These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Deff plexing of vulnerable systems
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Jurik McMoney
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-10-24 12:46:07 UTC
Hello everyone,

I tried to get a system from vulnerable to contested. But after deff-plexing 4 major, 4 medium and 3 minors, it's still vulnerable.

Althought it was said that you can't get any LPs with off-plexing when the system is vulnerable.

My question: that means that you still can offplex (or at least the last couple of weeks, where ppl offplexed) to drive the vulnerability that is reached at 100% to ... maybe 250% ... so I've to deff-plex 151% to get it back to contested?

I thought with last patch, they changed the contested status back to 100% vulnerabie and that's it.

Kind regards,
Jurik

can't delete signature
Hidden Snake
Inglorious-Basterds
#2 - 2012-10-24 13:01:52 UTC
Jurik McMoney wrote:
Hello everyone,

I tried to get a system from vulnerable to contested. But after deff-plexing 4 major, 4 medium and 3 minors, it's still vulnerable.

Althought it was said that you can't get any LPs with off-plexing when the system is vulnerable.

My question: that means that you still can offplex (or at least the last couple of weeks, where ppl offplexed) to drive the vulnerability that is reached at 100% to ... maybe 250% ... so I've to deff-plex 151% to get it back to contested?

I thought with last patch, they changed the contested status back to 100% vulnerabie and that's it.

Kind regards,
Jurik



with last patch they just screwed it a bit more ... wellcome to FW ... guinea pigs farm of CCP and CSM ....
Jurik McMoney
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#3 - 2012-10-24 13:06:53 UTC
Hidden Snake wrote:

with last patch they just screwed it a bit more ... wellcome to FW ... guinea pigs farm of CCP and CSM ....


Yeah Snake, I am in FW for almost a year ;) ... but thought they would have changed this too.

Cuz what does CCP expect? Systems where afkplexers plexed weeks over invulnerable are now 10000% or what?

Now we need AFK plexers to get those systems back to contested? ;)

can't delete signature
Hidden Snake
Inglorious-Basterds
#4 - 2012-10-24 13:16:40 UTC
Jurik McMoney wrote:
Hidden Snake wrote:

with last patch they just screwed it a bit more ... wellcome to FW ... guinea pigs farm of CCP and CSM ....


Yeah Snake, I am in FW for almost a year ;) ... but thought they would have changed this too.

Cuz what does CCP expect? Systems where afkplexers plexed weeks over invulnerable are now 10000% or what?

Now we need AFK plexers to get those systems back to contested? ;)



ROFL ... fix farmers to fix **** made by alt farmers .....
Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#5 - 2012-10-24 13:22:29 UTC
Infinite invulnerability was indeed changed, temporary numbers are said to be 133% maximum, so the infinite systems you are d-plexing will not switch to contested until you have taken some 50 plexes or so (roughly 150 needed to go from stable to vulnerable, 33% as you know is 50).

So take the farm alts back out of mothballs and grab what free LP you can before the bunker-bust blob arrives to flip the systems! ..
Jurik McMoney
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#6 - 2012-10-24 13:28:37 UTC
Veshta Yoshida wrote:
Infinite invulnerability was indeed changed, temporary numbers are said to be 133% maximum, so the infinite systems you are d-plexing will not switch to contested until you have taken some 50 plexes or so (roughly 150 needed to go from stable to vulnerable, 33% as you know is 50).


Oh 33% doesn't sound that bad. Thanks alot for this info! :)

can't delete signature
Hidden Snake
Inglorious-Basterds
#7 - 2012-10-24 13:31:41 UTC
Jurik McMoney wrote:
Veshta Yoshida wrote:
Infinite invulnerability was indeed changed, temporary numbers are said to be 133% maximum, so the infinite systems you are d-plexing will not switch to contested until you have taken some 50 plexes or so (roughly 150 needed to go from stable to vulnerable, 33% as you know is 50).


Oh 33% doesn't sound that bad. Thanks alot for this info! :)


33% does not .... 50 does
Rengerel en Distel
#8 - 2012-10-24 13:32:04 UTC
Veshta Yoshida wrote:
Infinite invulnerability was indeed changed, temporary numbers are said to be 133% maximum, so the infinite systems you are d-plexing will not switch to contested until you have taken some 50 plexes or so (roughly 150 needed to go from stable to vulnerable, 33% as you know is 50).

So take the farm alts back out of mothballs and grab what free LP you can before the bunker-bust blob arrives to flip the systems! ..


That's not quite right. They dropped the systems to 133%, but you can then offensively plex them over that. There is no cap at the moment, you just don't get LP for it.

With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.
Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#9 - 2012-10-24 14:20:26 UTC
Rengerel en Distel wrote:
That's not quite right. They dropped the systems to 133%, but you can then offensively plex them over that. There is no cap at the moment, you just don't get LP for it.

Bolded the important bit. There is absolutely no need to plex whatsoever beyond what was done pre farm nerf as 50 plexes will take 12 hrs uninterrupted or so take if defender wants to move it to contested ... all a bunker fleet need to do is have a roaming contingent that keeps defenders running around and systems remain vulnerable until the blob can get to it.

So again: expect all old vulnerable systems to be flipped by the weekend, get your free LP before your neighbor!
Garr Earthbender
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2012-10-24 16:58:17 UTC
Gallente alts are working hard to take as many systems out of vulnerable as possible as quickly as possible. So far, so good.

-Scissors is overpowered, rock is fine. -Paper