems to choose from. Which means it takes more time to run the plex. As Amarr you have the whole and almost empty Metropolis back-yard to grind in peace.

Anyway. I give up. If you think that minor economical differences should dictate your game play and that they take away all your fun, then you really should consider to join the Minmatar side just the have the feeling you are on the "winning" side. If you don't think so then you should stay where you are, stop moaning and take it as a challenge to organize the Amarr folks to simply turn the things around.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#65 - 2012-10-31 16:57:47 UTC
Sura Sadiva wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Meditril wrote:
[quote=Cearain]
I'm glad you can make isk from plexing. One militia can make 2xs as much from this. Which militia do you think most people will join?


The Minmatar can do 2xs LP in respect of Amarr cause they worked for this.


No you are confusing the inferno mechanics with retribution. Inferno rewarded people who got you to the winning position. Retribution rewards those who join your team after you are winning.

Someone who never did any work for either side will be able to join minmatar and get the benefit of your extra tiers. Or they could choose half pay for the same tasks and join amarr.

Hell I could grind up my standings and join minmatar and get the bonuses under retribution. With inferno that wasn't the case because inferno gave no lp for defensive plexing and gave the same amount of lp regardless of what tier you were at when you earned it. Retribution directly punishes you for joining the side with the lower tier.



[quote=Sura Sadiva]
This the consequence of Amarr being for now the loosing side. You keep talking as it's the reason, as the game was cheatted or consequence of some plot. It's an effect not a cause, everyone started witht he same playground.


That is not true. It is not true at the start of inferno (when ccp decided to change the rules and make occupancy actually worth something) and it was not even true at the start of fw in general.


Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#66 - 2012-10-31 16:58:20 UTC

Sura Sadiva wrote:

Point is Amarr doing nothing to change this. And guess what? They don't cause it's fine for them so.

In the darkest age of the gunless plex farming Amarr simply had no interest in changing the status quo because for them was more convenient to cash out with their alts in minmatar militia.

I remember a drama about this forum about some Amarr alliance splitting cause their directors were blamed for pretending to have their farming alts flagged as blu by the others. Of course this lead to decay, but cannot blame the game mechanics or other players if the ammarr leadership is corrupted; work to fix it.

In all this months you folks had plenty of time to revert all this. But, sure, this would require some work and effort... much easyer to just whine on the forum while cashing at T5 with your alts.

The last change fix a lot of these issues; I think your problem now is simply that is no longer so easy using your alts in minmatar to earn bilons of ISK.


You seem to think that the actual players are really amarr. Most players don't care about the rp. Why am I amarr? Because I didn't want to get locked out of jita and I thought the caldari gallente war was over. Your view is out of touch with reality.

Also Susan black, unwittingly, posted the numbers that demonstrated that leading up to retribution the massive minmafarm was all but unstoppable. CCP had to address farming and then amarr would have had a shot at tier 5. But instead thanks to Susan Jagerblitzen they just made it so the winning side would be able to cement their lead.

They made it so that when people choose a side they are just flat out deciding if they want more or less money.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#67 - 2012-10-31 17:04:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
Meditril wrote:
Cearain wrote:

Or I could join minmatar and only have to spend one hour grinding and have more time for fun pvp.

No matter how you try pat our heads and say "half the isk is plenty for you," rational people will always choose more money instead of less money for same task. Dress it up however you want but your failure to admit this just ruins your credibility.


You forgot one thing. Running plexes as Minmatar in Amarr space means you are much more often disturbed since there are significantly less systems to choose from. Which means it takes more time to run the plex. As Amarr you have the whole and almost empty Metropolis back-yard to grind in peace.


Right so you can grind it back up in peace and make 2xs the isk. Sorry if you want that you will have to roll an amarr alt. I won't be your alt for you.

Meditril wrote:

Anyway. I give up. If you think that minor economical differences should dictate your game play and that they take away all your fun, then you really should consider to join the Minmatar side just the have the feeling you are on the "winning" side. If you don't think so then you should stay where you are, stop moaning and take it as a challenge to organize the Amarr folks to simply turn the things around.



Its not even a matter of my gameplay. Its just obviously what players choose to do - look at the number of people in amarr and minmatar before inferno and the economic consequences and after.

People will choose to get paid more money instead of less money for the same task. Why do you keep fighting this? And 2xs as much is not a minor amount.

My switching to or from amarr is not going to change this.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Dread Operative
Lowlife.
Snuffed Out
#68 - 2012-10-31 18:16:54 UTC
You guys are such freaking babies! I just made 5.2b off my Amarr alt. You guys are too busy crying and complaining to actually do anything. You have it better then you did last month. Id rather have t1 prices at 1/2 LP then Navy Apocs for 800k LP and normal LP. The Caladari had a chance to take more systems over after the patch like Happy Endings did (with no problem whatsover) but were too busy complaining and deplexing their own systems.

FFS you're the result of millions of years of evolution, act like it.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#69 - 2012-10-31 18:21:14 UTC
Dread Operative wrote:
You guys are such freaking babies! I just made 5.2b off my Amarr alt. .


You should have made a minmatar alt and made 10 bill.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Dread Operative
Lowlife.
Snuffed Out
#70 - 2012-10-31 18:25:21 UTC
Cearain wrote:
Dread Operative wrote:
You guys are such freaking babies! I just made 5.2b off my Amarr alt. .


You should have made a minmatar alt and made 10 bill.



Why? I love Navy Geddons and Apocs, hate Phoons and SFI's. And I left minimatar with my main to fight with Gal Mil when they were only peaking T3, not everyone is about the iskies. Some people would rather play then complain.
Itala D'Uhmri
Doomheim
#71 - 2012-10-31 18:32:50 UTC
I frankly think both sides should have a few cul-de-sacs (3 systems, no more) and a relatively linear setup. My ideal solution would be to take jumps OUT of amarr space, making it harder for the Matar to roam it freely.

That said, the Hofja situation's a bit extreme, and a second way around should be set up.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#72 - 2012-10-31 18:57:34 UTC
Dread Operative wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Dread Operative wrote:
You guys are such freaking babies! I just made 5.2b off my Amarr alt. .


You should have made a minmatar alt and made 10 bill.



Why? I love Navy Geddons and Apocs, hate Phoons and SFI's. And I left minimatar with my main to fight with Gal Mil when they were only peaking T3, not everyone is about the iskies. Some people would rather play then complain.



You could have bought all those ships and have had another 5 billion left over.

I agree not everyone is about the iskies but most people will choose more isk over less isk. That is why this current rule set is bound to fail.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Dread Operative
Lowlife.
Snuffed Out
#73 - 2012-10-31 19:07:59 UTC
Don't get me wrong though, I think Amarr specifically got boned on the patch (since Inferno). Whinedari is a whole other story. I think it all comes down to the outlook you have towards it. When the alt army first came the squids were smashing us. But the core gallente players stayed strong till we could finally hit tier 3 then the minnie farms joined the fight and we are were we are today.

I personally think they need to add enough systems to get you t3 with all lvl V and just make them yours. Then you and the ninnies can have it out again.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#74 - 2012-10-31 19:33:32 UTC
Dread Operative wrote:
Don't get me wrong though, I think Amarr specifically got boned on the patch (since Inferno). Whinedari is a whole other story. I think it all comes down to the outlook you have towards it. When the alt army first came the squids were smashing us. But the core gallente players stayed strong till we could finally hit tier 3 then the minnie farms joined the fight and we are were we are today.

I personally think they need to add enough systems to get you t3 with all lvl V and just make them yours. Then you and the ninnies can have it out again.



I always advocated amarr fighting back in the plex war despite the imbalances of inferno. Susan Black started crying that the minmatar were being punished for winning due to the fact that they could not farm defensive plexes. She wrote 5 blogs about it and the amarr kept explaining that this was the primary balance that allowed them to keep hope. Hans kept siding with his alliance mate and getting beligerent with the amarr.

Instead of pushing for rules that give a bit more balance to the losing side hans and ccp decided to push these rules that make it completely lopsided. Thats fine but I am done. I was burned for sticking with amarr through inferno and I am not going to be burned again.

Hans got some great pro-minmatar rules passed for his alliance but I am done. Good for you Susan jagerblitzen. You have now made faction war a clear choice: do you want more isk or less? I wonder what people will choose.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Deen Wispa
Sheriff.
Caldari Tactical Operations Command
#75 - 2012-10-31 19:38:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Deen Wispa
Cearain wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:

Whether you can fund your pvp depends on your enemies numbers and economics. If your enemy has 2xs the numbers and 10xs the isk you will not be able to sustain pvp against them.

Ridiculous statement. There's still plenty of pvp available. However, you will not be able to blob them, nor will you be able to take systems from them if they want to stop you from doing so.



Right the pvp is completely unrelated to occupancy.

I know you are happy with, rvb style, no context pvp. But some of us were hoping these fw updates would bring these things together. Instead retribution is just driving them even further apart.

And your idea of "plenty of pvp" and my idea of "plenty of pvp" are probably quite a bit different.


My opponents up here are richer than I am due to their ability to have more t5 and t4 cashouts than my militia. However, I and many others are able to keep the pace with them and kill them constantly due to superior tactics and strategy.

inb4 the next excuse.

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#76 - 2012-10-31 19:39:06 UTC
Cearain wrote:


Instead of pushing for rules that give a bit more balance to the losing side hans and ccp decided to push these rules that make it completely lopsided. Thats fine but I am done. I was burned for sticking with amarr through inferno and I am not going to be burned again.

Hans got some great pro-minmatar rules passed for his alliance but I am done. Good for you Susan jagerblitzen. You have now made faction war a clear choice: do you want more isk or less? I wonder what people will choose.

Bah,
1. It was a Fweddit guy who suggested the current constant LP store scheme.
2. They softened the Tier payouts so that people could make a living at Tier 1 now.

No matter what the rules, your side would get roflstomped because you don't have the numbers.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#77 - 2012-10-31 20:30:14 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:


Instead of pushing for rules that give a bit more balance to the losing side hans and ccp decided to push these rules that make it completely lopsided. Thats fine but I am done. I was burned for sticking with amarr through inferno and I am not going to be burned again.

Hans got some great pro-minmatar rules passed for his alliance but I am done. Good for you Susan jagerblitzen. You have now made faction war a clear choice: do you want more isk or less? I wonder what people will choose.

Bah,
1. It was a Fweddit guy who suggested the current constant LP store scheme.
2. They softened the Tier payouts so that people could make a living at Tier 1 now.


Fweddit guy: "I don't care if minmatar can afford sfis as long as I can afford a t1 fit thrasher"

Hans: "AGREED! See, I listen to amarr concerns."


X Gallentius wrote:

No matter what the rules, your side would get roflstomped because you don't have the numbers.


the rules make it so we will never get the numbers. "Join amarr and make less isk" is not really a good campaign slogan.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#78 - 2012-10-31 20:32:15 UTC
Deen Wispa wrote:
Cearain wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:

Whether you can fund your pvp depends on your enemies numbers and economics. If your enemy has 2xs the numbers and 10xs the isk you will not be able to sustain pvp against them.

Ridiculous statement. There's still plenty of pvp available. However, you will not be able to blob them, nor will you be able to take systems from them if they want to stop you from doing so.



Right the pvp is completely unrelated to occupancy.

I know you are happy with, rvb style, no context pvp. But some of us were hoping these fw updates would bring these things together. Instead retribution is just driving them even further apart.

And your idea of "plenty of pvp" and my idea of "plenty of pvp" are probably quite a bit different.


My opponents up here are richer than I am due to their ability to have more t5 and t4 cashouts than my militia. However, I and many others are able to keep the pace with them and kill them constantly due to superior tactics and strategy.

inb4 the next excuse.



Oh I wouldn't dream of giving an excuse. Surely its your "superior tactics and strategy." Lol

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#79 - 2012-10-31 20:47:43 UTC
Cearain wrote:
The rules make it so we will never get the numbers. "Join amarr and make less isk" is not really a good campaign slogan.
You might be on to something! :)

ISK IS FOR BABBIES!!11! JOIN TEH AMMAR!!
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#80 - 2012-10-31 20:52:05 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Cearain wrote:
The rules make it so we will never get the numbers. "Join amarr and make less isk" is not really a good campaign slogan.
You might be on to something! :)

ISK IS FOR BABBIES!!11! JOIN TEH AMMAR!!



It will get some people until they realize just how many ships you lose when you are doing faction war. Then they will start to wonder how they can pay for this pvp. They will then figure out we can't and leave the amarr like so many have in the past.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815