These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Miners Unite to Fight the New Order!

First post First post First post
Author
Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#221 - 2012-10-29 13:33:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Morrigan LeSante
These threads continue to deliver

Miners: We want to mine without repercussions
Bumpers: No activity has it allowed to have no repercussions. /bumps with no repercussions

It's forum gold Big smile


Edit: Miners have the game by the throat, they simply don't realise it Ugh
HollyShocker 2inthestink
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#222 - 2012-10-29 13:34:46 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Marvin Narville wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
Zero Audier wrote:
I'm getting tired of people talking about this. Just hire some dam mercs with all those iskies you made from mining Roll.

Whilst I do not agree with the whining going on about it, the fact remains that the bumper incurs no cost for his actions and a cost is required to stop it.

In fact the bumper profits in that he gains a killright and insurance payout. For ZERO risk.

Let's be true to our game if nothing else.

If we are to do anything - stop the NPC corp hiding so he can be at least wardecced.


Wouldn't this also allow for Miners hiding in NPC corps to be war decced? The most likely outcome here is that since James 315 is at least nominally aware of game mechanics, he'd simply utilize dec shields, and perhaps utilize free services listed elsewhere on these fine forums to trap said miners in perma-war decs. The miners on the other hand, by and large being less savvy in terms of these nuances, (i'm not saying all miners, but lets be honest, lots of them) would likely just end up griefing themselves twice as hard. Not that I disagree with any of it mind you, if it results in more pvp under any circumstances, I wholeheartedly endorse it.

Oh my, it's like the highsec mechanics allow people to avoid pvp.


Yes becuase this has pvp written all over it....well goofwaffle pvp any how.
HollyShocker 2inthestink
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#223 - 2012-10-29 13:38:56 UTC
Tesal wrote:
Why another post on James 315? The OP is playing right into his hand by making another post about this. Miner tears on the forums will only embolden him even more.


Most likely an order alt trying to draw attention to the whole thing. My guess is its not going well for them.
HollyShocker 2inthestink
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#224 - 2012-10-29 13:41:51 UTC  |  Edited by: E-2C Hawkeye
Some Rando wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
(we can argue "counter" ofc but i think you get what i'm saying)

If you don't want to be bumped, either increase the mass of your ship or move out of the way. How is that a difficult counter to understand? There are probably other counters as well, like interposing another ship or something. Saying bumping has no counter is stupid.

It's almost like miners don't bother using the grey matter between their ears.

You know, I think miners just might be the worst people in EVE because they clog up the petition system, whine incessantly, and actually don't even play the game if all the AFK claims are true. What terrible people.



you dont mine do you? Or have never been bumped while mining. If so you would not have made this statement.
HollyShocker 2inthestink
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#225 - 2012-10-29 13:44:10 UTC
Ludi Burek wrote:
Counter 1 = Orbit the damn roid as close as possible.

Amazing.

Wait, mining barges can orbit? Roll


Counter 2 = Probe gravimetric site and mine away.

Oh you don't have a clue about probing? Also what are gravimetric sites? I am not surprised... Roll


Counter 3 = Go to a less ******** system. You don't "have to" mine with the rest of the herd you know. Roll

Effort, right?


Again more bad advice from someone who has not been bumped while mining....counter 2/3 are viable counter one was poor advice.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#226 - 2012-10-29 13:45:59 UTC
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:


you dont mine do you? Or have never been bumped while mining. If so you would not have made this staement.


He may not mine, he may never have been bumped. I, on the other hand, do mine and have been bumped, I still mine (roids not ice) and spend some of my time helping to remove fellow miners from the ice belts via bumping, because it appeals to my twisted sense of humour.

Next irrelevant argument please?

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

HollyShocker 2inthestink
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#227 - 2012-10-29 13:52:02 UTC  |  Edited by: E-2C Hawkeye
Nothing is stoping gankers from ganking. If they want to keep it up then let them. No mechanic has changed it or stoped it. Gank away
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#228 - 2012-10-29 13:54:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Natsett Amuinn
shadowhearth Eto wrote:
stuff




I want to apologize in adavance. This is a little rude and I admit it.

Anyone that thinks that lower mineral prices in high sec would be good for the games economy is an idiot.

High sec needs mineral prices to RISE, and by a good margin.

Low and null needs mineral prices to stay low.


Higher mineral prices in high sec would increase the cost of goods, reducing the gap between the prices of bulk manufactured goods in high sec and those sold in low and null, thus improving the living conditions in null for those of us that play EVE for the industrial and market side of things.


Low prices and continual inflation is BAD for the economy.

Wihtout ganking and bumping of miners prices in high sec would just drop, and it would pretty much kill any and all industry in null.

You guys are your own worst enemy, seriously. You guys keep asking for more protectin when less would actually make you mroe ******* money! WTF, if you mine in high sec, you SHOULD WANT THE GUY MINING NEXT TO YOU TO GET BLOWN UP. Everyt time another miner is blown up, bumped, or just has his output reduced, YOU have the potential to sell for more.



YOU do not understand supply and demand, along with what seems to be a bunch of other people. EQUILIBRIUM is NEVER achieved in EVE, because output is NEVER ADJUSTED based on supply. There is constantly more minerals going into the system than coming out of it.

When the price of rare earth elements starts to rise, China doesn't produce more, they reduce trading to reduce supply and inflate the cost of rare earth elements. If the bottom end falls out, you do not produce more, you stop trading it.

You guys in high sec keep doing everything you WOULDN'T do baed on supply and demand. You're overproducing a good that is ALWAYS in demand, and then complain that you want to put even more into the system and drive down costs, that's as stupid as stupid gets.

For the mentally impaired.
If you can make 2 of something everyone wants, in a proper supply and demand system, you would only make 1. Making 2 would make you LESS money than if you only made one and charged more for it.

You guys are literally hurting yourselves everytime you complain about not being able to mine.
You would make more if everyone mined less. You guys should be treating mineral slike oil and you don't.

What a coincidence that people in null sec don't just get this, they practice it. Go figure.
Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#229 - 2012-10-29 13:58:59 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:


you dont mine do you? Or have never been bumped while mining. If so you would not have made this staement.


He may not mine, he may never have been bumped. I, on the other hand, do mine and have been bumped, I still mine (roids not ice) and spend some of my time helping to remove fellow miners from the ice belts via bumping, because it appeals to my twisted sense of humour.

Next irrelevant argument please?

I still mine occasionally, when I get some sick yen to build my own ammo. So yeah, next irrelevant argument? You don't see Jonah here shitting up the forums about being bumped.

CCP has no sense of humour.

HollyShocker 2inthestink
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#230 - 2012-10-29 13:59:23 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
shadowhearth Eto wrote:
stuff




I want to apologize in adavance. .


Yes....yes you should. Do you really believe that this minor bumping and ganking is effecting prices?
Karrl Tian
Doomheim
#231 - 2012-10-29 14:24:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Karrl Tian
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
If there was collision damage in the game I'm pretty sure there'd constantly be a huge number of threads complaining about how broken collision damage is.


It would go like this:

Gankers kill tankless miners by bumping.

Miners get mad and demand a means to defend themselves, refuse to fit tank.

CCP implements aggression flagging for bumping people.

Gankers use collision bumping to flag miners that they then kill.

Miners demand protection from CCP, refuse to have friends or defend themselves as they claimed they wanted to, and still won't fit a tank (why should I have to train tank skills because of your playstyle?)

CCP buffs exhaumers by introducing an anti-collision shield and more EHP.

CCP then decides to make bump-aggoring a global flag for some reason.
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#232 - 2012-10-29 14:31:08 UTC
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
shadowhearth Eto wrote:
stuff




I want to apologize in adavance. .


Yes....yes you should. Do you really believe that this minor bumping and ganking is effecting prices?


No, and that's what I'm telling you.

It's not effecting, and you should want it to effect it. It's stupid to not want it to effect it.

YOU WOULD MAKE MORE MONEY IF OUTPUT WAS ABLE TO BE IMPACTED MORE! Wanting less impact is bad; it effects the ecoomy and your own personal wealth.

You're already making a mess of the economy, it's why null suffers on the industrial side. You guys aren't charging enough for minerals, which is keeping high sec produced goods lower than they should be, and that creates a gap that is to large to compete with building in null.

High sec industry is very much like a communist state. People think I'm being an ass when I make my little communist rants, but I"m being serious. You've centralized industry in high sec by flooding the market with more minerals than needs to be there, keeping costs well bellow what people can afford, and making it so that null is better off importing than building.

You guys are ******* up the economy through all of New Eden, and you keep asking for CCP to do things that would just make it worse.



I want you guys in high sec to make more isk, if you make more isk with higher prices then I'll make more isk building and selling in null. Over competition and producation is a problem. Competition can't be reduced, but mineral outputs can.



If you're a miner in high sec, it would benefit you to put bounties on as many other miners as you possibly can come Dec. 4th. The more miners you can impact, the more output is reduced, and the more you can charge for mineals. WE need a much larger group working in high sec to disrupt outputs, and miners can be a part of it soon instead of being the problem.

But then you guys want more output and lower prices already, so I doubt you'll be smart enough to do the right thing come Dec. 4th. Instead you guys will ***** about having bounties on your head untill CCP nerfs that.



Forced demand, you know like oil, and you guys are like here buy a barrell for a few cents, I'll jus go get more for you. Effing moronic.
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#233 - 2012-10-29 14:34:19 UTC
Robert De'Arneth wrote:

Ignore this, they have no way to enforce it. Stop making threads about it and go mine. In fact when they demand ISK from you, tell them in very nice terms to go f them selves. Big smile

I find it really cute how miners tell each other this but, when they actually find themselves up against the masters of bumping, they inevitably end up paying.

Some of the easiest-to-find examples can be found here and here.
Casirio
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#234 - 2012-10-29 14:37:00 UTC
Love the emergent gameplay P did you guys really hire mercs?
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#235 - 2012-10-29 14:39:01 UTC
Casirio wrote:
Love the emergent gameplay P did you guys really hire mercs?

If they did, we certainly haven't seen them yet.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#236 - 2012-10-29 14:47:57 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Casirio wrote:
Love the emergent gameplay P did you guys really hire mercs?

If they did, we certainly haven't seen them yet.


I'm waiting for mercs to take their money and then show up in the belts to bump them for being whiney little kids Twisted

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Robert De'Arneth
#237 - 2012-10-29 14:54:26 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Robert De'Arneth wrote:

Ignore this, they have no way to enforce it. Stop making threads about it and go mine. In fact when they demand ISK from you, tell them in very nice terms to go f them selves. Big smile

I find it really cute how miners tell each other this but, when they actually find themselves up against the masters of bumping, they inevitably end up paying.

Some of the easiest-to-find examples can be found here and here.



Well you are more then welcome to come and try and make me pay, I assure you, I will laugh at you. You see, you have no way to make me pay. This is a fact, you may think you show up and people shiver, but you would be wrong. Big smile I would be very polite and tell you to go f yourself. You act like you know everyone in the game and how they will react, that is your mistake, thinking you know everyone.

I'm a nerd, you can check my stats!! Skilling Int/Mem at 45 sp per minute is how I mack!     I'm like a lapdog, all bark no bite. 

Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#238 - 2012-10-29 15:00:49 UTC
Robert De'Arneth wrote:
Well you are more then welcome to come and try and make me pay, I assure you, I will laugh at you. You see, you have no way to make me pay. This is a fact, you may think you show up and people shiver, but you would be wrong. Big smile I would be very polite and tell you to go f yourself. You act like you know everyone in the game and how they will react, that is your mistake, thinking you know everyone.

Where do you live?

Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
I'm waiting for mercs to take their money and then show up in the belts to bump them for being whiney little kids Twisted

I, too, am waiting to see this happen.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#239 - 2012-10-29 15:07:43 UTC
This thread is evidence of WHY many people don't like high sec miners. No simply bumping a miner is somehow the end of the world, because orbiting stuff is hard.
Max Doobie
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#240 - 2012-10-29 15:14:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Max Doobie
Just an idea, maybe the miners can come together and drive the ore prices up until either the community turns on them, the bumpers stop or Alliances wipe them out (bumpers).

Seems like a nice CCP free way to "Sandbox-A-Solution" in my book. Would be completely fair and legit.