These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Winter] New destroyers

First post
Author
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#601 - 2012-10-05 18:42:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Omnathious Deninard
CheekyBabey wrote:
Lauren Chev wrote:

I reckon the idea of having 35m3 drone bay for Gally is GREAT! This will allow younger players to do lvl2 missions faster


I and may other players would prefer not to have yet another gallente drone ship limited to PVE

HELLBOUNDMAN wrote:

The complaint of the Gallente drones isn't the bay, it's the 35b/w.


Misguided complain if I"m honest the drone bay and bw are fine the problem is the lack of focused role that would result in the ship becoming yet another PVE ship.

Making the gallente ship have higher damage output than amarr ships seem to be the point behing the higher bandwith. This should still be true but gallente ships should get higher hull bonuses to drone damage and HP, but keep a smaller drone bay.

The higher bandwidth on gallente ships is an outdated bonus, as it goes back to when only bandwidth regulated the number of drones could be deployed I can longer find where I read this information, so it is void factually.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Vladimir Norkoff
Income Redistribution Service
#602 - 2012-10-05 18:43:59 UTC
HELLBOUNDMAN wrote:
The complaint of the Gallente drones isn't the bay, it's the 35b/w.

If I try to utilize that then i'll be fielding 2 meds and 3 lights.

However, that's all I can hold in the drone bay, so I'm losing 2 light drone to battle frigs.
Say what? Pretty certain the changes said 35 b/w and 60 bay. Lemme check. Yup right there....
Quote:
Gallente:
Drone bandwidth increased to 35m3
Drone bay increased to 60m3

So let's do some basic math... 60 -35 = ..... 25! And a flight of light drones is 5+5+5+5+5 (I only do basic math) which is.... 25! So it looks like you can fit a flight of 3/2 AND a flight of lights. Weird. It's almost like Fozzie planned it that way. But that can't possibly be true!
HELLBOUNDMAN
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#603 - 2012-10-05 19:03:01 UTC
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
HELLBOUNDMAN wrote:
The complaint of the Gallente drones isn't the bay, it's the 35b/w.

If I try to utilize that then i'll be fielding 2 meds and 3 lights.

However, that's all I can hold in the drone bay, so I'm losing 2 light drone to battle frigs.
Say what? Pretty certain the changes said 35 b/w and 60 bay. Lemme check. Yup right there....
Quote:
Gallente:
Drone bandwidth increased to 35m3
Drone bay increased to 60m3

So let's do some basic math... 60 -35 = ..... 25! And a flight of light drones is 5+5+5+5+5 (I only do basic math) which is.... 25! So it looks like you can fit a flight of 3/2 AND a flight of lights. Weird. It's almost like Fozzie planned it that way. But that can't possibly be true!


Hurray for you and your ability to do math.

Heaven forbid anyone could possibly overlook something.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#604 - 2012-10-05 20:11:25 UTC
Let's look at the signature resolution of medium drones vs frigates and destroyers.
Medium drone signature resolution = 125m
Average frigate signature radius = about 40m
Average destroyer signature radius = 65m

When tracking destroyers medium drones take an unnoticed 48% reduction in tracking, which the tracking formula creates the chance to hit which affect the maximum damage that will be applied, so medium drones vs destroyers is not very good, medium drones vs frigates take a 68% reduction in tracking, making them even worse.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Lauren Chev
Shadow Wolf Squadron
#605 - 2012-10-05 20:48:05 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
..... so medium drones vs destroyers is not very good, medium drones vs frigates take a 68% reduction in tracking, making them even worse.

And if they have a web going on drone's target? or TP? Or both? Would it change significantly then?? Not being snide, I seriously don't know myself? Oops


Its also a shame to see caldari lose a high slot to become on par with the race that specializes in projectiles. Sure they overlap a bit, but so do the cormorant and catalyst, and who has the higher hyb turrets slots there?

So, maybe the high slot for caldari should go back to 8, or minmitar swap a launcher slot or two with turrets.



CCP - don't forget! Destroyers should be something frigs fear!!! .... (and what cruisers laugh at... Sad )

PS- Did I mention Peregrine for a Caldari destroyer name?? LOL Cool
PinkKnife
The Cuddlefish
Ethereal Dawn
#606 - 2012-10-05 20:58:23 UTC  |  Edited by: PinkKnife
Lauren Chev wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
..... so medium drones vs destroyers is not very good, medium drones vs frigates take a 68% reduction in tracking, making them even worse.

And if they have a web going on drone's target? or TP? Or both? Would it change significantly then?? Not being snide, I seriously don't know myself? Oops


Its also a shame to see caldari lose a high slot to become on par with the race that specializes in projectiles. Sure they overlap a bit, but so do the cormorant and catalyst, and who has the higher hyb turrets slots there?

So, maybe the high slot for caldari should go back to 8, or minmitar swap a launcher slot or two with turrets.



CCP - don't forget! Destroyers should be something frigs fear!!! .... (and what cruisers laugh at... Sad )

PS- Did I mention Peregrine for a Caldari destroyer name?? LOL Cool


The 2 medium web drones, 3 lights might work, or vice versa, but the problem is that you can't launch a group of separate drones, and again, the UI then becomes a HUGE pain in the ass to work with.

Rats do not make good examples of drone use in PVP where frigs can and will take them straight out of your control range and shoot them down.

Also, the problem is the switch between orbiting mode and mwd mode. In that once the drones are orbiting they should STAY orbiting untill they are pushed towards a new target. But in order to chase a frigate, they then have to pursue using the mwd mode and don't apply their dps.
CheekyBabey
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#607 - 2012-10-05 21:09:00 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:

Making the gallente ship have higher damage output than amarr ships seem to be the point behing the higher bandwith. This should still be true but gallente ships should get higher hull bonuses to drone damage and HP, but keep a smaller drone bay.

The higher bandwidth on gallente ships is an outdated bonus, as it goes back to when only bandwidth regulated the number of drones could be deployed I can longer find where I read this information, so it is void factually.


It would be better if the dps was purely put into the light drones as the prime target for the destroyers by nature is frigate sized ships.

Bandwidth was to reduce how many drones you could control despite how many drones you have space for i.e. the ishkur used to have the ability to deploy 5 medium drones with it's 50m3 bay however the bandwitdh reduced it to 25.

Another example of this was the Myrm where they changed it so that it could only use 3 Heavies previously it could deploy 5 heavies

http://www.eve-search.com/thread/424067-0/page/1

Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
a flight of light drones is 5+5+5+5+5 (I only do basic math) which is.... 25! So it looks like you can fit a flight of 3/2 AND a flight of lights. Weird. It's almost like Fozzie planned it that way. But that can't possibly be true!


Yes and medium drones are next to pointless on smaller ships for what isn't much more in the DPS increase due to tracking etc.

Vladimir Norkoff
Income Redistribution Service
#608 - 2012-10-05 21:22:38 UTC
CheekyBabey wrote:
Yes and medium drones are next to pointless on smaller ships for what isn't much more in the DPS increase due to tracking etc.
ummm... Then use the flight of light drones for smaller ships? And if you decide to wolf pack a cruiser or BC then use the mediums? Yeah yeah I know, dessies get insta-popped whenever a cruiser locks them or if a BC even warps on grid. Plus no dessie has ever gotten on a cruiser or BC killmail in the entire history of EvE (at least if you go by the frantic whining on these forums). Just think of the mediums as an extra option you have should the opportunity arise.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#609 - 2012-10-05 21:26:33 UTC
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
CheekyBabey wrote:
Yes and medium drones are next to pointless on smaller ships for what isn't much more in the DPS increase due to tracking etc.
ummm... Then use the flight of light drones for smaller ships? And if you decide to wolf pack a cruiser or BC then use the mediums? Yeah yeah I know, dessies get insta-popped whenever a cruiser locks them or if a BC even warps on grid. Plus no dessie has ever gotten on a cruiser or BC killmail in the entire history of EvE (at least if you go by the frantic whining on these forums). Just think of the mediums as an extra option you have should the opportunity arise.

So Gallente get the "potentially more useful than the other drone counterpart in a situation I'd never actually choose to engage in" destroyer by that logic. Nice.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#610 - 2012-10-05 21:36:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Omnathious Deninard
Lauren Chev wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
..... so medium drones vs destroyers is not very good, medium drones vs frigates take a 68% reduction in tracking, making them even worse.

And if they have a web going on drone's target? or TP? Or both? Would it change significantly then?? Not being snide, I seriously don't know myself? Oops


Its also a shame to see caldari lose a high slot to become on par with the race that specializes in projectiles. Sure they overlap a bit, but so do the cormorant and catalyst, and who has the higher hyb turrets slots there?

So, maybe the high slot for caldari should go back to 8, or minmitar swap a launcher slot or two with turrets.



CCP - don't forget! Destroyers should be something frigs fear!!! .... (and what cruisers laugh at... Sad )

PS- Did I mention Peregrine for a Caldari destroyer name?? LOL Cool

Yes target painting and webbing would help a lot, but even if your target is stationary the drone is still moving, so it will only ever track so well.
edit BTW Peregrine would be an awesome name for the caldari destroyer Big smile

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

CheekyBabey
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#611 - 2012-10-05 21:41:58 UTC
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
ummm... Then use the flight of light drones for smaller ships? And if you decide to wolf pack a cruiser or BC then use the mediums? Yeah yeah I know, dessies get insta-popped whenever a cruiser locks them or if a BC even warps on grid. Plus no dessie has ever gotten on a cruiser or BC killmail in the entire history of EvE (at least if you go by the frantic whining on these forums). Just think of the mediums as an extra option you have should the opportunity arise.


I think you have "wannabe bitter vet status" as you seem to be missing the point that if you design something to achieve a task you don't flimsily tack on something that is useless to that task and call it a feature.

You wouldn't add a small and medium weapon bonus to a ship just because they might want to use a 2 medium guns and 3 small at some point.

This ship is a great chance to add something that is well thought out and works to fulfil it's role.

We have the other 3 races as wonderful ships, why is it so hard to make a good gallente ship that isn't a jack of all trades or a half bred clone of another ship's feature implemented poorly for no reason.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#612 - 2012-10-05 21:46:14 UTC
Is the Gallente rule, "Tight fitting, Multi-weapon, low speed, high signature radius, hull tanking, mediocre damage is how we roll"?

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Vladimir Norkoff
Income Redistribution Service
#613 - 2012-10-05 22:04:53 UTC
CheekyBabey wrote:
I think you have "wannabe bitter vet status" as you seem to be missing the point that if you design something to achieve a task you don't flimsily tack on something that is useless to that task and call it a feature.

You wouldn't add a small and medium weapon bonus to a ship just because they might want to use a 2 medium guns and 3 small at some point.
Then don't use medium drones? Why is that so difficult? You don't "have" to use the full bandwidth. A flight of bonused lights, and 5 tracking bonused guns is still gonna rip up frigs. If you want something else then go whine to Fozzie. Crying at me ain't gonna do shiite. I'm pretty awesome, but I can't change the ship stats. Sorry.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#614 - 2012-10-05 22:48:41 UTC
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:

If you want something else then go talk to Fozzie.

Well that IS what we have been working toward, by keeping comments regarding the Gallente destroyer coming. It could still use some tweaks in the eyes of some players. If we could get a dev comment on some of the ideas that have been suggested it could clear things up a bit. Otherwise we could be going around in circles for a few more pages.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#615 - 2012-10-05 23:08:16 UTC
More than 50% damage bonused drones would be crazy OP. Remeber, DDA are having a buff too. 5 super bonused drones would be instant death for any frigate. 5 normally bonused drones + 5 turrets will already be their doom, so why ask for even more ?

And a MWDing frigate or dessy is way above 125m signature, allowing bonused valkyries to be faster than the frigate, and to hit it fine. May the frigate shut it's MWD off, and both the light drones and your guns will tear it appart. Use a tracking link, and all your drones will track and hit fine in any circumstances.

As said, 35m3 drone bay allow for a lot of creative ways to use drones. 5 bonused drones + 5 tracking turrets are already a bane for any frigate. What you are asking for is prone to be massively OP.

At least give it a chance on the test server.

PS : mediocre damage and gallente hull in the same sentence made me lough. That cannot be serious. Look at Myrmidon or Vexor for "uncomon" drone bandwidth used with effectiveness. And if you say the Vexor or the myrm are bad, just reprocess yourself.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#616 - 2012-10-05 23:28:23 UTC
I would still like to see only 2 turrets at Max, making it a drone based hull, not the split weapon ship that Gallente all ways gets.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Doddy
Excidium.
#617 - 2012-10-05 23:38:48 UTC
This world where small ships only shoot other small ships while not webbing them sure is cool.
CheekyBabey
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#618 - 2012-10-06 00:33:55 UTC  |  Edited by: CheekyBabey
Bouh Revetoile wrote:


PS : mediocre damage and gallente hull in the same sentence made me lough. That cannot be serious. Look at Myrmidon or Vexor for "uncomon" drone bandwidth used with effectiveness. And if you say the Vexor or the myrm are bad, just reprocess yourself.


For ships that regually use projectile weapons, because hybrids are still very much borked and for ships that were even better pre drone nerf?


Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
Then don't use medium drones? Why is that so difficult? You don't "have" to use the full bandwidth. A flight of bonused lights, and 5 tracking bonused guns is still gonna rip up frigs. If you want something else then go whine to Fozzie. Crying at me ain't gonna do shiite. I'm pretty awesome, but I can't change the ship stats. Sorry.


Because the idea of giving more bandwidth makes it look better on paper and the guns wont do anything to a frig that can outrange them at ... 3km and the drones are not as good as you think, I mean why bother using the ship if an ishkur is about the same price (including fit) does a better job and wont pop like a balloon if another ship sneezes at it.

And I'm not whining at you I'm just saying you are misguided or think you are a bitter vet cant tell which tbh, that's not a dig it's a comment on what you've been posting.
Zarnak Wulf
Task Force 641
Empyrean Edict
#619 - 2012-10-06 00:49:14 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
I would still like to see only 2 turrets at Max, making it a drone based hull, not the split weapon ship that Gallente all ways gets.


Let's suppose you got your dream and it was a 15% per level drone damage bonus as well as a 10% per level drone tracking bonus. It would suck. Your destroyer would be novel but it would die in a fire vs. any hardened AF or other ranged destroyer. With two DDA II your DPS would not reach 300. 300 is normal for many assault frigates. 400 is possible on the Enyo. 400 - 600 DPS is where many Destroyers come in. You're going to throw 250ish DPS at them and win?

At the frigate and destroyer level combat is over in seconds. I take ships with less then 4k EHP and win on a regular basis because I can project over 400 DPS to 14km and 300 DPS to 20km. I've seen people supertank Thrashers. The struggle to hit anything past 6km. In the frigate world gank just about always wins out over tank. The only exception is when implants and boosts can come into play.

Drone boats at the small level are incredibly difficult to use. If you send in the drones too early - they can be killed at leisure and your DPS is greatly diminished. If you release them too late you could be deep in armour before they even come into play. Your suggestion pretty much limits the new Gallente Dessy to the first scenario. Send in the drones! That's the only DPS you get. I'd much rather have options. Send in the drones at 200 DPS and be right on their ass with your own 200 DPS in blasters. This dessy can have a web and that is huge. Engage at distance with rails. When the enemy commits send in the drones. Have a flight of ECM drones shut down the enemy while your hybrids inflict the pain.

The last point I'll make is the Amarr destroyer is the drones only supertanked option. It has four lows. The coercer has made that into an incredible tank for years. It also can suck a frigate dry in seconds. That again is huge and an option the Gallente destroyer can't copy unless it wants a poor man version of it.
Lili Lu
#620 - 2012-10-06 00:55:26 UTC
Doddy wrote:
This world where small ships only shoot other small ships while not webbing them sure is cool.

It's called FW and minor plexes in lowsec. The current ship restrictions on minor, medium, and to lesser extent major plexes. It gives worth to tech I frigs and destroyers, and tech I cruisers. It's a blast really.Smile