These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

It's Time To Think About Physical Appearance
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#21 - 2012-09-03 07:26:06 UTC
Crucifier: fine
Atron: Fine
Celestis: Fine.
Griffin: Fine
Incursus: Fine
Probe: Fine.

Navitas: Actually, it is kind of OK. It kind of grows on you, but unfortunately, so do a variety of irritating fungal diseases.

Bantam: Looks like a half-stuffed turkey. Would not mind these being redesigned.
Burst: Looks half-finished. Which, I admit, is very Minmatar. But even for a Minmatar ship it is pretty weaksauce.

~~ Localectomy Blog ~~
Tarn Kugisa
Kugisa Dynamics
#22 - 2012-09-03 19:20:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarn Kugisa
Thrym Garsk wrote:
Dorian Tormak wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
I think she was joking. Making fun of you probably.

Making fun by having an exact opposite opinion from mine?

ghey


I have the exact opposite opinion of yours too. Almost to a point, the ships I find most distinctive and attractive are the ones you'd want revamped.

The ugliest ships in the game, in my opinion? Minmatar battleships, possibly excepting the Typhoon. Aerodynamics may not matter in space, but I'm just not into the asymetrical sailboat thing.


Maelstrom says hi


Bully Hedro wrote:
Yeah, the screening posses for ship designs needs to be more rigorous. There's nothing to say that Eve ships can't be unique, dark, and still not be cool at the same time. Ships like the Moa make me want to cry... :(


Moa does look ugly
but people rage when you kill them with one
I need a Moa BPO Pirate

Be polite. Be efficient. Have a plan to troll everyone you meet - KuroVolt
Previous page12