These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

New site for Declarations of War, complete with Ripard Teg vs the CSM

First post
Author
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#1 - 2012-09-15 23:54:37 UTC
Hey CSM junkies, if you're looking for Declarations of War it can now be found on www.declarationsofwar.com

This brand new site has a lot of things people have long been asking for, including a proper iTunes feed and episode polls. DoW has become not just a PVP podcast, but also an important part of the CSM communication with the EVE community. It's long overdue that its web presence got an upgrade, and myself along with NinjaTurtle and JaredC01 are proud to present it.

And what's a grand opening without some fanfare? Episode 33 with Ripard Teg, Seleene,and Hans Jagerblitzen is now live

Show Notes:
-Ripard Teg talks about his start in EVE and as a blogger
-Discussion of the CSM6 election and the experience of being a candidate
-Fierce debate over the role of the CSM
-Alek reads controversial parts of Ripard’s latest blog and **** gets real
-Real talk continues over Technetium alchemy and the accomplishments/shortcomings of CSM7

Enjoy!

Alek the Kidnapper, Hero of the CSM

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#2 - 2012-09-16 04:34:45 UTC  |  Edited by: rodyas
Awesome, thanks. (CSM junkies, psshh, I am just waiting for the CSM action figures to come out, then I go cold turkey)

I wanted to comment on the CSM 6 with the media. I feel like they had an easier time or it was less of a trap for them. They could talk about a lot of game or development issues that were already public and not sure to meet the NDA hammer in the face.

I feel like CSM 7 would have a lot more to talk about or to the media, but it is all NDA'ed out. They aren't really whining a lot either, so I tell myself they hear good things then.

Also for the trap part, CSM 7 could take stuff to the media or bring them in, only for CCP to tell the media that it is NDA's right now, so why are they standing there, when they should be off reporting on other stories, until CCP has something ready to talk about.

The only thing that disturbs me so far, is CCP's greed towards DUST, but I suppose its the only thing CCP can talk about, so that is all they do talk about.

(Also wanted to add, that we have already seen the worst case scenario, where CCP and CSM conspire together and never tell the players or media, The voting reform threads)

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2012-09-16 04:36:47 UTC
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:

Show Notes:
-Ripard Teg talks about his start in EVE and as a blogger
-Discussion of the CSM6 election and the experience of being a candidate
-Fierce debate over the role of the CSM
-Alek reads controversial parts of Ripard’s latest blog and **** gets real
-Real talk continues over Technetium alchemy and the accomplishments/shortcomings of CSM7

Enjoy!

anything related to eve gameplay other then the tech alchemy thing?
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#4 - 2012-09-16 05:18:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Alekseyev Karrde
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:

Show Notes:
-Ripard Teg talks about his start in EVE and as a blogger
-Discussion of the CSM6 election and the experience of being a candidate
-Fierce debate over the role of the CSM
-Alek reads controversial parts of Ripard’s latest blog and **** gets real
-Real talk continues over Technetium alchemy and the accomplishments/shortcomings of CSM7

Enjoy!

anything related to eve gameplay other then the tech alchemy thing?

not really. On the question of tech though, I put a poll up whether you think Ripard's right and the tech alchemy made things worse than before or the CSM guys were right that it's not The Fix but at least a step in the right direction. Will be interesting to see the results.

Posting 2 public discussion threads about voting reform isn't much of a secret conspiracy...

Alek the Kidnapper, Hero of the CSM

Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-09-16 09:06:15 UTC
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:

Show Notes:
-Ripard Teg talks about his start in EVE and as a blogger
-Discussion of the CSM6 election and the experience of being a candidate
-Fierce debate over the role of the CSM
-Alek reads controversial parts of Ripard’s latest blog and **** gets real
-Real talk continues over Technetium alchemy and the accomplishments/shortcomings of CSM7

Enjoy!

anything related to eve gameplay other then the tech alchemy thing?

not really. On the question of tech though, I put a poll up whether you think Ripard's right and the tech alchemy made things worse than before or the CSM guys were right that it's not The Fix but at least a step in the right direction. Will be interesting to see the results.

Posting 2 public discussion threads about voting reform isn't much of a secret conspiracy...

Ya'll's dumb and I shut down the voting thing in like 3 posts. The rest were just me never stopping posting.
Frying Doom
#6 - 2012-09-16 13:52:02 UTC
Courthouse wrote:

Ya'll's dumb and I shut down the voting thing in like 3 posts. The rest were just me never stopping posting.

Starts a post with Ya'll's and calls other people dumb Lol

Really sums it up doesn't it.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#7 - 2012-09-16 15:55:17 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Courthouse wrote:

Ya'll's dumb and I shut down the voting thing in like 3 posts. The rest were just me never stopping posting.

Starts a post with Ya'll's and calls other people dumb Lol

Really sums it up doesn't it.

What you tryin' ta say city boy?

Alek the Kidnapper, Hero of the CSM

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-09-16 19:17:58 UTC
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
On the question of tech though, I put a poll up whether you think Ripard's right and the tech alchemy made things worse than before or the CSM guys were right that it's not The Fix but at least a step in the right direction. Will be interesting to see the results.
Nicely slanted poll.

Ripard didn't argue that it was worse or a step in the right direction. He argued that it wasn't a fix at all. It was a rollback. Yet, you didn't offer that as an option.

You're kind of directing people to the answer you want. Even Ripard would have to answer "step in the right direction", since he didn't feel it made things worse. He simply believes that it didn't do much of anything at all.
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2012-09-16 19:20:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
I'm surprised you even posted the podcast. I'm guessing you saw it as a "CSM Victor!"?

You guys seriously came off as childish and petty and overly defensive throughout the podcast.

Everyone knows I'm not a Ripard fan at all ... yet, he comes out of this making the bunch of you look pretty foolish.

First the voting reform thread ... and now this.
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#10 - 2012-09-17 01:51:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Alekseyev Karrde
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
On the question of tech though, I put a poll up whether you think Ripard's right and the tech alchemy made things worse than before or the CSM guys were right that it's not The Fix but at least a step in the right direction. Will be interesting to see the results.
Nicely slanted poll.

Ripard didn't argue that it was worse or a step in the right direction. He argued that it wasn't a fix at all. It was a rollback. Yet, you didn't offer that as an option.

You're kind of directing people to the answer you want. Even Ripard would have to answer "step in the right direction", since he didn't feel it made things worse. He simply believes that it didn't do much of anything at all.

I'm pretty sure, having been there and listened to it after the fact, he said *exactly* the words the change made things worse, and furthermore that tech alchemy was a Bad Thing was his overall point. I'm not sure how else you could characterize his argument; i thought he made himself pretty clear and laid out his point of view very articulately.

If you thought Ripard did well and the CSM members did not, that's cool. Several people have said it went the other way. I think there's a case to be made on both sides, that's why it's controversial. Players are smart enough to make up their own minds.

But "First the voting reform thread now this" what does that even mean lol?

Alek the Kidnapper, Hero of the CSM

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2012-09-17 01:53:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
On the question of tech though, I put a poll up whether you think Ripard's right and the tech alchemy made things worse than before or the CSM guys were right that it's not The Fix but at least a step in the right direction. Will be interesting to see the results.
Nicely slanted poll.

Ripard didn't argue that it was worse or a step in the right direction. He argued that it wasn't a fix at all. It was a rollback. Yet, you didn't offer that as an option.

You're kind of directing people to the answer you want. Even Ripard would have to answer "step in the right direction", since he didn't feel it made things worse. He simply believes that it didn't do much of anything at all.
I'm pretty sure having, been there and listened to it after the fact, he said exactly the words the alchemy change made things worse.

And I'm pretty sure, having listened to the podcast, that you were the guy who heard only what he wanted to hear.

Unless you edited stuff out, we all heard exactly what you heard. You were no more "there" than anyone else who listened.
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#12 - 2012-09-17 03:48:16 UTC
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:


Posting 2 public discussion threads about voting reform isn't much of a secret conspiracy...


It was a conspiracy for who knows how long, then trebor leaked it onto this forum. Making it a public conspiracy. Then CCP Xhagen came in for damage control, but I didn't read it, so I don't know if it worked or not.

As for the tech question, not sure where your poll is, but I kind of view, both jester and CSM as winners in a way. Even CCP won I suppose as well.

Like it was only designed to nerf the tech deals and overly high prices, which it did and its nicer. But CCP stated they were gonna price fix the tech, to the 2010 or 2011 lvls. Like Jester doesn't like. Which I kind of supported the price fixing, but it is still a bit hard to deal with the overwhelming must have tech all the time.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#13 - 2012-09-17 03:55:30 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
I'm surprised you even posted the podcast. I'm guessing you saw it as a "CSM Victor!"?

You guys seriously came off as childish and petty and overly defensive throughout the podcast.

Everyone knows I'm not a Ripard fan at all ... yet, he comes out of this making the bunch of you look pretty foolish.

First the voting reform thread ... and now this.


You have to start at the beginning of the CSM and jester drama, instead of starting in the middles, with CSM looking defensive.

Seleene was on the voices of the void podcast, talking about how Jester was trolling CCP and CSM with his blog, over how they felt a year later after incarna. Why they might come across as defensive, since they were already being attacked, before this podcast even started.

Of course I do like Jester as well, he is the only one who feeds my paranoid mind the most.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#14 - 2012-09-17 04:28:19 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Courthouse wrote:

Ya'll's dumb and I shut down the voting thing in like 3 posts. The rest were just me never stopping posting.

Starts a post with Ya'll's and calls other people dumb Lol

Really sums it up doesn't it.

Figured I'd speak down to your level.
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#15 - 2012-09-17 04:32:00 UTC
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
But "First the voting reform thread now this" what does that even mean lol?


It means the CSM is a sack of retards regurgitating the same crap to each other over and over in hopes that people will catch on and like you for it. You guys can talk about how hard it is being CSM or how you need to clearly define what the CSM ~is~ with CCP before anything can be done...

Or you can admit that none of you can swing soft power for **** and you're being led around by a guy who made a career in and out of EVE being led around like a bottom ***** to his own detriment and the detriment of everyone around him.

CCP's not the broken part of this scenario. The CSM is. And it's not an institutional problem, it's a problem with the people on it.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#16 - 2012-09-17 04:54:25 UTC
Courthouse wrote:
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
But "First the voting reform thread now this" what does that even mean lol?

It means the CSM is a sack of retards regurgitating the same crap to each other over and over in hopes that people will catch on and like you for it. You guys can talk about how hard it is being CSM or how you need to clearly define what the CSM ~is~ with CCP before anything can be done...

Or you can admit that none of you can swing soft power for **** and you're being led around by a guy who made a career in and out of EVE being led around like a bottom ***** to his own detriment and the detriment of everyone around him.

CCP's not the broken part of this scenario. The CSM is. And it's not an institutional problem, it's a problem with the people on it.

So what kind of steps would be needed to address the issue, to avoid a repeat of events like we have just recently observed on these very forums, nay, this very thread ?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Vricrolatious
HIgh Sec Care Bears
Brothers of Tangra
#17 - 2012-09-17 05:04:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Vricrolatious
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Courthouse wrote:
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
But "First the voting reform thread now this" what does that even mean lol?

It means the CSM is a sack of retards regurgitating the same crap to each other over and over in hopes that people will catch on and like you for it. You guys can talk about how hard it is being CSM or how you need to clearly define what the CSM ~is~ with CCP before anything can be done...

Or you can admit that none of you can swing soft power for **** and you're being led around by a guy who made a career in and out of EVE being led around like a bottom ***** to his own detriment and the detriment of everyone around him.

CCP's not the broken part of this scenario. The CSM is. And it's not an institutional problem, it's a problem with the people on it.

So what kind of steps would be needed to address the issue, to avoid a repeat of events like we have just recently observed on these very forums, nay, this very thread ?


Clearly we vote Courthouse onto the CSM

Of course, this could end badly.

Well, at least it'd be entertaining

WIDot, Best Dot, Even Sans Dot! -Vric

Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#18 - 2012-09-17 05:47:21 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
So what kind of steps would be needed to address the issue, to avoid a repeat of events like we have just recently observed on these very forums, nay, this very thread ?


You know how you go to grade school and they teach you these patriotic little half-lies like "We celebrate Columbus Day because Christopher Columbus discovered America" or "Isaac Newton discovered gravity when an apple fell and hit him on the head"?

So when you're little that's what you understand. Then you grow up a little and you realize that the real story is like 6 degrees deeper and has all of these connotations attached to them, vis a vis Colombus was inadvertently responsible for mass native deaths or Newton was only 24 when he developed Calculus and he couldn't codify this until he had reasoned out planetary motion and didn't publish a theory of gravity until Principia when he was 45.

These realizations suddenly mean that the depth of knowledge and understanding of the principles related to these formerly simple concepts are vast in comparison to your previous conceptualization and therefore understanding the consequences is a much more complex process.

That's the CSM. The people in there now are still talking about how awesome Columbus was with his 3 ships and their fair trade practices with the natives and how a young newton got bonked on the head and ~magically~ worked out the universal laws of planetary motion right there on the spot.

tl;dr: They're simple figureheads who barely understand the rudimentary parts of what the CSM is and certainly have no concept of how to use it effectively, and that's without going into their complete lack of political understandings or systems of power and influence.
Epic Vulture
Reportable Offensive Name
Goonswarm Federation
#19 - 2012-09-17 06:25:54 UTC
Courthouse wrote:
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
But "First the voting reform thread now this" what does that even mean lol?


It means the CSM is a sack of retards regurgitating the same crap to each other over and over in hopes that people will catch on and like you for it. You guys can talk about how hard it is being CSM or how you need to clearly define what the CSM ~is~ with CCP before anything can be done...

Or you can admit that none of you can swing soft power for **** and you're being led around by a guy who made a career in and out of EVE being led around like a bottom ***** to his own detriment and the detriment of everyone around him.

CCP's not the broken part of this scenario. The CSM is. And it's not an institutional problem, it's a problem with the people on it.

Have you considered running for CSM?
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-09-17 06:35:55 UTC
Epic Vulture wrote:
Courthouse wrote:
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
But "First the voting reform thread now this" what does that even mean lol?


It means the CSM is a sack of retards regurgitating the same crap to each other over and over in hopes that people will catch on and like you for it. You guys can talk about how hard it is being CSM or how you need to clearly define what the CSM ~is~ with CCP before anything can be done...

Or you can admit that none of you can swing soft power for **** and you're being led around by a guy who made a career in and out of EVE being led around like a bottom ***** to his own detriment and the detriment of everyone around him.

CCP's not the broken part of this scenario. The CSM is. And it's not an institutional problem, it's a problem with the people on it.

Have you considered running for CSM?

Uh oh. New voting reform proposal from CSM7 in 3 .. 2 .. 1.
123Next page