These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EVE: The last of the sub based MMO?

Author
William Walker
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#21 - 2012-09-14 07:07:45 UTC
Webvan wrote:
WWII Online is still sub


WWII online went free to play Cool

ヽ(⌒∇⌒)ノ へ(゜∇、°)へ (◕‿◕✿)

Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#22 - 2012-09-14 07:14:06 UTC
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:
Astroniomix wrote:
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:
CCP managed to kill the true sandbox as well as turn their game into pay to win (not as bad as other games) the moment plex hit the scene. Treating eve like a strict monthly sub game is simply misguided.

This statement is so untrue as to not even be funny. As I already said in my earlier post, a skilled player will beat a well geared player ALL-DAY-LONG.


I know huge swathes of people that purchase plex to replace lost ships instead of farming or mining like players use to in the past... The options to invest real life cash to purchase a plex which is then used to obtain large amounts of in game currency is exactly pay to win, regardless of which way you want to spin it.


I guess if you define having stuff as "winning".

They can't gain any tactical advantage by paying more RL iskies that I myself cannot gain from just spending in game iskies.
Paul Oliver
Doomheim
#23 - 2012-09-14 07:16:06 UTC
But they can more easily afford things like gol...faction ammo and expensive ships which they have no fear of losing because they can always drop more rl money for plex and buy a new one.
Its good to be [Gallente](http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1209/QEQlJ.jpg).
Alphaphi
KASK Heavy logistics
#24 - 2012-09-14 07:18:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Alphaphi
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:
Astroniomix wrote:
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:
CCP managed to kill the true sandbox as well as turn their game into pay to win (not as bad as other games) the moment plex hit the scene. Treating eve like a strict monthly sub game is simply misguided.

This statement is so untrue as to not even be funny. As I already said in my earlier post, a skilled player will beat a well geared player ALL-DAY-LONG.


I know huge swathes of people that purchase plex to replace lost ships instead of farming or mining like players use to in the past... The options to invest real life cash to purchase a plex which is then used to obtain large amounts of in game currency is exactly pay to win, regardless of which way you want to spin it.




That's not pay to win.

no matter how much plex they buy, and how many ships they replace, it still won't change the fact that said player might not have proper skills trained to support the ships potential, thus leaving him to more fail and lost ships.
you are not getting anything superior that non-plexing players can't get, the only thing that you are getting is your items (which all other players can obtain and use just as good with the same skills as you trained) therefore, it's not pay to win.

Paul Oliver wrote:
But they can more easily afford things like gol...faction ammo and expensive ships which they have no fear of losing because they can always drop more rl money for plex and buy a new one.


they can afford to lose it, and replace it.
which brings us back to one of the most basic rules of eve: if you can't afford to lose it, don't fly it.
players who fly those ships, buying Plex or not, can usually afford to replace it. unless they are carebearing high-sec missioners that likes to pimp their vindicator out with officer fittings.
Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#25 - 2012-09-14 07:21:31 UTC
Paul Oliver wrote:
But they can more easily afford things like gol...faction ammo and expensive ships which they have no fear of losing because they can always drop more rl money for plex and buy a new one.

But they can't get anything that I cant by simply playing the game.

My point is that it's not "pay to win"
It's more like "pay extra to be slightly less inconvenienced"
Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#26 - 2012-09-14 07:29:55 UTC
William Walker wrote:
Webvan wrote:
WWII Online is still sub


WWII online went free to play Cool

Hmm? I just reactivated a month three months ago. *checks* oh... it's a tier trial. Ryzom did the same, you get access up to a point, then you need to sub to go further, not really the free to pay model.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
#27 - 2012-09-14 07:44:05 UTC
Ambo wrote:
Actually, eve is free to play.
As long as you have/make enough isk to buy a plex a month.

PLEX isn't really a F2P system. If I had to give it a name I'd probably call it a Deferred Subscription system because in buying PLEX to keep your account active you're actually getting someone else to pay your sub.

Alayna Le'line
#28 - 2012-09-14 08:14:32 UTC
Lilianna Star wrote:
pussnheels wrote:
nothing is free to play not even F2P if youplay a F2p game eventually you wiill pay just to pass a certain level cap or you will pay to use a certain powerfull item etc etc eventually you pay more than what you pay for a sub
Second F2p works fine on a MMO with 100 s of different serrvers
EvE is not, introducing F2P will create a unnbalance between people willi ng to pay for their toys and people who can't afford it or are not willing to pay for it


What you describe is bad free to play MMOs.

Good free to play games allow playing for free to be palpable while still giving plenty of reasons to pay some money. League of Legends, while not a true MMO, has this aspect down pat and that's one of the reasons why it is so popular today.


Unfortunately good free to play games are the exception, not the rule. Most F2P games are glorified shareware where you can only get so far before you have to start paying (because you run out of stuff to do and have to buy new expansions/missions/whatever), can only play a limited set of races/classes (hey, EVE is free, but you can only fly Amarr up to frigates and cruisers, but for only €5 you can also fly BC and for anothter €5 you can fly battleships and for $15 you can fly Caldari too!... You get the idea)

Doing F2P or even microtransactions "right" is very hard and the vast majority of games fails at it because greed takes the upper hand and the regular content suffers. One example: EverQuest 2 has a carpentry class that crafts furniture to put in people's houses (read, CQ) since Sony figured out they could make money selling furniture through the ingame shop the amount of interesting additions to the profession has been reduced to almost 0. While arguably this is just fluff it's still part of the "normal" gameplay and as such does affect players negatively.

So while most people don't much care about the CQ clothing (as it's totally outside "regular" EVE gameplay) an argument could be made that selling ship skins is affecting regular EVE gameplay and as such should be off limits for RMT selling, I'm sure a long argument could be formulated either way (and I'm sure there will be once we get to that stage)

Back on topic, EVE has the advantage that there is really not much content beyond what players provide, it's a lot easier to keep paying a sub when you still get the feeling that you are getting something for your money, unlike most other MMOs where you'll have run out of content to do 6 months before the next major update, making it sort of hard to justify paying the sub, quitting otoh means you most likely lose your guild, so starting again gets harder again especially if there's a monetary cost attached to starting again (need to find new guild + need to pay sub + need to buy expansion).

Being F2P removes or at least lowers this monetary barrier and makes it easier for people that have quit to get back into the game once an update has been released. Ultimately though I think it's just the game model for those kinds of games that is failing as people eventually will stop coming back for the next update, so the decline of those MMOs that are/went F2P might have slowed down but imho they're still declining, just slower.
Lilianna Star
Vagrant Empress
#29 - 2012-09-14 08:23:14 UTC
Astroniomix wrote:
Paul Oliver wrote:
But they can more easily afford things like gol...faction ammo and expensive ships which they have no fear of losing because they can always drop more rl money for plex and buy a new one.

But they can't get anything that I cant by simply playing the game.

My point is that it's not "pay to win"
It's more like "pay extra to be slightly less inconvenienced"

Pay to save time. And when you do it, you are putting real money on the line.

Spoiled kids with rich parents are the exception, not the rule. Other rich people don't have a lot of time on their hands (Typically) so this is a good way to help them catch up.
Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#30 - 2012-09-14 08:40:15 UTC
Lilianna Star wrote:
Astroniomix wrote:
Paul Oliver wrote:
But they can more easily afford things like gol...faction ammo and expensive ships which they have no fear of losing because they can always drop more rl money for plex and buy a new one.

But they can't get anything that I cant by simply playing the game.

My point is that it's not "pay to win"
It's more like "pay extra to be slightly less inconvenienced"

Pay to save time. And when you do it, you are putting real money on the line.

Spoiled kids with rich parents are the exception, not the rule. Other rich people don't have a lot of time on their hands (Typically) so this is a good way to help them catch up.

It also gives everyone else pretty loot pinatas to shoot.
Rats
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2012-09-14 08:52:03 UTC
Fremium is a rip off, you will end paying a lot more that you would with a subscription if you want to really enjoy everything, WOT is an example.

They know ppl, won't blink at paying £1 a shot for extras, then won't realise they spent 40 quid rather than see a 40 quid charge in one hit and go no that's too expensive.


Tal

I Fought the Law, and the Law Won... Talon Silverhawk

Lilianna Star
Vagrant Empress
#32 - 2012-09-14 08:54:06 UTC
Rats wrote:
Fremium is a rip off, you will end paying a lot more that you would with a subscription if you want to really enjoy everything, WOT is an example.

They know ppl, won't blink at paying £1 a shot for extras, then won't realise they spent 40 quid rather than see a 40 quid charge in one hit and go no that's too expensive.


Tal



World of Tanks is a good game so I'm not complaining about the money I spent. *shrug*
Kult Altol
The Safe Space
#33 - 2012-09-14 09:57:41 UTC
This game needs a real money market place...just kidding. We see how well that is working for diablow 3

[u]Can't wait untill when Eve online is Freemium.[/u] WiS only 10$, SP booster for one month 15$, DPS Boost 2$, EHP Boost 2$ Real money trading hub! Cosmeitic ship skins 15$ --> If you don't [u]pay **[/u]for a product, you ARE the [u]**product[/u].

Rats
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2012-09-14 10:16:17 UTC
Lilianna Star wrote:
Rats wrote:
Fremium is a rip off, you will end paying a lot more that you would with a subscription if you want to really enjoy everything, WOT is an example.

They know ppl, won't blink at paying £1 a shot for extras, then won't realise they spent 40 quid rather than see a 40 quid charge in one hit and go no that's too expensive.


Tal



World of Tanks is a good game so I'm not complaining about the money I spent. *shrug*



WOT is a good game, doesn't take a away from the fact that Fremium is misleading and more expensive in the long run.

Tal

I Fought the Law, and the Law Won... Talon Silverhawk

Baneken
Arctic Light Inc.
Arctic Light
#35 - 2012-09-14 11:09:21 UTC
LOTRO is also ftp and from what I looked it's FTP model seems pretty solid which is that you can buy extras separately or use the subscription model.

Only thing is that I regret not putting up the money for lifetime subscription when LOTRO came out. Blink

eddie valvetino
Victory or Whatever
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#36 - 2012-09-14 11:19:21 UTC
eve already is "free to play" as it is also "pay to win"

ever since game time has been traded for ISK and bought or sold with RL cash.

If you can pay with isk to play, when clearly that is a free to play model.

and since, if your set up is "better" and therefore more expensive, all the time, guys like me can use RL cash to buy isk (which is what we do when we buy and sell plex). it's also play to win.

sometimes, i wonder what game people are playing, it's called eve, but doesn't look or sound much like the game i've been playing for nearly a decade
LilRemmy
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2012-09-14 11:24:09 UTC
Do you have a blog?
eddie valvetino
Victory or Whatever
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#38 - 2012-09-14 11:38:50 UTC
LilRemmy wrote:
Do you have a blog?


hehehe... yeah the eve-online fourms
Rico Minali
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2012-09-14 11:54:27 UTC
Nyla Skin wrote:
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:
CCP managed to kill the true sandbox as well as turn their game into pay to win (not as bad as other games) the moment plex hit the scene. Treating eve like a strict monthly sub game is simply misguided.


This I agree with..



Dumb. Eve has always had timecodes to buy and sell for isk. Always. It didnt arrive with plex. Also as stated earlier there are alot of people (me included) who only play due to the ability to buy gametime with isk becasue quite simply, I dont want to pay to play with RL money. Also, no I dont spend much time grinding isk for it, I mostly pvp.

Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#40 - 2012-09-14 12:13:53 UTC
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:
CCP managed to kill the true sandbox as well as turn their game into pay to win (not as bad as other games) the moment plex hit the scene. Treating eve like a strict monthly sub game is simply misguided.



Bullshit. If being able to sell PLEX for ISK somehow stops EVE from being a "sandbox" (hint: it doesn't) then EVE stopped being a sandbox the very moment the first ISK seller appeared, back in 2003.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016