These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Updated][Winter] Missile Rebalance 2.0 + Hurricane tweak

First post First post First post
Author
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#4581 - 2012-10-12 13:12:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Daichi Yamato
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:


the point is when ppl try to say they know something about pvp, then something to back it up would give their points merit.



I posted you one of my alts which obviously doesnt have the issues you mentioned: 1) PvP 2) by no way Drake only :)



must have missed it. link again?

edit - wait i think i got it.
they guy shooting frigs and indies with the sleip and GCC targets in jita?

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#4582 - 2012-10-12 13:15:40 UTC
Oh and I didn't forget this thing I was waiting till I have a PC

Noemi Nagano wrote:
Onictus wrote:

What facts?

It's been posted over and over in MEDIUM long range catagory HMLs are the best weapon by a significant margin, and will remain so after the nerf.

I sure as **** didn't go selling my Drakes and Tengus.


1) Its been posted over and over again that there are range windows for MEDIUM long range weapons where HML is NOT best but worst in DPS.

2) Its been posted over and over again that missiles have FLIGHT TIME.

3) Its been posted over and over again that NO OTHER HML-based ship actually works except Drake and Tengu.

4) Its been posted over and over again that NO OTHER CALDARI MISSILE PVP ship than those 2 actually works above frig size.

5) Its been posted over and over again that Drakes are NOT the most used ship in lowsec and highsec.

6) Its been posted over and over again that picking on SOME STATS alone does not make sense in a game which is about ALL STATS combined. Eve is NOT EFT.

7) Its been posted over and over again that there are known and used counters against nullsec blobs with HML Drakes.

Onictus, you said you were in lowsec a few days ago and met gatecamps, each of them with 2 or so Drakes. You failed to answer my questions which other ships and how many of them where in those lowsec gatecamps. Nor didnt you tell us how many ships of which kind you met overall. I am pretty sure Drakes were not the majority of ships you saw in lowsec ;)



1) Apples to oranges. HMLs do less dps then then AC/blasters/pulses SHORT range weapons, they out DPS Arties/beams/rails/ UNTIL you factor in short range T2 ammo, which HMLs are getting as well.

2) Who cares, find a tackle, if the target isn't leaving....you still hit hard.

3) There are only four medium missile boats, 50% of them are pretty damn good.

4) Wow look at all of the qualifiers there......yeah and so what. Learn a turret. I did. Off the top of my head, harpy, claw, caracal (rapids are funny) drake, tengu, falcon, rook, scorp and rokh are workable PvP ships. Use them if you must be a purist.

5) Whatever, they are as common as anything else.

6) You are right Eve isn't EFT show my a long range turret BC that has the range damage AND tank of a Drake or a T3 that can match a Tengu in the preceding categories. I'm willing to bet you can't.....and no sentry myrm bullshit, no one.ever. flies them.

7) Yeah, I know pretty much anything that can hit back beats a drake blob.


...and sorry I didn't note the exact composition of those camps. they were all half (or better) drakes with cyclones and or various light tackle. Lucky for me I was running an AB frig and they weren't locking me fast enough to keep me from burning back to the gate and the ceptor that caught me couldn't slow me down.
Lili Lu
#4583 - 2012-10-12 14:40:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Noemi Nagano wrote:

1) Its been posted over and over again that there are range windows for MEDIUM long range weapons where HML is NOT best but worst in DPS.

2) Its been posted over and over again that missiles have FLIGHT TIME.

3) Its been posted over and over again that NO OTHER HML-based ship actually works except Drake and Tengu.

4) Its been posted over and over again that NO OTHER CALDARI MISSILE PVP ship than those 2 actually works above frig size.

5) Its been posted over and over again that Drakes are NOT the most used ship in lowsec and highsec.

6) Its been posted over and over again that picking on SOME STATS alone does not make sense in a game which is about ALL STATS combined. Eve is NOT EFT.

7) Its been posted over and over again that there are known and used counters against nullsec blobs with HML Drakes.


Noemi, you are so full of it. That list is not facts. It is perceptions. Your perceptions. They prove nothing.

Also, you say you linked who your main is that supposedly is flying Hurricanes. I'm not asking, I'm demanding. Post it. You can post up your spam about pve all you want, because noone doubts you have experience with that. But, until you prove you have some pvp record, anything you say here concerning pvp is a load of ****.

1. That damage window is incredibly short, not 35km as you assert. You keep doing precisely what many of us and Fozzie have criticized as a facetious argument. To compare short range weapons systems dps against Drake HML dps is mixing apples and oranges. You mix them everytime you engage in your Cane whine. Those Canes are dps-ing in a short perimeter, the 10k or so that they have been engaging their dual medium neuts and ACs already in falloff.

And you keep missing that with the nerf they won't be able to use 425 ac and dual medium neuts anymore without a totally gimped fit, because they are getting grid nerfed, ffs, directly. My god if (no really, when Lol) the Drake had got directly nerfed with this pass what would you be saying. You'd be sperging your unsupported crap even more than you are now.

2. Flight time? So what? It does not matter. Those heavys are moving faster to target than any scout drone. Drakes would only have to worry about it if they are sitting at max range. In nullsec they do this with a bunch of other drakes and the thus the delay doesn't matter at all for killmail glory and doesn't matter for effectiveness because the whole fleets volley is what matters.

It doesn't happen in lowsec because almost everyone is sitting at zero to 30 so they can get a point. 30km of travel time on a missile doesn't lose anyone killmail glory. Drakes do fine, even near the top on killmails in mixed gangs, and noone is warping away from missiles in flight if they weren't already not pointed anyway. Try whining about drone travel time and you would have more credibility.

Oh, and if you are going to parade flight time as this terrible drawback to missiles, then balance that out with benefits like not needing cap (and not currently subject to tracking disruption Blink)

3. Onictus already destroyed your whine about no other HML ships. And, with rebalancing Minmatar is getting a line of missile focused ships. But thats the whole point, this adjustment to HMs is being done to enable the process of rebalancing.

4. Ugh, your assertion number 4 is a rewording of your assertion number 3, so already addressed.

5. Agian for the umpteenth time, and you always avoid addressing it when I point this out, POSTING OVER AND OVER the same assertion based on your perception DOES NOT MAKE IT A FACT. You have no rangdom statistical sample of drake v cane usage numbers in lowsec. You have only your perception.

I have a differing perception. I see just as many Drakes or more in lowsec than Canes. Last night I was in two BC battles. Mainly mixed drakes and canes beacuse the others are **** atm. Drakes were outnumbering Canes by about 2 to 1. But does that make my perception and assertion any more an accurate portrayal of drake v cane use in lowsec? NO.

But, CCP has the tools to evaluate drake use in the game on a true statistical basis. They are not saying Drakes predominate only in nullsec. So stop repeating your own assertion as if we will all eventually accept it as fact. It is not fact.

6. Indeed, eve is not eft. But again, until you post with a main that has some pvp record all your posting can only be figured as that of an eft whore. And anyway, it seems your side finally gave up on the damage stats arguments because HMs are so obviously better. Regardless, CCP is not relying on EFT.

7. The issue is not whether there are counters to nullsec drake blobs. Again this is your attempt to characterize the problem as just nullsec drake blobs. CCP does not see it that way, and they have the ability to see drake/HML use within the game in all contexts. And, to just keep pointing to nullsec drake blobs doesn't help your argument anyway because you won't see Myrm or Harby blobs, and even Cane blobs won't be viable to replace Drakes (and especially after this nerf). BCs will all be getting rebalnced later as well. I doubt CCP wants to have them inhabiting all the available niches for tech I Cruisers and HACs (or even BSs) anymore.

Stop posting arguments and calling them facts.Roll Stop calling posts, facts. This is an exchange of arguments.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#4584 - 2012-10-12 17:08:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Noemi Nagano
@Lili Lu

First of all, there is one full of it .. but thats not me.

I linked an alts KB, if you, Lili Lu,are not happy, go on. I wont link more alts (which I have). And you can demand what you want, but you wont get any. There is really no more need to argue with you. You are set, and its not changing anything to talk to you. But still, others should not read your lies uncommented :)

Lili Lu wrote:


1. That damage window is incredibly short, not 35km as you assert. You keep doing precisely what many of us and Fozzie have criticized as a facetious argument. To compare short range weapons systems dps against Drake HML dps is mixing apples and oranges. You mix them everytime you engage in your Cane whine. Those Canes are dps-ing in a short perimeter, the 10k or so that they have been engaging their dual medium neuts and ACs already in falloff.


no. You just cant read, obviously. I said it again and again. And again. I compare LONG RANGE MEDIUM WEAPONS.
If you are unable to do so, then not my problem. Everyone who is able to read already understood it, there is a range window where HML are doing more DPS, and before and after LR MT do more.

Application is another issue, but mechanics are very different here for both types, missiles and guns. So if you compare the weaks of the one with the strongs of the other or vice versa, then you are comparing apples and oranges, not me.

Lili Lu wrote:

And you keep missing that with the nerf they won't be able to use 425 ac and dual medium neuts anymore without a totally gimped fit, because they are getting grid nerfed, ffs, directly. My god if (no really, when Lol) the Drake had got directly nerfed with this pass what would you be saying. You'd be sperging your unsupported crap even more than you are now.


I am not missing anything. Again, learn to read and understand.

Lili Lu wrote:

2. Flight time? So what? It does not matter.


Yeah, thats your opinion. But thats not fact. Its a measurable thing on those longer ranges we are talking about. If you deny that fact you just show your set up mind - again.

Lili Lu wrote:

3. Onictus already destroyed your whine about no other HML ships. And, with rebalancing Minmatar is getting a line of missile focused ships. But thats the whole point, this adjustment to HMs is being done to enable the process of rebalancing.


Onictus destroyed nothing, tbh. There are 2 HML using ships in Eve, one of them a t3 which are on par or good in a role. All others are NOT. Thats exactly my point, and if HML get nerfed (which is the plan of Fozzie, do you deny that?), those other ship are even more on the receiving end.

Lili Lu wrote:

4. Ugh, your assertion number 4 is a rewording of your assertion number 3, so already addressed.


Hahaha .... now you made me laugh. Exactly. But only because large missiles and medium short range missiles dont exist. Or ... maybe .... wait?
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#4585 - 2012-10-12 17:08:59 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:

5. Agian for the umpteenth time, and you always avoid addressing it when I point this out, POSTING OVER AND OVER the same assertion based on your perception DOES NOT MAKE IT A FACT. You have no rangdom statistical sample of drake v cane usage numbers in lowsec. You have only your perception.


No one with their brains set right (and yes, unfortunately this will exclude you ..) will claim Drakes are the most used ships in high and low. No one. Not even Onictus.

Lili Lu wrote:

But, CCP has the tools to evaluate drake use in the game on a true statistical basis. They are not saying Drakes predominate only in nullsec. So stop repeating your own assertion as if we will all eventually accept it as fact. It is not fact.


Err no. Thats a simple lie you tell here :) I never ever read anything like that in an official CCP announcement.

I will not stop posting facts, at least not as long as narrow minded people who obviously even cant read keep spamming their Drake/HML hate here :)
Lili Lu
#4586 - 2012-10-12 17:39:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Noemi Nagano wrote:
@Lili Lu

First of all, there is one full of it .. but thats not me.

I linked an alts KB, if you, Lili Lu,are not happy, go on. I wont link more alts (which I have). And you can demand what you want, but you wont get any. There is really no more need to argue with you. You are set, and its not changing anything to talk to you. But still, others should not read your lies uncommented :)

Lili Lu wrote:


1. That damage window is incredibly short, not 35km as you assert. You keep doing precisely what many of us and Fozzie have criticized as a facetious argument. To compare short range weapons systems dps against Drake HML dps is mixing apples and oranges. You mix them everytime you engage in your Cane whine. Those Canes are dps-ing in a short perimeter, the 10k or so that they have been engaging their dual medium neuts and ACs already in falloff.


no. You just cant read, obviously. I said it again and again. And again. I compare LONG RANGE MEDIUM WEAPONS.
If you are unable to do so, then not my problem. Everyone who is able to read already understood it, there is a range window where HML are doing more DPS, and before and after LR MT do more.

Application is another issue, but mechanics are very different here for both types, missiles and guns. So if you compare the weaks of the one with the strongs of the other or vice versa, then you are comparing apples and oranges, not me.


Weak. I haven't sen any post by you with a link to a character with any pvp record. Why so afraid to re-post if you say you already did?

You keep whining about Canes and dps. Canes only out dps Drakes because they are usally fit with 425 ACs and 2 mdium neuts. Few people fight in arty canes because it leave little grid for tank. Unless they are with a group looking to alpha some poor sucker.

Also, just resorting to "liar liar" is pretty **** poor on your part. I haven't presented any of what I say as absolute fact. You do. That is my point. We both are presenting arguments. Neither of which can be authoritatively stated to be fact. THerfore I am not lying (and neither are you btw). But you try to cast your opinions as fact. That is not a lie, but it is a mischaracterization. And thus your arguments are weak.

Also, CCP is able to track all module activations each day. They can tell just how many more HML II activations are occuring in game. I suspect they can break that down as well geographically. So while they may not be able to count individual activations to differentiate pve from pvp, certainly if they are finding plenty of HML activation in lowsec it's not Drake blobs or people running level 4s in Drakes there (although it may catch some low sec Tengu level 4 activity).
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#4587 - 2012-10-12 18:07:30 UTC
Just go back 2 pages and you see the link easily.

Second: if you accuse me of mixing AC Canes and Arty Canes, comparing HML Drakes with AC Canes and the like, then yes - you are a liar . I never did that.

The only time I mentioned those two ships/fittings was when I spoke about viable roles. There is no discussion about the AC Cane being the ship of choice for most low sec PvP players (if they want to go BC). The Drake with HML on the other hand is also a viable choice. If you really want to compare those two in terms of what they do in a 1on1, then HML Drake will lose to any AC Cane with a half smart pilot due to it cant catch the Cane, and if it can then the Cane will be too close for the Drake so the winner will be the Cane.

That does not mean the Drake has no role - it has. It has to stay far enough out and deal DPS from there. Those DPS are not so hot (esp. when not shooting kinetic ..) and come in delayed, but steady. So thats the role of a Drake, it can be a brick of a tank and deal solid DPS from 0-max. Its role is not favoured by current meta though, except in nullsec blobs. Simple as that.
Major Killz
inglorious bastards.
#4588 - 2012-10-12 18:14:52 UTC
Noemi Nagano is p funny.

I doubt anyone with any sense really believes most of Noemi Nagano statements. I'm p sure CCP isn't paying much attention.


With that said. If a player does SPAM enough, it's possible to derail a thread or any changes a player may NOT want (I know from experience lol). However, I've never seen it work the other way around.

[u]Ich bin ein Pirat ![/u]

Rita May
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4589 - 2012-10-12 18:16:40 UTC
on a totally unrelated side note:

i have the feeling that the sudden changes in argumentation from the topic of this thread to "your points are invalid because you are posting with a NPC-Corp Alt" has two reasons:

1. The horse is dead, no more beating, let it rest in peace
2. if one starts to feal s/he has no (more) valid points to contribute s/he starts to flame the "inexperienced" noobs in the NPC-Corps

regarding point 1. i'd like to add: if new information comes up i'm more than happy to discuss that again

cu.
Marcus Harikari
#4590 - 2012-10-12 18:24:16 UTC
NO HML NERF NO HML NERF
Lili Lu
#4591 - 2012-10-12 18:53:44 UTC
Rita May wrote:
on a totally unrelated side note:

i have the feeling that the sudden changes in argumentation from the topic of this thread to "your points are invalid because I am posting with an NPC-Corp Alt and calling you a liar liar" has two reasons:

1. The horse is dead, no more beating, let it rest in peace
2. if one starts to feal s/he has no (more) valid points to contribute s/he starts to flame the those that disagree with her from an inexperienced noob in the NPC-Corps

regarding point 1. i'd like to add: if new information comes up i'm more than happy to discuss that again

cu.

FYP Smile See what I did there.

But yeah, I said about a hundred pages ago that those whining about the changes were just repeating themselves, or as you put it, beating a dead horse
Lili Lu
#4592 - 2012-10-12 19:08:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Why Noemi, is this http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=ROU+Psychopath&page=1#kills really you. So you like to gank noobships in Jita? Or are you maybe one the noobships ganked? I paged back many pages and still didn't see any lowsec fighting, which you profess to do. Whatever floats your boat I guess.Lol And, damn, if it is you, shouldn't you be moaning about the Hurricane nerf? Why all your hair pulling over the HML nerf and Drakes?

You know you can post with that guy.Blink or can you? duhn dah dunh Ok, I have some pity for you now. Carry on.Smile
Buzzy Warstl
Quantum Flux Foundry
#4593 - 2012-10-12 19:58:21 UTC
Missile users get the HAM buff to go alongside the HM nerf.

Is switching fits really such a tragedy?

http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm Richard Bartle: Players who suit MUDs

Gypsio III
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4594 - 2012-10-12 21:57:24 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:


http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=13141153

I see a Jita ganker who can't fit a Drake. No wonder. Seriously Noemi, you should really stick to forum PVP.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#4595 - 2012-10-12 22:31:33 UTC
Gypsio III wrote:
Noemi Nagano wrote:


http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=13141153

I see a Jita ganker who can't fit a Drake. No wonder. Seriously Noemi, you should really stick to forum PVP.


Maybe its beyond your knowledge, but kills in Jita dont neccesarily need to be ganks ... there is a thing called wardec :)

And that Drake was not a good one, agreed on that. FC wanted HAMs when I had just t1 ready, he still wanted HAMs .. *sigh* the BCS were no issue for me, like I said - trading ;)

About the rest - everything has been said. I never said I fly only Drake, in fact in most of my postings you can read I can use all there is in subcap (and nowadays also all t2 weapons). So for me this is nothing personal, I dont *need* the Drake or Cane or whatever ship. But I like balance. I want Eve to be a place where every race can do something (and more than just E-war or Logi) in every ship class. And with their signature weapons, not some Gallentean gunnery ;) ... so fix the NH, fix the Raven, fix Torps, CMs and HAMs and then you can think of a change to HMLs. But not the other way round. Screwing over a race again and again is just lame.

Best regards.
Noemi Nagano
Perkone
Caldari State
#4596 - 2012-10-12 22:39:29 UTC
Major Killz wrote:
Noemi Nagano is p funny.

I doubt anyone with any sense really believes most of Noemi Nagano statements. I'm p sure CCP isn't paying much attention.


With that said. If a player does SPAM enough, it's possible to derail a thread or any changes a player may NOT want (I know from experience lol). However, I've never seen it work the other way around.


http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=17230713

well, I think you are funny too :) you managed to fit an even worse PvP HAM Drake than me - do you also have an FC as excuse? :D

thats what I mean .. you can and will find stupid/bad/whatever fittings for everyone, if you look a bit. Didnt take me long in fact to find this, was the first Drake I clicked on.

So, what does that mean about you and your credibility? Nothing, tbh .. you could have learned, or it was bad luck when you were caught in a semi-fitted ship or whatever. I can only say something about your credibility in terms of what you write here. It makes no sense to me, but others may feel different.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#4597 - 2012-10-12 22:44:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Major Killz wrote:
Noemi Nagano is p funny.

I doubt anyone with any sense really believes most of Noemi Nagano statements. I'm p sure CCP isn't paying much attention.


With that said. If a player does SPAM enough, it's possible to derail a thread or any changes a player may NOT want (I know from experience lol). However, I've never seen it work the other way around.


http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=17230713

well, I think you are funny too :) you managed to fit an even worse PvP HAM Drake than me - do you also have an FC as excuse? :D

thats what I mean .. you can and will find stupid/bad/whatever fittings for everyone, if you look a bit. Didnt take me long in fact to find this, was the first Drake I clicked on.

So, what does that mean about you and your credibility? Nothing, tbh .. you could have learned, or it was bad luck when you were caught in a semi-fitted ship or whatever. I can only say something about your credibility in terms of what you write here. It makes no sense to me, but others may feel different.

As one who doesn't PvP much what was the issue with that fit?

Edit: Wait, reading more closely I just saw:
Noemi Nagano wrote:
or it was bad luck when you were caught in a semi-fitted ship or whatever.

but if you look at the listed items under implants it should be obvious BC apparently doesn't know what ASB's or CPU rigs are or doesn't understand where they fit. The ship was fully fit.
Major Killz
inglorious bastards.
#4598 - 2012-10-12 22:52:26 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Noemi Nagano wrote:
Major Killz wrote:
Noemi Nagano is p funny.

I doubt anyone with any sense really believes most of Noemi Nagano statements. I'm p sure CCP isn't paying much attention.


With that said. If a player does SPAM enough, it's possible to derail a thread or any changes a player may NOT want (I know from experience lol). However, I've never seen it work the other way around.


http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=17230713

well, I think you are funny too :) you managed to fit an even worse PvP HAM Drake than me - do you also have an FC as excuse? :D

thats what I mean .. you can and will find stupid/bad/whatever fittings for everyone, if you look a bit. Didnt take me long in fact to find this, was the first Drake I clicked on.

So, what does that mean about you and your credibility? Nothing, tbh .. you could have learned, or it was bad luck when you were caught in a semi-fitted ship or whatever. I can only say something about your credibility in terms of what you write here. It makes no sense to me, but others may feel different.

As one who doesn't PvP much what was the issue with that fit?



Just being terribubble with terribubble
fits ofc v0v

[u]Ich bin ein Pirat ![/u]

Unit757
North Point
#4599 - 2012-10-12 23:38:04 UTC
I thought this was settled like 100 pages ago.... drakes are barely losing any dps, who cares? ***** when its on the test server, because sitting here whining about base numbers and eft warrioring doesnt mean a damn thing.
Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#4600 - 2012-10-12 23:53:18 UTC
Noemi Nagano wrote:

Maybe its beyond your knowledge, but kills in Jita dont neccesarily need to be ganks ... there is a thing called wardec :)


Maybe its beyond your knowledge but the rest of eve generally considers HS pvp with scorn and derision as it barely qualifies as real pvp in 99% of all cases.

BYDI recruitment closed-ish