These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

rigs

First post
Author
Elvis Fett
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#41 - 2012-09-20 21:25:38 UTC
Lord Ryan wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
xKolax wrote:
GM Homonoia wrote:
We just double checked this and the rigs still affect your cargo space (just not your ore hold) and this is working as it was intended. If your rigs are not affecting your cargo hold please try and relog or clear your cache.

In regards to reimbursing these rigs; we have a strict policy of not reimbursing for any changes made to ships, modules, etc. Change is simply part of the game. We did not reimburse when we nerfed nano setups, nerfed supercarriers, nerfed titans, changed POS fuel mechanics, etc. In the same way we will not be reimbursing or removing rigs on mining barges. This is a blanket policy and filing a petition will not change this in any way; all reimbursement requests tied to this change will be denied.



We are CCP and we screw everyone equally and when we screw you we will make sure you stay screwed. if you are pissed we did our job and stop bothering us.

Or you could have read the patch notes, Dev blogs, Csm minutes, news items, opened a SiSi account ect.. and been well informed a long time before the changes and acted accordingly.

So if he would have did the things you stated, than he would have been able to remove his rigs?


No but if he did those things he could of sold his Hulk with T2 cargo rigs to some other idiot that was incapable of reading the forums, because I assure you that you and the OP are not alone in that aspect. Then he could of taken all that isk from the sale of his hulk and bought 2 mackinaws. The day after the patch sell one of the mackinaws for a 60mil profit, and have a super afk miner with a decent tank.
Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#42 - 2012-09-20 22:24:44 UTC
GM Homonoia wrote:
We just double checked this and the rigs still affect your cargo space (just not your ore hold) and this is working as it was intended. If your rigs are not affecting your cargo hold please try and relog or clear your cache.

In regards to reimbursing these rigs; we have a strict policy of not reimbursing for any changes made to ships, modules, etc. Change is simply part of the game. We did not reimburse when we nerfed nano setups, nerfed supercarriers, nerfed titans, changed POS fuel mechanics, etc. In the same way we will not be reimbursing or removing rigs on mining barges. This is a blanket policy and filing a petition will not change this in any way; all reimbursement requests tied to this change will be denied.


Well snakes and rogue implants were unplugged and placed in peoples hangar when the nano nerf hit. The rogues were moved slots so I get that but snakes just got a nerf no need to remove those.
Buck Futz
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#43 - 2012-09-20 22:38:31 UTC
Vaal Erit wrote:
I've never seen a CCP dev beaten down so hard before.

CCP Soundwave is so cocky in the barge fairy tale thread about how barges should not be suicide ganked and how they should be given BC/BS tanks and then the brave awesome CCP Tallest comes out with a dev blog giving the new hulk a very tiny EHP boost over what they currently have. If you want that super EHP then you gotta get less yield, that is perfect balance right there CCP Soundwave, watch and learn. Hulks will still die to catalysts post barge rebalance. You lose CCP Soundwave, you'll never ever get what you want.

I only wish I could've been in the meetings when the real CCP devs told CCP Soundwave how EVE-Online is supposed to work and how he should never touch game balance again.

So this is a public service announcement to CCP devs, think before you post and make sure you are in step with what the game philosophy or get humiliated publicly here in GD.


Did you get a one month vacation for this one, Vaal?

It was awesome, I LOL'd.
Bart Starr
Aggressive Structural Steel Expediting Services
#44 - 2012-09-21 05:25:08 UTC
The whining in this thread sickens me.
Previous page123