These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Hypocrisy of High Sec

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#261 - 2012-10-31 20:56:52 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Gankers.

"Now I have to use two destroyers to destroy 1 Mackinaw. Unfair."
[citation needed]
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#262 - 2012-10-31 20:57:20 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
While he makes a rediculous arguement that has nothing to do with how the game is played.


How this game is played?
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#263 - 2012-10-31 20:58:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Natsett Amuinn
Touval Lysander wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
"because a fat kid likes cake"

...but most people in null don't want to nerf the hell out of high sec
...we just don't want to be disadvantaged because we choose to play in the part of the game that is entirely player driven.

It was icecream.

Only the CFC guys want it changed because Mittens said so. Given you only have 49.5% of null, that's not most. Correct.

Reread that last line and tell me how that might relate to a highsec carebear. Go on. Put the carebear hat on and reread it. See anything?


I suspect that the obnoxiousness of your posts is intended.

But I thank you for being another individual contributing to my point.

"because mittens told us to"
Obvously not because we play in null and therefore KNOW.
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#264 - 2012-10-31 21:00:27 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
While he makes a rediculous arguement that has nothing to do with how the game is played.


How this game is played?

You know, those silly things called mechanics.

Like the one that lets you get blown up if someone else choses to blow you up.

We're still waiting for those threads started to complain about needing 2 destroyers to blow up a mach.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#265 - 2012-10-31 21:01:39 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
How this game is played?
See the post you quoted.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#266 - 2012-10-31 21:03:44 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Like the one that lets you get blown up if someone else choses to blow you up.

We're still waiting for those threads started to complain about needing 2 destroyers to blow up a mach.


What stops you from destroying my Skiff then? It's possible, you know.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=137125
http://eve-search.com/thread/137125-1

There's a few more. Learn to use Google.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#267 - 2012-10-31 21:06:22 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
There's a few more. Learn to use Google.
So where's that thread where people complain about having to use two destroyers?
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#268 - 2012-10-31 21:07:08 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
There's a few more. Learn to use Google.
So where's that thread where people complain about having to use two destroyers?


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=137125
http://eve-search.com/thread/137125-1
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#269 - 2012-10-31 21:08:22 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=137125
http://eve-search.com/thread/137125-1
…doesn't contain any such complaint.

So where's the thread in question?
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#270 - 2012-10-31 21:08:39 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Like the one that lets you get blown up if someone else choses to blow you up.

We're still waiting for those threads started to complain about needing 2 destroyers to blow up a mach.


What stops you from destroying my Skiff then? It's possible, you know.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=137125
http://eve-search.com/thread/137125-1

There's a few more. Learn to use Google.

I would laugh and ask if you're kidding, but i"m sure you're not.

You didn't get that it was a thread about CCP passively tanking miners becaue they couldn't be bothered to do it themselves and not about needing 2 destroyers to blow up a single mach?

Looked pretty obvious by it's body of content to me. Not to mention valid.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#271 - 2012-10-31 21:10:50 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
I would laugh and ask if you're kidding, but i"m sure you're not.


So are you saying that game mechanic prevents you from destroying my Skiff?
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#272 - 2012-10-31 21:11:10 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
There's a few more. Learn to use Google.
So where's that thread where people complain about having to use two destroyers?


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=137125
http://eve-search.com/thread/137125-1

"hurr CCP buffed the mining ships when the miners could easily tank >1 destroyer by fitting a few mods, but because they can't possibly bear to reduce their yield, daddy CCP is there to soothe their worries" != "oh god I can't gank a mining ship with a single destroyer anymore my life is worthless :( :( :("

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#273 - 2012-10-31 21:13:15 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
I would laugh and ask if you're kidding, but i"m sure you're not.


So are you saying that game mechanic prevents you from destroying my Skiff?

No, they do not.

Where in the hell would you even get, even remotely get, the idea that I was implying that, let alone saying it?
Baroness Vulna
Armada vi Vulnezia
#274 - 2012-10-31 21:13:47 UTC
OP is just another control freak who wants to force his 'play style' on everyone else. He thinks his way of playing is how everyone should play and those who dont are hypocrites. I think CCP is doing a great job and hi sec /nulsec is great!!

Play the game, have fun

brought to you by -Barony of Vulnezia MMO micro nation- www.vulnezia.com Be a part of the world's first MMO Micro Nation
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#275 - 2012-10-31 21:14:53 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
No, they do not.

Where in the hell would you even get, even remotely get, the idea that I was implying that, let alone saying it?
The same place Jorma always gets his “facts”: the Bottomless Pool of Jorma Lies™.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#276 - 2012-10-31 21:16:52 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
No, they do not.

Where in the hell would you even get, even remotely get, the idea that I was implying that, let alone saying it?


You guys waste 1+ bil to gank a freighter, but you don't waste 1+ bil to gank a exhumer.
KrakizBad
Section 8.
#277 - 2012-10-31 21:17:49 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
No, they do not.

Where in the hell would you even get, even remotely get, the idea that I was implying that, let alone saying it?


You guys waste 1+ bil to gank a freighter, but you don't waste 1+ bil to gank a exhumer.

Huh? This is even more senseless than usual.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#278 - 2012-10-31 21:18:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
You guys waste 1+ bil to gank a freighter, but you don't waste 1+ bil to gank a exhumer.
…which has nothing to do with being mechanically prevented from ganking a skiff.

So the question remains: where did even remotely get the idea that he was implying that, let alone saying it?

Oh, and are you going to provide that thread where people complain about having to use two destroyers?
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#279 - 2012-10-31 21:19:01 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:

"because mittens told us to"
Obvously not because we play in null and therefore KNOW.

Indeed. I owned a cat, a horse, 3 budgies and a dog once. I am therefore a vet. (<< pun intended)


OK. Let's cut the crap and keep this simple.

Hypothetical:

CCP, tomorrow morning, in their infinite wisdom, cascade to your forum whines like they so obviously did for carebears and give you 10,000 x 0.0 station slots with no escalating penalty for use. The cost to use is set by alliance.

Will that make you happy? Y/N
Would that stop you calling for highsec "fixes"? Y/N

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#280 - 2012-10-31 21:19:29 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
You guys waste 1+ bil to gank a freighter, but you don't waste 1+ bil to gank a exhumer.

I'm asking my 8-ball for if there's any point to your post. It's telling me to ask again later.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat