Wormholes

That I suddenly feel very Mexican.

I would love to see containers "Audit Logs" higher capacity. Could be created more containers of various capacities greater. 50k, 200k, 500k

But I think it already is a beginning and a good idea of direction to solve the problem of organization in POS

Or just wait for the POS revamp. You have put up with it so far.

But the larger containers could never be removed from a station before as they were too large to fit in any ship. Now they can be repackaged to a smaller size and moved. So they could actually be used at a pos.

An assembled station container does not fit into a ship. We cannot repackage in our POS. Doesn't that mean that once you put a station container into your CHA and assemble it, you can never get it out again? And thus never unanchor your CHA? Since you cannot unanchor a tower that has anchored modules near it, this will also permanently trap your tower.

If I'm right, people bringing station containers to POSes could cause a major headache for their corps...

The other issue is the nagging one where it seems you cannot open a container inside a CHA. I always have to move it to a ship cargo, open, transfer stuff, and put back in the CHA. Wouldnt work very well with the station containers

This is why I'm suggesting we go take our concerns to CCP so that when the changes hit, we might be able to bypass the whole "pull container out to assemble and then put back" headache. We should be aiming for ease of use instead of just speculating on the issue.

This is what I heard too, but when I tried it once, it didn't work. Error message was "you cannot unanchor a structure with items inside it" or similar.

Maybe they changed it, maybe it's confused with the case when you unanchor a pos module that does not belong to your corp, after the tower is destroyed. That is possible and destroys the contents, but first the tower has to be destroyed.

If you are the owner of the tower, you can't unanchor modules with stuff in them, and you can't unanchor a tower with modules still anchored on grid.

Just a few months ago I was in the situation that I wanted to abandon a C2 with static LS, and I didn't want to leave a dead POS behind. I also didn't want to haul all the cheap crap out (about 75 modules). And I wanted to at least take the tower and some of the most expensive modules with me.

What I did in the end was that I unanchored everything and just left it floating, then unanchored the tower and took it with me. Someone surely found all those modules and hauled them away... there were never any loss mails, and they still do generate loss mails when unanchored, I tested it on one.

The only change I see being necessary to POS mechanics is the ability to open containers within a structure. Because it's very unsecure to have everyone have access to everything. I'd rather they had their own password protected, non removeable container that could act like a true hangar. It would also be nice if they added a few larger sizes like 5k, 10k and so on.

Also, get rid of the 3 week or whatever it is timer, I get it's an audit log container, but they can't work in a pos until that happens, you want to take your cha down, oops sorry you can't, there's a station container that was accessed recently so you've got to destroy the cha or wait another couple of weeks or so.

Should be able to set up something like it evemailing directors with who repackaged it, and contents on repackaging, but that would probably mean some roles sorting out for ccp, so unlikely to happen. I don't know what roles are required to repackage something, or even if the role is grantable or just something that happens.