These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Missile nerf and future sleeper ops

Author
Dwight K Schrute
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-09-19 11:47:50 UTC
Hello friends.

Me and my buddies have been quietly existing in a C2/C3 for around five months, training away so we can find an established Wormhole Corp in the future, getting the relevant skills up to speed and learning how to play them, as well as attempting to adapt to WH life. It's no secret that RR Tengus are the preferred method for most sleeper sites, at least up to C4 and, from what I've seen, some C5s.

We've gotten to the point where the isk is rolling and we've moved our skill plans to the PvP systems of choice, namely armour ships and mostly turret based, with a view to T3 hulls. Needless to say, the incoming missile nerf is a concern for us.

Have you fine WH dwellers given much thought to PvE post nerf, or are we looking at trial and error for a while? We've been biding our time training for some time and would like to adjust as soon as possible. With little to no experience, personally, other than missile platforms, I really am not sure where to start. We're looking to be able to fly all T3 cruiser hulls however I'm sure you'd understand that we'd like to move in a direction that would enable us to move to an existing, and successful, WH corp/alliance with as much speed as possible. It has been a long five months getting to this point and we'd like to waste as little time as possible moving forward.

Any thoughts or discussion on the matter will be great appreciated and the beets will be on the house.
Terrorfrodo
Interbus Universal
#2 - 2012-09-19 11:56:13 UTC
That worst that can happen is the ISK will be reduced from ridiculously good to merely very good.

The nerf is probably worse for C2 than for C3 because in C3 the sleepers are not far away in most sites. In C2 (and C4) range is going to be a problem. As for dps, well it's just going to take a little longer to complete a site.

.

Utsen Dari
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2012-09-19 12:04:29 UTC
Assuming you're talking about subcaps only: Random DPS ships with appropriate logi cruisers alongside works for everything up to class 6.

Also, I don't see RR Tengus becoming useless; they'll just kill stuff 20% slower, or however many % by which the missile damage is reduced. Heck if TCs and TEs really will work on explosion radius / velocity they might even kill sleeper frigs/cruisers faster.
Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2012-09-19 13:05:39 UTC
I don't see it as being too huge. At least until they take a bat to the actual T3 ships as well.

For non-RR setups, Generally C3 or below, you get a max range with furies of about 110km. That will get reduced to about 82km. Sleepless upholders Neut to 70km, so you can still kite them without trouble. You just won't have as large of a distance buffer as before.

With most RR setups, you have to use the CPU sub instead of the dissolution sequencer. So even though you still have a 110km missile range, your lock range max is about 90km. So the fact that your missile range is lower isn't even as big of an issue since you can't lock as far as they can fly now to begin with.

In all it will be an adjustment, but not the end of the world by any means.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#5 - 2012-09-19 13:10:53 UTC
I have given 0 thoughts to wh pve because lmao at using missiles in wh pve
Rroff
Antagonistic Tendencies
#6 - 2012-09-19 13:19:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Rroff
Worst case people would go back to using RR domis + abaddons. Or maybe sentry droning RR prot :S


While I do think the range is a little too extreme I don't see the need to nerf HML damage at all - drakes do less than 500dps with missiles in most sensible fits, RR tengus top out around 550 unless you throw a lot of pimp at them, granted a pimp PVP fit can hit around 840dps with what is ostensibly a long range weapon but that fit will cost well into the 2-3billion ISK range - when you start looking at the complaints that the tengu long range weapon platform out performs the short range "high" dps systems on other comparable ships its often the case that those short range systems are under-performing for what they are i.e. a sensible fit HAM legion with T2 modules is doing around 150dps too low for what it is.

When you start looking at other long range weapons they are also often under-performing for what they are for instance take railguns with spike loaded - medium railguns take way to big of a dps drop when switching to spike for what they should be doing (tho I think this is somewhat due to a large turret balancing issue with spike loaded and the stats are kept for other ammo type due to trying to keep ammo type attribute conformity.
Seleia O'Sinnor
Drop of Honey
#7 - 2012-09-19 14:29:08 UTC
Living in a black hole will become even worse :) Ah hell, a good time to try some new things then.

Odyssey: Repacking in POS hangars for modules +1,  but please for other stuff too, especially containers. Make containers openable in POS hangars.

Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#8 - 2012-09-19 14:41:25 UTC
RR Domis > Tengus anyway

.

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#9 - 2012-09-19 15:29:11 UTC
Seleia O'Sinnor wrote:
Living in a black hole will become even worse :) Ah hell, a good time to try some new things then.


no one lives in black holes
Rayge PVV
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2012-09-19 15:42:08 UTC
What do you Tengu guys think of switching to HAMs and using TCs to increase range? you actually get a DPS boost compared with HMLs, it would just be a question of getting into range with 35/40km HAMs.

‎"Don't give yourselves to the unnatural men, machine men, with machine minds and machine hearts. You are not machines, you are not cattle, you are men!" -Charlie Chaplin

Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2012-09-19 16:08:41 UTC
Rayge PVV wrote:
What do you Tengu guys think of switching to HAMs and using TCs to increase range? you actually get a DPS boost compared with HMLs, it would just be a question of getting into range with 35/40km HAMs.


Meh,

If I were going to go thru the trouble, I'd just use a legion. Scorch will have the same range and does better overall applied DPS. I have a corpie who runs sites with me in his legion and his ownly downside is range vs my current HML tengu. But he pops cruisers and frigs faster than I can, and hits the battleships just as hard as I do.
Marsan
#12 - 2012-09-19 16:23:38 UTC
The problen with HAMs is range. Tengu's with HAMs tend to get out of rep range and die. This is problem in higher class sites that scram.

Former forum cheerleader CCP, now just a grumpy small portion of the community.

Oxandrolone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2012-09-19 18:46:52 UTC
HAM's might become viable when tracking mods affect the,. optimal range script tracking computer for example.

Looking at it from my side of the fence this might mean it takes longer for farmers to run sites and so they are vulnerable to being attacked for longer Pirate
Tommassino Preldent
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-09-20 08:49:18 UTC
At least they shake up stuff a little bit. Im pretty sure you can compensate for the range with the tracking mods, so you will have to change the fits, but it will be pretty easy to fly a tengu - and hopefully even the other T3s will become more popular.
Ashimat
Clandestine Services
#15 - 2012-09-20 09:07:18 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
I have given 0 thoughts to wh pve because lmao at using missiles in wh pve

TheGunslinger42 wrote:
no one lives in black holes

Is there a special course you can take to be able to post so much useless garbish that assumes the way *I* do things it is the best way, the only way and the way everybody else should be doing things?

And if that's the case is that education mandatory for everybody in Elysian?

Got blog: http://thecloakedones.blogspot.com

TunaKross
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#16 - 2012-09-20 10:12:01 UTC  |  Edited by: TunaKross
Ashimat wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
I have given 0 thoughts to wh pve because lmao at using missiles in wh pve

TheGunslinger42 wrote:
no one lives in black holes

Is there a special course you can take to be able to post so much useless garbish that assumes the way *I* do things it is the best way, the only way and the way everybody else should be doing things?

And if that's the case is that education mandatory for everybody in Elysian?



As you probably know since you are coming from a big alliance aswell is that one person does not represent the whole alliance. You will find these people in most alliance's that think they know everything and its only their way or no way and dont understand that people can actually have different views of things.

When I started in wormholes few years ago I actually began my journey in a tengu. Couple of tengus raiding a C4/C5 for example can actually make a decent isk. So I understand that this nerf is going to hit some tengu loving pilots badly.


Regards, Tuna
Ashimat
Clandestine Services
#17 - 2012-09-20 11:08:26 UTC
TunaKross wrote:
Ashimat wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
I have given 0 thoughts to wh pve because lmao at using missiles in wh pve

TheGunslinger42 wrote:
no one lives in black holes

Is there a special course you can take to be able to post so much useless garbish that assumes the way *I* do things it is the best way, the only way and the way everybody else should be doing things?

And if that's the case is that education mandatory for everybody in Elysian?



As you probably know since you are coming from a big alliance aswell is that one person does not represent the whole alliance. You will find these people in most alliance's that think they know everything and its only their way or no way and dont understand that people can actually have different views of things.

When I started in wormholes few years ago I actually began my journey in a tengu. Couple of tengus raiding a C4/C5 for example can actually make a decent isk. So I understand that this nerf is going to hit some tengu loving pilots badly.


Regards, Tuna


That last comment might have been a bit too much, sry for that.

However, I do think you represent your corp as well as your alliance to some degree when posting here. If that was not true, you would not felt compelled to try to do the distinction you did.

Got blog: http://thecloakedones.blogspot.com

Hathrul
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#18 - 2012-09-20 17:00:08 UTC
as far as i can work out in c1-4 it will just mean youll be 20% slower on sites. though maybe getting some more tp's and TE's to roll along will mitigate this mostly

in a C5 im not so sure since the standard RR fit doesnt leave much room for midslot goodness. maybe well see more carriers around to rep them so the tengu's can focus more?
we can only hope!!!
Frothgar
State War Academy
Caldari State
#19 - 2012-09-20 18:15:19 UTC
I'm excited to try the new missiles. I can't help but feel that HAMs + Tracking computers may end up being just as effective if not more than say Scorch HPLs. Explosion radius bonus for tracking speed scripts could potentially be huge and more effective than webs or painters depending on the values given, and range scripts could allow a Tengu to handily outrange any short range weapon system.

Range was never an "Issue" with HAMs on a Tengu, the issue was HMLs probably did it all better over 30km with slightly easier fitting.
Efraya
V0LTA
New Eden Alliance 99013733
#20 - 2012-09-21 11:34:05 UTC
Hathrul wrote:
as far as i can work out in c1-4 it will just mean youll be 20% slower on sites. though maybe getting some more tp's and TE's to roll along will mitigate this mostly

in a C5 im not so sure since the standard RR fit doesnt leave much room for midslot goodness. maybe well see more carriers around to rep them so the tengu's can focus more?
we can only hope!!!


1 extender can be swapped out when you are rolling with 6 or more in c5.

Less than that and you want to be pure tank.

Dread ops, best ops.

[b][center]WSpace; Dead space.[/center] [center]Lady Spank for forum mod[/center][/b]

12Next page