These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I guess Amarr FW is dead, any takers with balls?

Author
Markius TheShed
T.R.I.A.D
Ushra'Khan
#61 - 2012-08-21 12:42:05 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:


The point Jade and these other guys are trying to make is that if the alt plexing situation were straighted out, Amarr would still lose. They - Electus Matari, Star Fraction, Murietor Tribe, are doing occupancy warfare for system control, not isk. They'll be doing occupancy warfare whether or not they are at Tier 1 or Tier 5. They aren't going to failcascade when things go **** up.



Don't forget Sasa as well Big smile

**Murientor Tribe** a capsuleer organization composed of radical Minmatar. Since YC107

Thomas Kreshant
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#62 - 2012-08-21 12:43:41 UTC
Holding systems and the associated upgrades are lol worthy and there isn't really any penalty/downside for not holding anything other than having to spend a few minutes travelling back and forth from staging points in highsec.

FW is very casual with no real tie to a faction your're fighting for, outside some RP groups or maybe the odd person who have become really invested in being faction 'x' it shouldn't be surprising to see people pile onto just one side to make the most possible money out of the system.




Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#63 - 2012-08-21 12:47:22 UTC
Barrogh Habalu wrote:
It's not about e-bushido, but about people who were in Amarr militia like forever making their own Amarr LP pretty damn worthless by grinding plexes for Minmatar. Sure, they get ISK anyways, but when they log on their Amarr toon to fight all they see is people upset by everything that is going on. As a result, instead of FW being "PvP combat + ISK" it became "ISK + Derp"
for them, which isn't something they wanted in the first place. But which is something that they could try to avert even with current system.

"I can expend a lot of energy to try to force the hilariously easy to exploit game mechanic that is the new FW, or I can sit and farm it for tons of easy isk."

Human nature means they'll always go for the easy isk.

Barrogh Habalu wrote:
Maybe FW is playable with current system as people (those who make sense ITT at least) suggest, but it still allows "sov" to be affected by people who have nothing to do with actual fighting. So maybe it'll indeed make sense to introduce some tweaks in FW system. I'm pretty sure there's lot of ideas floating around (contested plexes instead of defencive/offencive applying whatever gaming industry knows of "domination", "capture points", whatever you call it, gameplay; tweaking LP gain to re-rout the flow into hands of those who do actual fighting a bit etc.). Sometimes you don't need to start everything from scratch in order to make stuff work.

There's no "maybe" about it, FW as it stands as a game mechanic is in dire need of iteration.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#64 - 2012-08-21 12:47:22 UTC
Markius TheShed wrote:
Don't forget Sasa as well Big smile
Post edited Big smile
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#65 - 2012-08-21 12:52:44 UTC
Why do those that don't care about SOV care?

1 - Docking rights.
2 - Losing a war and having that bashed over your head even though to win it you must play in a way that's the opposite of how you want to is balls.

Adapting in this case means leaving FW for all those that dislike the new system and that's ******* galling. Hence all the whining.

Adapting in PVP is something I do all the time but I am definately not adapting to become a PVE player so i can win a war. If you are happy doing that then more power to you but to those that don't want to we'll bring this up time and again.

Case in point.

Last night I went for a roam solo, found a plex. Sat in it for 28minutes and everyone else was having fun in system having fights as i defended that plex from... er no one that entered.

i then stopped orbiting a button and started pewing, met some new amarr friends in the process. We had a blast pew pewing and my trusty little jag got assploded because of an interesting hurricane fit.

The bit i enjoyed, did nothing for the war at all. the previous part was a 28minute waste of my time for **** all gain. even if it was offensive plexing it'd still be a waste of time.

So can someone tell me why I should care about SOV again please? Someone actually explain to me why my time is not wasted orbiting buttons? It's all well and good daying adapt or die but to adapt by turning myself into a button orbiting risk averse PVE player is not my thing.....

If I leave FW I can at least continue the good fight hunting Minnies down while being able to dock.

BolsterBomb
Perkone
Caldari State
#66 - 2012-08-21 13:10:30 UTC
Some interesting things in this thread the only one that I really can say is worthy however is:

Why Sov?

This is what CCP is working on, there is no point to hold sov at this time. There is no reason to keep the systems upgraded and no point in owning more sov unless you are preparing for an lp dump.

However the main problem is Amar dont care about the new way FW mechanics work, until they care they will just be the same old Amar.

ISK feeds the war machine. FW provides this. People that want to war will also need isk. Without ISK there is no war so stop complaining and make isk for the war which means plexing......

Brig General of The Caldari State

"Don" Bolsterbomb

Traitor and Ex Luminaire General of The Gallente Federation

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#67 - 2012-08-21 13:27:07 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Ill ask you the same questions I will ask the other minmatar cheerleaders who try to claim this has anything to do with pvp. See my post above. I'm sure you will ignore it like they do. Because anything close to honest answers shows that winning occupancy has almost nothing to do with pvp.



In any case you are completely right. Occupancy warfare involves zero pvp when one side decides to not fight. In the hinterlands it's the gunless frigates running plexes....


Thank you for agreeing on this obvious point. I think most minmatar can see this as its obvious, but they don't want to break rank with the cheerleaders. the hinterlands are the vast majority of systems by the way. There might be 4 base systems on each side. The rest is hinterlands.

X Gallentius wrote:

If you don't want to fully particpate in the occupancy warfare that's your choice. And guess what, nobody is forcing you to. I am just amazed at how much complaining there is from people who don't care about occupancy warfare to begin with. ..


I participate pretty well. But I don't plex as efficiently as I could. I don't multibox 3 alts in pve ships and run everytime an enemy comes in. But I am in a plex or looking for one about 80% of the time I am active.

You know I care about occupancy warfare.

X Gallentius wrote:

My theory is that the real complaint is all about access to easy isk, not pvp, and how plexing alts are disrupting that access for Amarr FW. However, nobody wants to say it directly so they start complaining about lack of pvp, station lockouts, whatever even though PVP in FW is the best it has ever been. ..



You know that is not true of me. I have been posting for years that adding rewards will not fix the occupancy plexing system. I want changes that make plexing pvp. I am not against getting lp for plexing - in fact I think its good. But I was one of the few voices who repeatedly said simply adding rewards would not fix faction war.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#68 - 2012-08-21 13:27:30 UTC


X Gallentius wrote:

The point Jade and these other guys are trying to make is that if the alt plexing situation were straighted out, Amarr would still lose. ..


Well then lets admit this is a pve mechanic so ccp will fix it. Then we can see who will win. But by keeping up this obvious lie that it is already a pvp mechanic ccp might never fix it.

X Gallentius wrote:

They - Electus Matari, Star Fraction, Murietor Tribe, sasawong, are doing occupancy warfare for system control, not isk. They'll be doing occupancy warfare whether or not they are at Tier 1 or Tier 5. They aren't going to failcascade when things go **** up.
..


If they are happy to do pve thats fine for them. Others want pvp and want occupancy to be a pvp mechanic.

X Gallentius wrote:

Most of the Amarr will only do occupancy warfare if they have a chance at a higher tier payout because all they care about is easy isk. Fweddit, Nulli, WBR were in Amarr FW for other reasons and have since bailed once the prospects of easy Amarr FW isk have dried up. My guess is that Iron Oxide and Late Night are in FW mostly for pvp, but they are rooted in Minmatar FW forever since they all "grew up" in FW. So they're staying too.

Who are the Amarr equivalents of these alliances and corporations?


Fweddit wasn't in for the isk - at least not originally. Nulli was in it for the isk. WBR I am notreally sure. They were in fw before the big inferno farmville started. I would imagine each of their members had their own reasons to be in fw.

My corp TMFED are 2 of the older amarr militia corps. Others left due to the station lock out rule change. (whcih didn't really effect minmatar) Others left for caldari like amarrian retribution.

But really when you have a system that is a pve system pretty much everyone will farm it. "No amarr were killed in the farming of the minmatar lp. " Make the system pvp and this will change.

We used to have a hard and fast rule no plexing for the enemy that is no plexing for minmatar and no plexing for gallente. Perhaps we were one of the last hold outs I'm not sure. But then after our 40 systems that we flipped became about 50% contested in 36 hours after the flip, even I lost all faith in this system.

Jade says we should ahve gone up there and started defensive plexing the metro area. LOL how long do you think that would work for? how much more isk would minmatar earn from us letting them continue to farm these systems? How fun is it to just run into a plex and watch the enemy warp to a different plex again and again and again. If I had recomended that people would rightly think I was crazy. I don't want to be the guy who recomends we do the most boring pve gameplay- all the time.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#69 - 2012-08-21 13:30:32 UTC
BolsterBomb wrote:


However the main problem is Amar dont care about the new way FW mechanics work, until they care they will just be the same old Amar....


Nulli is not old amarr.

The old amarr care. Nulli is the one who decided to leave before tier 5. The old amarr couldn't do anything about that.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#70 - 2012-08-21 13:55:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Jade Constantine
Cearain wrote:
Jade says we should ahve gone up there and started defensive plexing the metro area. LOL how long do you think that would work for? how much more isk would minmatar earn from us letting them continue to farm these systems? How fun is it to just run into a plex and watch the enemy warp to a different plex again and again and again. If I had recomended that people would rightly think I was crazy. I don't want to be the guy who recomends we do the most boring pve gameplay- all the time.


I'll get to some other responses later on (lunch break now) but just want to bring you up on this point. I certainly didn't suggest that you should be defensive plexing metro in the wake of your tier 4 spike. In fact the only kind of defensive plexing I'd advise anyone to do in good conscience is defensive plexing in a critical staging system where the enemy is interested in fighting to kick you out. The thrust of my critique on your strategy Cearain is that you fixated on ISK through the infinite vulnerability situation as an extremely short term tactic that immediately vanished in smoke when you achieved it, rather than using the numerical advantage you had for a time to remove critical minmatar staging systems in order to throw us back 10 jumps to our hisec.

Defensive plexing is only PVE when its done in irrelevant systems nobody really cares about taking. It becomes vibrant PVP when its done in systems that matter (and people are fighting over it).

Short point is that you weren't contesting systems that matter to the overall war, you got seduced into pure short term isk-gain effort and got surprised about it when an enemy (you'd done nothing to actually hurt) bounced back to immediately punch you in the face minutes after your cash out.

In historical terms you can't "win" faction warfare without fighting a Stalingrad at some point you've either got to crush your enemy and drive them from their staging systems or accept that you raising your flag in a few dozen pointless backwater villages in the countryside will mean nothing when their big battalions come rolling out the collective factories and reclaiming territory in days.

If you read what I said to you yesterday its about overall strategy and my belief that your fixation on alt-plexing hordes is misplaced and draws your eye from the real necessity to displace an enemy encamped on your doorstep. Its utterly astonishing that the Matari faction is able to maintain an operating base in Huola in the center of the Amarrian heartland given the relative strengths of the two factions fleet and pvp assets (until last week end) - and fighting for and against occupation in huola would be done purely with combat ships and fleet battles in complexes (gunless alts and whatnot would and have been completely irrelevant to a fight in a significantly defended system).

The imbalance in the warzone is player made really. Minmatar have an operational base with its boot on the Amarrian throat. That's your problem Cearain - not the hordes of plexing alts elsewhere in the warzone. You will never achieve a reliable high tier of warzone control unless you defeat the major minmatar corporations and alliances and push them back closer to their hisec.

What you tried to do over the past month was to finesse this reality and game your way to a short term cash out that did nothing whatsoever to hurt your enemy. It worked in those terms - it got you some more isk in your pocket. But it was pretty crushing to overall Amarrian morale and camaraderie and sense of unity. Ultimately it actually hurt the collective Amarrian fortunes because some of your more mercenary comrades took the money and promptly buggered off.

A sensible strategist in the Amarrian ranks would be trying to leverage the pvp expertise you claim (I've heard it said many times that the amarrians consider themselves able to run pitched battles against Minmatar with great success) and fight in places where the enemy cannot ignore you.

Still, its just an observation from the outside.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#71 - 2012-08-21 13:57:50 UTC
Christine Peeveepeeski wrote:

So can someone tell me why I should care about SOV again please?

You don't have to care about SOV, that's the whole point. Have fun killing stuff!
Ezra Tair
Doomheim
#72 - 2012-08-21 14:00:58 UTC
Cearain wrote:


Defensive plex? In the 36 hourse after we flipped those 40 ssytems they were already on average over 50% contested. Defensive plexing against that army of alts is crazy.

I will ask you the same thing I asked vordak (and now Ezzra). What percent of plexes do you think were capped by t1 frigates?

I mean we can keep using relative terms all we want. I can say "too much" of it is farm alts. You can say things like "the real war was won with pvp."



For 5 hours after the systems flipped, myself, and at lest 10 others you were in the Aset pocket contesting the systems to pull Amarr out of T4 as fast as possible. My Navy Caracal had missiles. (and I also lost it to a Pirate Talos grrrrr).


I don't know how many were by t1 frigs. I'll give you 90%. You feel better? It does not change what happened. About the only argument I can see for why things are the way they are is that a majority of Amarr elements decided that they did not want to employ themselves in elements they deemed unworthy of their time and effort. Even after being made to understand how that would impact the parts they did care about.


Alts did not make choices for those people. Those people made their choices with alts. Beside, Saswong won the FW for us, remember that. *Saswong is overpowered and needs nerfed*
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#73 - 2012-08-21 14:03:13 UTC
Cearain wrote:

If they are happy to do pve thats fine for them. Others want pvp and want occupancy to be a pvp mechanic.
Just read what Jade said about Huola or any FW low sec home system.
Endrysk
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#74 - 2012-08-21 14:06:33 UTC
Synthetic Cultist wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:
alt farming characters in apocryphally-gunless t1 frigates.


gunless plexing frigates do seem to exist :\

was looking at a fairly backwater system (Avenod) on Eve-kill. http://eve-kill.net/?a=system_detail&sys_id=2090

A whole lot of ships killed there have been gunless plexer frigates, on both sides, some from corporations that i wouldn't have thought would do that sort of thing :s

some of them aren't alts, since they have kills in other ships too.

Not sure that they matter in the wider scheme of things, but for such a big percentage of all the pvp activity in that system to be gunless plexer frigates with 0 offensive ability seems somewhat less than ideal. :\


Please continue flying gunless ships. It makes killing them less risky.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#75 - 2012-08-21 14:24:18 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Jade says we should ahve gone up there and started defensive plexing the metro area. LOL how long do you think that would work for? how much more isk would minmatar earn from us letting them continue to farm these systems? How fun is it to just run into a plex and watch the enemy warp to a different plex again and again and again. If I had recomended that people would rightly think I was crazy. I don't want to be the guy who recomends we do the most boring pve gameplay- all the time.


I'll get to some other responses later on (lunch break now) but just want to bring you up on this point. I certainly didn't suggest that you should be defensive plexing metro in the wake of your tier 4 spike. In fact the only kind of defensive plexing I'd advise anyone to do in good conscience is defensive plexing in a critical staging system where the enemy is interested in fighting to kick you out. The thrust of my critique on your strategy Cearain is that you fixated on ISK through the infinite vulnerability situation as an extremely short term tactic that immediately vanished in smoke when you achieved it, rather than using the numerical advantage you had for a time to remove critical minmatar staging systems in order to throw us back 10 jumps to our hisec.


First you woudlnt' have to go 10 systems back to high sec. You can go to egg or gratesier or several other places including amarr high sec. The navy is not that big of a deal. You can put plexing ships there.

That said I do think taking huola would have been a worthy goal and disruptive to the minmatar. I was never against taking huola and in fact plexed huola auga dal and kourm more than any other system. So I don't know what you mean.

When you say we outnumbered you I can only assume you included nulli. And would you beleive they didn't actually take orders from the other amarr corps?

As far as fixated on isk through infinite vulnerability that had nothing to do with "my strategy." "My strategy" was simple. Offensive plex instead of defensive plex, and don't flip vulnerable systems until we can cash out. I put "my strategy" in quotes because it wasn't really my strategy. It is just an obvious strategy to anyone who looks at the mechanics.


When I saw that nulli was just farming vulnerable systems up in metro I actually advised my corp and told them to start plexing in systems that were not yet vulnerable. Here are the actual posts I made in my corp forum:

Cearain wrote:

"I don't think there is much we can do about this, but there are a ton of people farming vulnerable systems. That is why we are not at tier 5 already. I am not sure how long these larger groups want to farm.

I have no idea what this will do to the market. I really don't. Certainly the lp market can bear some amount of farming because of the sheer number of items. But there seems to be 3 merlins in every system.....

I think we may want to move things along and start focusing on getting the remaining systems vulnerable. Or by the time we do flip the systems there will litterally be trillions of lp people are cashing in. But really I don't know what to make of it."


And:
Cearain wrote:

"I had my alt plexing systems that are not vulnerable. I had him doing majors in ebolifer sirekur and ontorn. Not in eszur but around there its pretty peaceful and you are helping amarr much more than just milking an already vulnerable system."



Then shortly after this I heard nulli was going to cash out at tier 4! I was amazed at this. The areas I mention above easilly could have been added to our cashout. It was just taking some time because nulli wasn't even trying to plex there. They were just plexing vulnerable systems. But these systems were easy to plex in a merlin as there was no resistance.

So really you are criticizing the old amarr for not being able to control nulli.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#76 - 2012-08-21 14:31:16 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:

If they are happy to do pve thats fine for them. Others want pvp and want occupancy to be a pvp mechanic.
Just read what Jade said about Huola or any FW low sec home system.



Each faction has at most 7 systems as home base systems. Flipping these is not going to bring about tier 5. The minmatar were riding tier 5 for ages without ever flipping the 2 base systems of kamela or sahtogas.

People who talk of "core systems" or the importance of basing in fw systems are those who don't really understand the plexing mechanic or tier system.

People who are smart realize that if you base in a fw system that just means you are going to have to waste time defensive plexing it. It becomes a tar baby that sucks your pilots time. Time that would be better spent offensive plexing or fighting enemy plexers trying to plex your own systems.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#77 - 2012-08-21 14:40:39 UTC
Ezra Tair wrote:
Cearain wrote:


Defensive plex? In the 36 hourse after we flipped those 40 ssytems they were already on average over 50% contested. Defensive plexing against that army of alts is crazy.

I will ask you the same thing I asked vordak (and now Ezzra). What percent of plexes do you think were capped by t1 frigates?

I mean we can keep using relative terms all we want. I can say "too much" of it is farm alts. You can say things like "the real war was won with pvp."



For 5 hours after the systems flipped, myself, and at lest 10 others you were in the Aset pocket contesting the systems to pull Amarr out of T4 as fast as possible. My Navy Caracal had missiles. (and I also lost it to a Pirate Talos grrrrr).


I don't know how many were by t1 frigs. I'll give you 90%. You feel better? It does not change what happened.*


It doesn't change what happened but it does prove mechanic has more to do with hiding in sytems while orbiting a button in a frigate than it does with pvp. Should the armarr continue to chase after these frigates forever? Come on even you know that is foolish.

You may have been out in a caracal but you had very little impact. You would have helped your militia hit tier 5 much faster if you would have opened all your alt accounts got them in frigates and started them all speed tanking plexes and running when enemies came. That is what the other 90% did and that is how minmatar got to where you are. I'm glad you admit it.

Ezra Tair wrote:

About the only argument I can see for why things are the way they are is that a majority of Amarr elements decided that they did not want to employ themselves in elements they deemed unworthy of their time and effort. Even after being made to understand how that would impact the parts they did care about.*


Yes I did decide I am not going to spend all my time in my alt accounts in back end systems hiding from the enemy orbitting buttons. The fact that the current mechanics make this the most effective way to win occupancy means it is broken. I care about plexing and want it to be fixed. That is why I don't want people to be able to "hide and plex" anymore.

Ezra Tair wrote:

Alts did not make choices for those people. Those people made their choices with alts. Beside, Saswong won the FW for us, remember that. *Saswong is overpowered and needs nerfed*


The vp totals don't lie.


Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#78 - 2012-08-21 14:53:57 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
Quote:

Each faction has at most 7 systems as home base systems. Flipping these is not going to bring about tier 5. The minmatar were riding tier 5 for ages without ever flipping the 2 base systems of kamela or sahtogas.

I see you are more interested in isk than winning the war. /thread! Big smile

Quote:

People who talk of "core systems" or the importance of basing in fw systems are those who don't really understand the plexing mechanic or tier system.

It's only important because we choose to make it important. For Gallente, basing in key choke point systems (Heyd, Nenna, Nis, Vlill) leads to more fights and gets us closer to the action -wherever it is on the FW map. We can also project power more easily.

Quote:

People who are smart realize that if you base in a fw system that just means you are going to have to waste time defensive plexing it. It becomes a tar baby that sucks your pilots time. Time that would be better spent offensive plexing or fighting enemy plexers trying to plex your own systems.
It's only important if you make it important. You Cearain don't, so it's not. For those who want to hold systems (Occupancy Warfare) and get more fights closer to the action (PVP guys, especially the -5 and below guys) - it's important.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#79 - 2012-08-21 15:00:59 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
Cearain wrote:

If they are happy to do pve thats fine for them. Others want pvp and want occupancy to be a pvp mechanic.
Just read what Jade said about Huola or any FW low sec home system.

Each faction has at most 7 systems as home base systems. Flipping these is not going to bring about tier 5.

I see you are more concerned about making isk than winning a war. /thread Big smile



For me a clear goal of winning the war is hitting tier 5. But there are other indicators. How exactly does one win the war in your book?

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#80 - 2012-08-21 15:02:05 UTC
Cearain wrote:
For me a clear goal of winning the war is hitting tier 5. But there are other indicators. How exactly does one win the war in your book?
How does one win any war in Eve? Break the will of the opposing force.