These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Winter] ORE frigate

First post First post
Author
Rio Bravo
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#241 - 2012-10-02 15:42:06 UTC
Yeah, cycle time works too. Very nice! Can't wait to drive one. I won't even bother responding to the blatant trolling of my previous posts. People figured you out a long time ago...

“You see, in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. I dig.”  - Clint Eastwood, misquote.

Rio Bravo
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#242 - 2012-10-02 18:30:58 UTC
Warde Guildencrantz wrote:
Name ideas:

Annexer, collector, securer, ransacker, recoverer, inheriter


Yeah out of the list you have there, I like Annexer, Collector, Securer, Recoverer, and Inheriter. They all kind of follow the rest of the mining naming convention. Be neat to see whats come up with when its released.

“You see, in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. I dig.”  - Clint Eastwood, misquote.

Xython
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#243 - 2012-10-02 20:35:37 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
Designed as an entry mining ship, it will replace the old 4 mining frigates in the Industry Career Path (the Tormentor, Bantam, Navitas and Burst). Compared to them, it has a much improved mining output, capacitor reliance and mobility, while having a decent 5000m3 ore hold. Its purpose is to be a fast hull capable of mining in hostile space (even if the current value of high-sec ores defeats this quite a bit, but that's another problem). It also serves as a gas harvester, a profession that was lacking love until now. With its +2 warp core strength bonus, it should stand a fair chance of doing its job in low-security space without being instantly tackled and killed.


Thank god at least someone in CCP recognizes it.
Acac Sunflyier
The Ascended Academy
#244 - 2012-10-02 21:56:52 UTC
Any word as to the change to cycle time for harvesting gas over yeild per level? Cause, a thorax can still out harvest an ORE Frig for gas sites in a wormhole.
Infinite Force
#245 - 2012-10-02 22:10:16 UTC
Acac Sunflyier wrote:
Any word as to the change to cycle time for harvesting gas over yeild per level? Cause, a thorax can still out harvest an ORE Frig for gas sites in a wormhole.

Is it really that hard to look on the previous pages?

For those not wanting to look for it, it's on the previous page ... https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1989973#post1989973

CCP Ytterbium wrote:
Hey folks, just quickly passing by to tell you the Gas Cloud Harvesting amount bonus on this ship has been swapped for a Gas Cloud Harvesting duration reduction to account for your comments on the skill progression that didn't scale well. It also makes the ship a bit more viable with fully trained skills, as it increases its output from 5 theoretical gas harvesters to 5.33.

HROLT CEO Live Free; Die Proud

http://tinyurl.com/95zmyzw - The only way to go!

Tarn Kugisa
Kugisa Dynamics
#246 - 2012-10-03 02:43:50 UTC
I wanna see someone do a video of a bunch of these frigs swarming a gas site to the tune of 'ride of the valkyries'

you know, for fun

Be polite. Be efficient. Have a plan to troll everyone you meet - KuroVolt

Garrett Herveaux
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#247 - 2012-10-03 04:24:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Garrett Herveaux
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
... it should not be the best at everything regarding gas or we would be falling back into the old Hulk case all over again Blink


Wait a second! Am I missing something here, Ytterbium? I know there has been a crazy amount of rebalancing going on here, so maybe I missed it?.. Did you rebalance something bigger to handle more gas that I've just missed? Or is this hinting at a new gas harvester?
Brego Tralowski
Tralowski Independent Traders.
#248 - 2012-10-03 04:36:14 UTC
Thanks for this CCP - another new toy to build for the masses.

Supplying Quality goods to the masses.

See 'T1 Module supplies' for all your T1 needs or T1.com in game chat.

Infinite Force
#249 - 2012-10-03 15:33:30 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
Hey folks, just quickly passing by to tell you the Gas Cloud Harvesting amount bonus on this ship has been swapped for a Gas Cloud Harvesting duration reduction to account for your comments on the skill progression that didn't scale well. It also makes the ship a bit more viable with fully trained skills, as it increases its output from 5 theoretical gas harvesters to 5.33.

Given that you're giving a cycle time reduction now, how will the specific OP bonuses be worded?

CCP Ytterbium wrote:
Mining frigate skill bonuses:
+5% to mining yield per level
+5% to gas harvesting yield per level
Role bonuses:
+100% to mining yield
+100% to gas harvesting yield
+ 2 warp core stabilizer bonus

If it is just the hull bonus is being udpated, would this now be correct?

Mining frigate skill bonuses:
+5% to mining yield per level
-5% to gas harvesting cycle time per level

Thanks!

HROLT CEO Live Free; Die Proud

http://tinyurl.com/95zmyzw - The only way to go!

Caliguard Donnes
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#250 - 2012-10-04 07:25:44 UTC
Something that has been said multiple times, but has yet to be understood by many, is this is NOT a ship that is even designed to be min/maxed. It's a noob miner that can be flown 'effectively' on day 3 of a new characters life. That's impressive in itself. As for the gas, again, stop thinking of using this in nullsec - it's not for there.

I can easily see that the first time most new players will fit a gas harvester on this thing, it will be a part of a mission from a mining agent (there ARE gas harvesting missions). That will likely be what gets noobs interested in the skills required to huff fumes, and THEN, since they have the skills, will start looking for fumes that can make some isk. That will put an early interest in low-sec, potentially bringing a few noobs out there in the wilds - in ships that are cheap enough to not sting so badly when the get stomped back to the safety of high-sec.
Alx Warlord
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#251 - 2012-10-05 00:41:13 UTC
WHAT WILL BE THE NAME OF IT!?!?

DIgger? Excavator? Schriba? etc?
Maevelynne Aihaken
Mars Mining Directorate
#252 - 2012-10-05 02:44:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Maevelynne Aihaken
The more I look at this thing and read up on everyone elses comments the more I think that the ship would serve alot better as a destroyer hull instead of a frigate. Four faction destroyers are being added anyways, so instead of 4 faction destroyers and a mining frigate you're adding five separate faction destroyers. It also makes sense in that the minning barges aren't exactly cruiser hulls. Maybe the Procurer, but the hulk is more along the lines of a battlecruiser. These aren't combatant ships so why have them fill out the frigate, destroyer, cruiser, etc. progression.

Because it is nowly loosly a destroyer drop the +2 warp strength, increase the highslots to maybe 5 with 4 turrets, increase the drone bay to be able to use 5 light drones. The ore/gas bay is fine at his point maybe 6k m3. This I think makes it a ship that can now be used long term. Maybe even add a reduction to gas or mercoxit elplosions or maybe at , ORE extractor (instead of ORE frigate) V it is invulnerable to the explosion.

In these ways you still have the ability to get it extremely early in the game, however on a destroyer size hull you can make it work at higher lvls of gameplay. Along the lines of one of the reasons for the change to the mining ships was to make them all viable, instead of progression ships. In my assesment this makes a ship that you start your mining career early in and later come back to when you want to mine gas or mercoxite.

Anyways my two cents.
Lathera Hen
Nakama
#253 - 2012-10-06 10:53:51 UTC
any word on when will we be able to test this lovely ship out on the tests servers...?
Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices
Masters of Flying Objects
#254 - 2012-10-06 11:14:00 UTC
Lathera Hen wrote:
any word on when will we be able to test this lovely ship out on the tests servers...?

After the 19th at the earliest.

If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide

See you around the universe.

Lathera Hen
Nakama
#255 - 2012-10-06 11:40:21 UTC
Salpun wrote:
Lathera Hen wrote:
any word on when will we be able to test this lovely ship out on the tests servers...?

After the 19th at the earliest.



thank you.... i thing im gona go nuts untill then....
gona go my stray jacet
Oraac Ensor
#256 - 2012-10-07 03:26:04 UTC
Name suggestion: Prospector.
Klingon Admiral
Carcinisation
#257 - 2012-10-07 21:36:06 UTC
Will the bpo of this little gem only be seeded in ORE-stations, like the other ORE-ships?
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#258 - 2012-10-08 03:17:23 UTC
Klingon Admiral wrote:
Will the bpo of this little gem only be seeded in ORE-stations, like the other ORE-ships?



Possibly. But from what was said, you'll be able to pick up the ship by doing the tutorial for mining. so if you've not already done it, that's up to 12 of them.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Savira Terrant
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#259 - 2012-10-08 10:26:05 UTC
Are we finished with that "+2 warp strength is overpowered" discussion yet? Cause I think we should not be! Cause it is! Evil

.

Lathera Hen
Nakama
#260 - 2012-10-08 11:06:14 UTC
i think its a way to balence out a situation where miners are getiing ganked at increesing frequency, and the supply chain for rare matirials is getting dirupted to much, the +2 wcs will on some lvl balence it out a bit so that some epiriansed miners will be able to increese suplly of those matirials