These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Updated][Winter] Missile Rebalance 2.0 + Hurricane tweak

First post First post First post
Author
Acac Sunflyier
The Ascended Academy
#5821 - 2012-11-03 09:33:02 UTC
Why are faction missiles getting better range for heavies over t2 when t2 needs more skills and everything to use? If the goal is to bring it in line with other t2 ammo and weapons, why can't the t2 ammo for missiles be better than faction missiles just as t2 ammo is better than faction ammo?
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5822 - 2012-11-03 09:43:15 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:

Good god, how many times have I tried to tell you I don't identify as a projectile only user like you identify as a HM only user.What?


The point is though, that there are people who like to fly one race only. May it be for RP or whatever. I agree on the fact many Caldari pilots feel like HML only users. Now there is still 2 ways to interprete this data, and since you, Lili, are so fond of doing analysis of data you should maybe be able to do that too ;) ..

so, here we go. The first way is to say HML must be OP, thats why everyone uses them. There is a small part in it which is not completely wrong, because HML are indeed not a bad weapon system at all. Thats your interpretation of this all. Apart from the reaction you and/or others argued also with numbers, mostly EFT/Pyfa/whatever numbers, and also Eve-kill stats. Those numbers showed (in your opinion) everything which was needed to backup your point.

But there is also a second way. And that second way is the one you seem to forget about or which you dont want to let come to your mind. The sad fact is, all those missile using Caldari pilots had *no other option* than to go for HML, with Torps and Cruises being less than useful in anything but PvE, and even there they are no longer top of the list for a really long time (rework of pirate faction ships & Projectile buff). And with the Tengu, their own t3 obsoleted the Caldari Marauder and missile faction BS choices too. But again, not only because it was so good (and agreed, it is!), but also because the others were not.


HAM was not a really good option either, so Caldari medium and large missile PvP was just that - HML. Note the fact, that Caldari pilots even accepted the handicap to use a system which had only kinetic damage bonus in their hulls, because it *still* was better than the rest. And again, not because it was so OP. But because the other options sucked so hard.

Me and others see that this point is a really valid one too, and we also backed up our claims with facts. EFT, Pyfa, whatever. And Eve-kill stats. But apart from those stats I also looked at the game itself. And found that, YES: HML/Drake is the king of long range medium engagement. But first: this is not, what his game is all about, and second: HML/Drake is not the king of anything else. And funny, Caldari missile except HML/Drake and Tengu is not the king of anything else either. And its correct, it does not need to be king. But if its everywhere else far from being on par, then how can it be balance if this one thing will get killed too?

I do know that Hybrids have been buffed not just yesterday, and Caldari had also the option to go there. Still, Caldari have been told for ages that Hybrids suck (which they did for a long time) and if they went gunnery, for sure they chose something else. Besides crosstraining is harder for missile to for example projectiles than any gunnery to any other gunnery.

So thats what makes Caldari upset. They have been kicked in the balls numerous times, been buttraped without lubes again and again with "changes" which were in fact just nerfs. But this time they feel like someone wants to not just kick but also cut em off.

Now some of those changes have been taken back a bit, and most probably there will have to be more adjustments later on, but this feeling of "they will take everything I still have" is what made this thread so big.

Again, I do see some people here do have the best intentions and want to end up in a well balanced/well imbalanced game. But to understand the concerns of so many is important too, which ever your intention is. If its not just trolling, then ignoring those concerns would be indeed the best bet.

OT Smithers said this again and again. And he also showed (like I did) he is no HML-only pilot. In fact I am less a "one system only" pilot with my main than you are, Lili, since I seem to have more SP in both gunnery and missiles than you with my main, although I do know you need far less than even you to be diversified enough normally.

So as a resume, no Lili, I dont agree with your analysis of this data. I agree your analysis might be true for some, and might be one reason for this thread, but its for sure not the only one, or even the most important one.

Best regards.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5823 - 2012-11-03 09:44:24 UTC
Acac Sunflyier wrote:
Wait, is this google doc before or after skills? Like, are you assuming all lvl 5?


I think its assuming all l0. Else the nerf would be way out of line ;)
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5824 - 2012-11-03 10:24:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
"I'm poor Caldari Drake/Tengu pilot and I'm forced to use HMLs!"

Try to fly:
Light missile Vengeance
HML Sac
HML Legion
without being laughed at.

Amarr pilots are forced to use short range missiles. Unless you want to ignore 50% of your missile damage bonuses.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#5825 - 2012-11-03 11:56:55 UTC
So, after all this bloobloo Tengu and Drake got buffed


awesome

.

Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5826 - 2012-11-03 13:10:42 UTC
Roime wrote:
So, after all this bloobloo Tengu and Drake got buffed


awesome



How so?
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5827 - 2012-11-03 13:38:00 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Roime wrote:
So, after all this bloobloo Tengu and Drake got buffed


awesome



How so?


HAMs

You wanted Tengu that can compete against pirate battleships. You will get 1000 dps Tengu.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5828 - 2012-11-03 13:56:59 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:
But there is also a second way. And that second way is the one you seem to forget about or which you dont want to let come to your mind. The sad fact is, all those missile using Caldari pilots had *no other option* than to go for HML, with Torps and Cruises being less than useful in anything but PvE, and even there they are no longer top of the list for a really long time (rework of pirate faction ships & Projectile buff). And with the Tengu, their own t3 obsoleted the Caldari Marauder and missile faction BS choices too. But again, not only because it was so good (and agreed, it is!), but also because the others were not.

You keep saying this, though you forget a few points :
- There could be only one option, the option have to be good enough to be used at all. Look at medium railguns and gallente for an example of a "no other alternative" and "not used anyway" thing. Gallente have no other alternative than medium railguns for a medium weapon able to hit farther than 15km. Drones are not an option, because the myrmidon only have 75MBps bandwidth, and that mean even less dps than railguns.
- HAM are not broken as is. Tehy are not outstanding, though they are not that broken IMO, and the buff they are receiving will put them a but further ; their problem is only HML which are so much better they are pointless.
- Hybrids receive a buff a YEAR ago. Should each and every caldari pilot receive a registered letter to inform them ? Are they all that much stupid they cannot even consider using something else than missiles ? A year is way more than enough to train a weapon to very good effectiveness, so time to skill is not an excuse.
- I still would like to read an *argument* for the Raven being so bad at 70-100km with cruise missiles.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5829 - 2012-11-03 14:20:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Noemi Nagano
Bouh Revetoile wrote:


You keep saying this, though you forget a few points :
- There could be only one option, the option have to be good enough to be used at all. Look at medium railguns and gallente for an example of a "no other alternative" and "not used anyway" thing. Gallente have no other alternative than medium railguns for a medium weapon able to hit farther than 15km. Drones are not an option, because the myrmidon only have 75MBps bandwidth, and that mean even less dps than railguns.
- HAM are not broken as is. Tehy are not outstanding, though they are not that broken IMO, and the buff they are receiving will put them a but further ; their problem is only HML which are so much better they are pointless.
- Hybrids receive a buff a YEAR ago. Should each and every caldari pilot receive a registered letter to inform them ? Are they all that much stupid they cannot even consider using something else than missiles ? A year is way more than enough to train a weapon to very good effectiveness, so time to skill is not an excuse.
- I still would like to read an *argument* for the Raven being so bad at 70-100km with cruise missiles.


Your first "point" is? Well, I think you meant something like "it could be also one thing, HML are just too good". Thats what Lili said. And I spoke about this enough in my other answer. So I dont object to HML being good, but I object to they are gamebreaking OP. And I cant see any proof of any of you guys for that claim they are gamebreaking OP. Because they are not :)

Your claim about HAMs will have to be seen. If they are better than the rest of med SR, then ofc HML should not be better than the rest of LR anymore. If they are not, then not. Simple as that :) btw, I would be most happy if there would finally be more choice for Caldari missile PvP. It makes me happy to think of a universe where LR&SR large and med missiles are all viable in PvP on Caldari hulls, where one can really choose what to take for which job. And not be a one trick pony anymore.

Your hybrid argument - has been told how and why it works.

Your Raven - just friggin train the ship and use it. Then you see its issues. I am no longer in the mood to explain to a guy who is not willing to accept the simple truth in a thing which he has absolutely NO first hand experience with.

And about that other guy with no combat alt, I really dont care about you :) And that egg goes to your face too, not only Lilis (who took it like a good sport, btw).
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5830 - 2012-11-03 15:27:12 UTC
Why it's so important to have battleship that can own everyone?

Why it's so important to have OP weapon system?
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5831 - 2012-11-03 15:50:08 UTC
Why is it so important to understand what this is all about?

Why is it so important to get a clue?

Why is it so important to keep on posting here?

Why has the liquid soap been invented, and by whom?
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5832 - 2012-11-03 16:11:35 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Your first "point" is? Well, I think you meant something like "it could be also one thing, HML are just too good". Thats what Lili said. And I spoke about this enough in my other answer. So I dont object to HML being good, but I object to they are gamebreaking OP. And I cant see any proof of any of you guys for that claim they are gamebreaking OP. Because they are not :)

Your claim about HAMs will have to be seen. If they are better than the rest of med SR, then ofc HML should not be better than the rest of LR anymore. If they are not, then not. Simple as that :) btw, I would be most happy if there would finally be more choice for Caldari missile PvP. It makes me happy to think of a universe where LR&SR large and med missiles are all viable in PvP on Caldari hulls, where one can really choose what to take for which job. And not be a one trick pony anymore.

Your hybrid argument - has been told how and why it works.

Your Raven - just friggin train the ship and use it. Then you see its issues. I am no longer in the mood to explain to a guy who is not willing to accept the simple truth in a thing which he has absolutely NO first hand experience with.

And about that other guy with no combat alt, I really dont care about you :) And that egg goes to your face too, not only Lilis (who took it like a good sport, btw).

First, I won't spend six month only to prove your point. Dude, think a little will you ?

And you didn't understand my first point. HML are not use because there is no other alternative but because they are the best alternative caldari have. This mean they are OP, because railguns Rokh are working.

As for your stupid argument of turret being the "best" in large and small size, it's plain stupid. There is no such thing as the "best", only "too good", if any, or the best *in a defined scenario*. And right now, HML are too good in too many scenarios, and still are the best in their own field (dps at long range)

But again, the most important part is : NOTHING SHOULD EVER BE SO GOOD THEY OBSOLETE ALL THE OTHER WEAPONS OF THEIR CLASS.

Maybe you will understand in capslock ?
Takeshi Yamato
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#5833 - 2012-11-03 16:12:27 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Roime wrote:
So, after all this bloobloo Tengu and Drake got buffed


awesome



How so?


HAMs

You wanted Tengu that can compete against pirate battleships. You will get 1000 dps Tengu.


The Tengu's missile subsystem is due to a nerf by the way. It has effectively a +100% dps bonus. The next highest dps increase any other subsystem offers is +66%.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5834 - 2012-11-03 16:17:47 UTC
Takeshi Yamato wrote:
The Tengu's missile subsystem is due to a nerf by the way. It has effectively a +100% dps bonus. The next highest dps increase any other subsystem offers is +66%.


T3s are probably the last class of ships they rebalance before moving to capitals.
I'd say summer 2014...
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#5835 - 2012-11-03 16:44:52 UTC
Bouh Revetoile wrote:

First, I won't spend six month only to prove your point. Dude, think a little will you ?


So you agree to my point? Why do you ask then all the time? The Raven sucks in PvP. Simple as that. There is no other explanation needed. But if you actually *did* spend some time to train missile PvP you would maybe see how wrong you are with most of your other stuff.

Bouh Revetoile wrote:


As for your stupid argument of turret being the "best" in large and small size, it's plain stupid.


Thanks for sticking with personal attacks, I like that. Seems like you ran out a bit?

Bouh Revetoile wrote:


But again, the most important part is : NOTHING SHOULD EVER BE SO GOOD THEY OBSOLETE ALL THE OTHER WEAPONS OF THEIR CLASS.

Maybe you will understand in capslock ?


If that would be the case, then I would agree. Shame for you its *not* the case. HML on Drakes are really good in certain things, and suck in others. Same applies to most of the top 20 ships in Eve-kill. As long as there are no viable missile alternatives its not a problem there are many HML Drakes, and you will see they will get far less as soon as other options are there (maybe starting with HAM Drakes in the next patch).

Bouh, you are beyond all hope. Really. You talk about ships which you cant even sit inside, nor use their weapons. And sorry to say so, but that fact shines through with every single posting you do here. Either stay out of missile discussion or get those skills up. Simple as that.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5836 - 2012-11-03 16:51:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Bouh Revetoile
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Bouh Revetoile wrote:

First, I won't spend six month only to prove your point. Dude, think a little will you ?


So you agree to my point? Why do you ask then all the time? The Raven sucks in PvP. Simple as that. There is no other explanation needed. But if you actually *did* spend some time to train missile PvP you would maybe see how wrong you are with most of your other stuff.

There is. I'm among those people who like to understand things, though you are obviously not among those who understand them nor like to explain them.

PS : "believe me" is not an argument, and you never brought one argument against cruise raven effectiveness beyond 70km.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5837 - 2012-11-03 16:55:00 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Bouh Revetoile wrote:


But again, the most important part is : NOTHING SHOULD EVER BE SO GOOD THEY OBSOLETE ALL THE OTHER WEAPONS OF THEIR CLASS.

Maybe you will understand in capslock ?


If that would be the case, then I would agree. Shame for you its *not* the case. HML on Drakes are really good in certain things, and suck in others. Same applies to most of the top 20 ships in Eve-kill. As long as there are no viable missile alternatives its not a problem there are many HML Drakes, and you will see they will get far less as soon as other options are there (maybe starting with HAM Drakes in the next patch).

Bouh, you are beyond all hope. Really. You talk about ships which you cant even sit inside, nor use their weapons. And sorry to say so, but that fact shines through with every single posting you do here. Either stay out of missile discussion or get those skills up. Simple as that.

What do you not understand in "of the same class" ?

HML are medLR weapons, and they do obsolete medLR turrets. Hence, they are OP. Indeed HML are worst than AC for a brawl, but THEY ARE NOT A SHORT RANGE TURRET.

Now, will you try to argue that turret are better than HML ? Because of the 10% dps advantage they have before 25km ? Completely ignoring turrets tracking ? Go on. We already had this conversation plenty of times.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5838 - 2012-11-03 17:48:55 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:
The Raven sucks in PvP.


Since you prefer solo PvP, what's the name of battleship that can solo?
Cazador 64
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5839 - 2012-11-03 18:58:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Cazador 64
Bouh Revetoile wrote:

First, I won't spend six month only to prove your point. Dude, think a little will you ?

And you didn't understand my first point. HML are not use because there is no other alternative but because they are the best alternative caldari have. This mean they are OP, because railguns Rokh are working.

As for your stupid argument of turret being the "best" in large and small size, it's plain stupid. There is no such thing as the "best", only "too good", if any, or the best *in a defined scenario*. And right now, HML are too good in too many scenarios, and still are the best in their own field (dps at long range)

But again, the most important part is : NOTHING SHOULD EVER BE SO GOOD THEY OBSOLETE ALL THE OTHER WEAPONS OF THEIR CLASS.

Maybe you will understand in capslock ?


WOW just wow you really don't have a ******* clue do you ?
Bouh Revetoile wrote:
: NOTHING SHOULD EVER BE SO GOOD THEY OBSOLETE ALL THE OTHER WEAPONS OF THEIR CLASS.

THEY ARE SO OVERUSED BY CALDARI **************MISSILE*********** DO YOU UNDERSTAND MISSILE PILOTS BECAUSE THERE IS NO OTHER VIABLE MISSILE PLATFORM FOR THE CALDARI MISSILE PILOT DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET? MAYBE CAPS WILL HELP YOU !!!

good god between you and Lu I have never seen a more arrogant pair of people.
I am starting to think you two are the same person because I can not see how on this entire earth you would have such an astounding amount of ignorance between two different people in the same place at the same time.

We are looking at a bigger picture here when you focus on MISSILES you have no other option thats worth a damn in PVP. So they appear to be over used because no one is going to use Cruise for PVP one because they suck and two the platforms that fir them suck this is not something that is debated everyone knows this to be a truth.
No one is saying Caldari do not have an option with hybrids but this is all about MISSILES
If you have more viable Caldari MISSILE platforms you would see a more even spread across the board.

You are seeing this all wrong maybe it's because you got owned by the drake blob one to many times, but it is not the fact that they are so OP they obsolete all other weapons, its that when looking at the entire MISSILE platform everything else sucks so bad there is no other option.
So nothing should be so Underpowered within a weapons system they only have ONE viable option.

And don't try to throw torps in there we know a very small % are caldari based I would bet 80% of those are Hound / MIM torp boats.

Oh did I mention we are talking about MISSILES ?

EDIT:
Oh and http://eve-kill.net/?a=top20 still trending bad for Tengu number 17 I do not see them breaking top 10 but I will keep an eye on it and keep posting every few days.
Still do not see any Missile Caldari BS on this list hrmm.
And from these stats the canes needed a nerf.
Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#5840 - 2012-11-03 19:09:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Bouh Revetoile
Cazador 64 wrote:

THEY ARE SO OVERUSED BY CALDARI **************MISSILE*********** DO YOU UNDERSTAND MISSILE PILOTS BECAUSE THERE IS NO OTHER VIABLE MISSILE PLATFORM FOR THE CALDARI MISSILE PILOT DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET? MAYBE CAPS WILL HELP YOU !!!

Go back to your incursion please, and eat some of your missiles.

Hybrid buff, ever heard of this ? That was a year ago.

So here we are again : caldari players are even more fanatic than any amarr NPC could be, and they are stuck in their mind with using missiles only. OR, maybe they only didn't heard about the hybrid buff and CCP should have had sent them all a letter.

PS for statistics : observing is the good first thing to do. Then, it will be time to analyse. No cruise missiles in the stats, so what are the problems of cruise missiles ?