These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Herr Ronin For CSM 8: High Sec Representative

First post
Author
Frying Doom
#101 - 2013-01-23 15:21:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
I will admit I do have a few questions for this incursion representative

What alterations do you feel need to be made to hi-sec to allow more dangerous parts of space to be more viable?

What time frame do you feel POSs and Sovereignty need to be fixed in?

How would you suggest sovereignty is fixed?

Do you agree with moon mining in its current form? If not how would you fix it?

How would you make mining and industry better?

Thank you for your time.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#102 - 2013-01-23 17:38:12 UTC
Hi there. You mention fixing wardecs in your OP. what, specifically, needs fixing, and how would you go about it?
Callduron
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#103 - 2013-01-24 01:06:58 UTC
Herr Ronin, I had a look at your employment history. You seem to change corps every other week and to have mostly been in high sec war dec corps. Is it fair to say you're a pvper/wardeccer/griefer? If so, why do you feel you represent high sec Eve players?

I write http://stabbedup.blogspot.co.uk/

I post on reddit as /u/callduron.

Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#104 - 2013-01-24 11:55:30 UTC
Callduron wrote:
Herr Ronin, I had a look at your employment history. You seem to change corps every other week and to have mostly been in high sec war dec corps. Is it fair to say you're a pvper/wardeccer/griefer? If so, why do you feel you represent high sec Eve players?

Wouldn't you say that people who spend time in highsec, wardeccing other highsec corps, are highsec players?
Callduron
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#105 - 2013-01-24 16:10:07 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Callduron wrote:
Herr Ronin, I had a look at your employment history. You seem to change corps every other week and to have mostly been in high sec war dec corps. Is it fair to say you're a pvper/wardeccer/griefer? If so, why do you feel you represent high sec Eve players?

Wouldn't you say that people who spend time in highsec, wardeccing other highsec corps, are highsec players?


Highsec players - Yes. Highsec representatives - No.

I think it's misleading to put yourself forward as a high sec candidate when you support a playstyle that's actively counter to how the vast majority of players in high sec enjoy the game.

I write http://stabbedup.blogspot.co.uk/

I post on reddit as /u/callduron.

Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#106 - 2013-01-24 16:36:47 UTC
Callduron wrote:
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Callduron wrote:
Herr Ronin, I had a look at your employment history. You seem to change corps every other week and to have mostly been in high sec war dec corps. Is it fair to say you're a pvper/wardeccer/griefer? If so, why do you feel you represent high sec Eve players?

Wouldn't you say that people who spend time in highsec, wardeccing other highsec corps, are highsec players?


Highsec players - Yes. Highsec representatives - No.

I think it's misleading to put yourself forward as a high sec candidate when you support a playstyle that's actively counter to how the vast majority of players in high sec enjoy the game.

So if Mynnna runs as nullsec representative when in fact he only represents Goonswarm and not Solar Fleet/Test/PL/Nulli Secunda, does that mean he's being misleading?

If Hans ran as faction warfare candidate when he fights for the Minmatar (correct me if I'm wrong, I think he's Minmatar) and not the Amarr or Fweddit or whatever, does that mean he's being misleading?

No, if this man ran as 'carebear representative' when in fact he is a wardeccer and awoxer, that would be misleading. If he runs as highsec representative, that's fine.
Singular Snowflake
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#107 - 2013-01-25 00:14:44 UTC
Herr Ronin wrote:
Change's

How would you be different from Issler?
Anslo
Scope Works
#108 - 2013-01-25 19:57:40 UTC
Bump.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#109 - 2013-01-25 21:41:47 UTC
Anslo wrote:
Bump.

A bump when it's on the front page?

In addition,

Quote:
Spamming, bumping and pyramid quoting are prohibited.

Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or text or nonsensical posts that have no substance and are often designed to annoy other forum users. This includes “first” and “go back to another game” posts. Bumping posts in order to keep them near the top of the list is also prohibited. Petitions or "/signed" posts are a version of bumping and likewise are not permitted. Pyramid quoting is a response to a forum thread that contains the quotes of four or more previous posters, sometimes with additional spaces added unnecessarily. Posts of this nature are not conducive to community spirit and are unwelcome.


Lipbite
Express Hauler
#110 - 2013-01-27 09:45:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Lipbite
I believe Herr Ronin clearly demonstrated his great thinking ability, unparalleled communication skills, charming personality, unsurpassed problem solving skills during site blocking crisis just couple weeks ago with well-thought and constructive comments in the infamous twelve pages long thread:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2400170#post2400170
TL;DR TVP is bad, site blocking is ok, there is no problem at all.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2429878#post2429878
quote: God, are will still talking about this?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2438945#post2438945
quote: Can i haz your stuffz? ^^

and - bam! - with all his help high-sec incursions site blocking officially declared an exploit by GMs council. Flawless victory. And Herr Ronin didn't even have any real power at that moment (as he's retired from ISN) - imagine what he could do if he was a member of CSM?

It will be great if such person represent hi-sec and incursion community in CSM so other members and CCP stuff could think "so this is how incursion runners / hi-sec dwellers act - they are solid community and great people, they are really respectful and helpful to each other, let's not mess with them and fulfill Herr Ronin's requests and ideas how to make high-sec space more fun and suitable for its dwellers".

So - why not?
Anslo
Scope Works
#111 - 2013-01-31 19:12:16 UTC
Still bumping Smile

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

ry ry
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#112 - 2013-01-31 19:30:35 UTC
A lot of talk of 'fixing' hisec griefing, a smart move - the risk adverse entitlement platform will bring a lot of votes.

That said, how do you plan to help ccp integrate hisec more fully into the rest of Eve if your focus is one of protectionism?
Anslo
Scope Works
#113 - 2013-02-04 13:39:08 UTC
And another daily bump.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Ya Huei
Imperial Collective
#114 - 2013-02-04 15:18:05 UTC
Yay.. D3 Reloaded candidate..
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#115 - 2013-02-06 22:21:09 UTC
Winchester Steele
#116 - 2013-02-07 05:42:49 UTC
Callduron wrote:
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Callduron wrote:
Herr Ronin, I had a look at your employment history. You seem to change corps every other week and to have mostly been in high sec war dec corps. Is it fair to say you're a pvper/wardeccer/griefer? If so, why do you feel you represent high sec Eve players?

Wouldn't you say that people who spend time in highsec, wardeccing other highsec corps, are highsec players?


Highsec players - Yes. Highsec representatives - No.

I think it's misleading to put yourself forward as a high sec candidate when you support a playstyle that's actively counter to how the vast majority of players in high sec enjoy the game.



Citation please.

...

Anslo
Scope Works
#117 - 2013-02-20 20:43:03 UTC
bampin

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Endeavour Starfleet
#118 - 2013-02-27 19:42:31 UTC
Hello there! I am glad to see people from the Incursion community as candidates.

I would like to name several situations that I feel are detrimental to the game. Give a solution and ask you for your stance on both. I do need answers to all the situations for my vote(s)

POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready?

Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard)

Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining?

The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts.

The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE.

Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi.

Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet.

Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet.