These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Retriever reprocessed mineral value

Author
Pipa Porto
#41 - 2012-09-08 04:55:53 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
*Extra Mats aren't affected by ME, roll them into normal mats and they are, so the build cost will drop.

When build costs are comparable between 2 ships and one stands to gain from ME research more than another, that is an issue in and of itself.

And as far as build in progress, what was done during the change? We didn't suffer catastrophic failure when the materials were changed last month and I'm sure there were more than a few individuals who were trying to take advantage of the ships imminent increase in value down to the last possible moment. How is this change any different?

Also, what, after significant enough time has passed for stockpiles to dwindle to the point where the ship begins to gravitate back up in price to better reflect it's current mineral cost and is freed from the influence of speculative dumping, is the actual issue with making the change? This isn't a massive rewrite and re-balance. I'd anticipate this was very few man hours of actual work and a sort decision making process if you don't try to inflate the effort involved.

Given the data that CCP has been gathering, per sources such as the CSM and more directly evidence to the player base at large by CCP Diagoras, it most likely already falls well within the gathered data and even more so if CCP expends any tangible effort to track and interpret data based on their recent changes. In fact I would be surprised if the very analysis, which given minor re-purposing and drawing from the same already collected data would apply to the subject at hand, wasn't already underway.


1. So you're saying any ship built with capital components is a problem? They top out at like ME 8 or something.

2. This change allowed people to get ships at an effective discount. Imagine what the rage would be if people woke up to see their month long builds now guaranteed to lose money because the effective mineral cost is going to drop.

3. What is the benefit? You're arguing for a change. A strong argument against a change is "there's no benefit to it." In this case, there's also a detriment to any miners who don't want a flood of free minerals to compete against (from the bits and pieces I've heard, the stockpiles are on the order of several years of Jita demand and, as Suicide Ganking becomes rarer, that'll stretch).
3a. Making changes to a database like EVE's is never risk-free or easy.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Previous page123