These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP reimburses player for atron loss because 20 accts?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Kai Sheia
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2012-10-23 02:14:41 UTC
No More Heroes wrote:
Kai Sheia wrote:
am I the only one who suspects this is evidence of "API Verified" being not necessarily reliable?

I mean am I misreading it or does that kill-mail seem to be saying that the "victim" dropped THREE Hulk BPO's?

maybe I'm just too skeptical, but "API Verified" or not, I just can't imagine anyone being dumb enough for that KM to be real.


You can't really argue with 'API verified' however, eve-kill is not reliable at recognizing BPO's. Or even staying online lately. For those bitching about the story- it's one of the largest loss-mails in recent times and the dude was interviewed for the story.

The tale of ~reimbursement~ was HIS claim, not something the story was putting forth as factual.


.... yeah, not gonna put any faith in a goon-originated story to start with.

the unreliability of killmail sites at recognizing BPO's VS BPC's, I can totally buy, and it makes it slightly more reasonable.

but I am still a bit skeptical, I am not sure the level of my "faith in humanity" will allow me to buy that someone would be that stupid or frivolous. ... though this is EVE....
EvEa Deva
Doomheim
#22 - 2012-10-23 02:18:44 UTC
This just in WHAAAAAAAAAAAA
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2012-10-23 02:26:44 UTC
Do you really think CCP would reimburse him?
They can be pretty off the mark sometimes, but they're not total idiots.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#24 - 2012-10-23 02:30:18 UTC
Erh?

News of the Goons publishing something that might be true?

Shocking.

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2012-10-23 02:42:54 UTC
Lors Dornick wrote:
Erh?

News of the Goons publishing something that might be true?

Shocking.

Seems people are conveniently oblivious that the article doesn't say that he was reimbursed, the article says that the pilot in question claims to have been reimbursed - the article itself calls this into question.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#26 - 2012-10-23 02:44:49 UTC
ISD TYPE40 wrote:
...and remember to ensure that your tinfoil hats are firmly placed in the kitchen drawer or the bin, whichever is easier.
So CCP through you are confirming that this not happen as is being reported?
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2012-10-23 02:47:48 UTC
Graic Gabtar wrote:
ISD TYPE40 wrote:
...and remember to ensure that your tinfoil hats are firmly placed in the kitchen drawer or the bin, whichever is easier.
So CCP through you are confirming that this not happen as is being reported?


Those are both in the kitchen.... What?

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2012-10-23 02:51:23 UTC
Graic Gabtar wrote:
ISD TYPE40 wrote:
...and remember to ensure that your tinfoil hats are firmly placed in the kitchen drawer or the bin, whichever is easier.
So CCP through you are confirming that this not happen as is being reported?

If CCP had something to say they wouldn't go through ISD to say it.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#29 - 2012-10-23 02:53:25 UTC
This is a fine example of people getting outraged at something they didnt read.
destiny2
Decaying Rocky Odious Non Evil Stupid Inane Nobody
Looking for Trouble
#30 - 2012-10-23 02:55:22 UTC
if he gets that reimbursed i want my officer fitted titan i have never owned reinbursed.

^ and that is sarcasim
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#31 - 2012-10-23 02:59:29 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Graic Gabtar wrote:
ISD TYPE40 wrote:
...and remember to ensure that your tinfoil hats are firmly placed in the kitchen drawer or the bin, whichever is easier.
So CCP through you are confirming that this not happen as is being reported?

If CCP had something to say they wouldn't go through ISD to say it.
The unpaid help has just suggested that people should not speculate through their statement.

So there was a position made, it should be clarified. There is a thing called the ISD, it represents CCP on this forum so they are effectively CCP. Who cares what an ISD or a DEV is here. Shouldn't need a glossary to sort out what level of fact can be taken with public statements.

Simple answer, is the ISD player alt stating that the article as linked is wrong.
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#32 - 2012-10-23 03:00:24 UTC
Graic Gabtar wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Graic Gabtar wrote:
ISD TYPE40 wrote:
...and remember to ensure that your tinfoil hats are firmly placed in the kitchen drawer or the bin, whichever is easier.
So CCP through you are confirming that this not happen as is being reported?

If CCP had something to say they wouldn't go through ISD to say it.
The unpaid help has just suggested that people should not speculate through their statement.

So there was a position made, it should be clarified. There is a thing called the ISD, it represents CCP on this forum so they are effectively CCP. Who cares what an ISD or a DEV is here. Shouldn't need a glossary to sort out what level of fact can be taken with public statements.

Simple answer, is the ISD player alt stating that the article as linked is wrong.


Your post reads like your avatar looks

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#33 - 2012-10-23 03:04:00 UTC
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
Graic Gabtar wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Graic Gabtar wrote:
ISD TYPE40 wrote:
...and remember to ensure that your tinfoil hats are firmly placed in the kitchen drawer or the bin, whichever is easier.
So CCP through you are confirming that this not happen as is being reported?

If CCP had something to say they wouldn't go through ISD to say it.
The unpaid help has just suggested that people should not speculate through their statement.

So there was a position made, it should be clarified. There is a thing called the ISD, it represents CCP on this forum so they are effectively CCP. Who cares what an ISD or a DEV is here. Shouldn't need a glossary to sort out what level of fact can be taken with public statements.

Simple answer, is the ISD player alt stating that the article as linked is wrong.


Your post reads like your avatar looks
As per post #20 that is an off topic remark and should be removed.
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Midgard Academy
#34 - 2012-10-23 03:04:27 UTC
Oh look another one of these threads. CCP still has yet to reimburse my for my Enigma loss for ganking in jita using the nerf bats.

Why Can't I have a picture signature.

Also please support graphical immersion, bring back the art that brought people to EvE online originaly.
Christopher Scott
#35 - 2012-10-23 03:05:31 UTC
Genuine question: If a player has their account hacked, and the hacker is responsible for the player losing all their stuff, will CCP reimburse the loss?

Because I can't think of any other possible way CCP would offer a reimbursement. I don't think they even reimburse losses from hacked accounts, but I might be wrong. Does somebody know the answer?
Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#36 - 2012-10-23 03:07:44 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Lors Dornick wrote:
Erh?

News of the Goons publishing something that might be true?

Shocking.

Seems people are conveniently oblivious that the article doesn't say that he was reimbursed, the article says that the pilot in question claims to have been reimbursed - the article itself calls this into question.


So?

It's News of The Goons.

If it isn't biassed and/or part of a generic meta game plot it would be a shame of Goons everywhere and therefore rejected.

And if it is biassed and part of a generic meta game plot it is just that and therefore rejected.

So, why would anyone bother to click on the link?

Except to feed clicks to the site?

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#37 - 2012-10-23 03:10:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Surfin's PlunderBunny
Graic Gabtar wrote:


Your post reads like your avatar looks
As per post #20 that is an off topic remark and should be removed.

First off, that's on the previous page so it doesn't count.

Secondly, you're offensive and should be removed.

Also your post is off topic so I win

*edit: ok I failed at quoting and I changed it so much I can't fix it now. Screw all of you! Evil

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#38 - 2012-10-23 03:13:34 UTC
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:
Graic Gabtar wrote:


Your post reads like your avatar looks
As per post #20 that is an off topic remark and should be removed.

First off, that's on the previous page so it doesn't count.

Secondly, you're offensive and should be removed.

Also your post is off topic so I win

*edit: ok I failed at quoting and I changed it so much I can't fix it now. Screw all of you! Evil
Reported for continually posting off topic and making personal attacks.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#39 - 2012-10-23 03:14:24 UTC
Lors Dornick wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Lors Dornick wrote:
Erh?

News of the Goons publishing something that might be true?

Shocking.

Seems people are conveniently oblivious that the article doesn't say that he was reimbursed, the article says that the pilot in question claims to have been reimbursed - the article itself calls this into question.


So?

It's News of The Goons.

If it isn't biassed and/or part of a generic meta game plot it would be a shame of Goons everywhere and therefore rejected.

And if it is biassed and part of a generic meta game plot it is just that and therefore rejected.

So, why would anyone bother to click on the link?

Except to feed clicks to the site?


Well the article isn't biased. You can determine bias by reading the text regardless of source. It doesn't matter who it came from.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#40 - 2012-10-23 03:15:37 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Lors Dornick wrote:
Erh?

News of the Goons publishing something that might be true?

Shocking.

Seems people are conveniently oblivious that the article doesn't say that he was reimbursed, the article says that the pilot in question claims to have been reimbursed - the article itself calls this into question.

QFT

For mine, it's just another way to "OH LOOK, THE MITANNI DOT CON".


external linking. CCP fix this.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."