Jita Park Speakers Corner

+ 1

Carebear CSM best CSM

I have an idea,
let's prevent all nullsec alliances from griefing highsec incursions by putting them on a blacklist so that they can't use stargates in system with highsec incursions.

Do eeeeeet ronnin, do eeet!

My vote will go to Ronin for sure. I've been running with him and ISN for quite some time now and only have positive words for either one and I do think he is certainly able to make a change for the better in HighSec.

This is your interpretation of the statement. Not everybody. You would have not come across as a troll (my interpretation) had you given a bit of thought to that end.

I fly Incursions. I used to be a Mission Runner. I mainly fly in TVP due to the simpler requirements on pilots to get into fleet.
I have grown up (just a bit, lol) and have flow with ISN on numerous occasions. I have flown under Herr.

I can say, from my own personal experience, Herr is patient. He listens. He digs to the roots of problems, then fixes, with the best interest of those involved, regardless of personal bias. I have seen him do this many times.

I speak only of my experience, in fleets, with Herr.

Allow me to pose this Rhetorical Question:

Would you vote into position, someone who has his own opinion/idea of what is, or would you vote into position the guy who asks YOU, the rest of the players, your opinion/ideas as to what is?

I for one, would rather vote for someone who asked my opinion on what is, rather than the guy who thinks he knows all the problems, and knows how to fix them. In the end, he may address the issues he feels needs addressing. But the Issues I or You, the rest of the world, feel might need some attention just got brushed under the rug, as they don't fit into the guys opinion of needing attention.

You vote for the guy who asks you, the players, what needs attention.

OR

You vote in the guy that already has an idea/opinion about what needs attention, and you hope it holds some semblance of your ideas/opinions.

In the end, it's all a matter of interpretation, of which, your life experiences, values, and ideals will shape your impression and understanding into a unique opinion, not necessarily shared by others.

"An opinion is akin to an anus.
We all have one, and it stinks..." -Unknown

oh, yeah....

+1 for the guy who best fits my idea/opinion of what needs attention, Herr Ronin.

Let me give you some advice, m8 - don't make your campaign all about "HI SEC" or any other kind of sec. Go into more depth about what your overall play experience in EVE actually is because I can promise you that if you put yourself in a box you will be limiting your voting pool. The CSM does not work in actuality (post-election) based upon who ran on what issues; while some members tend to have more institutional knowledge of a particular subject, they are not always the best to speak on it depending on the context of an ongoing discussion.

As for the current CSM, your three points are already well covered by Alek, Issler and Keldumm. Hell, Elise has forgotten more about Incursion running than most players will ever know. Don't assume that an alliance tag is a broad paint brush for what an EVE player is familiar with. Come election time, if current voting trends continue, you are probably going to need a minimum of at least 2,000 votes to get on CSM 8. Good luck.

I'm the current high sec/mining rep on the CSM, the leader of the alliance with the third largest bounty in Eve and a person who like say "ring mining" a lot, plus sign my posts.....

Issler

I'm gonna run for the n00bs!!

Who cares what the game was like 5 or 10 years ago, ricdic stole the old timers money.. The hatchery and G &W used loopholes to make trillions!

We need to look to the future, CCP needs n00bs, they PAY for their accounts old schoolers have macro'd and loop holed all the isk and play for free!! Who cares what they want!! CCP needs to look towards new blood and the n00bs are the future.

I would quite enjoy it if he managed to push you or one of your kind out.
The bulk of the CSM can couch it in whatever language they like, using words like "balance", and "risk/reward", and "emergent gameplay", all they like, but bottom line, your actions have shown your true colours.

You want to obliterate high sec as a viable way to make ISK in the game.

High sec needs about 8 members on the CSM to get proper representation, but even getting one true high sec rep (please don't insult anyone's intelligence suggesting that Kelduum or Issler are high sec reps) would be better than we have today.

But in reality, the war has been lost already. The high sec haters have won, and all a high sec rep will be able to do on CSM 8 is be cast as whiner, when he sees the changes that are already in the pipe.

Nonetheless, I will be exercising my democratic right to vote for a high sec rep, assuming CCP has not banned me by then.

Hi, I created wormholes with CCP Greyscale and have spent most of my time in and out of CCP pushing equally on many different features. I'm pretty sure I nerfed something you love at some point as well, but that's life in the sandbox. My null-sec bias is blindingly obvious.



Actually, I was part of the original Invention dev team that ended the T2 BPO monopoly and opened up new avenues of revenue for ALL players. I don't care what part of space you live in.



You're not wrong in that if someone on the CSM spends their entire term talking about nothing but one area of space that they will be marginalized. That's pretty much a fact because no one else on the CSM or at CCP is going to listen to someone that misses the point that all areas of EVE game play are interconnected. The best CSM members are those that have an understanding of the how different elements of the game relate to each other and can argue their points intelligently without coming across as a single minded automaton.