These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Exhumers have no business in high sec.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#1 - 2012-09-03 10:07:17 UTC
These ships are designed for deep space operation and using them in high sec is overkill.

Either allow use of bombs, warp bubbles and capitals in high sec or also remove these specialised ships from use in high.

What is the point of low and null sec industrial 'content' if you are going to give no incentive for being out there. People play Eve for the spaceships, give them a reason to earn their shiny toys.

At present I am pushed to find a belt that hasn't been mined out by greedy bots and the mining 'community' needs to be displaced. At present it's more crowded than the M1 during rush hour.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)
Frying Doom
#2 - 2012-09-03 10:09:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Maybe you should have gone the other road and suggested a dedicated Capital mining ship (I thought I better add Mining ship not Mining support ship) or maybe a corvert ops barge.

Other than that it sound like the other big thread whining about the barges.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
pussnheels
Viziam
#3 - 2012-09-03 10:12:45 UTC
Lady Spank wrote:
These ships are designed for deep space operation and using them in high sec is overkill.

Either allow use of bombs, warp bubbles and capitals in high sec or also remove these specialised ships from use in high.

What is the point of low and null sec industrial 'content' if you are going to give no incentive for being out there. People play Eve for the spaceships, give them a reason to earn their shiny toys.

At present I am pushed to find a belt that hasn't been mined out by greedy bots and the mining 'community' needs to be displaced. At present it's more crowded than the M1 during rush hour.



i had expected better from you , now you just trolling with a ' they not playing how i want this game to be played so i demand that CCP nerf them

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire
Mukuro Gravedigger
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2012-09-03 10:15:36 UTC
You mean bots are mining everything out of null sec? Yes, I agree that would suck for the null sec industrialist.

So what ship were you planning on using in high sec if you planned to mine there since mining barges "are designed for deep space operation and using them in high sec is overkill"?

Of course, the forum howling if CCP did allow players to use a titan in high sec and following the safety rules, got it Concorded by accidentally blasting a day old newbie following the tutorial. Cool
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-09-03 10:17:41 UTC  |  Edited by: nat longshot
Lady Spank wrote:
These ships are designed for deep space operation and using them in high sec is overkill.

Either allow use of bombs, warp bubbles and capitals in high sec or also remove these specialised ships from use in high.

What is the point of low and null sec industrial 'content' if you are going to give no incentive for being out there. People play Eve for the spaceships, give them a reason to earn their shiny toys.

At present I am pushed to find a belt that hasn't been mined out by greedy bots and the mining 'community' needs to be displaced. At present it's more crowded than the M1 during rush hour.



Ah you need to learn what the term "deep space means" look it up and its1 Au from a planet is what is called deep space.

If your going to remove specialised mining ships then you might as well remove all t2 ships from high sec as well has all faction ships. Give all t2 ships are specialised.

If you read what hulk are there specialised mining ships not deep space like the old info used to say. They got buffed deal with it.

Now grab yourself by your boot straps stand up and move on.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#6 - 2012-09-03 10:19:54 UTC
Removing all tech II from high sec is a good idea, but doesn't follow logical progression of specialisation and growth from the training area of high sec into low sec and beyond. At present CCP are giving no incentive for people to leave the starting areas.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)
Pak Narhoo
Splinter Foundation
#7 - 2012-09-03 10:19:55 UTC
He kid, stop using your mom's account!

Hm, reminds of that kid who did and lost his dad's super carrier. Now that was fun to read. Lol
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-09-03 10:22:10 UTC  |  Edited by: nat longshot
Lady Spank wrote:
Removing all tech II from high sec is a good idea, but doesn't follow logical progression of specialisation and growth from the training area of high sec into low sec and beyond. At present CCP are giving no incentive for people to leave the starting areas.


Btw the starteding area there are 3 high sec system for each race so that 12 systems out of what 5000 soafter that its not a starting area. Ccp has posted what are the Starting system for the rookie's everything outside those are open ground for all players to use.

low sec and 0.0 was your progression. Its a open game you deside were you go. Sound like your trying to tell people you way of playing is the right way. witch is not.

That like me trying to tell you my way of life is the right way and forceing you to live that way. You play style fits you not everyone.

Now get over the "i'am right" bs and move on.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
Cede Forster
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#9 - 2012-09-03 10:25:08 UTC
yet another "the sandbox, you are doing it wrong" thread?
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#10 - 2012-09-03 10:25:31 UTC
I'm going by CCP's design philosophy. If you don't understand it and want to just throw around poorly spelled insults then kindly remove yourself from this discussion.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)
Bubanni
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2012-09-03 10:25:55 UTC
hmm limiting the exhumers to low and null sec is actually a good idea, it would encourage more people to move to low sec for mining, but they could still stay in high sec with retrievers and such...

simply disallow the hulks and such to activate their strip miners in high sec.. (so they can still travel to low sec)

Supercap nerf - change ewar immunity https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194759 Module activation delay! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1180934
non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
#12 - 2012-09-03 10:26:27 UTC  |  Edited by: non judgement
People should also stop flying jump freighters in highsec. How dare they even think of doing something so unholy?!?!

PS: I'll probably be mining in an exhumer, in highsec, tomorrow.
Jax Bederen
Dark Horse RM
#13 - 2012-09-03 10:27:09 UTC
Lady Spank wrote:
I'm going by CCP's design philosophy. If you don't understand it and want to just throw around poorly spelled insults then kindly remove yourself from this discussion.


Nah admit it, you are just bored, threw some **** out there and watched if it sticks.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#14 - 2012-09-03 10:28:38 UTC
they should be in hisec, they make good prey for the slaughter

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
ugh zug
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2012-09-03 10:31:15 UTC
Jax Bederen wrote:
Lady Spank wrote:
I'm going by CCP's design philosophy. If you don't understand it and want to just throw around poorly spelled insults then kindly remove yourself from this discussion.


Nah admit it, you are just bored, threw some **** out there and watched if it sticks.


this.

Want me to shut up? Remove content from my post,1B. Remove my content from a thread I have started 2B.
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2012-09-03 10:32:20 UTC  |  Edited by: nat longshot
yet more morons thinking they are right. Damn you people are way off.

Lady Spark please tell me what will happen if you idea comes around? what will happen to the market and ship building.

Well ill tell you this only poeople playing will be those in 0.0 they get the tect moons and all the ore's so low still will be the sh*t whole its allways been.

players will leave high and head stright for 0.0 and given goons have they highest count for players right now they will just grown and not one soul will beable to do anything or buy anything without handing more isk to the larger allinaces.

Just used goons becase they have the highest body count btw.

now lets here another failed idea from Lady.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#17 - 2012-09-03 10:32:36 UTC
Ho, look it's another Spank thread.

Lol

brb
Hypercake Mix
#18 - 2012-09-03 10:38:13 UTC
Want Tech 2 out of High-sec? Go cut off the supply.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#19 - 2012-09-03 10:39:50 UTC
nat longshot wrote:
yet more morons thinking they are right. Damn you people are way off.

Lady Spark please tell me what will happen if you idea comes around? what will happen to the market and ship building.

Well ill tell you this only poeople playing will be those in 0.0 they get the tect moons and all the ore's so low still will be the sh*t whole its allways been.

players will leave high and head stright for 0.0 and given goons have they highest count for players right now they will just grown and not one soul will beable to do anything or buy anything without handing more isk to the larger allinaces.

Just used goons becase they have the highest body count btw.

now lets here another failed idea from Lady.


you're right everyone in 0.0 has tech moons

lol

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
nat longshot
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-09-03 10:40:10 UTC
Lady Spank wrote:
I'm going by CCP's design philosophy. If you don't understand it and want to just throw around poorly spelled insults then kindly remove yourself from this discussion.


ccp's design philosohy. lol you kidding right?? ccp's design philosophy come on really you going to go there do i have to remind of nex store and the CQ. lol please there design is f'd up.

there philosophy changes more offen then a street walkers underware.

 [13:12:18] CCP Punkturis nat longshot you're a cutie.. OH YAH I WIN!!
123Next pageLast page