These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP allow miners to defend against bumpers ?

Author
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#81 - 2012-10-24 18:25:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Tali Ambraelle
James 315 wrote:
In all seriousness though, there are plenty of ways to defend against bumpers. Go mine in low/null and shoot them. Smile


In all seriousness though, no. They don't want to because they don't want to be interrupted in THEIR game play style. Whether shooting or bumping. Your logic is wrong. Smile
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#82 - 2012-10-24 18:27:53 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
James 315 wrote:
In all seriousness though, there are plenty of ways to defend against bumpers. Go mine in low/null and shoot them. Smile


In all seriousness though, no. They don't want to because they don't want to be interrupted in THEIR game play style. Whether shooting or bumping. Your logic is wrong. Smile

Why should my game play style be interrupted then, pray tell? Smile
Vanyr Andrard
VacuumTube
#83 - 2012-10-24 18:28:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Vanyr Andrard
Malcanis wrote:


Well then web away! Aggressing a corpmate isn't a CONCORD offence.


(You knew that, right?)


How do i simultaneously join the corp of every bumper in existence, assuming they agree to it?

(you knew that was impossible already, right?)

((did you miss the specification of 'hostile webifying', or the parellelism between bumping and webifying implying webifying noncorpmates?))
Alice Saki
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#84 - 2012-10-24 18:28:56 UTC
Shaalira D'arc wrote:
For anyone curious as to what's behind this thread:

http://www.minerbumping.com/



Wow. Funny Website ^_^

FREEZE! Drop the LIKES AND WALK AWAY! - Currenly rebuilding gaming machine, I will Return.

Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2012-10-24 18:29:11 UTC
James 315 wrote:
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
James 315 wrote:
In all seriousness though, there are plenty of ways to defend against bumpers. Go mine in low/null and shoot them. Smile


In all seriousness though, no. They don't want to because they don't want to be interrupted in THEIR game play style. Whether shooting or bumping. Your logic is wrong. Smile

Why should my game play style be interrupted then, pray tell? Smile


Because your game play style was not being interrupted by miners. You're simply annoying people. That's not game play, that's undesirable behavior. Smile
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#86 - 2012-10-24 18:31:04 UTC
James 315 wrote:
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
James 315 wrote:
In all seriousness though, there are plenty of ways to defend against bumpers. Go mine in low/null and shoot them. Smile


In all seriousness though, no. They don't want to because they don't want to be interrupted in THEIR game play style. Whether shooting or bumping. Your logic is wrong. Smile

Why should my game play style be interrupted then, pray tell? Smile

If CCP let you blow up asteroids with the same rules as can flipping, would you guys do that instead of bumping miners?
Vanyr Andrard
VacuumTube
#87 - 2012-10-24 18:31:25 UTC
James 315 wrote:
In all seriousness though, there are plenty of ways to defend against bumpers. Go mine in low/null and shoot them. Smile



I tried that a few times, but you guys only bump in high sec Evil
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#88 - 2012-10-24 18:33:00 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
James 315 wrote:
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
James 315 wrote:
In all seriousness though, there are plenty of ways to defend against bumpers. Go mine in low/null and shoot them. Smile


In all seriousness though, no. They don't want to because they don't want to be interrupted in THEIR game play style. Whether shooting or bumping. Your logic is wrong. Smile

Why should my game play style be interrupted then, pray tell? Smile


Because your game play style was not being interrupted by miners. You're simply annoying people. That's not game play, that's undesirable behavior. Smile


A flood of low end minerals, keeping high sec prices down, is undesirable. James is helping to curb an economic problem that exists in New Eden. It's just unfortunate that he's not able to have a larger impact, and that the only affordable option CCP allows is bumping. :(
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#89 - 2012-10-24 18:38:28 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
[
A flood of low end minerals, keeping high sec prices down, is undesirable. James is helping to curb an economic problem that exists in New Eden. It's just unfortunate that he's not able to have a larger impact, and that the only affordable option CCP allows is bumping. :(


False. Low prices ensure a vital economy as more players buy more things. Trade continues to flourish as the barrier of entry is low enough that anyone could be involved in any market they so choose from day 1 if they'd like.

He is not curbing problems, he is adding to them as a belligerence undesirable individual causing trouble. His "impact" is luckiyl minimal for now, but all tumors must be nipped before they grow. Smile
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#90 - 2012-10-24 18:38:51 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
Because your game play style was not being interrupted by miners. You're simply annoying people. That's not game play, that's undesirable behavior. Smile

But you are attempting to interrupt my game play style, even suggesting that I ought to be banned. I am not annoying people; far more people support what I do than support you. It seems like I win on desirability. Smile
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#91 - 2012-10-24 18:40:36 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Suvetar
James 315 wrote:
But you are attempting to interrupt my game play style, even suggesting that I ought to be banned. I am not annoying people; far more people support what I do than support you. It seems like I win on desirability. Smile


False. Clearly more are annoyed at you. You simply have a very vocal minority of fellow undesirables. In your little world of lolRP, you are winning. In reality, you need culling. You should be careful of who you annoy Smile

Edit: Please avoid posting personal details. It's against the rules. - ISD Suvetar
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#92 - 2012-10-24 18:40:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
James 315 wrote:
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
James 315 wrote:
In all seriousness though, there are plenty of ways to defend against bumpers. Go mine in low/null and shoot them. Smile


In all seriousness though, no. They don't want to because they don't want to be interrupted in THEIR game play style. Whether shooting or bumping. Your logic is wrong. Smile

Why should my game play style be interrupted then, pray tell? Smile


Because your game play style was not being interrupted by miners. You're simply annoying people. That's not game play, that's undesirable behavior. Smile


I do believe that James315s game play can be considered to be Role Play, the role he has chosen to play is that of the Saviour of Hisec and as such, by refusing to take part in his way of playing the game you are ruining the immersion of his Role Playing. Ergo you are interrupting his game play. Miners annoy James, so he annoys them back. It swings both ways P

Welcome to the sandbox. I'm one of the players taking a crap in your corner of it.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#93 - 2012-10-24 18:41:06 UTC
Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#94 - 2012-10-24 18:44:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Inquisitor Kitchner
Tali Ambraelle wrote:


False. Low prices ensure a vital economy as more players buy more things. Trade continues to flourish as the barrier of entry is low enough that anyone could be involved in any market they so choose from day 1 if they'd like.

He is not curbing problems, he is adding to them as a belligerence undesirable individual causing trouble. His "impact" is luckiyl minimal for now, but all tumors must be nipped before they grow. Smile



False. Low prices are bad.

Low prices mean PvP is totally meaningless as the average player with any sense can just get unlimited of any ship that they want. When PvP becomes pointless then whats the point of about 70% of the star systems in the game?

Plus you keep going on about your gameplay style, MY gameplay style is to enjoy being space rich and laughing at poor players who can't afford high prices. If anything you're interrupting my gameplay by making prices low everywhere, you should be banned.

Plus have you actually read any of James315's website or his post? They are all full of prose, rehtoric and totally over the top. They are great and in my opinion his website and activities have added about 600 times more depth and colour to the EVE Universe and community then your whining on the forums or "mining afk" could ever do.

James315 for CSM High Sec Rep.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#95 - 2012-10-24 18:46:34 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Suvetar
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
False. Clearly more are annoyed at you. You simply have a very vocal minority of fellow undesirables. In your little world of lolRP, you are winning. In reality, you need culling. You should be careful of who you annoy Smile

Not so clear. Where's the evidence more people are against me than with me? I've got more than 170 shareholders and run one of the most popular EVE blogs in existence. What do you got? Smile
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2012-10-24 18:46:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Tali Ambraelle
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
I do believe that James315s game play can be considered to be Role Play, the role he has chosen to play is that of the Saviour of Hisec and as such

In his little world sure, he can do that all he wants. Not at the cost of the miners and their right to gain what they paid money for.

Quote:
by refusing to take part in his way of playing the game you are ruining the immersion of his Role Playing. Ergo you are interrupting his game play.

It is not game play, it is him gaming the system and exploiting something as an undesirable belligerent.

Quote:
Miners annoy James, so he annoys them back. It swings both ways P

Except miners never bothered him, let alone knew who he was before he took it upon himself to interrupt paying customers trying to relax. So what mining is boring? They need minerals to feed their industrial machine to provide items to people and to feed their other gameplay. Would you really tell me that they have to sit there and stare at rocks?

If so, you too are a belligerent undesirable for not allowing them the freedom of choice they deserve, as opposed to hiding behind the same excuse of "freedom" to justify his beligerent behavior.

Quote:
Welcome to the sandbox. I'm one of the players taking a crap in your corner of it.

It's ok, soon you're be pushed out with the rest of the undesirables :)
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#97 - 2012-10-24 18:49:25 UTC
Vanyr Andrard wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Well then web away! Aggressing a corpmate isn't a CONCORD offence.


(You knew that, right?)

How do i simultaneously join the corp of every bumper in existence, assuming they agree to it?

(you knew that was impossible already, right?)

((did you miss the specification of 'hostile webifying', or the parellelism between bumping and webifying implying webifying noncorpmates?))

You do realize that you web the mining ships, so they don't move as much, right? And yes, with an in-corp (player) web.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#98 - 2012-10-24 18:50:04 UTC
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#99 - 2012-10-24 18:50:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Tali Ambraelle
James 315 wrote:
Not so clear. Where's the evidence more people are against me than with me?

The multiple locked threads and posts of negativity against you. Use eve search.


Quote:
I've got more than 170 shareholders and run one of the most popular EVE blogs in existence.

Except that your shareholders were coerced by your extortion. That's equivalent to a mob saying they are the most popular security company only because their customers are afraid of something "happening" to their livelihood.

As for popular blogs...hah...in your little world. Also your blog is riff with hate posts. I would not call that "popular."

Quote:
What do you got? Smile


Desirable and none belligerent game play Smile
Christy D Floyd
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#100 - 2012-10-24 18:52:38 UTC
Bumpers are pilots who cant gank its that simple. Have you seen some of these bumpers the couldnt get wet if they jumped in a pool.

Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons.