These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Faction Warfare - Same As It Ever Was

First post
Author
Hidden Snake
Inglorious-Basterds
#101 - 2012-10-31 13:16:23 UTC
More I see things go ... and more I am out of the FW I am strong in my opinion.

1) remove the tier system
2) make it simple
3) work on low sec diferentiation

stop making it null light ....

Yuri Intaki
Nasranite Watch
#102 - 2012-10-31 13:19:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Yuri Intaki
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
To be brutally honest, while i have doubts about the exact rewards for d-plexing, specially at higher tiers. I am without a single doubt that if the dice fell while caldari had most system, the forum would be full of caldari telling gallente to HTFU.


Nobody would be complaining if CCP had not decided to make systems not vulnerable with few miserable plexes. Both sides would have still benefitted and key systems could have been held since there was reward for defending them. Instead CCP showed their true colors by fast forwarding after gallente cash-in.

This gave gallente the "last cash in", then CCP handed them more money by opening all their currently held but vulnerable systems for defensive lp farming, then they put forward "System can only be this deep into vulnerable" mechanics which made it impossible for Caldari to ever stage a comeback because lp from defensive plexes is simply too lucrative and all vulnerable systems were no longer so after couple of hours.

Yet many people tell Caldari to take off the tinfoil hats despite their continued favour directed at their pet goat militias. How about you lot go f.ck yourself.

Ninjaedit: Snake, you might want to check your signature.
Hidden Snake
Inglorious-Basterds
#103 - 2012-10-31 13:29:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Hidden Snake
Yuri Intaki wrote:


Ninjaedit: Snake, you might want to check your signature.


:) they still recruiting ... and it is still kinda my baby ... despite the fact I decided to leave home and roll my ass on the calm beaches of nullsec with nullbears ;)

Just because CCP screwed the FW there is no need to not promote the best corp of Caldari FW ;)

and that thing with Hans is not corp/alliance related :D
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#104 - 2012-10-31 13:45:02 UTC
Yuri Intaki wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
To be brutally honest, while i have doubts about the exact rewards for d-plexing, specially at higher tiers. I am without a single doubt that if the dice fell while caldari had most system, the forum would be full of caldari telling gallente to HTFU.


Nobody would be complaining if CCP had not decided to make systems not vulnerable with few miserable plexes. Both sides would have still benefitted and key systems could have been held since there was reward for defending them. Instead CCP showed their true colors by fast forwarding after gallente cash-in.

This gave gallente the "last cash in", then CCP handed them more money by opening all their currently held but vulnerable systems for defensive lp farming, then they put forward "System can only be this deep into vulnerable" mechanics which made it impossible for Caldari to ever stage a comeback because lp from defensive plexes is simply too lucrative and all vulnerable systems were no longer so after couple of hours.

Yet many people tell Caldari to take off the tinfoil hats despite their continued favour directed at their pet goat militias. How about you lot go f.ck yourself.

Ninjaedit: Snake, you might want to check your signature.



While I don't think ccp did this to favor one side or another. The sudden change in rules that ruined lots of factions plans does tend to show that they really don't care about faction war. They would never do this in null sec.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#105 - 2012-10-31 13:51:53 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:

To be brutally honest, while i have doubts about the exact rewards for d-plexing, specially at higher tiers. I am without a single doubt that if the dice fell while caldari had most system, the forum would be full of caldari telling gallente to HTFU.

Little tweaks may be needed but i think this is a large improvement overall.

Maybe reduce LP payout for defensive plexing or perhaps decouple it from Tier multiplier. Ridiculous LP for afk atrons. Not that my alts are complaining....



Ah now I see why you want pvpers to have to stay in their plexes. You don't want them to be able to leave their plex and hunt your afk altrons.

My main problem with the timer counting back even though there aren't any enemies around. I typically will only enter a plex if there are allot of wts around or I see wartargets and the right sized ship on scan. But if they leave and I still have over 5 minutes on the timer I will generally head to another system too.

Minmatar typically will not fight for a plex. They typically will let me capture them and then defensive plex it after I leave. With the new system that cowardice is actually incentivized. So when I leave to look for another system with more wartargets in it my time will tick away. Great.

Seriously this whole plexing mechanic is so screwed up (for people who use plexes for pvp) now I am never going to bother doing another plex for amarr.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Yuri Intaki
Nasranite Watch
#106 - 2012-10-31 15:03:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Yuri Intaki
Cearain wrote:
Seriously this whole plexing mechanic is so screwed up (for people who use plexes for pvp) now I am never going to bother doing another plex for amarr.


Bad Messenger summed it pretty well: If you want to roleplay, you go for Amarr/Caldari. If you want Isk (like 99%) of people, you go for Matar/gallente.

Militias suck for pvp anyway. The moment you manage to gather yourself a posse, any and all reasons to fight disappear anyway, like they have already done. Why take systems and do massive when you can just roll alts to opposing militia and profit from tier which is already high-enough?

In fact, the changes CCP installed just might have made FW worse than it was, which itself is fairly mind boggling achievement. Previously farming alts didnt stop you taking systems. Now they do that and it's even worse for health of low-sec than old system.

Again, I ask a question. Why attack a system since you are just handing your enemy free isk when they can defend with alts when you sleep?
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#107 - 2012-10-31 15:11:23 UTC
Cearain wrote:
There is no economic balance in the current mechanics. If they happened to do this change when caldari were ahead gallente would be burried and you would start to bleed players.


Actually, Gallente got omgwtfpwn'd in May by plexing alts, but we survived and our militia is stronger now than before the patch.

"If your only motivation is isk, then that's what you'll get." - Princess Leia
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#108 - 2012-10-31 15:14:56 UTC
Yuri Intaki wrote:
In fact, the changes CCP installed just might have made FW worse than it was, which itself is fairly mind boggling achievement. Previously farming alts didnt stop you taking systems. Now they do that and it's even worse for health of low-sec than old system.
The map is going to stagnate and occupancy warfare is going to be a big grind because instead of having the plexing alts helping attack, they are now helping to defend.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#109 - 2012-10-31 15:17:37 UTC
Cearain wrote:
Ah now I see why you want pvpers to have to stay in their plexes. You don't want them to be able to leave their plex and hunt your afk altrons.
I want them to be able to grief my plexing alts. It's ridiculous that an afk atron can 1) affect occupancy warfare so much, and 2) get paid ridiculous amounts of LP to do it.

The "barrier to entry" for capturing systems is now a bit high. It's going to take a concentrated effort through multiple timezones to mount an offensive.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#110 - 2012-10-31 15:17:47 UTC
Yuri Intaki wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Seriously this whole plexing mechanic is so screwed up (for people who use plexes for pvp) now I am never going to bother doing another plex for amarr.


Bad Messenger summed it pretty well: If you want to roleplay, you go for Amarr/Caldari. If you want Isk (like 99%) of people, you go for Matar/gallente.

Militias suck for pvp anyway. The moment you manage to gather yourself a posse, any and all reasons to fight disappear anyway, like they have already done. Why take systems and do massive when you can just roll alts to opposing militia and profit from tier which is already high-enough?

In fact, the changes CCP installed just might have made FW worse than it was, which itself is fairly mind boggling achievement. Previously farming alts didnt stop you taking systems. Now they do that and it's even worse for health of low-sec than old system.



This system is definitely worse than inferno. With inferno amarr could always strive for the tier 5 cashout. The more lp we built up the more reason we had to try to achieve it!

Now we just flat out get paid less for the same work. Fight for amarr where you get half the pay!

Caldari still has a nominal numbers advantage. I have no clue whether that works out to any more real boots on the ground. If caldari manages to get the lead then the tide may swing for them and we can have everyone join minmatar and Caldari and fight it out.

Otherwise its just not smart for the losing side to engage the occupancy mechanic at all. Its just giving isk to your enemy. Its better to just let them take all the systems. Because after that is done at least the economic bleeding stops.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#111 - 2012-10-31 15:20:35 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:
There is no economic balance in the current mechanics. If they happened to do this change when caldari were ahead gallente would be burried and you would start to bleed players.


Actually, Gallente got omgwtfpwn'd in May by plexing alts, but we survived and our militia is stronger now than before the patch.

"If your only motivation is isk, then that's what you'll get." - Princess Leia



I thought Gallente had more systems when inferno hit. Gallente also had tons of minmatar alts come to help you.

But really the problem with the system is not which side wins and stays winning. The problem is one side will win and stay winning and it will be economically stupid for the losing side to even try to come back.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#112 - 2012-10-31 15:21:07 UTC
Cearain wrote:

Now we just flat out get paid less for the same work. Fight for amarr where you get half the pay!

Caldari still has a nominal numbers advantage. I have no clue whether that works out to any more real boots on the ground. If caldari manages to get the lead then the tide may swing for them and we can have everyone join minmatar and Caldari and fight it out.

1. That half pay is still enough to keep you fighting and in the game.
2. Caldari plexing alts have vanished and I think many have reappeared as Gallente and Minmatar alts since we're both at Tier 4 now.


Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#113 - 2012-10-31 15:22:11 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Ah now I see why you want pvpers to have to stay in their plexes. You don't want them to be able to leave their plex and hunt your afk altrons.
I want them to be able to grief my plexing alts. It's ridiculous that an afk atron can 1) affect occupancy warfare so much, and 2) get paid ridiculous amounts of LP to do it.

.


Then agree that you shouldn't get paid for defensive plexing. Problem solved.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#114 - 2012-10-31 15:26:18 UTC
Cearain wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Ah now I see why you want pvpers to have to stay in their plexes. You don't want them to be able to leave their plex and hunt your afk altrons.
I want them to be able to grief my plexing alts. It's ridiculous that an afk atron can 1) affect occupancy warfare so much, and 2) get paid ridiculous amounts of LP to do it.

.


Then agree that you shouldn't get paid for defensive plexing. Problem solved.

I have always advocated for no/minimal pay for defensive plexing, so yes I agree.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#115 - 2012-10-31 15:31:25 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:

Now we just flat out get paid less for the same work. Fight for amarr where you get half the pay!

Caldari still has a nominal numbers advantage. I have no clue whether that works out to any more real boots on the ground. If caldari manages to get the lead then the tide may swing for them and we can have everyone join minmatar and Caldari and fight it out.

1. That half pay is still enough to keep you fighting and in the game.


Not really. When one side is getting 2xs the pay they will get many more people joining thier side. Also they will have 2xs the ships and resources to help them overpower you even if you had equal numbers.

Rational people just don't choose less money over more money.

X Gallentius wrote:

2. Caldari plexing alts have vanished and I think many have reappeared as Gallente and Minmatar alts since we're both at Tier 4 now.




Right like I said rational people choose more money instead of less money. Are you surprised?

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#116 - 2012-10-31 16:17:30 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
Cearain wrote:
Right like I said rational people choose more money instead of less money. Are you surprised?

Rational people choose what they want to worship. The alts choose isk. Your militia is stronger if your core members choose to value other things over isk.


1. YOU can still get pvp, so the argument w.r.t not being able to pvp is a red herring.
2. YOU can still make a living doing FW, so the argument w.r.t isk making ability is a red herring,

You should concentrate your argument to the following and get rid of the two red herrings above: Alts affect occupancy warfare too much. First it was easy offensive plexing and now it is through super easy defensive plexing. With Tier 4, it will also be through easy offensive plexing.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#117 - 2012-10-31 16:42:13 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Right like I said rational people choose more money instead of less money. Are you surprised?

Rational people choose what they want to worship. The alts choose isk. Your militia is stronger if your core members choose to value other things over isk.


1. YOU can still get pvp, so the argument w.r.t not being able to pvp is a red herring.
2. YOU can still make a living doing FW, so the argument w.r.t isk making ability is a red herring,

You should concentrate your argument to the following and get rid of the two red herrings above: Alts affect occupancy warfare too much. First it was easy offensive plexing and now it is through super easy defensive plexing. With Tier 4, it will also be through easy offensive plexing.



You didn't answer my question. Are you surprised people are choosing more money instead of less money?

Neither of the above points are red herrings. Just because people can choose to be economically foolish doesn't mean the economically foolish team will have a shot at winning.

Getting rid of farmers is fine but it is beside the point. Even if no one ever farmed at all, the side that pays 2xs as much for the same task will get more pilots and isk to spend on ships and fittings.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#118 - 2012-10-31 16:53:15 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
Cearain wrote:

You didn't answer my question. Are you surprised people are choosing more money instead of less money?

I answered it perfectly. I am not surprised you and everybody's plexing alts choose isk over their militia. I am also not surprised that many players like myself, Julius Foederatus, Val Erian, (most likely even Damar, flyinghotpocket, Super Chair) and the guys in Electus Matari and Murietor Tribe do not.
Quote:

Neither of the above points are red herrings. Just because people can choose to be economically foolish doesn't mean the economically foolish team will have a shot at winning.
Assuming alts are not a part of the equation - winning FW is not about isk. Dessies, Cruisers, BCs, etc.. are easily affordable at Tier 1 payouts. Numbers, coordination, good FCs, morale matter much, much more.
Quote:

Getting rid of farmers is fine but it is beside the point. Even if no one ever farmed at all, the side that pays 2xs as much for the same task will get more pilots and isk to spend on ships and fittings.
Your character can only fly one ship at a time.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#119 - 2012-10-31 17:15:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:

You didn't answer my question. Are you surprised people are choosing more money instead of less money?

I answered it perfectly. I am not surprised you and everybody's plexing alts choose isk over their militia. I am also not surprised that many players like myself, Julius Foederatus, Val Erian, (most likely even Damar, flyinghotpocket, Super Chair) and the guys in Electus Matari and Murietor Tribe do not.


EM and MT joined amarr? I thought they were in minmatar - where the money is.

As far as people in the caldari militia they still have a shot. But the question is not where a few diehards are going to go. The question is what are most people doing. And if you really want to know the answer you look at the data not anecdotal stories. The data has shown people prefer more money to less money.

I guess you aren't surprised by this either.

X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:

Neither of the above points are red herrings. Just because people can choose to be economically foolish doesn't mean the economically foolish team will have a shot at winning.
Assuming alts are not a part of the equation - winning FW is not about isk. Dessies, Cruisers, BCs, etc.. are easily affordable at Tier 1 payouts. Numbers, coordination, good FCs, morale matter much, much more.
Quote:

Getting rid of farmers is fine but it is beside the point. Even if no one ever farmed at all, the side that pays 2xs as much for the same task will get more pilots and isk to spend on ships and fittings.
Your character can only fly one ship at a time.



Non sequitur.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Yuri Intaki
Nasranite Watch
#120 - 2012-10-31 17:32:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Yuri Intaki
Cearain wrote:
But the question is not where a few diehards are going to go. The question is what are most people doing.


Few dedicated diehards are not going to affect things when there are up to 50 moneymakers opposing for each of them.

Mathematics are a hard to argue with so I assume most people (me included) will roll up alts for opposing militia missioning and move their stuff to non-lockable lowsec. X Gal of course does not think this is somehow bad since his and his allied militia end up on top anyway.

Nobody will fight in FW over systems but then again, nobody has actually fought over anything in FW since Inferno anyway. This of course wont hinder Gallente and Minmatar militias in the least since it's going to be isk making paradise until end of Eve.

I quess congratulations are in order for CCP and Hans for finally stacking the deck big enough to be too much for Amarr/Caldari to handle and achieving their dream of killing FW.