These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

[Proposal] Jailtime for pirates.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2011-09-27 14:27:49 UTC
I thought this would not only be really funny but would also make sense. CONCORD should also jail the pod of an offending pirate after they destroy the ship. This pod would be in a stasis period of 48 hours where no game functions such as chat, market, and so on would work. They float in station in a pod and can't do ANYTHING except pod themselves to get out. This jail would also play the "Banana Phone" song over and over.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821
Red Teufel
Calamitous-Intent
#2 - 2011-09-27 15:26:45 UTC
i'm going to pirate you now
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2011-09-27 15:30:47 UTC
Go for it.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2011-09-27 17:26:48 UTC  |  Edited by: De'Veldrin
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Go for it.


This thread is now about going for it.

I went for it last night but got shot down. So I cried myself to sleep while clinging to my Hello Kitty Island Adventure Online blanket and sucking my thumb.

On a related note:

Next to the Tag as Favorite button at the top of each thread, can we possibly add an Ignore as Stupid button?

Thanks.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.
Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2011-09-27 17:33:58 UTC
Youd think people would have somethign better to do than to post these foolish and obvious troll threads.

Yes...going to block now.

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152
Baaldor
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#6 - 2011-09-27 18:49:57 UTC
Drake Draconis wrote:
Youd think people would have somethign better to do than to post these foolish and obvious troll threads.

Yes...going to block now.


Drake, just chill bro.


Just fire back with a counter like.....The victim trains 50% slower for 48 hours due to stress of getting his/her/it's **** pushed in.

Just roll with it.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#7 - 2011-09-27 18:52:11 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I thought this would not only be really funny but would also make sense. CONCORD should also jail the pod of an offending pirate after they destroy the ship. This pod would be in a stasis period of 48 hours where no game functions such as chat, market, and so on would work. They float in station in a pod and can't do ANYTHING except pod themselves to get out. This jail would also play the "Banana Phone" song over and over.



Counterproposal: people who run military missions for an empire faction should be valid war targets to members of the opposing faction's milita. This would be really funny and make sense. I mean if you shoot at military ships, that's an act of war, right? Their captains quarters should also play "In The Navy" over and over.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2011-09-27 18:55:07 UTC
Somebody needs to learn what "trolling" is.

This is a legitimate post...

Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I thought this would not only be really funny but would also make sense. CONCORD should also jail the pod of an offending pirate after they destroy the ship. This pod would be in a stasis period of 48 hours where no game functions such as chat, market, and so on would work. They float in station in a pod and can't do ANYTHING except pod themselves to get out. This jail would also play the "Banana Phone" song over and over.


This is a troll...

Red Teufel wrote:
i'm going to pirate you now


There is a difference.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2011-09-27 18:56:32 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I thought this would not only be really funny but would also make sense. CONCORD should also jail the pod of an offending pirate after they destroy the ship. This pod would be in a stasis period of 48 hours where no game functions such as chat, market, and so on would work. They float in station in a pod and can't do ANYTHING except pod themselves to get out. This jail would also play the "Banana Phone" song over and over.



Counterproposal: people who run military missions for an empire faction should be valid war targets to members of the opposing faction's milita. This would be really funny and make sense. I mean if you shoot at military ships, that's an act of war, right? Their captains quarters should also play "In The Navy" over and over.


I think that would actually be interesting. Brings a whole new level to missioning and PvP in empire.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821
MNagy
Yo-Mama
#10 - 2011-09-27 19:15:57 UTC
IF....
and thats a pretty big IIIFFFF......

one can get away from concord after doing something bad in high sec.....

Then we can start to discuss the punishments.

Until then,

No
Baaldor
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#11 - 2011-09-27 19:37:20 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Somebody needs to learn what "trolling" is.

This is a legitimate post...

Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I thought this would not only be really funny but would also make sense. CONCORD should also jail the pod of an offending pirate after they destroy the ship. This pod would be in a stasis period of 48 hours where no game functions such as chat, market, and so on would work. They float in station in a pod and can't do ANYTHING except pod themselves to get out. This jail would also play the "Banana Phone" song over and over.


This is a troll...

Red Teufel wrote:
i'm going to pirate you now


There is a difference.


No, I think he is actually going to give you some loving.
steave435
Perkone
Caldari State
#12 - 2011-09-29 09:50:19 UTC
Interesting, but then I demand the ability to kidnap people in high sec and keep them hostage under the same conditions until they pay their ransom.
Goose99
#13 - 2011-09-29 14:51:35 UTC
No. Concord should biomass them instead.Cool
lord xavier
Rubbed Out
#14 - 2011-09-29 15:49:00 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I thought this would not only be really funny but would also make sense. CONCORD should also jail the pod of an offending pirate after they destroy the ship. This pod would be in a stasis period of 48 hours where no game functions such as chat, market, and so on would work. They float in station in a pod and can't do ANYTHING except pod themselves to get out. This jail would also play the "Banana Phone" song over and over.

I'm sorry but, how does this allow continued freedom of game-play in which you want to do? The penality for "pirating" is already negative security status. In which you must then rat/carebear in order to regain security status. Now you are proposing to take away people's game time in which they pay for or at the expense of podding themselves?Roll

Next you are going to suggest that "pirates/Outlaws" once reaching -5 security status are banned from high sec for 6 months or some ****.
Goose99
#15 - 2011-09-29 16:06:34 UTC
lord xavier wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I thought this would not only be really funny but would also make sense. CONCORD should also jail the pod of an offending pirate after they destroy the ship. This pod would be in a stasis period of 48 hours where no game functions such as chat, market, and so on would work. They float in station in a pod and can't do ANYTHING except pod themselves to get out. This jail would also play the "Banana Phone" song over and over.

I'm sorry but, how does this allow continued freedom of game-play in which you want to do? The penality for "pirating" is already negative security status. In which you must then rat/carebear in order to regain security status. Now you are proposing to take away people's game time in which they pay for or at the expense of podding themselves?Roll

Next you are going to suggest that "pirates/Outlaws" once reaching -5 security status are banned from high sec for 6 months or some ****.


Oh noez, someone's suggesting actions have consequences?Bear
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#16 - 2011-09-29 17:09:28 UTC
Goose99 wrote:
lord xavier wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I thought this would not only be really funny but would also make sense. CONCORD should also jail the pod of an offending pirate after they destroy the ship. This pod would be in a stasis period of 48 hours where no game functions such as chat, market, and so on would work. They float in station in a pod and can't do ANYTHING except pod themselves to get out. This jail would also play the "Banana Phone" song over and over.

I'm sorry but, how does this allow continued freedom of game-play in which you want to do? The penality for "pirating" is already negative security status. In which you must then rat/carebear in order to regain security status. Now you are proposing to take away people's game time in which they pay for or at the expense of podding themselves?Roll

Next you are going to suggest that "pirates/Outlaws" once reaching -5 security status are banned from high sec for 6 months or some ****.


Oh noez, someone's suggesting actions have consequences?Bear


Locking someone out of the game for engaging in valid gameplay is never an appropriate "consequence".

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#17 - 2011-09-29 17:34:42 UTC
I support this idea if you sec status go back to 0.0 after punishment.
el alasar
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2011-11-18 00:38:12 UTC  |  Edited by: el alasar
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I thought this would not only be really funny but would also make sense. CONCORD should also jail the pod of an offending pirate after they destroy the ship. This pod would be in a stasis period of 48 hours where no game functions such as chat, market, and so on would work. They float in station in a pod and can't do ANYTHING except pod themselves to get out. This jail would also play the "Banana Phone" song over and over.

48h sounds way too harsh, but pods being completely left alone even after possibly repeated commited crimes sounds strange... adding a timer to leave space might be reasonable - after that also that pod would be attacked by concord... this would also benefit countering ganking from orca drops...

check the moderated 10000 papercuts evelopedia page! http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Little_things_and_ideas_-_low_hanging_fruit_-_10000_papercuts comment, bump(!) and like what you like
Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#19 - 2011-11-18 00:40:14 UTC
el alasar wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I thought this would not only be really funny but would also make sense. CONCORD should also jail the pod of an offending pirate after they destroy the ship. This pod would be in a stasis period of 48 hours where no game functions such as chat, market, and so on would work. They float in station in a pod and can't do ANYTHING except pod themselves to get out. This jail would also play the "Banana Phone" song over and over.

48h sounds way too harsh, but pods being completely left alone even after possibly repeated commited crimes sounds strange... adding a timer to leave space might be reasonable... this would also benefit countering ganking from orca drops...



Yes because Necro'ing a thread is a brilliant idea.

.

.

.

Noob.

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152
el alasar
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2011-11-18 00:41:49 UTC  |  Edited by: el alasar
Malcanis wrote:
Counterproposal: people who run military missions for an empire faction should be valid war targets to members of the opposing faction's milita. This would be really funny and make sense. I mean if you shoot at military ships, that's an act of war, right? Their captains quarters should also play "In The Navy" over and over.

pvp and pve should blend. yes. i would like to see this in .5-.6 systems. how to deal with concord then? they look away because it is sanctioned. ok. but then the navies should come to the pve players aid... otherwise it is like missioning in lowsec... the real problem is that 1. pve and pvp fits differ, 2. pocket aggro stays on the pve player

i would extend this allowance to pvp even to non-FW players shooting the opposing faction, meaning a pilot running a gallente mission to kill caldari would have an aggro timer against caldari FW pilots.

check the moderated 10000 papercuts evelopedia page! http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Little_things_and_ideas_-_low_hanging_fruit_-_10000_papercuts comment, bump(!) and like what you like
12Next page