These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Getting Rid of the Undesirables (for good this time)

First post First post First post
Author
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#381 - 2012-10-13 15:01:20 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
EglantinFinfleur wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
ABLOOBLOO


How about quitting EvE and jumping to Darkfall 2.0? it should come out around the time Retribution rolls out.

I'm sure we can have some meaningful PvP there!


There's no fake high sec in that game, Zim will not play it.

What have I said to make you think this?

Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
So, are you going to stop crying because high sec will no longer be your kitty online Concord protection and adapt?

1) Replacing what I write with "rabble rabble rabble" means you're losing.
2) I don't need concord to protect me against anything which they aren't protecting me against today, since I play hisec the way it's apparently supposed to be played: as singleplayer where people only interact via a chat window and a market window.
3) The only thing I've commented on is the fact that the changes which CCP are making are only made to make hisec slide even further into hello kitty online, and that not a single aspect of the killright transferal mechanic is geared towards making bountyhunting an actual profession done by people who do just that.

Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Your themepark gaming zone is over, man up Zim !! You worth better than that, cmon...

Really? What have I said to make you think I think even remotely like this? When have I said I'm in hisec to gank? Because I'll have to tell you, I'm not. I'm in hisec to make isk. I am, however, arguing that the change CCP is making is a ridiculously bad one, one which is pretty obvious is being made just to turn hisec into hello kitty online because other hisec pubbies are apparently not good enough at mitigating the little danger there is in hisec, so they're whining up a storm. And, like they did with mining barges, CCP are going overboard in bending over backwards to accomodate them.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#382 - 2012-10-13 15:02:13 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Which aspect of these proposals have been proposed because it would bring people of hisec into nullsec, and which of these proposals have been proposed just because you hate nullsec?


I don't hate null, and have spent a fair amount of time there.

The removal of local would make it harder for nullbears to farm massive amounts of isk with more safety than they can find in hisec. And taking steps to open up unused 0.0 systems to smaller alliances would obviously bring more people from hisec into 0.0. Lots of people in hisec want to live in 0.0, they just aren't too keen on having to join one of the gigantic alliances in order to do so.

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#383 - 2012-10-13 15:02:40 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
I can come up with quite a few reasons why hisec were given the nerfs it was given:
2) gunmining needed reducing to make mining more worth it.



Before leaving this attempt gave me a nice smile so I will look even better than usual.

Fake Edit: high sec gun mining was a joke, Drone regions and their alloys on the other hand was the highest mineral provider in new Eden

But nice attempt Blink

Who said drone region gunmining wasn't worse? They both needed nerfing. vOv

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#384 - 2012-10-13 15:07:10 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
2) I don't need concord to protect me against anything which they aren't protecting me against today, since I play hisec the way it's apparently supposed to be played: as singleplayer where people only interact via a chat window and a market window.

Soon everyone will "play highsec" the way it was supposed to be played.

And then they nerf local. Specifically Jita local ^___^

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#385 - 2012-10-13 15:08:52 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
The removal of local would make it harder for nullbears to farm massive amounts of isk with more safety than they can find in hisec. And taking steps to open up unused 0.0 systems to smaller alliances would obviously bring more people from hisec into 0.0. Lots of people in hisec want to live in 0.0, they just aren't too keen on having to join one of the gigantic alliances in order to do so.


Removing local is ******* dumb and anyone who suggests it literally has no clue why it works in wormholes and wouldn't work elsewhere.

It isn't hard to join one of the "gigantic alliances" - hisec carebears just don't want to join an alliance where they might have to do things like "join a fleet once in a while" and "have their ratting taxed."

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Arya Greywolf
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#386 - 2012-10-13 15:09:37 UTC
As someone mentioned earlier...

I'm so glad that CCP actually listened to what the players wanted and gave us transferable kill rights so that we can actually bounty hunt.

Oh wait.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#387 - 2012-10-13 15:10:39 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Which aspect of these proposals have been proposed because it would bring people of hisec into nullsec, and which of these proposals have been proposed just because you hate nullsec?


I don't hate null, and have spent a fair amount of time there.

The removal of local would make it harder for nullbears to farm massive amounts of isk with more safety than they can find in hisec.

"nullbears" aren't farming "massive amounts of isk" with "more safety than they can find in hisec". The rewards for effort put in, compared to rewards received, favour hisec. As for "more safety than hisec", can I sit in a velator at a gate in hisec and expect to come back to it intact 10 hours later? Can I sit in a velator at a gate in nullsec and expect to come back to it intact 10 hours later?

I've heard tons of whining from people who do roaming gangs that it's hard enough to find targets as it is, depopulating null even further won't make that any better.

Bane Necran wrote:
And taking steps to open up unused 0.0 systems to smaller alliances would obviously bring more people from hisec into 0.0.

How? Why would people move into 0.0 systems? Why do you think they are unused right now?

Bane Necran wrote:
Lots of people in hisec want to live in 0.0, they just aren't too keen on having to join one of the gigantic alliances in order to do so.

Yeah, I'm going to just call bullshit on this one.

If all people want to do is go to nullsec, there's tons of NPC nullsec space which they can base out of, which doesn't require they join any big alliance at all. What's stopping you?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

EglantinFinfleur
Ecpyrosis
#388 - 2012-10-13 15:17:37 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
[
EglantinFinfleur wrote:
How about quitting EvE and jumping to Darkfall 2.0? it should come out around the time Retribution rolls out.

I'm sure we can have some meaningful PvP there!

At which point have I talked about "some meaningful PVP"? Point out any post of mine where I've said "we must have more meaningful PVP".


So what do you want? Meaningless PvP? The test server is there for that.

Do you want PvP that is somewhat balanced, where people take precautions not to get clobbed silly? Then come play Darkfall, since, according to your abloobloo, New Eden is going to become lalaland. You'll try ganking me while I cut wood or mine copper and I'll give you a run for your money. Whatever the outcome, it will be fun for both sides -something that rarely happens in EvE as of now-.

But enlighten us, what kind of PvP are you after?

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#389 - 2012-10-13 15:19:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Bane Necran
Andski wrote:
It isn't hard to join one of the "gigantic alliances" - hisec carebears just don't want to join an alliance where they might have to do things like "join a fleet once in a while" and "have their ratting taxed."


I never said it was hard. Some people don't mind being obedient drones in a group of thousands, and that's fine, but others hunger for more independence.

Think about the guy who spent years building a strong hisec alliance. How is he going to get into 0.0? By becoming subservient to a giant 0.0 alliance is the only way provided by current mechanics. Most people would much rather just stay in hisec.

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#390 - 2012-10-13 15:24:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Vimsy Vortis
Errr my 10 man alliance didn't have any trouble setting up in nullsec, and have no difficulty switching between highsec and nullsec operations when we need to. There is literally nothing stopping anyone in highsec to moving out to nullsec if they want to. The barrier is in their heads.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#391 - 2012-10-13 15:27:20 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
I never said it was hard. Some people don't mind being obedient drones in a group of thousands, and that's fine, but others hunger for more independence.

Go to NPC nullsec then?

Bane Necran wrote:
Think about the guy who spent years building a strong hisec alliance.

Like that exists.

Bane Necran wrote:
How is he going to get into 0.0? By becoming subservient to a giant 0.0 alliance is the only way provided by current mechanics.

NPC nullsec?

Bane Necran wrote:
Most people would much rather just stay in hisec.

There you go, that's the problem.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
#392 - 2012-10-13 15:27:33 UTC
EglantinFinfleur wrote:
[quote=Lord Zim]
But enlighten us, what kind of PvP are you after?


They want can flip and killing rokie ships in HAC and then run away safe under concord protection without risking for 15 minutes to have someone else with a proper ship jumping on them. :)

And then talk **** in local "omfg, pownzed y0ou, LoL, n00bz"






Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#393 - 2012-10-13 15:28:07 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
I never said it was hard. Some people don't mind being obedient drones in a group of thousands, and that's fine, but others hunger for more independence.


That's a bullshit argument and you know it. It's not a wish for ~*independence*~, it's outright risk aversion.

Bane Necran wrote:
Think about the guy who spent years building a strong hisec alliance. How is he going to get into 0.0? By becoming subservient to a giant 0.0 alliance is the only way provided by current mechanics. Most people would much rather just stay in hisec.


A "strong hisec alliance." Are you trolling? There is literally no such thing as a "strong hisec alliance" because there is no incentive to form a "strong hisec alliance" as one is better off in a one-man alt corp.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#394 - 2012-10-13 15:35:49 UTC
Andski wrote:
Bane Necran wrote:
I never said it was hard. Some people don't mind being obedient drones in a group of thousands, and that's fine, but others hunger for more independence.


That's a bullshit argument and you know it. It's not a wish for ~*independence*~, it's outright risk aversion.

Bane Necran wrote:
Think about the guy who spent years building a strong hisec alliance. How is he going to get into 0.0? By becoming subservient to a giant 0.0 alliance is the only way provided by current mechanics. Most people would much rather just stay in hisec.


A "strong hisec alliance." Are you trolling? There is literally no such thing as a "strong hisec alliance" because there is no incentive to form a "strong hisec alliance" as one is better off in a one-man alt corp.

He's just trolling you now. If you were building a strong alliance, it would hardly be full of station traders, afk miners and mission runners.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#395 - 2012-10-13 15:52:07 UTC
EglantinFinfleur wrote:
So what do you want? Meaningless PvP? The test server is there for that.

I'm not looking for PVP in hisec, personally. I'm in hisec to avoid PVP, but I'm not looking to avoid PVP because all risk has been removed by CCP, I'm looking to avoid PVP by being not dumb and taking the proper preparations.

If, however, I wanted to do PVP in hisec, chances are I would want to be a bounty hunter, but not with the mechanics CCP are coming up with, since all it would take to be a "bounty hunter" under the upcoming changes is wait for someone with a killright with 0 isk cost to activate (or a very low cost to activate), activate it and watch "everyone else" attack him, or wait for someone else to activate the killright on someone. That's not bountyhunting, that's hisec gatecamping, and I strongly doubt any actual bountyhunter would want this mechanic.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#396 - 2012-10-13 15:54:56 UTC
Andski wrote:
That's a bullshit argument and you know it.


Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, your opinion, man. It's certainly a better argument than this anemic attempt at a counter argument.

I've been through this before with you people, and if i've learned anything from it, it's that you honestly believe every single person in hisec is just afraid of risk and that's all there is to it, which is ridiculous and an obvious oversimplification. If risk was really their primary concern, then wouldn't they be lining up to join large 0.0 alliances for the protection and relative safety instead of being ganked relentlessly in hisec? This game has everything stacked in favor of groups, so it's kind of hard to make a case that joining the largest groups is somehow more dangerous.

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#397 - 2012-10-13 16:00:37 UTC
Please point to the ice belt in which the miners are currently being ganked relentlessly.
Asuri Kinnes
Perkone
Caldari State
#398 - 2012-10-13 16:05:04 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
Andski wrote:
That's a bullshit argument and you know it.


Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, your opinion, man. It's certainly a better argument than this anemic attempt at a counter argument.

No local works in WH's because of the changing routes in and out, daily. No local in Null sec *won't* work, because of it's static nature.

All it would do is force people to keep alts stationed on all their gates (yeah, great mechanic that!) and effectively lock anyone *OUT* of nullsec who couldn't keep 23/7 gate watch up.

Which is what *everyone* wants to do, amiright?

These mechanics will effectively work to reduce Hi-Sec pvp below the joke level it already is. It says "Hi-Sec" not "SAFE-Sec". I guess I would be ok with these changes if they lowered Hi-Sec rewards to actually reflect the "safety" of hi-sec.

Maybe (for lore reasons) CCP could say the "Empires" are tired of policing anything above a cruiser in Hi-Sec, and lock all t2, t3 and Battlecruiser + sized ships out as well - that would make at least some sense if it's going to be "safe-sec".

Bob is the god of Wormholes.

That's all you need to know.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#399 - 2012-10-13 16:11:06 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
instead of being ganked relentlessly in hisec.


You don't get ganked relentlessly in hisec, period. You have to be worth ganking. If you're a mission runner in a officer pimped CNR, sure, you're more likely to get ganked than the guy next to you in a T2 fit Vindicator.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#400 - 2012-10-13 16:12:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
Bane Necran wrote:
I've been through this before with you people, and if i've learned anything from it, it's that you honestly believe every single person in hisec is just afraid of risk and that's all there is to it, which is ridiculous and an obvious oversimplification.

People who are in nullsec have tons of alts in hisec because
1) It's a fucktonne easier, logistically, to build ships here
2) L4s are much easier, less risk and less effort than it is in nullsec.
3) It's less risk there.

Bane Necran wrote:
If risk was really their primary concern, then wouldn't they be lining up to join large 0.0 alliances for the protection and relative safety instead of being ganked relentlessly in hisec?

Because people aren't getting "relentlessly ganked in hisec". I've yet to get ganked in hisec in all the years I've been there. All I do is avoid making a big, fat, juicy target of myself. vOv

Bane Necran wrote:
This game has everything stacked in favor of groups, so it's kind of hard to make a case that joining the largest groups is somehow more dangerous.

If they don't want to join the "largest group", then nothing's stopping them from taking a trip to NPC nullsec instead.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat