EVE General Discussion

I personally have said nothing about making high-sec worthless. In fact I would want to see the PVE not only in high sec but everywhere more interesting. I also said nothing about nerfing it either. What I've been stating is that Pve in general needs a overhaul, with how rats work, how missions work, how loot system works, and removing or scaling heavily back on the bounty system.

I'll make sure to leave a couple of web and scram frigates for you

I agree with you there mate!

Starting to wonder, don't you closet idyots know that more playerbase dwells within highsec than low/ null?

Ie: don't skrew with the main source of funding for the game, or you'll be back to the lame games you came from.

There is nothing wrong with level 4 mission payout and rewards, more missions need to be added, if anything .

So that's where I am going wrong!

My level 4 Navy Domi and fittings is worth quite a bit less than 1 bill.

It does the job, why pay more and be a gank magnet?

If you're not going for some moronic 10billion+ faction ship fit that will get ganked/awoxed, you're obviously doing it wrong.

Tell the nice people so they can nerf it to be in line with the "risk: reward" they've clearly thought through in the progression of anomalies from easiest to hardest.

Bleh ninja's aren't worth my time to fall for their traps. I'll just warp out, abandon mission or do it another time (if no mission item involved), go do something else. No sweat off my back.

Feed the troll, the troll's gonna stick to the food source.

All day everyday you get troll threads nerf, nerf, nerf, when will all these Mrs. Crabbits just play and stop worrying about their neighbor isk making ways, if it makes isk'ies then do it because if you worry so much its obvious you have a fail plan and nerfing your neighbors won't help your lack of imagination on how to get the most out of this game.

What they need to do is move PVE away from beeing all about "Bigger Ship = More Money".

For instance, in hisec you generally want to fly a Battleship, with as much damage as humanly possible. Forget about Tengus, a 750 DPS Tengu can't compete with the income of a 1200 DPS deadspace fit Golem. But a Tengu would on the other hand be a perfect lowsec mission / ratting platform. Because there is no way a 3 billion isk Deadspace fit golem would survive there for very long, but the Tengu on the other hand would be capable of getting out of dodge or even engaging and chasing off his enemies.

My suggestion:
*Massively buffed rat bounties in lowsec, but same difficulty. So that you can make a solid income there in a fast, agile, PVP fit ship.
* Massively buffed LP gains in lowsec missions, and a 25% regen debuff for rats as well as -25% EHP. (Meaning it takes less DPS to achieve the same income in lowsec as you would make in hisec)
0.0 would also recieve a LP buff, and a buff to cruiser and frigate bounties. As well as increased Battleship bounties in "bad" regions.
Balancing out lvl 3 and 4 missions so that fast lvl 3's can compete with high bounty lvl 4's. Making the choice between running level 3's and 4's a real one.
Major buff to level 5 rewards, nobody really runs them so it's needed!
Increased chance of rarespawns, possibly adding some new ones, chasing these makes PVE more interesting, and increased availability of modules would be balanced out by more people taking risks while using them.