These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why a high sec nerf is good for industrialists.

Author
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#301 - 2012-10-24 21:24:09 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
A real world example of resource denial?

China and rare earth elements comes to mind. It may not be due to war, but they understand that they're sitting on the majority of what's available, and that gives them an economic advantage.


Or Australia legislating to ban the mining of Uranium (and then rogue states legislating Uranium mining back in). Or BP blowing up an oil rig, thus denying access to the well underneath that rig.

Of course if Natsett is so focussed on only the denial of access to mineral bearing rocks using fire as a deterrent, perhaps Natsett could show us real world examples of ore being extracted using space ships equipped with mining lasers.

Other resource denial methods have included the sowing of weed plants that will out-compete any food crops.

Nowhere in history is there any record of resource denial by pushing mining machinery out of the way. There are plentiful records of mining operations being sabotaged, or access to mining/forestry leases being cut off by protesters.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#302 - 2012-10-24 21:30:25 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
We have accessto many things via the alliance but we still build most of the gear in empire because its cheaper.
Seriously how is this hard for people to understand?

So build your stuff in highsec fffs. How is this hard for you to understand?!

About as hard as it is for you to make a good post.

Zim... second heads up here.

You're doing it again.

Oh come on, man, allow a brother some fun at the posting zoo. I mean, just look at how incoherent he's become now, not a single aspect of that last post of his makes even a modicum of sense. :v:

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#303 - 2012-10-24 21:35:24 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:

People might actually take you seriously if every time you posted it didnt boil down to, "goons touched me, it hurt".

I don't post for your benefit - I post for mine.

My fun is in denying you the unfettered belief that you can perpetuate all this BS on the forums, the game and on the people in it and expect not be challenged for it. If that pisses you off, meh.

And no Goon. I'm not bitter. I have no agenda. I have no reason to be. Goons can't "touch me" and never have. You'd just like to think that because that's how you think.

I can play this game with you guys all day. I'm rich, I'm semi-retired and watching you guys repeat the same mistakes over and over provides me with mirth.

For truth Goon, I LIKE it when you shitpoast me. It means I'm getting under your skin. The "badder" my post is to you, the more likely it's right.

You seek reaction. You want the attention. You thrive in it. You're getting it. You should be happy.

I know I am. Enjoy my poasts.



"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Vanyr Andrard
VacuumTube
#304 - 2012-10-24 21:35:31 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
A real world example of resource denial?

China and rare earth elements comes to mind. It may not be due to war, but they understand that they're sitting on the majority of what's available, and that gives them an economic advantage.



I'm not asking for a real world example of resource denial, there are a bunch that I'm already aware of. Rubber, oil, rare earth, even diamonds in WW2, etc. Generally not accomplished by shooting the resource in question with guns. Baltec posted the example of Iraq lighting oil wells on fire...but that wasn't a very effective military strategy, really. Bit of a red herring.

Not sure why we're dwelling on this aspect of the debate so far. You posted a suggestion, I said I liked it, made my own suggestion on a similar line. The normal response would be for you to say "hey, your suggestion is pretty cool, too, perhaps we should do that instead." or "nah, my suggestion is still better imo, good try though". Instead we have this strange debate about whether anyone has ever blown up metal ore as a large-scale war tactic in military history. While the answer still seems to be no, it's not really important. I definitely now think it was the worst part of my post, which was a post AGREEING WITH YOU and making a SIMILAR SUGGESTION, which you have strangely ignored :/

hopefully we're clear now. If we want to nitpick, *points over there*, look, it's touval, posting long reams of nonsense.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#305 - 2012-10-24 21:39:19 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:

Oh come on, man, allow a brother some fun at the posting zoo. I mean, just look at how incoherent he's become now, not a single aspect of that last post of his makes even a modicum of sense. :v:

QFT.

That's something you will have to work on sunshine. I try posting simple but you know, sometimes facts get in the way.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#306 - 2012-10-24 21:49:04 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:

Nowhere in history is there any record of resource denial by pushing mining machinery out of the way. There are plentiful records of mining operations being sabotaged, or access to mining/forestry leases being cut off by protesters.

Which exactly what I meant when I said that the only compeition to Goons 0.0 indy is the Goons themselves.

They CAN'T shoot/blockade/stop the supply from highsec to nullsec because it's THEIR OWN PEOPLE doing it. I, as a non-blue, cannot dock at VFK and sell my stuff. I am not the problem.

These guys want to cripple highsec industry to deny THEIR OWN PEOPLE the ability to import.

We're circle-jerking on WHAT to do and no-one has focused on WHY we need to.

SHOOT BLUE IMPORTER - PROFIT. Problem solved.

Can we go now?

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Vanyr Andrard
VacuumTube
#307 - 2012-10-24 21:53:10 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:

Nowhere in history is there any record of resource denial by pushing mining machinery out of the way. There are plentiful records of mining operations being sabotaged, or access to mining/forestry leases being cut off by protesters.

Which exactly what I meant when I said that the only compeition to Goons 0.0 indy is the Goons themselves.

They CAN'T shoot/blockade/stop the supply from highsec to nullsec because it's THEIR OWN PEOPLE doing it. I, as a non-blue, cannot dock at VFK and sell my stuff. I am not the problem.

These guys want to cripple highsec industry to deny THEIR OWN PEOPLE the ability to import.

We're circle-jerking on WHAT to do and no-one has focused on WHY we need to.

SHOOT BLUE IMPORTER - PROFIT. Problem solved.

Can we go now?



Yes, my son, you are free to go, and never return.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#308 - 2012-10-24 21:57:05 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
A real world example of resource denial?

China and rare earth elements comes to mind. It may not be due to war, but they understand that they're sitting on the majority of what's available, and that gives them an economic advantage.

That's not resource denial. That''s monopolization.

Like Goons could do with Tech if they wanted to get serious.

Resource denial is where I stop you from producing.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Herr Hammer Draken
#309 - 2012-10-24 22:02:25 UTC
If CCP made it so a person could destroy roids then I suppose it would also apply to ice as well.

Then I am thinking about the area of space around Jita and the resource heavy POS around Jita that everybody uses to maximum effect. Deny those POS's the resources they need in the area could be a whole game in and of itself.

Nothing much could be provided locally. All would have to be shipped in by freight.

Interesting times. Resource management at a whole new level.

Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet"

Vanyr Andrard
VacuumTube
#310 - 2012-10-24 22:04:29 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
A real world example of resource denial?

China and rare earth elements comes to mind. It may not be due to war, but they understand that they're sitting on the majority of what's available, and that gives them an economic advantage.

That's not resource denial. That''s monopolization.

Like Goons could do with Tech if they wanted to get serious.

Resource denial is where I stop you from producing.



That is exactly what someone whose knowledge stemmed largely from RTS's, with little real-world experience or study, would say.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#311 - 2012-10-24 22:35:37 UTC
Vanyr Andrard wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
A real world example of resource denial?

China and rare earth elements comes to mind. It may not be due to war, but they understand that they're sitting on the majority of what's available, and that gives them an economic advantage.

That's not resource denial. That''s monopolization.

Like Goons could do with Tech if they wanted to get serious.

Resource denial is where I stop you from producing.



That is exactly what someone whose knowledge stemmed largely from RTS's, with little real-world experience or study, would say.

Don't just shitpoast me, explain why you think resource denial is a "fix".

Just remember that I'm denying this whole argument that resource denial is a way to "fix" anyhing. At best, it increases profits short-term for the smart. It does nothing except increase costs - for everyone.

You don't artificially increase costs for everyone to fix a localised access problem. You fix access.

All I see is no-one wanting to tackle the cause. They just seem hell-bent on creating effects.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Vanyr Andrard
VacuumTube
#312 - 2012-10-24 22:41:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Vanyr Andrard
Touval Lysander wrote:
Vanyr Andrard wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
A real world example of resource denial?

China and rare earth elements comes to mind. It may not be due to war, but they understand that they're sitting on the majority of what's available, and that gives them an economic advantage.

That's not resource denial. That''s monopolization.

Like Goons could do with Tech if they wanted to get serious.

Resource denial is where I stop you from producing.



That is exactly what someone whose knowledge stemmed largely from RTS's, with little real-world experience or study, would say.

Don't just shitpoast me, explain why you think resource denial is a "fix".

Just remember that I'm denying this whole argument that resource denial is a way to "fix" anyhing. At best, it increases profits short-term for the smart. It does nothing except increase costs - for everyone.

You don't artificially increase costs for everyone to fix a localised access problem. You fix access.

All I see is no-one wanting to tackle the cause. They just seem hell-bent on creating effects.


I quoted your ENTIRE post. All you said in the post that I quoted was semantic arguing over what a word means. That's the same thing that my post did, the only difference being that I was correct, and you were ignorantly wrong. Your definition of resource denial is not the one used in the real world, although it is the one used in Starcraft, due to limitations in allowed actions in that genre of game. You calling me shitpoaster is highly ironic, given that the content and structure of my post was an intentional mirror of yours(except that you have no clue what you are talking about and were incorrect). Your own words condemn you, I have nothing further I need say to you.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#313 - 2012-10-24 23:50:05 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Silk,

Do you understand that the problem would be fixed if you guys would just raise your prices?

We would both benefit if you aksed for more money from the stuff you built.


But you guys would never willingly do that, because it would require high sec industry working together, and quite frankly you guys could give give a **** if you're ruining the ability of most of the rest of the world to develop an economy of their own.

Not to mention a lot of you would actually have to learn to add. The amount of crap that gets sold for less than mineral cost is ******* full on ********.

Why don't I want to live in high sec? Because it obviously causes people to develop down syndrome; my health is important to me.


Industry in high sec don't give you down syndrome. It make you produce like industrialist do IRL. Cut down the cost to the very minimum to drive off competition. The only time where you are not going with lower price is if you had all the market for yourself. All industry where there is competirion are curretly trying to cut thier cost IRL. Why would industry in game go against that proven solution? We can't invent better stuff to grab the amrket by way of high quality and we can't create new amrket. All the items already exist in thier definitive forms. If you can't fight on a technological level or create a new niche for yourself, you sell lower than competition so YOU sell while the others don't. Thats why indy people go for the lowest cost.


The market in null is completely limited and thats why industry can't grow fast. No amount of tweak will make this change unless you litterally break high sec industry. People will produce in high because ***** sells in high. Even if given an undestructible POS, people would probably not produice un null because as soon as you get your stuff out on it's way to market, you might loose all you just spent your time on. People won't spend time and in-game ressource to produce stuff they might not even be able to get on the market to sell.

If you want to see why the market is unusable in null for industrialist, create an alt, don't tell anyone about who it is, load an indy ship with stuff to sell and go sell it in null. Remember to not warn people who is piloting this indy because most industrialist from high are not null alliance member.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#314 - 2012-10-25 00:04:32 UTC
Vanyr Andrard wrote:
I have nothing further I need say to you.

So stfu and thanks for coming.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#315 - 2012-10-25 00:13:17 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:

Do you understand that the problem would be fixed if you guys would just raise your prices? We would both benefit if you aksed for more money from the stuff you built.

lol. A cartel. That'll fix it. Why don't we just ask CCP to fix pricing?

Quote:

But you guys would never willingly do that, because it would require high sec industry working together, and quite frankly you guys could give give a **** if you're ruining the ability of most of the rest of the world to develop an economy of their own.

So highseccers who do compete with each other the "proper way" are stupid and don't set up cartels.

How much your petrol cost Jack? How much your diamonds cost Jack? How much your potatoes cost Jack?

Quote:

Not to mention a lot of you would actually have to learn to add. The amount of crap that gets sold for less than mineral cost is ******* full on ********.

Said same. I call that using the tools you have. Time in Eve has no attributable cost.

Quote:

Why don't I want to live in high sec? Because it obviously causes people to develop down syndrome; my health is important to me.

fyi: Downs Syndrome is a birth defect. You don't "acquire" it. And while such stupid statements are made, little else of what you say can be deemed as qualified either.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Zhade Lezte
#316 - 2012-10-25 00:16:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Zhade Lezte
Touval Lysander wrote:

So build your stuff in highsec fffs. How is this hard for you to understand?! A JF trip is like 20 seconds ffs.


Hey you're almost starting to understand what the problem is, goodness.

I love how Lysander's argument is some kind of inverse groupthink, in that GOONS ARE A GROUP THEREFORE THEIR POINTS ARE INVALID.

Hilariously he's using the same (or at least a very similar) kind of stereotypical, flawed thinking in this reasoning.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#317 - 2012-10-25 00:19:22 UTC
Zhade Lezte wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:

So build your stuff in highsec fffs. How is this hard for you to understand?! A JF trip is like 20 seconds ffs.


Hey you're almost starting to understand what the problem is, goodness.

You'd think so, but then he comes along with this:

Touval Lysander wrote:
Time in Eve has no attributable cost.

An unironic "my time is free!", just like when he spent most of a month mining just keeping a POS fuelled just to even begin to compete with hisec.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#318 - 2012-10-25 01:32:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Touval Lysander
Lord Zim wrote:

Touval Lysander wrote:
Time in Eve has no attributable cost.

An unironic "my time is free!", just like when he spent most of a month mining just keeping a POS fuelled just to even begin to compete with hisec.

ffs Zim, take ya blinkers off!

THEY, not I...

The people you are competing against do not use time to calculate sell price. They don't have to. There is NO COST TO TIME.

I can mine all day. The TIME it takes me has no cost - in ISK - like we do in RL where we need to eat, sleep and rest. We have direct and attributable - and unavoidable - overheads that cost REAL money.

In fact, the whole concept of adding cost to production (which is actually quite stupid in theory) is because you are trying to create a cost where none originally existed and would not need to exist if EVERYBODY added time.

As a serious indy guy sometime back, when margins were being squeezed, the sacrifice was made by devaluing my time because I had no other way to compete. And if you are prepared to devalue time itself, it's an easy argument to equate zero cost to production to justify the sell price. (and I gave you examples of that).

I've never said it's RIGHT, I've said that's how many do it. You will not accept that that is WHY an importer out of highsec can sell at below the cost of the minerals itself.

The seller of the minerals has to accept market value as it stands (created by "no-timers") . His own attributable costs can't be used no matter how hard he protests that it should.

You can rant about the subject as much as you like, until some way can be identified to make time cost for those that ignore it as a cost, you will NEVER win the market war - and it makes all efforts to apply external measures absolutely pointless.

Let's fix 0.0 industry. Completely incapacitate highsec. Remove minerals, everything. Doesn't matter.

The man NOT calculating time to acquire/produce will beat you wherever you are. EVERY TIME.

Stop being so bloody minded about the obvious.

EDIT: "Most of the month mining to keep a POS running". See, now, there's your problem. I only had to do like 20-30 minutes a day - usually while I went off and had lunch. Perhaps you've been doing wrong?

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#319 - 2012-10-25 02:02:54 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
Time in Eve has no attributable cost.

An unironic "my time is free!", just like when he spent most of a month mining just keeping a POS fuelled just to even begin to compete with hisec.

Hmm ....

Sell me some of your free stuff please. For free.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#320 - 2012-10-25 02:31:14 UTC
Zhade Lezte wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:

So build your stuff in highsec fffs. How is this hard for you to understand?! A JF trip is like 20 seconds ffs.


Hey you're almost starting to understand what the problem is, goodness.

I love how Lysander's argument is some kind of inverse groupthink, in that GOONS ARE A GROUP THEREFORE THEIR POINTS ARE INVALID.

Hilariously he's using the same (or at least a very similar) kind of stereotypical, flawed thinking in this reasoning.



I wish I was a Goon so I could call him a damn pubbie. Sadly I can't bring myself to part with the £10 it would cost me :(

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli